User talk:Mattximus

Archives

1, 2, 3, 4

Congratulations, Mattximus! The list you nominated, Municipalities of Tabasco, has been promoted to featured status, recognizing it as one of the best lists on Wikipedia. The nomination discussion has been archived.

This is a rare accomplishment and you should be proud. If you would like, you may nominate it to appear on the Main page as Today's featured list. Keep up the great work! Cheers, PresN (talk) via FACBot (talk) 12:25, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Matxximus. I'm a great fan of your work on lists of municipalities of places all over the world. I was wondering if maybe you could help me improve the lists for Spanish provinces. I've seen already that you put some work into the List of municipalities in Albacete, for instance. The population for each municipality is updated every year on the Nomenclátor: Población del Padrón Continuo and is then uploaded to Wikidata. If there were to be a template similar to this here on the English Wikipedia, then we would get rid of a significant amount of work when it comes to keep the list updated. Furthermore, specific links can be created as references for each municipality (this for the first on the list, Abengibre) and then we would only need to update the date on the header. (See this, with the updated population and the specific reference.) Let me know your thoughts, please. Thanks in advance! Alavense (talk) 07:04, 22 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello User:Alavense! I'm happy to take a look, I am busy for this week but should be free next week. For the main municipality lists I always encourage official censuses results, and the trend between them (I believe Spain does one every 10 years?), estimates could go in individual municipality pages. But this is just my opinion. It would make it easier to pass featured list nomination if that is of interest to you. Official census results are more "encyclopedic" than estimates, which are usually only used if there are no official census data. Would you like to collaborate on Albacete? Mattximus (talk) 23:39, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'd love to collaborate on this, for sure. It would be nice if we could set the standard for these kinds of lists for Spain and then replicate it for other provinces once the province of Albacete is done. I agree with you that it's better to use censuses, given that it would be a bit weird to compare census data to padrón data. From what I gather from this, the census was carried out every ten years, but it has now become an annual thing. Which year should we include in the first column? 2021 or 2023? There are also flags, coats of arms and even maps for each municipality. Should we add columns for that or is it a bit too much? You'll let me know. Thank you very much, Alavense (talk) 06:50, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Alavense: Yes creating a really good first list makes a nice standard from which to copy quite easily. I like what you have done to the List of municipalities in Albacete, the whole page looks great. In a few days I can make some suggestions to the explanatory paragraph that I know will come up in the featured list nomination. I actually think the table looks great as is (although last three rows are not complete yet), I would save the mini-maps and flags for the actual municipal page. This list is a nice portal to all the individual pages where we can go into more details. I think I need to research the census situation, does Spain actually do a full count every year? That seems hard to believe, but if it's true we should use the most up-to-date census data. If it's just estimates or partial censuses, then sticking with the 2021 would give a nice reliable overview of how the population is changing. I'm looking forward to some collaboration and maybe co-nominating for featured list? Mattximus (talk) 02:13, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello User:Alavense! Having looked it up, I think we should use the latest annual census data for the first column, and the decennial census for the second column for comparison purposes, with the caveat that they be at least 5 years apart to show a reasonable trend. So 2023 and 2011 seems like a good combination that you have already, but is the 2023 the annual census or is it just an estimate? I think once we get the 2026 data, we can safely remove the 2011 census column and replace with 2021 census. Do you agree? I will start on rewording the lead to make it specific to this province, but the template can be adjusted for other provinces. I've added a few citation needed tags that will be needed, and there are a few sentences that are not clear (what is pooled together mean?). Let me know what you think! Mattximus (talk) 16:44, 26 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with that. From what I've read, the census is now carried out on an annual basis, so if you give me the go ahead, I'll replace the padrón information (which follows different methods and thus gets slightly different results) with the one provided by the most recent census (2023). Regarding the text, I didn't write any of it, it was already there when I started to work on the table. Maybe we could give it a bath so that it has some meaningful information about how municipalities work in Spain and also some stats about the municipalities in each province (Albacete in this case). We'd also need to find sources to support the info about comarcas, but it can sometimes be a bit shady. Cheers! Alavense (talk) 19:07, 26 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sounds good Alavense, replacing the estimates with most recent census makes a lot of sense. Doing that, and completing of the last three rows would complete the table, with just the lead to work on. I did a first pass, and there seems to be good info/sources in Municipalities of Spain. I will try to work more on the lead over the next few days. But once we get the table sorted we can work on other tables for the other provinces if you like. We can only nominate one list at a time in the featured list nomination anyway. It would be ideal, but not necessary for that municipalities map to be labelled somehow, but with so many municipalities I don't know how that could be done. Mattximus (talk) 19:15, 26 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Awesome! I will do that tomorrow and maybe we can also mention in the prose something about how the census is now carried out annually. I will let you know when it's done. Thank you very much! Alavense (talk) 19:27, 26 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I've now updated the population for every municipality. We should decide which sources we are going to use for the land area of both the autonomous community and Spain itself. And I'm still not sure which source would be suitable for the comarcas, but I'll keep searching for one. Kind regards, Alavense (talk) 07:19, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi :) Do you think we could have a look at this? Kind regards! Alavense (talk) 13:52, 12 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Would love to! I'm done my work in 1 week and can look into it then. Mattximus (talk) 21:28, 13 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Awesome! Thank you very much. Alavense (talk) 07:08, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, Mattximus. Hope everything is going fine. I've given the prose a bath and everything is now supported by sources in List of municipalities in Albacete. It would be great if you could have a look at it and correct anything that is wrong with my English, though. I would also like to get your thoughts on these:

