Share to: share facebook share twitter share wa share telegram print page

User talk:WeatherWriter

1.8This user has 1.8 centijimbos.

Andrew5 again

I noticed you welcomed this IP. I want to let you know that is probably an IP sock of Andrew5. He lives in Delaware now and goes to college there. Just keep an eye out. wizzito | say hello! 05:12, 7 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

What stood out to me was the large addition on a weather article by a new IP. Also, it geolocates to a Dunkin' Donuts. Andrew loves editing from Dunkin' free WiFi and multiple IPs connected to Dunkin' locations have been blocked because they were connected to his socking. wizzito | say hello! 05:13, 7 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Gotcha! I welcome a lot of new accounts, especially from my watchlist as I am pet-peeved by red talk pages. I guess I overlooked that one…I must be losing my touch…I caught 1/3 of all the Andrew5 socks and I missed one. The Weather Event Writer (Talk Page) 06:18, 7 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Stop doing this, for the love of God! Andrew5 loves getting in revert wars. It's so obviously him! wizzito | say hello! 18:37, 8 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I won't stop welcoming new accounts...but I will try to see if they might be Andrew5 before welcoming them. The Weather Event Writer (Talk Page) 18:41, 8 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Please try. wizzito | say hello! 18:46, 8 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Honestly Wizzito, I do not see why you are so upset at a simple welcome message. Seriously. Editor to editor here...you might actually need to take a short break. If anything, a welcome message would alert Andrew5 that someone is watching their edits still and might deter them. It also puts the IP and/or account on my watchlist automatically, so I would be more inclined to investigate if they do 2+ edits. As someone who has literally been impersonated (twice) and got death threats from A5, you do not need to be so uptight over it. The Weather Event Writer (Talk Page) 19:02, 8 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Honestly, true. I do take short breaks from time to time. Sorry for getting so worked up. wizzito | say hello! 19:04, 8 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
(talk page watcher) I think everyone here needs to WP:AGF and WP:MOVEON. WeatherWriter made a mistake by welcoming an Andrew5 IP, but there isn't much harm in doing that and it was clearly a mistake. On the flip-side, this doesn't rise to the level of needing to "take a break"; it's just a misunderstanding. EF5 19:11, 8 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I've just been pissed off ever since Andrew started college.
Why, you may ask? I actually reported his behavior a few months ago to the University of Delaware, with evidence (including the usage of their network to evade his WMF ban). They said they would look into it in relation to their "Code of Conduct." UDel clearly doesn't think that sending death threats to and harassing WP editors is a violation of their "Code of Conduct" because he's pretty obviously attending the university right now.
See the edit history of 128.4.0.0/16 (block range · block log (global) · WHOIS (partial)) (University of Delaware registered IP range) from Aug. 28 on - all the Andrew5 editing interests of baseball, weather and elections are right there. wizzito | say hello! 19:28, 8 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Maybe they couldn't really do anything because the most egregious stuff wasn't done on their network, I don't really know, but it still upsets me. A separate LTA (WP:LTA/DENVER) actually stopped vandalizing for three whole years after I reported their behavior to their ISP. We used to have a program many years ago called abuse response that reported LTA behavior to ISPs, and that page now states "[i]t is still possible for administrators and vandal fighters to contact ISPs, schools, and employers on their own ... [m]any ISPs, schools, and employers are cooperative, while many others are not." wizzito | say hello! 19:46, 8 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

On September 9th you added the following harvnb cite -

*{{harvnb|Grazulis|2001a|p=[https://archive.org/details/tornadonaturesul0000graz/page/255 255]}}

to 1845 Montville tornado. This harvnb cite doesn't have a complete reference to target within the article. If you would add the complete Grazulis reference, that would take care of the present Harv error and the article would no longer be in Category:Harv and Sfn no-target errors. Thank you. - Shearonink (talk) 15:46, 9 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article United States Congress hearings on Hurricanes Helene and Milton is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/United States Congress hearings on Hurricanes Helene and Milton until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Dan Leonard (talk • contribs) 07:17, 11 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your Featured picture candidate has been promoted
Your nomination for featured picture status, File:NSSL Mobile Mesonet Truck chasing the 2024 Duke, Oklahoma tornado.png, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates. Armbrust The Homunculus 09:39, 11 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Notice

The article Tornado Research Act of 2004 has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Notability not established with substantive independent sources

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Reywas92Talk 13:58, 11 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Tornado Research Act of 2004 for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Tornado Research Act of 2004 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tornado Research Act of 2004 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Reywas92Talk 18:47, 11 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A kitten for you!

Sorry about what happened today (I think it's been a rough week for everyone given what's happening in America right now), and I really do understand your frustration with the whole project right now. I'm hoping this is somewhat motivating, but while that weather-politics draft might be large it'll certainly be an article to be proud of. Maybe you could even try to get an FA out of it, which is plusible given how well-written it is! Cheers to a (hopefully) happier weekend and start to fall.

EF5 19:13, 11 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of administrator's noticeboard discussion

Information icon There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding this AfD discussion. The thread is Vague aspersions cast by WeatherWriter. Dan Leonard (talk • contribs) 20:53, 11 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Prefix: a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

Portal di Ensiklopedia Dunia

Kembali kehalaman sebelumnya