User talk:MkIc

AEW Double or Nothing Predictions. Casino Battle Royal:Drew Gulak or Luchasaurus Nyla Rose Cody Jon Moxley Private Party The Elite

Hello, I'm TheImaCow. I noticed that in this edit to List of WWE Champions, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. TheImaCow (talk) 11:09, 30 May 2020 (UTC

Hi,Yes you've made a mistake,but thats ok,cause everyone did mistakes😀

Hello. In your recent edit, which I have reverted, to List of Impact World Champions, you have added “Moose” after a table. I believe you are attempting to add Moose (wrestler) to the table. If so, please add the information to the table, not out of it. Thank you! – MonAll ^t·c 08:40, 4 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to A.J. Styles, even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. JTP ^{(talk • contribs)} 20:46, 19 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you are also User:Karabelas, you must WP:DECLARE the connection between these two accounts. JTP ^{(talk • contribs)} 20:48, 19 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. HHH Pedrigree (talk) 09:13, 24 July 2020 (UTC) Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. --HHH Pedrigree (talk) 17:43, 24 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The In wrestling section was removed two years ago. Don't include it --HHH Pedrigree (talk) 19:41, 24 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Oh Sorry,i thougt it'd like the Professional Wrestling Style Scetion MkIc (talk) 21:36, 24 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia. TheDeviantPro (talk) 00:42, 7 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Materialscientist (talk) 06:09, 8 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Constructive contributions are appreciated and strongly encouraged, but your recent edit to the userpage of another user may be considered vandalism. Specifically, your edit to User:Hansen Sebastian may be offensive or unwelcome. In general, it is considered polite to avoid substantially editing others' userpages without their permission. Instead, please bring the matter to their talk page and let them edit their user page themselves if they agree on a need to do so. Please refer to Wikipedia:User page for more information on User page etiquette. Thank you. Chris Troutman (talk) 13:16, 13 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as User:UBX/schoolover, to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Chris Troutman (talk) 13:18, 13 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of NXT Champions, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Keith Lee. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:24, 21 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I have seen you created some style and persona sections for wrestlers like Okada and Naito, but there are several problems. One, I don't know why you are usin italics, use regular font. Second, it's unsourced, you need sources to create ther section. Understand that the section is to explain no-wrestling fans the character and moves, not just a list of moves and nicknames. If you want, there are several articles in the project you can read, like CM Punk, Dr Britt Baker or Bray Wyatt. --HHH Pedrigree (talk) 09:28, 30 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Despite Pedrigree's comment and my reverts, you still continue to add unsourced style and persona sections to articles. This kind of editing got you blocked, a month ago, MkIc and it seems you still don't grasp the understanding the need to providing sources on Wikipedia. The burden is on you to demonstrate verifiability by adding reliable sources to these sections you keep adding. Unless you have reliable sources then I suggest you stop re-adding these sections in, you're being disruptive. TheDeviantPro (talk) 02:09, 1 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Seriously,youre acting like a crybaby MkIc (talk) 14:44, 5 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Douki(Wrestler) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://puroresusystem.fandom.com/wiki/DOUKI. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. S Philbrick(Talk) 12:00, 5 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello MkIc,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Douki(wrestler) for deletion, because it seems to be promotional, rather than an encyclopedia article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Aaqib Anjum Aafī (^talk) 13:47, 5 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Karl Fredericks, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. John B123 (talk) 19:26, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Miro(wrestler). The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 September 12#Miro(wrestler) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. JavaHurricane 10:29, 12 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Karl Fredericks and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Karl Fredericks, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 11:32, 12 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, MkIc! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! KylieTastic (talk) 11:32, 12 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Do you call me new Editor? MkIc (talk) 09:04, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Team FTW, appears to be incomplete and needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. JTP ^{(talk • contribs)} 21:55, 12 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DannyS712 was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Please do not just resubmit this draft without addressing the issue raised, as done in Special:Diff/978021568.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Karl Fredericks and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Karl Fredericks, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DannyS712 (talk) 03:11, 14 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by KylieTastic were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Pointless resubmit - still no sources

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Karl Fredericks and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Karl Fredericks, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 13:30, 14 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please, don't include the table again. The RAW Underground segments are wrestling matches. WWE billed them as shootfights, but aren't legir fights. Still the good old wrestling matches. --HHH Pedrigree (talk) 17:06, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Piledriver (professional wrestling), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kazarian.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:27, 24 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Devonian Wombat was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Team FTW and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Team FTW, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Devonian Wombat (talk) 08:57, 29 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. It's not the first time. That's not how we handle that section. I gave several examples of proper sections. --HHH Pedrigree (talk) 17:47, 30 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not introduce links in actual articles to draft articles, as you did to Young Lion Cup. Since a draft is not yet ready for the main article space, it is not in shape for ordinary readers, and links from articles should not go to a draft. Such links are contrary to the Manual of Style. These links have been removed. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 08:44, 3 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please, read WP:EASTEREGG. It's not the first time you made this edition [1] --HHH Pedrigree (talk) 14:51, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:57, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, MkIc. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Team FTW".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. ƏXPLICIT 13:49, 29 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello can you explain why you reverted my edit at List of Ninjago episodes? The claim made was unsourced and no evidence for the change has been provided. Do you have a reliable source for this change? If not then it must be reverted. And you didn't provide an edit summary to explain. Fieryninja (talk) 16:18, 17 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

OK I have found the source. You could have just added it. Fieryninja (talk) 16:45, 17 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, MkIc. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Karl Fredericks, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:02, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, MkIc. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Karl Fredericks".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 15:58, 25 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:54, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Facu-el Millo. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Marvel Cinematic Universe, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. —El Millo (talk) 21:22, 29 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Spider-Man: No Way Home, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. —El Millo (talk) 22:18, 5 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I did, look at my resource MkIc (talk) 06:21, 6 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The source isn't reliable. —El Millo (talk) 06:30, 6 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:47, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]