User talk:CharlieMehta

This is CharlieMehta's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help. Assume good faith Be polite and avoid personal attacks Be welcoming to newcomers Seek dispute resolution if needed

Archives: Index, 1, 2Auto-archiving period: 3 months

Archives

Index Archive 1 Archive 2

This page has archives. Sections older than 90 days may be auto-archived by ClueBot III if there are more than 5.

Thanks for uploading File:Roche Caiman Power Station.png. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of non-free use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of non-free use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the file description page and add the text {{Di-replaceable non-free use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable non-free use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
2. On the file's talk page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification, per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --Min☠︎rax^«¦talk¦» 03:04, 30 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the update. I will see if I can find a free alternative. Charlie (talk) 01:30, 31 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. You're invited to participate in The World Destubathon. We're aiming to destub a lot of articles and also improve longer stale articles. It will be held from Monday June 16 - Sunday July 13. There is over $3300 going into it, with $500 the top prize. If you are interested in winning something to save you money in buying books for future content, or just see it as a good editathon opportunity to see a lot of articles improved for subjects which interest you, sign up on the page in the participants section if interested. Even if you can only manage a few articles they would be very much appreciated and help make the content produced as diverse and broad as possible! ♦ Dr. Blofeld 18:33, 15 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Dr. Blofeld I am interested in joining. could you please let me know how to sign up for it? Charlie (talk) 07:56, 19 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, you just add your name to the participants of Wikipedia:The World Destubathon. ♦ Dr. Blofeld 08:09, 19 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. You recently moved the page Bengali Islamic nationalism to Draft:Bengali Islamic nationalism. There is now another (expanded) version of the article at Bengali islamic nationalism. I was going to move it to the correct capitalization, but I saw there was a draft there, so I wanted to get your thoughts on what would be best to do first. I was just categorizing the page and then noticed some copy-edits; I'm not experienced with dealing with new pages.

Thanks! SomeoneDreaming (talk) 18:57, 16 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia already has pages like 'Bengali nationalism,' 'Bangladeshi nationalism,' and 'Islam in Bangladesh.' I believe that Bengali Islamic nationalism is merely a subset of these topics, which could lead to its content being merged into existing articles rather than justifying a new one. It fails to avoid redundancy with related topics. Many sources discuss 'Bangladeshi nationalism' or 'Islam in Bangladesh' without isolating this specific framework, which could challenge its notability under Wikipedia’s guidelines. So, instead of correcting the capitalization, consider submitting it to an AfD. Charlie (talk) 05:55, 17 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! Thanks for participating in the Articles for Creation June Backlog Drive! We've done amazing work so far, dropping the backlog by more than 2000 drafts already. We have around 2400 drafts outstanding, and we need your help to get that down to zero in 5 days. We can do this, but we need all hands on deck to make this happen. A list of the pending drafts can be found at WP:AFCSORT, where you can select submissions in your area of interest. Thank you so much for your work so far, and happy reviewing! – DreamRimmer ■ 01:29, 25 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@DreamRimmer How are you? Just count me in for the final push. I will do my part to help clear out the remaining drafts. Charlie (talk) 05:06, 26 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I am doing well. Thank you for your help with this :) – DreamRimmer ■ 12:02, 26 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello CharlieMehta,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Google ai stodio for deletion, because it's a redirect that seems implausible or is an unlikely search term.

If you don't want Google ai stodio to be deleted, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

jlwoodwa (talk) 03:21, 26 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Jlwoodwa No problem at all. I didn’t create the page. I just renamed it and but didn’t review it at New Page Patrol. You can decide whether to delete the page with the new title, Google AI Studio or move it back to draft. Charlie (talk) 05:04, 26 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for reviewing Draft:Rakesh Sarin. He meets Criteria 5 of WP:NACADEMIC because he holds a named chair at University of California, Los Angeles. He also meets criteria 3 for being a fellow of Institute for Operations Research and the Management Sciences. The specific criteria notes on WP:NACADEMIC state that in both cases "For documenting these honors, publications of the awarding institution are considered a reliable source." So I have used this for the named chair and this for the fellow status. These are buried deep down in the article, which is my fault. Should I move both these sources to the lead section for easy assessment? HRShami (talk) 03:31, 27 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@HRShami I am sorry as well. He clearly meets Criteria 5 of WP:NACADEMIC as you have mentioned, and also Criteria 8, since he was previously the editor-in-chief of a Scopus Q2-ranked journal. You don’t need to submit this through AfC; just go ahead and publish it as a regular article. Charlie (talk) 06:23, 27 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

