User talk:Materialscientist

This user is busy in real life and may not respond swiftly to queries.

You might be able to help us out here. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 13:33, 3 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

June 21 (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) June 22 (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) June 28 (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) October 6 (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) Those pages have been semi-protected more than a year ago, two of which were by you, with an indefinite expiration time. Can their settings be downgraded to indefinite WP:PCPP from now onwards and let's see how things go?197.19.166.10 (talk) 14:05, 3 July 2025 (UTC) NB: Whatever you do, please don't modify the move-protection settings.[reply]

	The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
	Thanks for all your help combatting that spammer just now. Gommeh 🎮 15:46, 3 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I’d like to respectfully clarify the rationale behind the faceless depiction of Abbas ibn Ali in the removed artwork. The image was intentionally designed without eyes or detailed facial features to align with Shia Islamic visual ethics, which generally discourage fully illustrating the faces of sacred figures—especially members of the Ahl al-Bayt. The artist, Muntadher Saleh (a Shia polymath and visual artist), follows this tradition, using symbolism over realism. The absence of facial details is not a flaw but a deliberate choice to reflect spiritual transcendence, inviting viewers to connect with the divine virtues Abbas represents—loyalty, courage, and sacrifice—rather than his physical traits. This style is commonly used in respectful religious art within Shia communities. It avoids anthropomorphizing revered figures while still honoring their memory. In this context, the facelessness is what adds reverence, not ambiguity. Therefore, I kindly suggest that the image be reconsidered for inclusion. It is culturally and religiously appropriate, and it adds a valuable visual and interpretive dimension to the article, especially from the Shia perspective. Thank you for your consideration. 004bvan (talk) 06:03, 5 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Farhan Ul Arshad Zona2 (talk) 08:30, 5 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Coming from this, they restored their unsourced version and added similar in other articles. I've reverted one of their edits, POV-change of source quote [1]. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 13:02, 5 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 You are invited to join the discussion at WP:Requests for page protection/Decrease§ Angry Birds Fight!. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 16:51, 6 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I doubt you intended to indef template protect here. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 16:51, 6 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I reverted a no doubt COI vandalism attempt to your last edit. The IP is from AZ, so again likely it's vengeful wife. 2A00:F3C:1234:0:1D92:BDDE:C120:8258 (talk) 04:13, 7 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for protecting the FBG Duck page, if you could also protect the talk page (is that possible or wanted?) because it is now getting the same treatment as the original page. It is less critical I suppose. Cheers, have a good week. Moritoriko (talk) 07:22, 7 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! Moritoriko (talk) 08:24, 7 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Read: https://www.iwm.org.uk/collections/item/object/30035979

The US M9A1 rocket launcher is an example of the weapon type commonly known as the 'B'azooka'. The name was taken from a homemade musical instrument played by American comedian Bob Burns, which an experimental model of the launcher was said to resemble. The first 'B'azooka' to be adopted by the US Army was the M1, which entered service in 1942. The M9A1 is a later development with a two piece tube that permitted disassembly for ease of transportation. In common with German rocket-propelled anti-tank munitions, the 'Bazooka' employed hollow-charge warheads. Hollow charge munitions rely upon the generation of a jet of molten metal to penetrate their target. Their performance is therefore unaffected by range or velocity and they can be relatively light in weight. The M9A1 had a maximum range of 640m, and its rocket propelled munition could penetrate 120mm of armour.

It is NOT about instrument, it is NIT about colloquial "bazooka" as any handheld rocket launcher neither. 94.246.147.217 (talk) 17:09, 7 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia uses its own conventions. See MOS:CAPS. Materialscientist (talk) 17:13, 7 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

So why is there Challenger tank and not "challenger"? And any and evey other capitalized weapon name, including the German improved Bazooka copy Panzerschreck? 94.246.147.217 (talk) 17:16, 7 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Because those are particular models rather than a collective term. Hence bazooka, but M20 Super Bazooka. Materialscientist (talk) 17:19, 7 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The Bazooka is the M1 and the M9A1 (improved Bazooka), the Super Bazooka is M20 (very different model, incompatible). Just like I linked you, I even quoted for you, still still didn't read. 94.246.147.217 (talk)

