Welcome to my talk page!
- Please use the Reply button to reply to a message, or add topic (+) to start a new section.
- If I have left a message on your talk page, please DO NOT post a reply here, instead, reply there.
- Mention me using the "Mention a user" button in the Reply box or type out {{ping|EditorShane3456}}.
- I will have your talk page on watch and will note when you have replied.
- If you prefer to manually edit the page to post:
- Use an accurate and appropriate heading.
- Indent your comment by using an appropriate number of colons ':'.
- Sign your post with four tildes (~~~~) at the end.
EditorShane3456 (talk) 17:36, 7 August 2025 (UTC)
[reply]
|
|
| Index
|
|
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 0.1 hours may be auto-archived by ClueBot III if there are more than 2. |
Hello, EditorShane3456. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Challenge Accepted (Youtube series), a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:06, 11 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I noticed that not only are you editing while logged out, but while doing so you're edit warring on another user's talk page ([1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6]), while at the same time running afoul of WP:BLANKING. Users are allowed to remove most content from their talk pages, and as a fellow editor you're in no position to restore it—especially when they've asked you multiple times to stop posting. This is at least the second time you've edit-warred with another user while simultaneously warning them for edit-warring.
Warning other users for disruptive behavior is appreciated, but before your own edits become disruptive, hand it off to WP:ANI, WP:AIV, or WP:ANEW where an actual administrator can address the issue rather than asserting the authority yourself.
The issue of editing and warning users while logged out probably needs a credible explanation. Celjski Grad (talk) 15:52, 12 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
- Hello! I usually keep editing while logged out because I sometimes accidentally log myself out while im at home (which im using a school computer to edit, and they blocked auth.wikimedia so I cant usually log in some times.) I also really didnt mean to edit war on that person's talk page, its just that they were removing warnings that are really important to keeping our policies and guidelines followed by most editors. I do not really understand why someone would remove their warnings that are important to make sure that us as a wikipedia society can work together. shane (talk) 16:13, 12 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
- (no comemnt on the editing whilst logged out) Hi EditorShane, even if you don't understand why someone would do that, people have the right to remove anything they want from their own talk page (with some exceptions that do not include warnings). Removing a warning means the editor has read and acknowledged them. (And if someone tells you to stay off their talk page, you should generally do so.) See WP:BLANKING and WP:USERTALKSTOP. Best GoldRomean (talk) 16:21, 12 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
- ok shane (talk) 16:22, 12 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Hi @EditorShane3456, I saw that you draftified Alta (company). That had already been done once, though, and the author had moved it back into the main space, so per WP:DRAFTONCE we wouldn't normally draftify for the second time (unless we know, or can reasonably suspect, COI). However, on this occasion the author subsequently submitted the draft to review at AfC, which I took to mean that they weren't violently objecting to the 2nd draftification, hence I've allowed it. Just bear this in mind in the future, okay? Best, -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 14:33, 15 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
- ok, i just wanted them to go through the afc process shane (talk) 14:38, 15 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
- Yes, that's probably a good idea... especially as I've now declined that draft for having zero evidence of notability. I was just offering this advice for future reference. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 14:58, 15 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
