User talk:DareshMohan

Archives

1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7

This page has archives. Sections older than 30 days may be auto-archived by Lowercase sigmabot III if there are more than 5.

Forbidden (2018 film), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Thilsebatti (talk) 07:34, 13 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by TheBirdsShedTears was:

Author blocked Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Shankar 1382. Possible UPE

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Gedda Maga and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

TheBirdsShedTears (talk) 20:47, 14 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@TheBirdsShedTears: I removed all of the promotional material and called the film's box office performance average per sources. Next steps? DareshMohan (talk) 20:49, 14 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Resubmit and wait for another reviewer. ~~ TheBirdsShedTears (talk) 20:53, 14 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please consider merging the information in User:Kailash29792/Sathyajith into Sathyajith (Tamil actor), which is about the same actor. LeapTorchGear (talk) 19:10, 18 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Dear DareshMohan! Can you check an article Pyaas (1982), because no one added cast, plotline and any information about this film except songs? Thanks in advance! 2A00:1FA0:C63C:B7F5:DD85:D56:E5A2:E7CD (talk) 21:00, 18 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Vanilla Wizard was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

• in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
• reliable
• secondary
• independent of the subject
  

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

No indication of notability. As of writing, this draft is just one unsourced synopsis, an unsourced cast member list, and a couple short sentences about how underwhelming it performed. For works of fiction, we'd like to see some more information about how it was received by audiences, possibly some more information about the production process, some critical analysis, or any sort of significant coverage in reliable, secondary, independent sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Gedda Maga and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

 Vanilla  Wizard 💙 13:49, 19 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Malai Murasu, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Adyar.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:58, 24 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Dear DareshMohan! Can you check and fixing an article 3 Dev, because is unreleased but no one didn’t write about controversy and reasons? Thanks in advance! 178.66.46.176 (talk) 18:55, 24 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Please can you help me retreive the deleted draft article of Diesel - upcoming film starring Harish Kalyan and Athulya Ravi. Gowthamaprabu (talk) 12:20, 28 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Namak Haraam. Thanks! RangersRus (talk) 12:55, 28 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Namak Haraam. Thanks! S0091 (talk) 17:23, 28 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by RangersRus was:

The proposed article does not have sufficient content to require an article of its own, but it could be merged into the existing article at Namak Haraam. Since anyone can edit Wikipedia, you are welcome to add that information yourself. Thank you.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Namak Haraam and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

RangersRus (talk) 03:29, 30 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Dear DareshMohan! Can you make an article about the film Pakhandi 1984, because some scenes from this film are visible in YouTube? Thanks in advance! 178.66.46.176 (talk) 15:16, 31 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The article you submitted to Articles for creation has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

DareshMohan (talk) 05:33, 1 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of Telugu films of 1997, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Prema (actress).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:54, 1 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Vrxces was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

• in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
• reliable
• secondary
• independent of the subject
  

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Given the limited sourcing to substantiate WP:BLP or WP:NBIO, not really seeing a reason why this person is independently notable beyond The Bobby Lees. This information could easily be provided in that article, unless Quartin has some sort of standalone coverage - which isn't here.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Sam Quartin and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

ＶＲＸＣＥＳ (talk) 08:07, 1 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, DareshMohan! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! ＶＲＸＣＥＳ (talk) 08:07, 1 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello DareshMohan,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Cocaine (upcoming film) for deletion, because it's a redirect from an article title to a namespace that's not for articles.

If you don't want Cocaine (upcoming film) to be deleted, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

ColinSchm (talk) 11:11, 2 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Dear DareshMohan! Can you make an article about Hindi film Thief of Baghdad (1977 film) starring Kabir Bedi? Thanks in advance! 178.66.46.176 (talk) 20:54, 3 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

There is already an article: The Thief of Baghdad (1978 film). DareshMohan (talk) 20:55, 3 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I mean about Bollywood film of the same title starring Shatrughan Sinha and Kabir Bedi, because it’s one of first works for Anuradha Paudwal, but need article? Thanks in advance! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 178.66.46.176 (talk) 20:59, 3 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hindi dubbed version of Flashback is available on YouTube. Does this mean the filmographies of the actors involved in the film can be updated to reflect its release? Manick22 (talk) 20:55, 7 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, please update it (similar to Telugu version of Veerapandiyapuram). @Manick22:. DareshMohan (talk) 21:25, 7 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Vicky Varun, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page College Kumar.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:52, 8 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, DareshMohan. This message concerns the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Rahasya Gorak".

Drafts that go unedited for six months are eligible for deletion, in accordance with our draftspace policy, and this one has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission, and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you read this, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the draft so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! DreamRimmer bot II (talk) 18:26, 8 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved content from Arjun Sarja into another page. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content (here or elsewhere), Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. The4lines |||| (talk) 23:58, 9 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, DareshMohan. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Billa Ranga".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:47, 10 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Thilsebatti was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Stun Shiva (action choreographer) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Thilsebatti (talk) 04:46, 12 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Dear DareshMohan! Can you make an article about Ek Naya Itihaas 1984, which considered as lost film? Because this film have only trailer and theatrical posters. Thanks in advance! 178.66.46.176 (talk) 21:13, 12 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Stop making requests, I am busy and not interested in making requests (this is a free encyclopedia). You can use these sources: [1] [2] [3]. DareshMohan (talk) 22:33, 12 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Fade258 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Generally, Times of India is not considered as a reliable source. Please review WP:TIMESOFINDIA for further information and also Indulgexpress is not a reliable source.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Aajeedh Khalique and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Fade258 (talk) 02:05, 14 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Fade258: FYI, Indulge Express is owned by The New Indian Express [4]. DareshMohan (talk) 02:09, 14 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

DareshMohan, I'm sorry that it took me a whle to see your message on my User talk page. I seem to get a lot of messages nd sometimes I wait until the end of the day to reply to them all. Did you get your request sorted out by another admin who was quicker to respond to your request for help? Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:16, 14 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello DareshMohan! Your additions to Draft:Stuvartpuram Dongalu have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably free and compatible copyright license—to request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, it's important to understand and adhere to guidelines about using information from sources to prevent copyright and plagiarism issues. Here are the key points:

• Limited quotation: You may only copy or translate a small portion of a source. Any direct quotations must be enclosed in double quotation marks (") and properly cited using an inline citation. More information is available on the non-free content page. To learn how to cite a source, see Help:Referencing for beginners.
• Paraphrasing: Beyond limited quotations, you are required to put all information in your own words. Following the source's wording too closely can lead to copyright issues and is not permitted; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when paraphrasing, you must still cite your sources as appropriate.
• Image use guidelines: In most scenarios, only freely licensed or public domain images may be used and these should be uploaded to our sister project, Wikimedia Commons. In some scenarios, non-freely copyrighted content can be used if they meet all ten of our non-free content criteria; Wikipedia:Plain and simple non-free content guide may help with determining a file's eligibility.
• Copyrighted material donation: If you hold the copyright to the content you want to copy, or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license the text for publication here. Please see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
• Copying and translation within Wikipedia: Wikipedia articles can be copied or translated, however they must have proper attribution in accordance with Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. For translation, see Help:Translation § Licensing.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices. Persistent failure to comply may result in being blocked from editing. If you have any questions or need further clarification, please ask them here on this page, or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. MCE89 (talk) 06:56, 14 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]