Here you have another example: https://www.pacificwarmuseum.org/visit/exhibits/artifacts/m9a1-bazooka 94.246.147.217 (talk) 17:31, 7 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Might make sense to look at Xada23 in the CU context of Liamalexander444 (see Talk:Poodle). Thanks and let me know if there's an SPI or if I should handle it different in future. Skynxnex (talk) 20:59, 8 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Seconded. Sopochil (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) is also related and has created a draft page (although it has no content) Traumnovelle (talk) 22:35, 10 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Dear user @Materialscientist, please have a look at the edit history of page named Anangpur, unlogged ip addresses are again and again doing unconstructive changes there, so i think this page must be locked for some time. Thank you HistorianAlferedo (talk) 17:51, 11 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You reverted my changes for the post Charles Eymundson. I am his granddaughter and have significant information and insight about this gentleman. I donated the families photos that were taken during his lifetime and my father's lifetime to the Provincial Archives of Alberta. These photos were not necessarily taken by Charles Eymundson and he was not "known" for photography as they were not released until 2012, after my father Romeo passed away. Charles worked for the Eau Claire lumber Company,(per Charles), but Charles, nor the PAA State that he was a lumberjack. I have not found any documentation to support this, however, in and it is not cited correctly on Wikepedia. Who ever uploaded the original, made assumptions. If you can cite the "lumberjack" job please and the citation to the article. If you read the biographical sketch and custodial history on the Provincial Archives of Alberta, that I wrote, you will understand that I did, cite the PAA Hermis. I would appreciate you re-posting the changes I made. If you require more information, please feel free to engage in a conversation with me. Skalar1872 (talk) 20:25, 12 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Are you having much trouble with Huggle? You appear to use Huggle extensively. I am having a fair number of issues with it. I left a message on wt:Huggle/Feedback#When will 3.4.14 be released?, but never got a response from the coders. Others have left similar messages. Any suggestions? Cheers Adakiko (talk) 21:10, 14 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, can you please consider blocking user 213.7.203.250 (talk · contribs) as they are pesistently changing referenced dates to false dates as shown here diff which contradicts the referenced date. They have ignored a final warning, regards Atlantic306 (talk) 21:04, 15 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

103.165.73.96 (talk · contribs · WHOIS)

Can you proxy block this IP address, similar to your block of 103.167.213.100 (talk · contribs · WHOIS). Thanks. 71.59.186.230 (talk) 05:42, 17 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

(talk page stalker) Looks like Lofty abyss did it. LilianaUwU ^{(talk / contributions)} 06:44, 17 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

For obvious reasons, I believe that the creation of SundostundBots (talk · contribs) was directly inspired by my username, and I don't like that at all. I'm never happy when someone mocks me, especially when it comes to my username, status and work here. That particularly applies to newly-created accounts, obviously used for disruptive editing only. — Sundostund mppria ^{(talk / contribs)} 20:34, 21 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Materialscientist. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

Thanks
Daniel (talk) 22:16, 22 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, hope its okay to DM for this but 62.4.36.182 (talk · contribs · WHOIS) is back after their block expired. Pelmeen10 (talk) 18:08, 24 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Boron nitride has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 19:01, 24 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, can you please unprotect the page as it's no longer necessary? Thanks, cheers. Thepharoah17 (talk) 19:39, 29 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Septiafni, Kiki; Pamudji, Raden; Rusmawardiana, R; Argentina, Fifa. Tuberculosis Verrucous Cutis Mimicking Chromoblastomycosis: a Case Report and Diagnostic Challenges. International Journal of Mycobacteriology 11(2):p 208-210, Apr–Jun 2022. | DOI: 10.4103/ijmy.ijmy_57_22

TBVC is caused by Mycobacterium Tuberculosis. It is the one of the rarest forms of skin infection caused by M. tuberculosis.

There are few case reports of the causative organism being M. avium complex or other species in the same genus. I prefer not to include them as causative organism of TBVC, since it's a rare cause for a rare disease. In clinical practice, diagnosis of TBVC requires ruling out so many other conditions. 117.193.149.241 (talk) 06:44, 1 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Wikipedia Administrators and Editors,

I hope this message finds you well.

I am reaching out in regard to a recent edit I made to the Wikipedia page about the Gedo region in Somalia. I changed the classification of Gedo from being a regional administrative division under Jubaland to a federal member state in formation. This edit was reverted, and I would like to respectfully appeal that decision by providing further context and justification based on recent political and administrative developments within Somalia.

