User talk:Psygremlin

You know how I know you're the same Psy from RW? "This user watches anime!"

Anyway, as the site's crashed, we've all taken to hanging out at Bob M's place [www.teflpedia.com teflpedia]. I would've emailed you and a few other but I don't have your address. SuperJosh Oh-One (talk) 12:34, 20 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please take note of WP:HUSH. It is my opinion that you are harrassing User:TK-CP on his talk page. It might be best if you disengage from him for a while. Thanks! Keegscee (talk) 18:24, 9 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

All I'm doing is calling him out on his blatant lies on the talk:Conservapedia page, and I've proved that he ignores the commandments the claims the administrators are beholden to. Sadly, he also isn't man enough to pony up himself. But then again, I expected nothing less from him. Hopefully he'll crawl back to Conservapedia where he can hide behind his lies, banhammer and oversight. I gave him a chance to state his side of the story and he refused. 'Nuff said. --Psygremlin (talk) 10:26, 10 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not attack other editors. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. Lulaq (talk) 06:16, 10 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

However, the editor in question is defending an issue that he has clearly violated himself. But you're right. Besides, a scumbag like him isn't worth the trouble anyway. --Psygremlin (talk) 10:19, 10 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Editors here at Wikipedia should not be pursued on their talk pages to answer for actions taken someplace other than on Wikipedia, and those are the rules of Wikipedia. This is not a forum for pursuing your vendettas, you have that at the vandal wiki you are a Sysop at. --TK-CP (talk) 13:12, 10 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Good to see you haven't lost the ability to use your fingers TK. And referring to your lame, old (the article you love to use is 4 years old now) tirade of a "vandal site" - is that not pushing a vendetta, albeit a very lame one? Still, run along to your right-wing blog now, I'm sure you have some editors to block. And I'm still willing to debate your excesses anywhere you please, seeing as you're ducking the issue here. But I know you won't because you know you're wrong. Bye bye now, old man. --Psygremlin (talk) 17:34, 11 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Psygremlin, please remember that user talk pages on Wikipedia are really only supposed to be used for discussing Wikipedia-related issues. I recognise that this is one of the few opportunities you have to discuss TK's conduct in a neutral location, but he really doesn't seem interested in talking with you. As far as I'm concerned, the conduct of another editor off-wiki is completely irrelevant here, and I think it's best if you just give the guy some space. Papa November (talk) 16:44, 10 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I have reverted your new mainpage image for Conservapedia.

Firstly the size was restricted so it wouldn't breach copyright. Secondly you put the new image under a misleading name. The image had a date in its name.

Also there is no point updating Alexa rating except on a very occasional basis.

Dmcq (talk) 16:47, 26 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Conservapedia mainpage Nov 2 2010.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk 05:55, 25 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry about that, only saw the message now. You can go ahead and delete the image, it was used to illustrate the Conservapedia article, and has been replace with an updated screen-shot. I'll remember to mark any subsequent replaced pictures as {{speedy}}. Psygremlin (talk) 09:40, 27 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

As a matter of interest, why did you bother 'updating' the page. The format of the main page hasn't changed that I can detect and at least the old one had a picture on it. Dmcq (talk) 16:27, 15 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Well, that page was almost 8 months old. Also it's interesting to see what CP is currently talking about - especially things like the "featured article" on the main page. --Psygremlin (talk) 17:26, 15 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Conservapedia mainpage Nov 24 2010.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

• I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
• I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
• If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
• To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
• If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 17:10, 15 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on File:Conservapedia main Page 15 Jun 2011.png requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a non-free file with a clearly invalid licensing tag; or it otherwise fails some part of the non-free content criteria. If you can find a valid tag that expresses why the file can be used under the fair use guidelines, please replace the current tag with that tag. If no such tag exists, please add the {{non-free fair use in|article name that the file is used in}} tag, along with a brief explanation of why this constitutes fair use of the file. If the file has been deleted, you can re-upload it, but please ensure you place the correct tag on it.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion," which appears inside of the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Psygremlin (talk) 08:51, 16 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Conservapedia main Page 16 Jun 2011.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 14:27, 28 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on File:Conservapedia main Page 3 Jul 2011.png requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is an unused redundant copy (all pixels the same or scaled down) of an image in the same file format, which is on Wikipedia (not on Commons), and all inward links have been updated.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion," which appears inside of the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Psygremlin (talk) 14:05, 10 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Do you really need to upload a new front page from Conservapedia every week? It is simply for illustrative purposes, the contents are not very relevant. All you seem to be doing is generating unnecessary work deleting old versions. Dmcq (talk) 14:15, 10 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Conservapedia main Page 10 Jul 2011.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Psygremlin (talk) 15:53, 18 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Conservapedia main Page 18 Nov 2011.png. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 17:07, 18 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Conservapedia main Page 18 Nov 2011.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

• I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions. If you have a question, place a {{helpme}} template, along with your question, beneath this message.
• I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
• If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
• To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
• If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:46, 21 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

What is the point of uploading new Conservapedia pages and putting people to the trouble of deleting the old ones? I can't see anything particular different about the layout or anything like that and the actual 'news' is not supposed to be of interest for this type image. Is there something of significance different in the latest image that I can't see? Dmcq (talk) 11:06, 26 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Conservapedia main Page 18 Nov 2011.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 05:55, 17 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Conservapedia main Page 24 Mar 2012.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:17, 23 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. When you recently edited E-Bay Queen is Dead, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page OMD (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:04, 20 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Conservapedia main Page 21 Jul 2012.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:23, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Conservapedia main Page 19 November 2012.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:39, 7 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Conservapedia main Page 19 November 2012.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Psygremlin (talk) 14:32, 7 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Baa, Baa, Black Sheep may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s and 1 "{}"s likely mistaking one for another. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• the line "one for the little boy who lives down the lane," in case it could be deemed sexist.<ref>{[cite news|title=Racial connotations over black sheep prompts changes to Baa Baa Black Sheep at
• black-sheep-at-victorian-kinders/story-fni0fit3-1227093091674?nk=c962b219e673e39f88fc16c7cc449edd}}</ref>

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 06:43, 20 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of centuries scored on One Day International cricket debut, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Benoni. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:03, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Conservapedia main Page 6 March 2013.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. —Matrix _{ping me}^{when u reply} (t? - c) 20:41, 11 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]