User talk:Fork99

This is Fork99's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help. Assume good faith Be polite and avoid personal attacks Be welcoming to newcomers Seek dispute resolution if needed

Archives: 1, 2Auto-archiving period: 3 months

If I have left you a message: please answer on your talk page, linking to me ({{Ping|Fork99}}), so that I will be notified. If you leave me a message: I will answer on my talk page, linking to your username, so that you will be notified. Please click here to leave me a new message.

This page was last edited by Lowercase sigmabot III (talk | contribs) 9 days ago. (Update timer)

September 2025 Backlog Drive | New pages patrol
On 1 September 2025, a one-month backlog drive for New Page Patrol will begin. Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles patrolled. Barnstars will also be granted for re-reviewing articles previously reviewed by other patrollers during the drive. Each review will earn 1 point. Interested in taking part? Sign up here.
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:31, 23 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

On the 3000 Class Railcar Page one of my Pictures was removed by User contributions for 203.56.146.90 - Wikipedia than recently I got a message from User:Upsq12c - Wikipedia on my talk page saying they had removed it, but they didn't edit the 3000 Class Railcar Page which has got me suspicious. 6EEEEEEVIDEOs (talk) 08:49, 8 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@6EEEEEEVIDEOs: I'm sorry but I don't understand what edits you're talking about and what the issue is? I looked at the edit history of 3000 class railcar and don't see any recent reverts. If there is a content dispute, please raise it with the other editor involved on their user talk page and/or on the article talk page. Failing that, there are dispute resolution options available. Fork99 (talk) 20:41, 8 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

it wasn't a revert someone removed it by editing. 6EEEEEEVIDEOs (talk) 20:51, 8 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@6EEEEEEVIDEOs: Ok, well I still don't understand what the issue is. I'm not involved in this presumed content dispute about the inclusion of an image. It's best that you try and discuss this with the other involved editor(s) to reach a WP:CONSENSUS. Fork99 (talk) 21:02, 8 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I just wanted to say that I think there was a misunderstanding. Another editor said that the article uses Br Eng but used an American spelling, I reverted it, and you reverted me (and you were correct). I have no intentions of edit warring whatsoever. Cheers, Eem dik doun in toene (talk) 08:00, 13 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Eem dik doun in toene: No worries, of course, don't worry about it :) Fork99 (talk) 08:16, 13 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

check out https://hkrail.fandom.com/wiki/%E4%B9%9D%E5%BB%A3%E9%90%B5%E8%B7%AF if MTR owned stations on Sha Tin to Central Link. Jerry, Ho Lun (talk) 10:02, 18 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Jerry, Ho Lun: You have not understood the multiple messages left on your talk page and in reply to your talk post at Talk:Sha Tin to Central Link.

Per Wikipedia's guidelines on reliable sources, Fandom wikis should not be used as a citation/reference on Wikipedia. User-generated content should not be cited on Wikipedia. If you can find the same information published elsewhere in a source like a news article or similar, please reference it and/or continue the discussion that you already started at Talk:Sha Tin to Central Link. Fork99 (talk) 10:11, 18 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Why don't you visit the website then translated about KCR owned stations (with exception owned by MTR.) Jerry, Ho Lun (talk) 10:19, 18 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Jerry, Ho Lun: All information on Wikipedia must be verifiably cited/referenced. Fandom wikis are not a reliable source that should be cited on Wikipedia.

The burden of providing a verifiable citation for new information on a Wikipedia article is on the editor who makes the change or proposes a change to an article.

Can you please provide a direct link or reference which is NOT the Fandom wiki page? I could not find any reference to the Sha Tin to Central Link in that page.

If you don't provide any new information to verify the claims you make, your edits will continue to be reverted for being insufficiently cited. Fork99 (talk) 10:27, 18 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Is it vandalism to remove a photo off a Wikipedia Page for no Reason? because one of the photos, I added in of a Cab was removed, I reverted the edit so the picture is back. 6EEEEEEVIDEOs (talk) 04:06, 23 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@6EEEEEEVIDEOs: Again, this appears to be a content dispute. Vandalism is defined on Wikipedia at WP:VANDALISM and I do not believe that this obviously meets that definition. Although the other editor seemingly did not justify why they removed your image in their edit summary (and seemingly neither did you justify why you undid their edit in your edit summary), you should discuss with them on the article talk page or on their user talk page why you believe that the image should stand. If they don't respond and/or no one else removes your image, it can probably remain in the meantime.

Please have a read of WP:Dispute resolution, WP:CONSENSUS and WP:Manual of Style/Images.

@Hudsons Trainspotting youtube: as the other editor involved. Fork99 (talk) 09:06, 23 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]