User talk:EditorShane3456/Archive 1

This is an archive of past discussions with User:EditorShane3456. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Hello, I'm Idontknowwhattouseasmyusername300. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Minecraft (franchise) have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Idontknowwhattouseasmyusername300 (talk) 18:45, 16 October 2023 (UTC)

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Minecraft (franchise), without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Idontknowwhattouseasmyusername300 (talk) 18:52, 16 October 2023 (UTC)

the source is mostly youtube and research from the internet. Shaneapickle (talk) 18:53, 16 October 2023 (UTC)

All material must be attributable to reliable, published sources per WP:V Idontknowwhattouseasmyusername300 (talk) 19:03, 16 October 2023 (UTC)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

• in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
• reliable
• secondary
• independent of the subject
  

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

no sources?

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:C/2024 G3 (ATLAS) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 17:00, 22 October 2024 (UTC)

Hello, Shaneapickle! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Theroadislong (talk) 17:00, 22 October 2024 (UTC)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

• in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
• reliable
• secondary
• independent of the subject
  

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:C/2024 G3 (ATLAS) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 20:21, 22 October 2024 (UTC)

Hello, I'm R0paire-wiki. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Gorilla Tag have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. R0paire 17:09, 25 November 2024 (UTC)

In the game, it is actually called Monke, not Monkey, thats why i edited it. Shaneapickle (talk) 15:06, 26 November 2024 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Waxworker. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, The Outer Worlds, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Waxworker (talk) 13:47, 6 March 2025 (UTC)

On 11 March 2025, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article IM-2, which you nominated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Stephen 05:38, 11 March 2025 (UTC)

Thanks, I was one of the first ones to figure out that NASA and IM lost contact, yet some people didnt believe me. Shaneapickle (talk) 12:14, 12 March 2025 (UTC)

Hello Shaneapickle! The thread you created at the Teahouse, Hello, I am working on a page about a recent plane crash that happened yesterday (March 9th), has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please create a new thread. See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by KiranBOT, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=KiranBOT}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). —KiranBOT (talk) 03:41, 15 March 2025 (UTC)

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Selam (moon). Thanks! Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 13:33, 19 March 2025 (UTC)

Selam (moon), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

LR.127 (talk) 04:31, 23 March 2025 (UTC)

Hello Shaneapickle! The thread you created at the Teahouse, Hey, I made a new page about a asteroid moon, Selam and I need some help, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please create a new thread. See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by KiranBOT, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=KiranBOT}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). —KiranBOT (talk) 03:26, 24 March 2025 (UTC)

Johann Nepomuk Hauser, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 22:19, 29 March 2025 (UTC)

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created, Draft:Aprod, was tagged as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion and has been or soon may be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other test edits you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 17:44, 2 April 2025 (UTC)

Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, the introduction of inappropriate pages, such as Talk:Jean-Rémi Yama, is considered vandalism and is prohibited. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Bored kittycat (talk) 14:49, 14 April 2025 (UTC)

ok Shaneapickle (talk) 15:03, 14 April 2025 (UTC)

You are going around making accusations about an edit war, but which specific article(s) is this supposed edit war happening on? Fram (talk) 15:40, 22 April 2025 (UTC)

Ok, let me explain here, MHD and Kajmer are warring over kurdish nationalist pages, (the battle ones to be specific) in which MHD is claiming that kajmer is targetting kurdish nationalist pages, but kajmer is saying he didnt. Shaneapickle (talk) 15:43, 22 April 2025 (UTC)

Specific articles. If you can't name them, then no report at any admin noticeboard will even be looked at. Disagreeing about a topic or occasionally editing the same page is not an edit war. Fram (talk) 15:52, 22 April 2025 (UTC)

You have recently edited a page related to the topics of Kurds and Kurdistan, broadly construed, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have an expanded level of powers and discretion in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

• adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
• comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
• follow editorial and behavioural best practices;
• comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
• refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures, you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

_signed, Rosguill ^talk 16:25, 22 April 2025 (UTC)

Hello, Shaneapickle. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:C/2024 G3 (ATLAS), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:08, 23 June 2025 (UTC)

I already self-requested for deletion. Shaneapickle (talk) 15:20, 24 June 2025 (UTC)

Hello, Shaneapickle. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:2025 BU, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 05:07, 5 July 2025 (UTC)

