User talk:Modokai

....

Archives

no archives yet (create)

This page has archives. Sections older than 31 days may be auto-archived by Lowercase sigmabot III.

Archive 1 Archive 2 Archive 3

Hi Modokai! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Masumrezarock100 (talk). Visit the Teahouse We hope to see you there! Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:02, 18 April 2019 (UTC)

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Coronavirus outbreak. Since you had some involvement with the Coronavirus outbreak redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Sharper {talk} 00:48, 19 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please accept this invitation to join the Tropical cyclones WikiProject (WPTC), a WikiProject dedicated to improving all articles associated with tropical cyclones. WPTC hosts some of Wikipedia's highest-viewed articles, and needs your help for the upcoming cyclone season. Simply click here to accept!

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, Modokai. I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may still benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

If you don't already know, you should sign your posts on talk pages by using four tildes (~~~~) to insert your username and the date.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Again, welcome! 🐔Chicdat ^ChickenDatabase 10:01, 10 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to 2006 Pacific hurricane season, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. CycloneYoris ^talk! 04:07, 13 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The article Tropical cyclones in 2014 has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This article is obviously incomplete, and has been incomplete since it was created in December 2018. It appears to reflect a plan by a task force to create articles on years that summarize all tropical cyclone activity around the world, but it appears to have been abandoned as soon as the skeleton was created. The monthly headings are not followed by actual listings of storms. Actual information is found in articles by years and basins, so that this level of information, by year, is not needed, and is not being maintained.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Robert McClenon (talk) 16:06, 6 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

What is that mean? МОДОКАУ 10:44, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Tropical cyclones in 2005, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Tropical cyclones in 2006 and Tropical cyclones in 2007 (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:18, 13 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from 2007 Atlantic hurricane season into Tropical cyclones in 2007. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was copied, attribution is not required. — Diannaa (talk) 13:09, 24 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, and welcome to the Tropical cyclone WikiProject! We are a group of Wikipedia editors who help to improve articles related to tropical cyclones on Wikipedia.

Looking for somewhere to start? Here are a few suggestions.

• You can check out topics on the main page.
• You can re-assess tropical cyclone-related articles to assure they are up to standards.
• See the to do list for the WikiProject, and opt to try and complete some of those tasks.
• Check out the guidelines to get an idea of the project's standards.
• If you want to work on an article, Category:Stub-Class Tropical cyclone articles is a great place to start.
• You can also check out the newsletter.
• For further information, you could join the WikiProject Tropical cyclones IRC channel or Discord server.

If you have any comments, suggestions, or would like to talk about the project in general, feel free to leave a message on the talk page.

🐔 Chicdat ^{Bawk to me!} 10:59, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Tropical cyclones in 2013, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Victoria.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:18, 5 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to Talk: 2020 Atlantic hurricane season, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. Stop predicting the future. There is a chance 2005 is still more active. --67.85.37.186 (talk) 12:17, 8 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Tropical cyclones in 2009, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Reunion.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:46, 12 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:2020 Pacific typhoon season/ACE calcs, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Talk:2020 Pacific typhoon season/ACE calcs and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Talk:2020 Pacific typhoon season/ACE calcs during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Jasper Deng (talk) 16:51, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:01, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Could you give me a help for the global conditions? It is North Atlantic, East Pacific and Western Pacific. SMB99thx my edits! 08:43, 26 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

By the way... I'm giving you these barnstars.

	The Writer's Barnstar
	I'm going to admit that I dogged you for refusal to respond in recent times, but I'm honestly want to congratulate you for writing most of Tropical cyclones by year articles summaries. SMB99thx my edits! 03:21, 17 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

	The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
	Thanks for your tireless work at Tropical cyclones in 2007. SMB99thx my edits! 03:22, 17 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I'm hoping that you respond to this. SMB99thx my edits! 03:23, 17 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks and... I don’t know what are you talking about! I was born in 2001 and i don’t know about the global conditions of 2003. МОДОКАУ 06:44, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Are you freaking kidding me right now!? I didn’t anything wrong for a long time! МОДОКАУ 06:43, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

What the hell is going on!? МОДОКАУ 06:45, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Well, in 2002 Pacific hurricane season you have separated the timeline from the article. In Talk:Timeline of the 2002 Pacific hurricane season#Merge?, the timeline was merged to the season article. Since you have split the timeline without consensus I have reverted your edits. Given that you ignored my messages (and repeatedly ignored reverts from Chicdat and more users), I decided to consider your edits disruptive and cautioned you. Understand? Please do not ignore messages sent to your talk page again, thank you. :) MarioJump83! 07:51, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ok! :( МОДОКАУ 09:03, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