### Background:

Gedo, while historically recognized as one of the regions within Jubaland, is currently at the center of a significant political realignment in Somalia. The Federal Government of Somalia (FGS) has, in recent months, asserted direct administrative and military control over the region, particularly in the town of Beled-Xaawo. This move follows ongoing disputes between the federal authorities and the Jubaland administration regarding the legitimacy and governance of Gedo.

As of recent reports (mid-2025), the Somali federal government has:

- Dispatched federal security forces to Gedo, particularly Beled-Xaawo, removing regional Jubaland forces.

- Appointed new federal-level officials, including a regional NISA commander, without coordination with Jubaland.

- Publicly stated, through government channels and allied media, that it does not recognize Jubaland’s claim over Gedo.

- Actively explored the possibility of formalizing Gedo as a federal member state in its own right, in line with growing regional demands and the political climate.

### Why the Edit is Justified:

My edit reflects the **ongoing political transition** and current **factual control** of Gedo by the federal government. The status of Gedo as a "region under Jubaland" is no longer uncontested, and therefore the Wikipedia entry should reflect the **disputed and dynamic reality** rather than present it as a settled matter.

This change was not made as an act of personal opinion or original research, but rather based on:

- Official statements from the Federal Government of Somalia.

- Reliable news coverage from Somali media and international sources.

- Direct military and administrative actions by the Somali government on the ground.

I would be happy to provide citations and references from credible sources to support this update, including:

1. [Caasimada.net - Federal Government explores new Gedo strategy](https://www.caasimada.net/xog-df-oo-kala-dooraneysa-3-tallaabo-oo-kiiska-jubaland-ay-ku-wajihi-karto)

2. [Goobjooge.net - Federal forces take control of Beled-Xaawo](https://www.goobjooge.net/wararkii-ugu-danbeeyay-ee-gedo-c-rashiid-janan-oo-ka-laabtay-beled-xaawo-ciidamada-dowladda-oo-la-wareegay)

3. [Shabelle Media - Fighting erupts in Beled-Xaawo after NISA reshuffle](https://shabellemedia.com/dagaal-culus-oo-ka-dhacay-beled-xaawo-kadib-markii-la-keenay-taliyaha-cusub-ee-nisa-gedo)

### Request:

I respectfully request that the Wikipedia page on Gedo be updated to reflect the **current political status and federal presence**, acknowledging that Gedo is a **disputed region** and currently under **direct federal administration**, with **active efforts to establish it as a federal member state**.

Please advise me on any format requirements or additional references you may need to validate this change. I am committed to ensuring that the information on Wikipedia remains neutral, verifiable, and in line with Wikipedia's core content policies.

Thank you very much for your time and understanding.

Sincerely, Xaliimo123 (talk) 11:31, 5 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello @Materialscientist,

Thank you for your message and for your attention to the edit I made regarding the Gedo region.

I understand and respect Wikipedia’s policy on avoiding original research. Please note, however, that the changes I made were not based on personal opinion or unsourced speculation. They reflect a current and well-documented political reality in Somalia, where the Federal Government has publicly declared and enforced administrative control over the Gedo region, particularly in Beled-Xaawo, and has explicitly distanced itself from recognizing Jubaland’s authority over the area.

To avoid misunderstanding, I am gathering a list of reliable sources that directly address this federal position and the evolving status of Gedo. These include government statements and widely cited news outlets within Somalia. For example:

- [Caasimada.net – Federal Government exploring new Gedo administration strategy](https://www.caasimada.net/xog-df-oo-kala-dooraneysa-3-tallaabo-oo-kiiska-jubaland-ay-ku-wajihi-karto) - [Goobjooge.net – Federal forces take control of Beled-Xaawo](https://www.goobjooge.net/wararkii-ugu-danbeeyay-ee-gedo-c-rashiid-janan-oo-ka-laabtay-beled-xaawo-ciidamada-dowladda-oo-la-wareegay) - [Shabelle Media – Fighting after NISA reshuffle in Gedo](https://shabellemedia.com/dagaal-culus-oo-ka-dhacay-beled-xaawo-kadib-markii-la-keenay-taliyaha-cusub-ee-nisa-gedo)

These articles reflect concrete actions by the federal government and a shift in administrative control that should be acknowledged in the Gedo article, at minimum in a “Controversy” or “Dispute” section if full status change is not yet accepted.

I will revise the content to better reflect these sources and avoid synthesis or speculative language. I appreciate your guidance and remain committed to contributing constructively to Wikipedia.