• I'd happily scrap the column with the comarcas. I haven't been able to find a source which supports which comarca each municipality belongs to. I don't think it's that important, either.
• I don't particularly like the source which has been used to support the land area for each municipality. I've been told that either the Nomenclátor Geográfico de Municipios y Entidades de Población by the Centro Nacional de Información Geográfica or this by Eurostat would be nice.
• I'm also unsure about the title of the list, although I see it is the way it's been done with all the provinces. As you can see in the Spanish list, when the province has the same name as the capital city (and that's the case for most of the provinces), it's common to refer to the city by its name and to the province as "province of X". Do you reckon we should discuss renaming these lists? It's also the way it's done in Commons.

Let me know if there's anything else I should do. Thank you very much in advance, Alavense (talk) 08:51, 11 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Alavense this is excellent work. I made a few minor tweaks.

• Do comarca's have any role in municipal government? The wikipage for them says they do in some provinces, does that hold true here? If not yeah it can be deleted, but if it does have administrative function we should keep it.
• The source for land you have isn't bad at all, but yes the first one you mentioned would be better I would think. However I think both would pass featured list as they are both government sources.
• I don't mind the name "List of municipalities in Albacete" as the city doesn't have municipalities so there is no confusion. I'm also open to shortening it to "Municipalities of Albacete", but for ease of editing I suggest leaving it as is, but if it comes up in featured list review we can change it then.
• One issue I see, is that you say "a law was passed" but need to say the name of the law.
• I think this is ready to go through featured list review! They will provide a lot of feedback on wording as the lead is still a bit convoluted but definitely fixable during the peer review. Did you want to nominate yourself or do a joint nomination? I'll support you either way. Mattximus (talk) 15:23, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much for your edits. So...:

• There are historical comarcas everywhere, but Castilla-La Mancha has not passed what's called a comarcalization law, so comarcas haven't got any administrative purposes there. Anyway, you could find diffent comarcas with different arrangements depending on the source. I'd be happy to scrap them. They are not mentioned in any of the lists of the other provinces in the autonomous community either. I'll get rid of them, then.
• I will amend the land area with the figures provided by the Centro Nacional de Información Geográfica.
• No problem with the title, then.
• The name of the law is "Ley 7/1985, de 2 de abril, Reguladora de las Bases del Régimen Local". How should I include that? Could you please help me with the wording?
• Regarding the nomination, I'd be very happy if you did it. It would be an honour to be a co-nominator alongside you. Let me amend those things and I'll let you know as soon as it's done.