BTW, please be civil. Are you freaking kidding me right now!? I didn’t anything wrong for a long time! What the hell is going on!? is unacceptable when communicating with other users or reaching consensus. When you get mad at another user, take deep breaths and calm down. It happens to everyone. Thanks, ~ Destroyeraa🌀🇺🇸 17:20, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at 2020–21 South-West Indian Ocean cyclone season, you may be blocked from editing. You have been told multiple times now to look at the RSMC's website; in this case, MeteoFrance has not yet upgraded it to a MTS, pretty clearly. Jasper Deng (talk) 08:42, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

I noticed your recent edit to 2021 North Indian Ocean cyclone season does not have an edit summary. Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. With a Wikipedia account you can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. Beraniladri19 🌀🌀 08:08, 11 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Modokai. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Tropical cyclones in 1981, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 12:01, 24 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Modokai. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Tropical cyclones in 1982, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 12:01, 24 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Modokai. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Tropical cyclones in 1983, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 12:01, 24 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Modokai. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Tropical cyclones in 1984, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 12:02, 24 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Modokai. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Tropical cyclones in 1985, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 12:02, 24 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Modokai. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Tropical cyclones in 1986, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 12:02, 24 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at 2021 Pacific hurricane season, you may be blocked from editing. You've been previously told to adhere to the RSMCs, in this case the National Hurricane Center. As of 06:00 UTC June 27, they have *not* issued an advisory raising Enrique's intensity; intermediate advisory 8A holds it at 75 kt/980 mbar. ~ KN2731 {talk · contribs} 07:08, 27 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect 2027 Pacific hurricane season. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 August 19#2027 Pacific hurricane season until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. -- Tavix ^(talk) 02:35, 19 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. I am glad to see that you are discussing a topic. However, as a general rule, talk pages (including user talk pages) are for discussion related to improving (a) an encyclopedia article in specific ways based on reliable sources or (b) project policies and guidelines. They are not for general discussion about the article topic or unrelated topics, or statements based on your thoughts or feelings. If you have specific questions about certain topics, consider visiting our reference desk and asking them there instead of on article talk pages. Thank you. HurricaneEdgar 10:03, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at 2021 Atlantic hurricane season shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
Ignoring the other's rationale is the worst. Jasper Deng (talk) 04:43, 27 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Hurricane Isaias series has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 19:35, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Hurricane Laura series has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 20:14, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to 2021 Pacific hurricane season, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Why are you changing the Season effects table? You shouldn't make these changes without consulting other editors first! CycloneYoris ^talk! 00:21, 23 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Modokai. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:2021 Pacific typhoon season/ACE calcs, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 20:03, 25 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Nuestra Canción is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nuestra Canción until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Htanaungg (talk) 07:32, 4 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Do you have a source for any of the information in Template:List of costliest Pacific hurricane seasons that prove the ranking that, for example, 2013 was the costliest Pacific hurricane season on record? YE ^{Pacific Hurricane} 01:36, 5 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Modokai. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Tropical cyclones in 1980, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 21:01, 17 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:53, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Modokai. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "ACE calcs".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 20:23, 25 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Modokai. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Tropical cyclones in 1982".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:06, 1 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Modokai. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Tropical cyclones in 1981".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:06, 1 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Modokai. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Tropical cyclones in 1983".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:08, 1 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Modokai. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Tropical cyclones in 1984".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:08, 1 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Category 5 Pacific typhoons (2001–present) has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Jasper Deng (talk) 00:12, 17 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Modokai. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Tropical cyclones in 1980".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 20:10, 17 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

HI there, for your information nyatoh reached to super typhoon as per in Best track data on JTWC https://www.nrlmry.navy.mil/tcdat/tc2021/WP/WP272021/txt/trackfile.txt thank HurricaneEdgar 07:36, 6 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:15 Aniversario.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:22, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Modokai. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Tropical cyclones in 1967, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 11:01, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:2022 Pacific typhoon season/ACE calcs, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Talk:2022 Pacific typhoon season/ACE calcs and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Talk:2022 Pacific typhoon season/ACE calcs during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Jasper Deng (talk) 06:14, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm HurricaneEdgar. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. HurricaneEdgar 23:49, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Where did you take the 1-minute winds of 50 knots that you presented in this edit for TC 01U of 2002-03 from? We generally take 1-minute winds from the JTWC and both the JTWC ATCR for 2003 and IBTRACS do not present any 1-minute winds, which means that we can not add 1-minute winds in unless another reliable source states that the 1-minute sustained winds were 50 knots. Jason Rees (talk) 10:25, 15 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Could you explain where you got the new pressures from for 2020–21 South-West Indian Ocean cyclone season, 2020–21 Australian region cyclone season, and 2020–21 South Pacific cyclone season? ~ KN2731 {talk · contribs} 06:58, 12 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I got it from Wikimedia Commons in the tropical cyclone tracks where they are in the description and the sea green browser bar called Track map generator input code appeared and there is the minimum pressure of each cyclone, each track. МОДОКАУ 08:11, 12 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