No worries. Yes, he meets criteria 8 as well. I am a paid editor so I cannot move it directly in to the mainspace. I have submitted the draft again. HRShami (talk) 06:42, 27 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

		The Reviewer Barnstar
		This award is given in recognition to CharlieMehta for accumulating at least 50 points during the May 2025 NPP backlog drive. Your contributions played a part in the 17,000+ articles reviewed during the drive. Thank you so much for taking part and contributing to help reduce the backlog! Hey man im josh (talk) 19:38, 27 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the recognition. Glad to be part of the backlog drive and help with the reviews. Charlie (talk) 07:12, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

		Worm Gear Award
		This award is given in recognition to CharlieMehta for accumulating at least 7 points during each week of the May 2025 NPP backlog drive. Your contributions played a part in the 17,000+ articles reviewed during the drive. Thank you so much for taking part and contributing to help reduce the backlog! Hey man im josh (talk) 19:53, 27 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the recognition. Glad to be part of the backlog drive and help with the reviews. Charlie (talk) 07:12, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, sorry for the inconvenience, I am a novice editor and I would like to know if the 2 articles I wrote (Draft: The Walt Disney Company Iberia and Draft: Disney Media Networks Latin America) meet the requirements to be accepted. Well, I decided to improve the one about Draft: Disney Media Networks Latin America by adding references after a reviewer rejected it because I had forgotten to add references. But I would like to know if you could accept them or how else I could improve them. CartoonsFan113 (talk) 10:35, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I am not an expert on the subjects covered in these articles. I recommend leaving a message at WT:AFC. Charlie (talk) 16:00, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, thank you very much, best regards :) CartoonsFan113 (talk) 20:34, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia Library: Books & Bytes
Issue 69, May–June 2025

In this issue we highlight a new partnership, Citation Watchlist and, as always, a roundup of news and community items related to libraries and digital knowledge.

Read the full newsletter

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team – 13:11, 1 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

War 2 (film), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

CNMall41 (talk) 05:56, 3 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This is awarded to CharlieMehta for accumulating more than 15 points during the June 2025 AfC backlog drive. Your dedication and sustained efforts in reducing the backlog and contributions to Wikipedia's content review process are sincerely appreciated. Thank you for your participation! ~/Bunnypranav:<ping> 13:33, 8 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, just a courtesy message to notify you in case you haven't seen the Wikipedia:The World Destubathon contest update in the last few days that we've decided to run the full month until the 16th of July. For those who have been too busy to contribute, we would love some help in reaching 4000 articles by Wednesday night! At present we're about 480 articles short!♦ Dr. Blofeld 16:52, 13 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

September 2025 Backlog Drive | New pages patrol
On 1 September 2025, a one-month backlog drive for New Page Patrol will begin. Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles patrolled. Barnstars will also be granted for re-reviewing articles previously reviewed by other patrollers during the drive. Each review will earn 1 point. Interested in taking part? Sign up here.
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:31, 23 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there! I wanted to reach out because you recently tagged Ringway Transportation System for G5, indicating that it was created by a user in violation of a block. However, you tagged Novatechnolabs as the blocked account. In this case, Novatechnolabs has a soft block and has been allowed to create a new account with a new username without violating their block. As such, I'm not sure I understand the G5 nomination. I have deleted the page under G11, but I wanted to reach out about this in case I'm missing something. Thank you! Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 15:27, 3 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Significa liberdade Hi, I saw the note at the top of the page suggesting it might be eligible for CSD G5 since the creator was blocked. After checking the content, I went ahead with the CSD nomination. On review, I think there’s a good chance you’re right about G11, and I may have overlooked the fact that it was a soft block. I only noticed the indefinite block on account creation and didn’t look closely at the full block details. It's my bad. Thank you for pointing this out and correcting me. Charlie (talk) 05:49, 4 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]