Thanks a lot for your patience and your willingness to help me. :) Cheers! Alavense (talk) 15:46, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

All done. It's looking better now with a source we can use for every single municipality in Spain, no matter what the province is. As far as I know, we are only missing that bit about the name of the law that was passed. Alavense (talk) 16:33, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Alavense looks great! I'll do one final pass and we will co-nominate together. Once we get the first one done, the others will be quite a bit easier. I will aim to look at it tonight or tomorrow. Mattximus (talk) 17:56, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sure thing! I am looking forward to this first nomination. I'm sure the list will benefit from other points of view as well. I'm already working on another province and, as soon as we get the feedback for this one, I'll incorporate the improvements, so that we can keep moving forward. Thank you very much for your support. We'll keep in touch. Kind regards, Alavense (talk) 18:31, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations, Mattximus! The list you nominated, Municipalities of Nayarit, has been promoted to featured status, recognizing it as one of the best lists on Wikipedia. The nomination discussion has been archived.

This is a rare accomplishment and you should be proud. If you would like, you may nominate it to appear on the Main page as Today's featured list. Keep up the great work! Cheers, PresN (talk) via FACBot (talk) 00:25, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Mattximus, hope you're doing well! Please take a look at List of cities in Donetsk Oblast (and List of cities in Luhansk Oblast if you have the time) and let me know if my edits address your suggestions and if you're ready to support now. Thanks! Dan the Animator 02:45, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Mattximus. I've already updated the other four lists of municipalities in the autonomous community of Castilla-La Mancha. If the first nomination goes right, I'll only have to incorporate the text and the maps with the amendments and they will all be ready to undergo the process as well. Next week, I'll begin to work on the provinces of another autonomous community to try and keep it all going. I'll reach you for comments and suggestions as soon as another list is ready. Thanks in advance! Alavense (talk) 16:50, 19 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations, Mattximus! The list you nominated, List of municipalities in Albacete, has been promoted to featured status, recognizing it as one of the best lists on Wikipedia. The nomination discussion has been archived.

This is a rare accomplishment and you should be proud. If you would like, you may nominate it to appear on the Main page as Today's featured list. Keep up the great work! Cheers, Giants2008 (talk) via FACBot (talk) 00:26, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, Mattximus, I'm back. :) Toledo and Guadalajara are now ready for the nomination. Regarding land areas, the Centro Nacional de Información Geográfica provides information for every single municipality in Spain, so I went ahead and added all the areas in each province to get the aggregate. Kind regards, Alavense (talk) 06:46, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Alavense done! We can nominate the other one after we get a few supports from the first one, we don't have to wait for completion. Let me know which one you want to do next and we can have a few lined up. Mattximus (talk) 20:17, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

That's great. Thanks once again. You can see the progress here. Kind regards, Alavense (talk) 05:43, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Mattximus. Hope you are doing great. Álava-Araba has municipalities arranged by cuadrillas and in Gipuzkoa they are divided into comarcas. Do we need to say something about those in the prose? Or, given that the lists are about municipalities, is it enough to have them listed in the tables? Kind regards, Alavense (talk) 09:52, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

And I'm very happy to let you know that I'm already working on Brazil now as well! :) This is how Acre's table would look. I still need to find some references, but it's quite promising already. Kind regards, Alavense (talk) 08:16, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Alavense, that table from Brazil looks excellent, that's a perfect table format for Brazilian states. No changes suggested. I think we can get away with 2 nominations at a time, so as soon as our second one passes I can start with a fourth, I'm thinking List of municipalities in Cuenca? Thanks for all your work, it's looking very good. Mattximus (talk) 16:03, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Of course, Cuenca and Ciudad Real are both ready to go, and those two would seal the deal with Castilla-La Mancha. I also have some doubts regarding Álava-Araba and Gipuzkoa, where there are already comarcas: as I said above, do we need to state something about them in the text? I'd like to have your opinion on that. Anyway, Biscay, Álava and Gipuzkoa are also almost ready, so that would be another autonomous community done. It's all looking promising. :) In any case, I don't want to get many Spanish provinces ready - I don't want to get ahead of myself - because at some point in 2025 we'll get the 2024 census, so I want go get sure that we can get all the nominations going. I'd also like to do it in batches, so all the provinces in each autonomous community will have the population information dating from the same census. Regarding Brazil, I'll keep on working on those tables now that I know you are happy with them, but I'd also like to get a text ready as a template to then use for all of them. Do you think we could try to do that together as we did with Spain? Kind regards, Alavense (talk) 17:30, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations, Mattximus! The article you nominated, Heptamegacanthus, has been promoted to featured status, recognizing it as one of the best articles on Wikipedia. The nomination discussion has been archived.