That's usually JTWC or IBTrACS data which is used to pull the 1-min sustained winds to generate the maps - not RSMC pressure. ~ KN2731 {talk · contribs} 11:48, 12 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Oh ok МОДОКАУ 18:26, 12 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I have noticed that you often edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. To help yourself remember, you may wish to check the "prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" box in your preferences. Thanks! PhantomTech[talk] 21:49, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, so just a small correction, they're not called cyclones, they're hurricanes. Cyclones form over the Indian ocean 2603:9000:5900:8818:C862:F2E7:C9FF:C575 (talk) 05:01, 30 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The article Tropical Storm Yamaneko has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No need for a SIA page with one entry only, nothing to DAB

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Drdpw (talk) 22:54, 12 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Dear project member, This message is being sent out to encourage new ideas and feedback on those proposed in regard to the colors debate for WikiProject Weather. For those who are unaware of what's been happening over the last year, I will give a brief summary. We have been discussing proposed changes to the colors of the dots on tropical cyclone maps and templates and infoboxes across the entire weather project in order to solve issues related to the limited contrast between colors for both normal vision as well as the various types of color blindness (MOS:ACCESS). We had partially implemented a proposal earlier this year, however, it was objected to by a number of people and additional issues were presented that made it evident this wasn't the optimal solution. We tried to come up with other solutions to address the issues related to color contrast, however, none of them gained traction and no consensus was generated.

We need your help and I encourage you to propose your own scale and give feedback on those already listed. Keep in mind that we are NOT making a decision on any individual proposal at this time. We are simply allowing people to make proposals and cultivate them given feedback from other project members. Please visit our project page for additional details. The proposal phase will close no later than December 31st at 23:59 UTC. Noah^Talk 03:34, 21 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:42, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You did not identify the source of the material in your edit. It appears to be 2014–15 Australian region cyclone season. Copying within Wikipedia is acceptable but it must be attributed.

This type of edit does get picked up by Copy Patrol and a good edit summary helps to make sure we don't accidentally revert it. However, for future use, would you note the best practices wording as outlined at Wikipedia:Copying_within_Wikipedia? In particular, linking to the source article and adding the phrase "see that page's history for attribution" helps ensure that proper attribution is preserved.

While best practices are that attribution should be added to the edit summary at the time the edit is made, the linked article on best practices describes the appropriate steps to add attribution after the fact. I hope you will do so.--S Philbrick(Talk) 22:56, 14 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I've noticed that this guideline is not very well known, even among editors with tens of thousands of edits, so it isn't surprising that I point this out to some veteran editors, but there are some t's that need to be crossed.S Philbrick(Talk) 22:56, 14 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Bumping this – I've added {{copied}} templates for you on Talk:2009 Pacific typhoon season and Talk:Typhoon Nida (2009), but please remember to attribute any future copying as outlined above. ~ KN2731 {talk · contribs} 14:36, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I have noticed that you often edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. To help yourself remember, you may wish to check the "prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" box in your preferences. Thanks! Zinnober9 (talk) 02:53, 24 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This is WP:POINTy and flogging a dead horse. Do not ever reinstate old-colored maps; this goes against the RfC's consensus. In a way, Wikipedia kinda works with democratic centralism: during the discussion you can voice your own opinion but after consensus is reached you must not go against it even if you continue to disagree. If you do this again, I will request that you be blocked from editing. Is that clear? Jasper Deng (talk) 22:56, 7 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ok МОДОКАУ 00:00, 8 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Then why did you do this? Do not ever insert old-colored maps for new storms, not even if the new-colored map does not exist. If it does not exist, then create it or omit the map entirely. Inserting the old map is against WP:ACCESSIBLE in addition to the RfC.--Jasper Deng (talk) 08:51, 11 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ok! Mister Jasper МОДОКАУ 08:55, 11 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You said ok, yet you did this. Exactly which part of this was not clear? If it continues, you're going to be headed for a block.--Jasper Deng (talk) 03:15, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I have noticed that you often edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. To help yourself remember, you may wish to check the "prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" box in your preferences. Thanks! Jasper Deng (talk) 07:30, 11 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:57, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I have noticed that you often edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. To help yourself remember, you may wish to check the "prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" box in your preferences. Thanks! Insendieum ALT (talk) 17:26, 8 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from 2023 Atlantic hurricane season into Tropical cyclones in 2023. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was copied, attribution is not required. 🌀Lunala 62🌀 (talk) 15:04, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from one or more pages into 2002 Atlantic hurricane season. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 15:01, 12 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Telenovelafan215. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Telenovelafan215 (talk) 19:11, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks МОДОКАУ 19:12, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to Fábrica de sueños, even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use your sandbox. Please do not add empty sections unless you plan on expanding later on. Telenovelafan215 (talk) 20:36, 22 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I did it for a good cause, after the television series The Hex ended, I decided to update all the data because it seems that it was outdated as if frozen. That's why I did it for a good cause. МОДОКАУ 20:39, 22 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Tropical cyclones in 1996, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Comoro and Cape York.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It appears that you copied or moved text from 1997 Pacific hurricane season to Tropical cyclones in 1997. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing requires that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Repeated violations of Wikipedia's attribution requirements may result in the loss of editing privileges. DanCherek (talk) 15:47, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to Rodolfo Márquez. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Broc (talk) 07:03, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Telenovelafan215. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person on Angelique Boyer, but you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now. Wikipedia has a very strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate and clear. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! Telenovelafan215 (talk) 20:33, 30 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

