User talk:DareshMohan

Archives

1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7

This page has archives. Sections older than 30 days may be auto-archived by Lowercase sigmabot III if there are more than 5.

Hindi dubbed version of Flashback is available on YouTube. Does this mean the filmographies of the actors involved in the film can be updated to reflect its release? Manick22 (talk) 20:55, 7 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, please update it (similar to Telugu version of Veerapandiyapuram). @Manick22:. DareshMohan (talk) 21:25, 7 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Vicky Varun, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page College Kumar.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:52, 8 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, DareshMohan. This message concerns the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Rahasya Gorak".

Drafts that go unedited for six months are eligible for deletion, in accordance with our draftspace policy, and this one has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission, and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you read this, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the draft so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! DreamRimmer bot II (talk) 18:26, 8 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved content from Arjun Sarja into another page. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content (here or elsewhere), Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. The4lines |||| (talk) 23:58, 9 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Regarding your recent edits to Ishari K. Ganesh when you modified the page, you introduced unknown parameters. Just because you specify |some_param=some_variable does not always mean that variable will display. The |some_param= must be defined in the template. You can look at the documentation for the template you are using but it is also helpful to use the preview button before you save your edit; this helps you find any errors you have made and ensure that the values you have added are displaying correctly. Below the edit box is a Show preview button. Pressing this will show you what the page will look like without actually saving it. It is strongly recommended that you use this before saving. If you have any questions, contact the help desk for assistance. Thank you. Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 05:45, 27 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Aadirulez8. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Sampath Ram, but you didn't provide a reliable source. On Wikipedia, it's important that article content be verifiable. If you'd like to resubmit your change with a citation, your edit is archived in the page history. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Aadirulez8 (talk) 05:54, 27 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, DareshMohan. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Billa Ranga".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:47, 10 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Thilsebatti was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Stun Shiva (action choreographer) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Thilsebatti (talk) 04:46, 12 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Dear DareshMohan! Can you make an article about Ek Naya Itihaas 1984, which considered as lost film? Because this film have only trailer and theatrical posters. Thanks in advance! 178.66.46.176 (talk) 21:13, 12 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Stop making requests, I am busy and not interested in making requests (this is a free encyclopedia). You can use these sources: [1] [2] [3]. DareshMohan (talk) 22:33, 12 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Fade258 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Generally, Times of India is not considered as a reliable source. Please review WP:TIMESOFINDIA for further information and also Indulgexpress is not a reliable source.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Aajeedh Khalique and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Fade258 (talk) 02:05, 14 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Fade258: FYI, Indulge Express is owned by The New Indian Express [4]. DareshMohan (talk) 02:09, 14 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

DareshMohan, I'm sorry that it took me a whle to see your message on my User talk page. I seem to get a lot of messages nd sometimes I wait until the end of the day to reply to them all. Did you get your request sorted out by another admin who was quicker to respond to your request for help? Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:16, 14 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Liz: it's ok I think I need Wikipedia a little bit at least in my life. DareshMohan (talk) 17:16, 14 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello DareshMohan! Your additions to Draft:Stuvartpuram Dongalu have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably free and compatible copyright license—to request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, it's important to understand and adhere to guidelines about using information from sources to prevent copyright and plagiarism issues. Here are the key points:

• Limited quotation: You may only copy or translate a small portion of a source. Any direct quotations must be enclosed in double quotation marks (") and properly cited using an inline citation. More information is available on the non-free content page. To learn how to cite a source, see Help:Referencing for beginners.
• Paraphrasing: Beyond limited quotations, you are required to put all information in your own words. Following the source's wording too closely can lead to copyright issues and is not permitted; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when paraphrasing, you must still cite your sources as appropriate.
• Image use guidelines: In most scenarios, only freely licensed or public domain images may be used and these should be uploaded to our sister project, Wikimedia Commons. In some scenarios, non-freely copyrighted content can be used if they meet all ten of our non-free content criteria; Wikipedia:Plain and simple non-free content guide may help with determining a file's eligibility.
• Copyrighted material donation: If you hold the copyright to the content you want to copy, or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license the text for publication here. Please see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
• Copying and translation within Wikipedia: Wikipedia articles can be copied or translated, however they must have proper attribution in accordance with Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. For translation, see Help:Translation § Licensing.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices. Persistent failure to comply may result in being blocked from editing. If you have any questions or need further clarification, please ask them here on this page, or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. MCE89 (talk) 06:56, 14 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@MCE89: I forgot to reword the other two sentences. Check it now. DareshMohan (talk) 22:42, 14 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please feel free to expand, as I find more sources. Kailash29792 (talk) 12:43, 16 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, DareshMohan. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