This is a rare accomplishment and you should be proud. If you would like, you may nominate it to appear on the Main page as Today's featured article. Keep up the great work! Cheers, Gog the Mild (talk) via FACBot (talk) 00:06, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations, Mattximus! The list you nominated, List of municipalities in Guadalajara, has been promoted to featured status, recognizing it as one of the best lists on Wikipedia. The nomination discussion has been archived.

This is a rare accomplishment and you should be proud. If you would like, you may nominate it to appear on the Main page as Today's featured list. Keep up the great work! Cheers, Giants2008 (talk) via FACBot (talk) 00:26, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I saw your mentioning the need for demographics context, especially comparing to national data. The closest I've seen it done is with Canberra, but not with U.S. city articles. I checked with the Minneapolis FAR which does not talk about the need for demographics context (should this be brought up?). I'm asking because I don't know the extent such context is needed. Does every data point need context or only certain data points? Thanks. Pentawing^Talk 06:38, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry I will try to be more clear. Demographics sections can easily end up as just a string of meaningless numbers because context is erroneously assumed. This is bad practice. But not every single data point needs external context, internal can suffice. An example of internal that would be ok is: ratio of male to female anything. In this case you're comparing *within* the city so that is the context. No external context needed, but if it is indeed unusual that should be noted. But if you throw out a number like "median income" and then give US dollars (again, not all wikipedian's are American and would know if this is above/below average), you would need to compare it to state or nation to give readers an idea of why this value is significant. Pentawing, does that make sense? Mattximus (talk) 01:44, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Makes sense in theory, though problematic in practice as it pertains to article format consistency. As I mentioned before, the current practice among city articles is a statistical breakdown of demographics with little if any context information - if context is used it is usually with a ranking. Right now I am following the current format I've observed so that data could be easily updated in the future (I have run into articles where formatting is so different that updating data is very difficult).

I am thinking of bringing up the issue with context information at Wikipedia:WikiProject Cities (along with a proposed guideline, e.g. context information in terms of income and education attainment if available at a census bureau) so that context information could be more widely adopted. What exact formula or process would you recommend so that every city article's demographics format is consistent with each other? Pentawing^Talk 06:14, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah Pentawing the exact format would need some fixing. For example, you shouldn't include male to female ratio unless it's unusual. It's just trivia, and doesn't really belong. But if there is a town with a skewed ratio then that is worth including. Not all pages should include all data, just data that is relevant to that city. You can always create a template then modify? More users should weigh in of course. Mattximus (talk) 23:08, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Mattximus. I replied to as many comments by Dantheanimator as I could, but there are still some which require your attention in the Toledo nomination, please. It would also be nice if you please could do the captions for the images before we nominate each list. I'll incorporate the rest of the improvements to every list, but I need help with the captions, because I'm no good at describing images with words. Thanks, Alavense (talk) 09:28, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yep no problem Alavense, I'm a bit busy at work these days but will contribute as soon as I am able. Mattximus (talk) 18:46, 21 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations, Mattximus! The list you nominated, List of municipalities in Toledo, has been promoted to featured status, recognizing it as one of the best lists on Wikipedia. The nomination discussion has been archived.

