Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Libraries

This is the talk page for discussing WikiProject Libraries and anything related to its purposes and tasks.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help. Assume good faith Be polite and avoid personal attacks Be welcoming to newcomers Seek dispute resolution if needed Shortcut WP:LibrariesWP:Libraries

Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 2 months

	This project page does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
Libraries This page is within the scope of WikiProject Libraries, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Libraries on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LibrariesWikipedia:WikiProject LibrariesTemplate:WikiProject LibrariesLibraries

Would someone mind checking if GNG was met for Draft:Illinois Heartland Library System? I think there should be enough articles in Illinois newspapers about the creation of this library system... WhisperToMe (talk) 17:26, 22 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I replaced the library's website with a new source that helped it meet notability. Your article is now live. You might want to use the file upload wizard to add your logo. Rublamb (talk) 00:55, 9 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Laura Bush has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 01:04, 24 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Multiple tags indicate that this needs improve or deletion. Please discuss. Bearian (talk) 18:19, 1 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Bearian: I removed the promotional tag as that no longer applies (there is no mention of any businesses). There is nothing here to suggest the need for deletion--it has sources. Yes, the addition of updated sources would be useful, so your new tag is appropriate. I don't think this is a Protologism or Neologism, but professional jargon.

My general thought is that this article should be moved to "e-resource access and management services" with a disambiguation for ERAMS, simply because the phrase ERAMS refers to at least three signification topics that I found with a quick Internet search. I started a discussion Talk:ERAMS#. Please discuss there, if you please. Rublamb (talk) 00:53, 8 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

On second look, it's looking much better. Bearian (talk) 01:00, 8 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

It has now been moved to E-resource access and management services. Thanks again for calling this to our attention. Rublamb (talk) 23:55, 8 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Can someone take a look at the lede of Comparison of Dewey and Library of Congress subject classification, a list article that compares the call numbers for the two systems? There is an editor who is challenging statements regarding the types of libraries and sizes of libraries that typically use DDC and LCC. A review of the content and sources would helpful; I don't see the issue but think a fresh set of eyes might figure it out. Rublamb (talk) 00:29, 8 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]