Best regards,

Xaliimo123 (talk) 12:36, 5 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Wikipedia Administrator,

I hope this message finds you well.

I am writing to respectfully appeal the reversion of my recent edits to the Gedo Region Wikipedia article, which were reverted on the grounds of containing “original research.” I understand and fully respect Wikipedia’s policies on verifiability and the prohibition of unpublished material.

However, I would like to clarify that my edits were based entirely on recent, verifiable, and reliable sources from July and August 2025, reflecting the ongoing political and military developments in the Gedo region—specifically the federal government’s control of Beled-Xaawo and related clashes with Jubbaland forces.

To ensure compliance with Wikipedia’s sourcing standards, I have included multiple citations from reputable media outlets that document the following:

The arrival of federal government-appointed security commanders in Beled-Xaawo.

Armed conflict between federal and Jubbaland-aligned forces.

Statements from the Somali federal cabinet confirming federal military presence in Gedo.

Confirmation of control shifts in Beled-Xaawo and the political significance of these actions.

Below are a few reliable sources supporting the edits:

1. Hiiraan Online (31 July 2025) – Somali Cabinet praises federal troops in Gedo region Link

2. AllAfrica / Shabelle Media (22 July 2025) – Heavy fighting erupts in Beled-Xaawo Link

3. Mustaqbal Media (31 July 2025) – Federal forces take control of Beled-Xaawo Link

4. Hiiraan Online (28 July 2025) – Clashes erupt in Gedo amid federal–Jubbaland struggle Link

These articles explicitly verify the claims made in the updated version of the Gedo article, particularly the shift in administrative and security control over Beled-Xaawo, a topic highly relevant to the article’s subject matter.

I respectfully request a review of the reversion and reconsideration of the content based on the verified sources provided above. I am also happy to revise any language or formatting issues to align with Wikipedia standards.

Thank you for your time and consideration.

Kind regards, (Full Direct Links – July & August 2025):

1. Hiiraan Online (31 July 2025) 📰 "Somali cabinet praises federal troops in Gedo region amid clashes with Jubbaland forces" 🔗 https://hiiraan.com/news4/2025/July/202400/somali_cabinet_praises_federal_troops_in_gedo_region_amid_clashes_with_jubbaland_forces.aspx

2. AllAfrica / Shabelle Media (22 July 2025) 📰 "Heavy fighting erupts in Beled-Hawo between Somali govt forces and Jubbaland troops" 🔗 https://allafrica.com/stories/202507220507.html

3. Mustaqbal Media (31 July 2025) 📰 "Federal government forces take control of Beled-Hawo after fierce clashes with Jubaland troops" 🔗 https://mustaqbalmedia.net/en/federal-government-forces-take-control-of-beled-hawo-after-fierce-clashes-with-jubaland-troops

4. Hiiraan Online (28 July 2025) 📰 "Clashes erupt in Somalia's Gedo region amid federal–Jubbaland power struggle" 🔗 https://hiiraan.com/news4/2025/July/202355/clashes_erupt_in_somalia_s_gedo_region_amid_federal_jubbaland_power_struggle.aspx

Xaliimo123 (talk) 12:44, 5 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

[2] @PhilKnight: You seemed to block an older account of User:Mushy Yank, but you did not take any action for their two other accounts User:Tchèque Point and User:Dolesbang [3]. I mean I interacted quite a bit with Mushy on their talk page and am confused similar to Liz. I can vouch that they do good edits (meaning that only their latest account shouldn't be blocked like PhilKnight said).

P. S. Not sure where your talk page archives are located. DareshMohan (talk) 18:18, 5 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@DareshMohan: - I have blocked the two accounts to enforce the 1 account restriction on Eva_UX. PhilKnight (talk) 22:18, 5 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I see you blocked 1.39.21.10. It's almost surely Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Dismant39, and they've been abusing a lot of 1.39.{16,18,21}.* over the past few months. Time for a rangeblock? DMacks (talk) 10:27, 6 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Yes. Blocked /16 for 60 hours. It is tricky to block for longer due to collateral. Materialscientist (talk) 10:30, 6 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You've got better goggles than I do:) DMacks (talk) 12:00, 6 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

i tired hard to mention the reference but I couldn't. Javedalibinsajid (talk) 14:51, 8 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

(talk page watcher) @Javedalibinsajid: Please review Help:Referencing for beginners. Cheers, - FlightTime (open channel) 14:53, 8 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Materialscientist, I hope you're doing well. I'm got a notification that a previous draft for "Lokafy" was deleted by you back in June 2021 for being too promotional. I'd like to try creating a new page for it, and I want to make sure I'm doing it right this time. Would you be able to give me some insight into what the issues were with the last draft, so I can avoid making the same mistakes? Any advice you have would be a huge help. Thank you for your time!