This is a rare accomplishment and you should be proud. If you would like, you may nominate it to appear on the Main page as Today's featured list. Keep up the great work! Cheers, PresN (talk) via FACBot (talk) 12:27, 25 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Mattximus. Cuenca already has three supports, so we could maybe nominate Ciudad Real next. I've already incorporated suggestions from previous nominations to this one, so it's only missing the proper captions now. If you could do that, then it'd be ready to be nominated. You'll let me know. Kind regards, Alavense (talk) 08:11, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'm on it Alavense. Mattximus (talk) 22:44, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much. :) Alavense (talk) 07:40, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Good evening Mattximus. I am looking to make this the TFA for 26 November. Is that ok with you? If so, do you fancy having a crack at a draft blurb? Gog the Mild (talk) 17:54, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I've never done one before! Maybe something like this?

The giant golden mole is the type host of H. niekerki.

Heptamegacanthus is a genus of acanthocephalans (thorny- or spiny-headed parasitic worms) containing a single species, Heptamegacanthus niekerki. This worm is a parasite of the endangered giant golden mole found only in isolated forests near East London and in the Transkei, both in South Africa. The worms are about 4 millimetres (0.2 in) long and 2 millimetres (0.08 in) wide with minimal sexual dimorphism. Their body consists of a proboscis with 40 to 45 hooks arranged in rings which are used to pierce and hold the rectal wall of its host and a long trunk. The life cycle of H. niekerki remains unknown; however, like other acanthocephalans, it likely involves complex interactions with at least two hosts. Although the intermediate host for Heptamegacanthus is not definitively identified, it is presumed to be an arthropod such as an insect which is then eaten by the giant golden mole where they mature and reproduce sexually within the Gastrointestinal tract#Lower gastrointestinal tract, creating eggs which are released in the feces. (Full article...)

Mattximus (talk) 18:05, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This is to let you know that the above article has been scheduled as today's featured article for 26 November 2024. Please check that the article needs no amendments. Feel free to amend the draft blurb, which can be found at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/November 2024, or to make comments on other matters concerning the scheduling of this article at Wikipedia talk:Today's featured article/November 2024. Please keep an eye on that page, as notifications of copy edits to or queries about the draft blurb may be left there by user:JennyOz, who assists the coordinators by reviewing the blurbs, or by others. I also suggest that you watchlist Wikipedia:Main Page/Errors from two days before it appears on the Main Page. Thanks, and congratulations on your work! Gog the Mild (talk) 16:08, 15 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

In which case that is impressive, and thanks. A light copy edit and add an image; how's this? Gog the Mild (talk) 18:24, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I will defer to you on final edit, you're the expert. Thank you! Mattximus (talk) 18:25, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hmm. Let's go with the above then. Your 15 minutes of fame. Gog the Mild (talk) 18:33, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations, Mattximus! The list you nominated, List of municipalities in Cuenca, has been promoted to featured status, recognizing it as one of the best lists on Wikipedia. The nomination discussion has been archived.

This is a rare accomplishment and you should be proud. If you would like, you may nominate it to appear on the Main page as Today's featured list. Keep up the great work! Cheers, PresN (talk) via FACBot (talk) 00:26, 19 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

The Wikimedia Foundation is conducting a survey of Wikipedians to better understand what draws administrators to contribute to Wikipedia, and what affects administrator retention. We will use this research to improve experiences for Wikipedians, and address common problems and needs. We have identified you as a good candidate for this research, and would greatly appreciate your participation in this anonymous survey.

You do not have to be an Administrator to participate.

The survey should take around 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement .

Please find our contact on the project Meta page if you have any questions or concerns.

Kind Regards,

WMF Research Team

BGerdemann (WMF) (talk) 19:28, 23 October 2024 (UTC) [reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of municipalities in A Coruña, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Spanish.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:54, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

I recently invited you to take a survey about administration on Wikipedia. If you haven’t yet had a chance, there is still time to participate– we’d truly appreciate your feedback. The survey is anonymous and should take about 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement.

Take the survey here.