Manick22 (talk) 07:00, 17 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Thilsebatti was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Manase (music video) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Thilsebatti (talk) 18:08, 17 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Katchi Sera, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

João^hola 05:40, 21 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, DareshMohan. This is a courtesy notice that the copy edit you requested for M. G. Srinivas at the Guild of Copy Editors requests page is now complete. All feedback welcome! Cheers, 🅑🅐🅖 ☿ 🅴🅻🅵🅵🅰🅱 01:11, 22 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Thilsebatti was:

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:K. Krishnakumar and Binni Krishnakumar and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Thilsebatti (talk) 06:30, 23 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:K. Krishnakumar and Binni Krishnakumar. Thanks! Thilsebatti (talk) 06:33, 23 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

On 25 September 2025, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Robo Shankar, which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Curbon7 (talk) 23:32, 25 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Thank you for your efforts to improve Wikipedia, and in particular for adding references, as you did to 2025 Karur crowd crush! However, adding a bare URL is not ideal, and exposes the reference to link rot. It is preferable to use proper citation templates when citing sources, including details such as title, author, date, and any other information necessary for a bibliographic citation. Here's an example of a full citation using the {{cite web}} template to cite a web page:

Lorem ipsum<ref>{{cite web |title=Download the Scanning Software - Windows and Mac |publisher=Canon Inc |work=Ask a Question |date=2022 |url=https://support.usa.canon.com/kb/index?page=content&id=ART174839 |access-date=2022-04-02}}</ref> dolor sit amet.

which displays inline in the running text of the article as:

Lorem ipsum^[1] dolor sit amet.

and displays under References as:

1. ^ Download the Scanning Software - Windows and Mac". Ask a Question. Canon Inc. 2022. Retrieved 2022-04-02.

If you've already added one or more bare URLs to an article, there are tools available to expand them into full citations: try the Citer tool, or in the wikitext editor, try the reFill tool, and in the Visual Editor, the reference dialog can convert some bare urls into a full citation. Once again, thanks for adding references to articles. Grumpylawnchair (talk) 00:15, 1 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Er....hello @Grumpylawnchair:, but DareshMohan has made >133K edits on the EnWP. You think there's a chance he does not know that? Sometimes, when the script is bugging but sources are needed urgently, I too leave a bare url instead of leaving unsourced statements. Thank you for your attention to this matter!--e.ux 20:36, 2 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Oh sorry, I forgot to check that. I'll be more careful in the future. Grumpylawnchair (talk) 20:38, 2 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Regarding your recent edits to Ramarajan when you modified the page, you introduced unknown parameters. Just because you specify |some_param=some_variable does not always mean that variable will display. The |some_param= must be defined in the template. You can look at the documentation for the template you are using but it is also helpful to use the preview button before you save your edit; this helps you find any errors you have made and ensure that the values you have added are displaying correctly. Below the edit box is a Show preview button. Pressing this will show you what the page will look like without actually saving it. It is strongly recommended that you use this before saving. If you have any questions, contact the help desk for assistance. Thank you. Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 04:51, 5 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, DareshMohan, hope you're well! I was just passing to say that I was shocked to read that Pinkvilla is now considered ...unreliable. The conclusion to be drawn from that RfC was imv not so clear but that's just me!@Kailash29792: and others made relevant comments there but to no avail)... It is going to be increasingly difficult to find accepted reviews for Indian films that are not blockbusters....but...ignorance is bliss, so I guess all is well. Cheers, --e.ux 20:36, 2 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Eva UX: I just wanted to focus on sources since I wanted to spend less time here and focus in GAs instead. Hopefully I will get time for The Elephant Whisperers, Peraanmai and 2025 Karur crowd crush.

All I can say is in general, Telugu sources are more abundant than English sources and that only users like Kailash can save them for Tamil ones. Just check his edits on older Tamil films, none of the sources are in English due to availability. Issue is I don't know how to access foreign language newspaper archives. — Preceding unsigned comment added by DareshMohan (talk • contribs)

If you are planning to take Peraanmai to GA, I have a book that could help: this. Please remind me to share pages via G Drive. Kailash29792 (talk) 02:53, 3 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]