ByChi (talk) 14:01, 15 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

From the edit history, it was created by somebody (you I presume), using an account with the same name as the draft implying you are creating an advert and quite possibly work for the company. If that's true, you need to read WP:PAID first. MarcGarver (talk) 14:11, 20 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Why did you protect the page? It has improper sourcing. Is it forbidden to improve? Sources should be independent and not someons Cv. 27.170.83.211 (talk) 11:04, 17 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure what beef this IP hopper has with the Ammar Siamwalla article, but they very much appear to be WP:NOTHERE, and intent only on disruptively removing content. Apparently they've also made a lot of edits to several Indian diaspora articles (e.g. Chindians, Indians in Japan, Indians in Korea, Indians in Thailand), but though almost all of the edits were removal of content, on the surface the edit summaries seemed reasonable. Given their behaviour in the Ammar article, though, perhaps further scrutiny is needed on their edits. --Paul_012 (talk) 14:44, 18 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I suspect the article was rewritten by AI since one reference is about a different person with same surname, one who is a music artist. Namely reference two. I suggest it should promptly be adjusted. 59.5.2.234 (talk) 10:02, 23 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Apparently it appears that their contributions have some overlap with 58.99.101.165, which you ranged-blocked earlier. I've started an ANI thread, FYI since you have pings disabled. --Paul_012 (talk) 19:16, 8 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I was looking at the edit hsitory and saw someone had added mentions of important pieces of the band's history and also included some collaborations they did, why I do undertsand removing stuff about that one song they mentioned, most of the info there should be available to the public instead of one small subreddit. 2600:1007:A012:5FA0:C0BD:8FEB:7412:F89 (talk) 21:08, 20 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The article Pete Fejeran has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:SPORTSCRIT and WP:NOLY.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. LibStar (talk) 00:34, 21 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Any objections to me unblocking Hugo Land? See User talk:Hugo Land. --Yamla (talk) 09:29, 21 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

No objections. Cheers. Materialscientist (talk) 12:08, 21 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! --Yamla (talk) 12:18, 21 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I saw that you reverted some of the edits done in the Kevin Mwachiro, see the diff. I believe this must have been a mistake, as the edits you reverted fixed the format of many of the references on the page. Therefore, I restored the version with the proper format for the references. Good day! Nacaru 14:39, 21 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, mistake, thanks for reverting me. Materialscientist (talk) 14:40, 21 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't get it a bit. Would you like to see examples from Russian literature of the use of the expression "Kamchatka"? 95.25.19.129 (talk) 10:18, 22 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I know them myself. The issue is to establish widespread use rather than occasional mentioning. WP:Secondary sources are needed for that. Materialscientist (talk) 10:40, 22 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Again, I don't quite understand. If you know about Kamchatka at school, then you are Russian. English-speaking people cannot know this. Isn't it? But the English wiki encyclopedia is written for them, not for Russian-speaking people. 95.25.19.129 (talk) 10:50, 22 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

They surely can, but this is not the issue. See my previous message. Materialscientist (talk) 10:56, 22 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Kamchatka will not lose much if English-speaking people do not find out this interesting fact about it. 95.25.19.129 (talk) 11:16, 22 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi MS, please check your email. Thanks, HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 20:37, 24 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Would you be able to change the block of the above IP to a proxy block? IPCheck analysis here Aydoh8^{[what have I done now?]} 14:26, 27 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Done, thanks. Materialscientist (talk) 15:07, 27 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The proxy-blocked IP 218.250.114.83 (u t c m l) appears to be block-evading from several IP addresses on the 218.250.0.0/16 (u t c m l)-range, especially 218.250.200.1 (u t c m l). Concurrently, they are soking from the 124.217.188.00/24 (u t c m l)-range, and have also edited from 112.120.27.139 (u t c m l). All these IPs geo-locate to Hong Kong. They edit almost exclusively in a handful of articles in the area of the 2024 and 2025 Pacific typhoon seasons, where they repeatedly change date formats and spelling against consensus.