Hi Shane. It's always great to see an enthusiastic newer user around. However, and I have to be blunt here, when it comes to your recent edits at AN/I, you frankly seem to not know what you are doing. WP:AN/I § Expecting ITN/C to make a exception: User:Morgajon was BITEy as noted there; you then went to the user's talk page and continued to call them suspicious. At WP:AN/I § Preaching WP:THETRUTH you tried to explain how TPA revocation works to admins. And, much more concerningly, at WP:AN/I § Kelisi and IPA you've thrown fuel onto a fire others were trying to put out first by baselessly alleging account compromise, then incorrectly stating everything on wikipedia should have sources, and finally making the completely incorrect statement that pronunciations on the English Wikipedia must be in English—which I guess, in a silver lining, was enough to unify the two opposing parties to tell you you were wrong.

AN/I isn't a playground. Admin areas aren't a playground, as I see another admin has already explained to you here. I see you've also made User:Shaneapickle/Empire of Wallenderte, which I've just deleted under CSD G3 as a hoax, and that, after being told you were wrong in that third AN/I thread, you went to one of the parties' usertalks to start a debate over monarchism. There's also this bit of vandalism a couple months ago. So maybe more broadly I should just say, Wikipedia isn't a playground.

Do you want to contribute to building an encyclopedia? Great! There's lots of things to do and always some new article to work on. I would absolutely encourage you to apply your enthusiasm to the awesome task of building the world's most comprehensive reference work. On the other hand, if you want to watch drama, play cops-and-robbers with bad guys, and argue with people over politics, there are plenty of sites for that, but this is not one. So I would encourage you to pick one of those two options—focusing on content work or not editing. If you continue to make these kinds of disruptive edits in admin areas, you will probably get blocked soon enough, either by me or someone else, either from AN/I or the WP: namespace or the whole site. And I hate to see enthusiasm wasted, so let's not go down that route. -- Tamzin^{[cetacean needed]} (they|xe|🤷) 19:55, 6 July 2025 (UTC)

Hey @Tamzin, I just got this message, and I personally think my suspicions against Morgajon were valid because I have seen many people edit pages with their own promotion of their buisness, and the ITN candidates debacle was kind of like those situations, and also I am not a new user, I have been editing for 2 years already. Morgajon tried to defy the notability guidelines we have for ITN by nominating the Oasis tour, (we never post tours, I checked like every single tour, and not ONE of them were posted to ITN) and everyone in that nomination had a consensus to not post. I told him upfront that I have seen many people do these kind of things, trying to promote their buisness or something they had a conflict of interest on, and I explained to him that his edits to the page (which are only the Oasis tour, mind you) seemed like he was being paid to do these edits and promote it on our wiki. And for the Empire of Wallenderte, my school blocked Fandom, Wikimedia, and MicroWiki so I cant make my own page/wiki for my micronation. I wouldn't call that a debate, i was just telling him my opinion on socialism and monarchism, which it wasn't a complete debate because he did not even respond to my opinion. Shaneapickle (talk) 20:06, 6 July 2025 (UTC)

And look, I dont have anything against new user's in general, but if they seem to be promotional in nature (like morgajon) I would call them out for it. Shaneapickle (talk) 20:08, 6 July 2025 (UTC)

What I'm hearing here is that you don't understand WP:NOTFORUM or WP:UPNOT, don't intend to comply with WP:BITE, and are continuing to make baseless allegations of COI that multiple admins have told you are non-actionable, pinging the user in the process, which makes this verge on harassment.

I'm sure you feel like you're offering a good rebuttal to what I said, but what you're actually doing is making a case that a block would be necessary to prevent disruption. You seem like a very bright young person, but it's important to understand that you don't know everything. I'm far from infallible, but for a moment let's just assume that I, as an administrator who's been editing for half her life, probably know more than you about what is and isn't acceptable conduct on Wikipedia. Can you reread what I wrote with that assumption in mind, and then consider whether there was a better way to respond? -- Tamzin^{[cetacean needed]} (they|xe|🤷) 20:24, 6 July 2025 (UTC)

Hey Shane, just to let you know -- I've declined your request for rollback. Rollback generally requires more experience both editing mainspace and reverting vandalism. The issues with WP:BITE were also a concern. Feel free to ping me if you have any questions.