Kind Regards,

WMF Research Team

BGerdemann (WMF) (talk) 00:40, 13 November 2024 (UTC) [reply]

Hello. I have noticed that you often edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. To help yourself remember, you may wish to check the "prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" box in your preferences. Thanks! -- mikeblas (talk) 17:51, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:18, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you today for Heptamegacanthus, introduced: "This is my fifth featured article nomination for parasitic worms, which were chosen as they are the first animals listed alphabetically using the taxonomy system (Animalia, Acanthocephala...)! -- Gerda Arendt (talk) 18:18, 26 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations, Mattximus! The list you nominated, List of municipalities in Ciudad Real, has been promoted to featured status, recognizing it as one of the best lists on Wikipedia. The nomination discussion has been archived.

This is a rare accomplishment and you should be proud. If you would like, you may nominate it to appear on the Main page as Today's featured list. Keep up the great work! Cheers, Hey man im josh (talk) via FACBot (talk) 00:25, 28 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Intraproboscis, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Type locality.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:01, 1 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Mattximus. Thank you for your work on Rhadinorhynchoides. Another editor, MPGuy2824, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

none of the checkable sources mention this genus

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|MPGuy2824}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

-MPGuy2824 (talk) 05:40, 10 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi {{Re|MPGuy2824}}, I added link with index of all genera.Mattximus (talk) 00:23, 11 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Mattximus. Thank you for your work on Rhadinorhynchoides. Another editor, SunDawn, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thank you for creating the article! Have a blessed day ahead.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 03:56, 11 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations, Mattximus! The list you nominated, Municipalities of Morelos, has been promoted to featured status, recognizing it as one of the best lists on Wikipedia. The nomination discussion has been archived.

This is a rare accomplishment and you should be proud. If you would like, you may nominate it to appear on the Main page as Today's featured list. Keep up the great work! Cheers, PresN (talk) via FACBot (talk) 12:25, 11 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Mattximus. I'm looking for experienced editors to interview here. Feel free to pass if you're not interested. Clovermoss🍀 (talk) 16:39, 3 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Just wanted to get your expert opinion on how List of municipalities in Washington has developed so far. Once the Classification section is rewritten, I think the list is just about ready for FLC. SounderBruce 06:51, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Sounder! This article looks to be in excellent shape.

• You will need alt-texts on the two maps and city images to pass FLN.
• The acronym GNIS needs to be linked or explained (even just a bracket with a definition).
• I don't mind the format of the classification section actually but it will require better citations.
• When you write Title 35 RCW, maybe provide a few examples of the functions they can preform (like collect property taxes or garbage collection or something like that).
• Home rule charter could be defined as well.
• 1881 territorial charter could be linked/cited

It's very close to nomination though, excellent work! Mattximus (talk) 22:47, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations, Mattximus! The list you nominated, Municipalities of Tlaxcala, has been promoted to featured status, recognizing it as one of the best lists on Wikipedia. The nomination discussion has been archived.

This is a rare accomplishment and you should be proud. If you would like, you may nominate it to appear on the Main page as Today's featured list. Keep up the great work! Cheers, Hey man im josh (talk) via FACBot (talk) 00:25, 17 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Precious

Five years!

Congratulations to more featured content, and happy new year! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:17, 17 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Intraproboscis you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Esculenta -- Esculenta (talk) 03:44, 10 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The article Intraproboscis you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article needs changes or clarifications to meet the good article criteria. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Intraproboscis and Talk:Intraproboscis/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Esculenta -- Esculenta (talk) 16:43, 4 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Medwin is a predatory publisher. Please don't restore citations to predatory journals Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 15:12, 27 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This may be a special case, Headbomb. As it's very niche and simply a correction to the article published in a more reputable journal by the same authors, can I include it with the caveat written directly in the page that the journal is considered predatory? It represents a significant portion of this article and is critical to it reaching GA and FA. Mattximus (talk) 16:49, 27 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