Sam Sailor 19:45, 29 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

2025-08-22 in 2025 Pacific typhoon season: changes the direct link National Center for Hydro-Meteorological Forecasting to the British spelling redirect National Centre for Hydro-Meteorological Forecasting. (diff) One may think it isn't right to change the spelling of word "center/re" in the name of the NCHMF; but please take a look at the header banner at https://nchmf.gov.vn/KttvsiteE/en-US/2/index.html. The same is true for https://mod.gov.vn/en, for the spelling of "defense/ce" in the name of the ministry. Apparently Sam Sailor has presumed non-registered editors are always wrong and making wrong edits. 218.250.200.1 (talk) 21:03, 29 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

And no I don't edit behind any proxy. And I edit only from IP addresses from the same ISP. The IP addresses are randomly assigned by the ISP which are reassigned randomly from time to time. I'm not aware of other users who may have edits in similar areas - except for the only instance that I was tagged at a talk page. 218.250.200.1 (talk) 21:04, 29 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The same editor continues the disruption on

• 116.48.91.116 (u t c m l)

  2025-09-03: diff (DMY), diff (DMY, fake undo edit summary)

  2025-09-04: diff (DMY, UBE), diff (DMY), diff (UBE)

  2025-09-05: diff (DMY)

Sam Sailor 06:08, 5 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

dear material scientists I would like to discuss the Albanian people’s army pages that it does not reflect the full strength of the Albanian people’s army at that time for example in 1991 it was listed to have 48000 active troops However through some very extensive research I found out that the number should be around 61 000 and not to mention that article also does not state that the Albanians also produced the TIP 57 a Albanian copy of the Chinese copy of the RPG 7 and does not mention that Albania produced the Dshk M Unitedred star (talk) 01:19, 30 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I am just writing to ensure that if I make an edit I don’t get banned Unitedred star (talk) 01:20, 30 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I hope you get back to me as soon as possible thank you so much Unitedred star (talk) 01:24, 30 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

There is a mistake on this page regarding the death of Sibnath Banerjee. As a historian, I research about trade union leaders in colonial Calcutta and I noticed that you posted that Sibnath Banerjee died in 1937. This can't be true. He was alive for sure during the Calcutta Corporation Employees' strike in 1945. In the 1940s he was also a member of the Bengal Legislative Assembly. If you want I can forward you some documents attesting these. 203.115.108.70 (talk) 07:41, 1 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

See [4] vs [5], and [6]. Since this is a generic {{checkuserblock-account}} with no linked master, I'm putting this here. Thanks! Children Will Listen (🐄 talk, 🫘 contribs) 23:41, 2 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Other checkusers used the same generic summary - it is a prolific sock and I don't know the master. Blocked, thanks. Materialscientist (talk) 09:16, 3 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

It's apparently Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Prince Of Roblox. Children Will Listen (🐄 talk, 🫘 contribs) 23:40, 3 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You appear to be one of the top editors listed for the Wikipedia Photography article. I've recently looked at the B&W and Monochrome articles for Wikipedia and they did not look very well maintained. It seems that the Photography article also has multiple issues; do you have any interest or ideas for how to improve it or make it better. For example, I'm finding that the lede at Photography does not even match the article; it seems to end with a mention of the digital impact, which covers only about half the article. Any thought? ErnestKrause (talk) 19:06, 4 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed that you blocked Shigeon12 but didnt link to any sockmaster, instead using the generic {{checkuserblock-account}}. I suspect that Adrian7790, Sugionaldo7, Greeners27, and Rakabuming Rakatokan may be socks, as all of them show the same editing interest on Persebaya Surabaya-related articles, with their edits limited only to that topic. Notably, Greeners27 was just created today and his first edit was to block my PROD on an article created by Shigeon12. How should I proceed to file an SPI in this case? Ckfasdf (talk) 14:31, 6 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

See Category:Wikipedia_sockpuppets_of_Shigeon12. Cheers. Materialscientist (talk) 16:52, 6 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry to ask again, but I just noticed a pattern in the editing behavior. Given the recent focus on Indonesian soccer–related articles, I suspect that Shigeon12 may be another sock of Jellywings19. Could you please look it up, and if confirmed, we can link all of the above socks to Jellywings19. Thank you. Ckfasdf (talk) 17:10, 12 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect Acta Orthopaedica has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 September 12 § Acta Orthopaedica until a consensus is reached. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 13:51, 12 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]