@Tamzin has given you some great advice above on how to get more involved in editing. I would encourage you to take it; working in mainspace is a great way to build up an understanding of how Wikipedia works and is frankly some of the most fulfilling work you can do here. Thanks, Giraffer (talk) 23:26, 6 July 2025 (UTC)

@Giraffer I actually have one concern here, as I now realize looking back I was a bit harsh on Morgajon, but still, I was being vigilant and calling out someone who I thought was paid to edit the Oasis tour page, and nominate it for ITN, but we still have notability guidelines for ITN, anything can be on ITN if it is notable enough. That's why I called him out for expecting us to make an exception for the tour, but I realize now that was harsh as hell. 2606:9400:98A0:92A0:89A7:7CA3:1401:7BC5 (talk) 19:50, 9 July 2025 (UTC)

I'm not sure why you pinged me...? Also, please edit while logged in if you can. Thanks, Giraffer (talk) 19:56, 9 July 2025 (UTC)

I logged in when I was in connecticut (6 days ago) , and my school blocked auth.wikimedia so i cant log back in, and you said here

" Feel free to ping me if you have any questions." 2606:9400:98A0:92A0:89A7:7CA3:1401:7BC5 (talk) 19:57, 9 July 2025 (UTC)

Hello, EditorShane3456. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Republic of Berlandia, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 19:04, 18 July 2025 (UTC)

Is there a reason you nominated a non-existent article for deletion? Celjski Grad (talk) 16:12, 25 July 2025 (UTC)

I didn't know the correct page at the time. EditorShane3456 (talk) 17:17, 25 July 2025 (UTC)

There's quite a few steps involved in nominating an article for deletion, the outline is here. Adding the notice to the AfD log is the last step, after tagging the article, creating a discussion page, identifying the grounds for deletion, and informing WikiProjects. On what grounds do you feel the article should be deleted? Celjski Grad (talk) 17:26, 25 July 2025 (UTC)

I believe the town in of itself (even though it's part of my life) has information that is just stale due to the fact that some of the sources are outdated. EditorShane3456 (talk) 17:29, 25 July 2025 (UTC)

Stale information is not a valid reason for deletion (I linked to them above). The correct action is to update it. Celjski Grad (talk) 17:37, 25 July 2025 (UTC)

Hello, EditorShane3456. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "2025 BU".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 04:19, 2 August 2025 (UTC)

Please review the RFC guidelines before opening one. Your proposal was not neutral and there was no discussion beforehand. Additionally, your proposal didn't really make much sense. voorts (talk/contributions) 17:34, 3 August 2025 (UTC)

Why have you created a new account? What do you intend to be the difference between the editing from the two accounts? JBW (talk) 14:51, 4 August 2025 (UTC)

If I get locked out of my main, I can use the other one until I can get main back. EditorShane3456 (talk) 14:53, 4 August 2025 (UTC)

OK, thanks for explaining. JBW (talk) 14:55, 4 August 2025 (UTC)

Hello EditorShane3456. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Bhabhua subdivision, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: GPTZero is not sufficient for G15 - G15 has strict criteria. Thank you. CoconutOctopus talk 16:58, 29 August 2025 (UTC)

Hello, EditorShane3456. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Late March 2025 severe weather complex, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 22:06, 30 August 2025 (UTC)

You re-added the db-A7 tag to Arielle Roth that I deleted, stating that

• A7 says " does not indicate why its subject is important or significant.... and is a lower standard than notability.
• Notability for a politician is established: "The following are presumed to be notable:

Politicians and judges who have held international, national, or (for countries with federal or similar systems of government) state/province–wide office. Therefore, as Arielle Roth is an Assistant Secretary of Commerce, she is de facto considered notable. Thus, her article does not qualify for A7 deletion.

I do not want to get into an edit war over this. I respectfully ask that you remove the db-A7 tag.