GAs and FAs don't need to rely on predatory journals to get there. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 16:55, 27 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Headbomb, would you consider leaving it in with a note that it comes from a controversial journal? I'm open to all wording options. The data within, which is an addendum to a paper (by the same authors) in a more valid journal. Without it half the page would have to be deleted for lack of citation. Surely exceptions can be made, if the note is present. Mattximus (talk) 16:57, 27 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe with a note it would be ok, but I'm still concerned with WP:DUE. That's something for the article's talk page though. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 01:09, 28 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, it is critical to the page. I will make a clear note in the page itself outlining your concerns. Mattximus (talk) 23:45, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Headbomb, I couldn't find the journal International Journal of Zoology and Animal Biology which you deleted on Beall's List. Is there another source you are using to determine it's predatory nature? Mattximus (talk) 23:54, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Look for Medwin Publishers. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 02:02, 2 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The article Intraproboscis you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Intraproboscis for comments about the article, and Talk:Intraproboscis/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Esculenta -- Esculenta (talk) 15:23, 4 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, Mattximus. It's been a long time, but I hope you are doing great. I grew disillusioned with Spanish municipalities, given that permalinks from the Instituto Nacional de Estadística seem to always go dead after some time. It's no good. However, I did a bit of work back then as well on Brazilian municipalities. Would you be interested? I already put together a few charts together (you can see the progress here), so what we would need now is to write the text for them. You'll let me know your thoughts. Kind regards, Alavense (talk) 15:14, 18 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Alavense! I'm happy to collaborate on any of these, I will see what I can do for adding some formatting to the first Brazil one. As for the Spanish ones, could there not be an internet archive permalink used? If so those are very easy to nominate as you already developed a very good lead that could be applied to other provinces. But I'm happy either way. Mattximus (talk) 14:38, 19 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

So happy to see you already creating a text for Brazilian lists. When it's ready, we can have a go at Acre, for example, and then we'll have a template we can work with. Regarding the Spanish municipalities, I know: it's a pity, having the template as we have. But, if you have a look at the ones we already got promoted, the links for the information of the most recent census have already gone dead... It's a bit infuriating. And the worst thing about it is that I didn't manage to get that information archived. However, I'll try to get it back and to find a way to make those permanent links... well, really permanent. In any case, I'll be happy to keep on working with you, so keep me updated! :) Kind regards, Alavense (talk) 15:10, 19 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

No problem Alavense! I did a quick first pass on List of municipalities in Acre, what do you think? And yes thanks for looking how to make the Spanish ones permanent, that would allow us to nominate more in the future as well. Mattximus (talk) 15:14, 19 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I've restored the links for the five featured lists we had for Spain. It may require further maintenance in the future, but it was not as difficult as I thought it'd be. The 2024 census is already there, so I'll update another province when I can so that we can nominate it. Regarding Brazil, I've added a couple of references, because they were needed as well in the prose to check some of the facts. I think the text is great, but you'll know better about that, as English is not my native language. Data wise the list is fine and I believe the text serves its purpose, so maybe we can have a go at it and see how it goes. Let me know and thanks for your work! :) Alavense (talk) 15:40, 19 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Oh no, the prose is not mine, I just took from another page and shortened it. Prose definitely needs work, but it is a good start. I'll take another look soon! Mattximus (talk) 19:13, 19 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, I see. Anyway, it's a good start, as you say, to keep on working. Anyway, I've got Almería and Cádiz ready, so that we can keep things going with Spain while we work on Brazil. Would you like to nominate one of them when you can, please? Remember to check the alt texts for the images, as that is precisely not my forte... And thanks for your encouragement! Kind regards, Alavense (talk) 06:13, 20 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Sounds good, Alavense ! I've nominated the Almería to get that going while we work on the others. Thanks for your collaboration! Mattximus (talk) 02:15, 21 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much for the improvements on the alt texts and for nominating the list. I'll keep working on more so that we can nominate when this starts to get supports. Happy to keep on collaborating with you! :) Kind regards, Alavense (talk) 06:47, 21 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Buenas noches, Mattximus :) Almería has already got a couple of supports and a pass on images, so I guess we can safely nominate Cádiz next. I've implemented (across the whole series of lists) a few suggestions that were very nice from this last FLC and I also saw that you found a better image for Cádiz, so I think that, once you've checked and improved the alt texts, we are good to go! Thanks in advance and have a nice day! Alavense (talk) 20:00, 28 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there. Hope you're doing great. Almería is now a featured list and Cádiz has already got some support, so I think we can safely nominate Córdoba next. If you do, please remember to check alt texts, as always! Thanks in advance, Alavense (talk) 15:53, 17 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations, Mattximus! The list you nominated, List of municipalities in Almería, has been promoted to featured status, recognizing it as one of the best lists on Wikipedia. The nomination discussion has been archived.