O_O

Ok… 2806:290:8814:3548:3199:DAA8:F1CE:284 (talk) 20:33, 30 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I didn’t log in it. But okay МОДОКАУ 20:34, 30 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed you added a damage total of $957 million to the Hurricane Anita article. I have removed this damage figure before due to it lacking any source. Do you have a source for that damage total? MCRPY22 (talk) 20:52, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Modokai. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Rodolfo Márquez, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:19, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Modokai. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Rodolfo Márquez".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:48, 11 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for abusing multiple accounts per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Modokai. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Izno (talk) 04:03, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know what you're talking about, I wasn't literal. I was always active but I didn't log out, someone did it to hurt me but I had nothing to do with it. What I checked the IP address user was not me. It's better to investigate to the last consequences but I didn't do anything. МОДОКАУ 04:08, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Tropical cyclones in 2013, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Victoria.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:54, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:41, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

FYI the JTWC revised Kevin's 1-min winds to 135 kts in BT which makes it a Cat 4 on the SSHWS, however, the system is still a Cat 5 on the Aus Scale which is the official scale for the region Kevin existed in.Jason Rees (talk) 00:03, 24 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Yes? And as Kevin's trajectory graphs indicate, a salmon red and lilac dot appears? МОДОКАУ 01:33, 24 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Tropical cyclones in 2025, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page De Grey.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:55, 27 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Modokai, WeatherWriter has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Go on, smile! Cheers, and happy editing!
Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

• The past week has been a difficult week for those involved in the weather community, with all the changes and firings in NOAA and the National Weather Service; and everything involved with NOAA under the second presidency of Donald Trump (new article for all of these events). Hopefully your day can get a little better from this smile! The Weather Event Writer (Talk Page) 20:50, 3 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

There is a new ongoing request for comment discussion, with the goal to solve the various disputes on weather-related articles (such as tornadoes or hurricanees) on how to best utilize damage estimates in the infobox. Your comments are highly-requested, as the result of this discussion will affect all weather-related articles. This notice is being sent to all editors who have recently edited weather event articles.

You can view and participate in the discussion here: Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Weather#RFC - Weather Infobox Damages. The Weather Event Writer (Talk Page) 17:32, 23 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there - regarding this edit - I wondered why you changed the numbers. How is that an appropriate update if you just edited without providing a new source? I don't mean to be accusatory, but I'm just confused. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 20:21, 14 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, i update it МОДОКАУ 20:24, 14 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

But you didn't update the source. Are you going to update the source too? ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 20:40, 14 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

	The Writer's Barnstar
	Thanks for working on older articles, like Tropical cyclones in 2016. Some people only care about the latest thing to happen, and then some people like digging into the archives and making sure the history gets told right! Cheers to that spirit, keep that up. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 23:38, 11 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Oh hey, where did you get that information that the storm is given the name "Iona"? CPHC still hasn't named them, but it will be a tropical storm on 8 AM Forecast. Tz fz (talk) 01:13, 28 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

According to Tropical Tidbits but CPAC no Modokai (talk) 01:13, 28 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]