User talk:TCBT1CSI

I found many of the edits you were making unconstructive. In addition to deleting so many pages and making a mockery of many other, I disagree you were having a balanced view of things. I saw you on multiple times remove and make a mockery of additions done in good faith with lot of supporting sources and hell bent of making a mockery of the article based on your press releases and edits without any neutrality which is want wikipedia claims to stand for. I therefore fear wikipedia is going into hands of editors like yourself who are pushing a certain agenda over truth and are not in any way editing content from a neutral, encyclopedic perspective.

I accept your criticism, as it only further demonstrates my point about how Wikipedia's integrity and ethical standards are being compromised. This behavior reinforces my concerns about the depth of bias and how you’re allowing these standards to erode. It’s unfortunate, as Wikipedia should be a space for balanced information, yet actions like these highlight the troubling direction things are heading. TC-BT-1C-SI (talk) 12:35, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I dont think this super editor is a neutral n editor by any standards. They have a hidden agenda, to destroy and distort pages. They don't stand for truth in any wild imagination but is a puppet working under the influence of unscrupulous and obnoxious elements who are liars andchave no regard for truth, they exist just to distort truth with their twisted and agenda.

It's a perfect example of power in the hands ofvevil people who revert even reasonable good faith edits backes by sources only to propagate their mischievous lies on pages 2409:4073:4D33:6C64:FF38:D11E:AF53:780A (talk) 01:52, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

????? Please write to me in simple English. Avoid copying and pasting responses from ChatGPT. TC-BT-1C-SI (talk) 08:42, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Copy and pasting and vandalizing pages is your job you m@ron . You destructive, cunning agenda is visie to all. You are a fraud with evil schemes dusguising yourself as a wikipedia editor. You are not a neutral editor, you are a paid editor carrying out evil schemes and designs by your evil master . You are free to use chatgpt to learn more of this simoke english 2409:4073:4E15:CBEF:13B8:DC29:FFED:B59D (talk) 07:52, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have been making an effort to keep our conversation civil so far. However, if you persist in disturbing me, I may have to report your IP address, the page titled 'Signature Global,' which was referenced by you to target me, and any other pages associated with the involved ID to ANI. Consider this a polite warning. TC-BT-1C-SI (talk) 08:59, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.

Please see WP:ANI#Reporting user for the discussion. TarnishedPath^talk 10:58, 13 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The ANI complaint about you is now at WP:ANI#Disruptive AfD nominations by TCBT1CSI. - EdJohnston (talk) 16:26, 13 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I might have unknowingly upset some paid editors, but there's no need to reply. Still, I truly appreciate those who checked my edit history and made a fair decision. Thanks! TC-BT-1C-SI (talk) 09:36, 20 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I hope you are doing well! I would kindly suggest taking a moment to pause and check things carefully before starting a deletion nomination. It would really help you if you looked at any past deletion discussions and read through the sources properly, as suggested by WP:BEFORE. And, please also try to review both on- and off-wiki sources before starting a new nomination.. There's no need to rush, as doing it right is more important than doing it fast. Thanks so much for your hard work. Charlie (talk) 16:42, 21 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi I see you’re bringing a lot of articles to AfD at once. Deletion discussions take a lot of editor time so it is generally best to avoid starting more than two or three a day. If you keep pumping them out at a high rate the risk is they just won’t get any engagement and the nominations will fail because of a lack of participation. There’s no deadline! All the best Mccapra (talk) 10:17, 30 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please comment at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#Concern about mass AfD nominations by TCBT1CSI with boilerplate comments. Do you know roughly how many articles you have nominated for deletion in, say, the last month? Do you know roughly what percentage of articles you nominate are actually deleted? It would be good if you could give some thoughts at the ANI report, not here. Johnuniq (talk) 06:07, 28 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @TCBT1CSI:. How goes it. I saw that complaint. If you need any help with difficult Afd discussions, please ping me. scope_creep^Talk 19:58, 28 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Good work. scope_creep^Talk 20:10, 28 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]