This is a rare accomplishment and you should be proud. If you would like, you may nominate it to appear on the Main page as Today's featured list. Keep up the great work! Cheers, PresN (talk) via FACBot (talk) 00:26, 18 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Mattximus. I'm just posting to let you know that List of municipalities in Prince Edward Island – a list that you have been heavily involved with – has been chosen to appear on the Main Page as Today's featured list for July 7. The TFL blurb can be seen here. If you have any thoughts on the selection, please post them on my talk page or at TFL talk. Regards, Giants2008 (Talk) 21:33, 20 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there. Córdoba already has two supports. Given that we are co-nominating, I asked whether we'd be allowed to have a third nomination and we were given the green light. It would be nice if you could nominate Granada now. Thanks in advance and kind regards, Alavense (talk) 17:09, 2 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Done Alavense, I will be on vacation for the rest of July so will only be able to help occasionally, however you are always faster than me at replying to the comments, so thank you! Mattximus (talk) 18:53, 2 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much, Mattximus. I'll keep an eye on the nominations, don't worry. Enjoy your holidays and we'll be in touch when you are back! :) Kind regards, Alavense (talk) 19:01, 2 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Alavense, I'm back from vacation and ready to help in our quest for list of municipalities! Mattximus (talk) 13:15, 25 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Happy to see you are back! I hope you enjoyed your vacation. I'm afraid both nominations are stuck at the moment, though, so we'll have to wait. Kind regards, Alavense (talk) 14:38, 25 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations, Mattximus! The list you nominated, List of municipalities in Cádiz, has been promoted to featured status, recognizing it as one of the best lists on Wikipedia. The nomination discussion has been archived.

This is a rare accomplishment and you should be proud. If you would like, you may nominate it to appear on the Main page as Today's featured list. Keep up the great work! Cheers, PresN (talk) via FACBot (talk) 00:26, 10 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations, Mattximus! The list you nominated, List of municipalities in Córdoba, has been promoted to featured status, recognizing it as one of the best lists on Wikipedia. The nomination discussion has been archived.

This is a rare accomplishment and you should be proud. If you would like, you may nominate it to appear on the Main page as Today's featured list. Keep up the great work! Cheers, PresN (talk) via FACBot (talk) 00:26, 10 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations, Mattximus! The list you nominated, List of municipalities in Granada, has been promoted to featured status, recognizing it as one of the best lists on Wikipedia. The nomination discussion has been archived.

This is a rare accomplishment and you should be proud. If you would like, you may nominate it to appear on the Main page as Today's featured list. Keep up the great work! Cheers, PresN (talk) via FACBot (talk) 01:20, 27 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Good morning, Mattximus. How are you doing? As you can see, Huelva and Jaén already have some support, so I nominated Málaga as well. Then it will be Seville's turn and we will be done with Andalusia. I have got some from Castile and León ready as well, but I would need you to check something. In some provinces, municipalities are clustered in comarcas (see Ávila) or mancomunidades (see Burgos). I have added a column for that and I also mention it in the text. Could you please check that the mention in prose makes sense and everything is fine? Thanks in advance, Alavense (talk) 08:04, 22 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Mattximus. I'm just posting to let you know that List of municipalities in Almería – a list that you have been heavily involved with – has been chosen to appear on the Main Page as Today's featured list for September 8. The TFL blurb can be seen here. If you have any thoughts on the selection, please post them on my talk page or at TFL talk. Regards, Giants2008 (Talk) 00:18, 23 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to List of municipal flags of Ontario. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 16:08, 30 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]