— ERcheck (talk) 20:21, 1 September 2025 (UTC)

Hello ERcheck, although you are correct, there is not enough information on her currently at this point, we should probably wait until more information about Arielle, like DOB, politics, early life, career, then we create a page. shane (talk) 20:32, 1 September 2025 (UTC)

I did not create the page. I came across it in my admin role, reviewing CAT:CSD for pages that needed deletion. As she met the notabilty standard, I removed the tag and added a comment to the talk page, as well as documenting my reasons in the edit summary. I did added some references and additional info. It is a blp-stub and does not qualify for speedy deletion. — ERcheck (talk) 20:36, 1 September 2025 (UTC)

I didnt assume you were the person who created the page or say you were the one who made it. shane (talk) 20:45, 1 September 2025 (UTC)

Hello, EditorShane3456. What happened with Happymon Jacob draft could you please tell me? JoidC (talk) 15:56, 4 September 2025 (UTC)

I redirected it to Rakkam A Sangma as it was a copy of a mainspace article 2606:9400:98A0:92A0:F965:A052:8324:6519 (talk) 16:23, 4 September 2025 (UTC)

But that was an article of Happymon Jacob, won't it be a problem to connect Happymon Jacob to Rakkam A Sangma ? JoidC (talk) 16:28, 4 September 2025 (UTC)

It was literally Rakkam A Sangma's source code, copied into another page. 2606:9400:98A0:92A0:F965:A052:8324:6519 (talk) 16:33, 4 September 2025 (UTC)

So how to resolve this? I mean Happymon Jacob Draft is different. Is Happymon Jacob's article in review waiting to be checked and turn into a main article? or what happened would you please tell me conspicuously ? JoidC (talk) 16:36, 4 September 2025 (UTC)

its not different bruh its literally just the same page copypasted 2606:9400:98A0:92A0:F965:A052:8324:6519 (talk) 17:07, 4 September 2025 (UTC)

Could you please guide me, what should i do now ? Because if Rakkam A Sangma's content go into Happymon Jacob's article then it would be a complete mess, what shall i do ? JoidC (talk) 17:10, 4 September 2025 (UTC)

please find reliable sources about the person you want to write about (make sure your not connected to the subject) then remove the redirect, and write about it. 2606:9400:98A0:92A0:F965:A052:8324:6519 (talk) 17:16, 4 September 2025 (UTC)

Thank you very much, JoidC (talk) 17:17, 4 September 2025 (UTC)

Hello EditorShane3456, and thanks for patrolling new pages! I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Draft:Matthew Swarts, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: G15 requires specific indications of LLM use and they do not appear to be present here. You may wish to review the Criteria for Speedy Deletion before tagging further pages. Thank you. asilvering (talk) 16:04, 4 September 2025 (UTC)

Please discuss if your move has been reverted. If you do continue to do so, please at least make sure your spelling is correct. ARandomName123 (talk)^{Ping me!} 20:00, 10 September 2025 (UTC)

Hello, EditorShane3456. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Challenge Accepted (Youtube series), a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:06, 11 September 2025 (UTC)

I noticed that not only are you editing while logged out, but while doing so you're edit warring on another user's talk page ([1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6]), while at the same time running afoul of WP:BLANKING. Users are allowed to remove most content from their talk pages, and as a fellow editor you're in no position to restore it—especially when they've asked you multiple times to stop posting. This is at least the second time you've edit-warred with another user while simultaneously warning them for edit-warring.

Warning other users for disruptive behavior is appreciated, but before your own edits become disruptive, hand it off to WP:ANI, WP:AIV, or WP:ANEW where an actual administrator can address the issue rather than asserting the authority yourself.

The issue of editing and warning users while logged out probably needs a credible explanation. Celjski Grad (talk) 15:52, 12 September 2025 (UTC)

Hello! I usually keep editing while logged out because I sometimes accidentally log myself out while im at home (which im using a school computer to edit, and they blocked auth.wikimedia so I cant usually log in some times.) I also really didnt mean to edit war on that person's talk page, its just that they were removing warnings that are really important to keeping our policies and guidelines followed by most editors. I do not really understand why someone would remove their warnings that are important to make sure that us as a wikipedia society can work together. shane (talk) 16:13, 12 September 2025 (UTC)

(no comemnt on the editing whilst logged out) Hi EditorShane, even if you don't understand why someone would do that, people have the right to remove anything they want from their own talk page (with some exceptions that do not include warnings). Removing a warning means the editor has read and acknowledged them. (And if someone tells you to stay off their talk page, you should generally do so.) See WP:BLANKING and WP:USERTALKSTOP. Best GoldRomean (talk) 16:21, 12 September 2025 (UTC)

ok shane (talk) 16:22, 12 September 2025 (UTC)