The Washington City Paper[a] is a U.S.alternative weeklynewspaper serving the Washington, D.C., metropolitan area since 1981. The City Paper is distributed on Thursdays; its average circulation in 2006 was 85,588. The paper's editorial mix is focused on local news and arts. It is owned by Mark Ein, who bought it in 2017.
History
The Washington City Paper was started in 1981 by Russ Smith and Alan Hirsch, the owners of the Baltimore City Paper.[3] For its first year it was called 1981: Washington's Alternative Newspaper.[2] The name was changed to City Paper in January 1982 and in December 1982 Smith and Hirsch sold 80% of it to Chicago Reader, Inc.[3] In 1988, Chicago Reader, Inc. acquired the remaining 20% interest. In July 2007 both the Washington City Paper and the Chicago Reader were sold to the Tampa-based Creative Loafing chain. In 2012, Creative Loafing Atlanta and the Washington City Paper were sold to SouthComm Communications.[4]
Amy Austin, the longtime general manager, was promoted to publisher in 2003. Michael Schaffer was named editor in April, 2010, two months after Erik Wemple resigned to run the new local startup TBD.[5]
On December 21, 2017, it was announced that D.C.-area venture capitalist and philanthropist Mark Ein would buy the City Paper.[6] He became the first D.C.-based owner in the paper's history.[7] Ein announced the creation of two groups to ensure the paper's long-term success: "Alumni Group" and "Friends of Washington City Paper."[8]
Defamation lawsuit
In 2011, Daniel Snyder, the owner of the Washington Redskins, filed a lawsuit[9] against the City Paper for The Cranky Redskins Fan's Guide to Dan Snyder, a November 19, 2010 cover story that portrayed him in a negative light.[10][11] He and the Simon Wiesenthal Center claimed that the story used anti-Semitic tropes.[12] Prominent sports journalists, Jewish groups,[13] and Jewish writers published sharp criticism of Snyder and the Simon Wiesenthal Center's claims of anti-Semitism, referring in various opinion pieces and public statements to their statements as, "breathtakingly dumb allegation",[14] "almost unbearably stupid",[15] and "so self-evidently lacking in merit".[16]
The Washington City Paper issued its own response in a published editorial, saying, "But we at City Paper take accusations of anti-Semitism seriously—in part because many of us are Jewish, including staffers who edited the story and designed the cover. So let us know, Mr. Snyder, when you want to fight the real anti-Semites."[17]
In response, hundreds of loyal readers donated over $30,000 to a legal defense fund.[18][19]
In September 2011 the lawsuit was dropped, after, in December 2010, Washington D.C. passed[20] anti-SLAPP legislation ("David Donovan, the Redskins' former chief operating officer and general counsel, that threatened an expensive legal battle unless Snyder received a retraction and an apology"[21]), while also, Amy Austin, the publisher, had written in a February article[22] that unauthorized switching of long-distance accounts by Snyder Communications and GTE Communications was not meant to be construed as, by Snyder himself, but people who worked for Snyder Communications and GTE Communications.[21][23][24][25][26][27][28][29]
Contents
Regular City Paper features include:
a cover feature, 2,500 to 12,000 words in length
an arts feature, 1,200 to 2,000 words in length
The District Line, a section of shorter news features about D.C.
Loose Lips, a news column and blog devoted to D.C. local politics[30]
^Originally titled 1981: Washington's Alternative Newspaper and titled the City Paper between 1982–1988, and still informally known by the latter name[2]
^"Burke v. John Doe No. 1". ACLU of DC. 31 December 2016. Archived from the original on April 28, 2021. In December of 2010, the D.C. Council passed (with our support) an Anti-SLAPP Act
^
Austin, Amy (25 February 2011). "Letter from the Publisher". Washington City Paper. Retrieved 26 September 2021. The story didn't actually say the things Snyder has claimed it does—like call him a criminal, or a user of illegal military chemicals, or mock his wife's battle against breast cancer. It did none of those things. In media interviews and in our own pages, City Paper editors have pointed this out repeatedly since the case was filed.