User talk:Kaki joe

Welcome!

Hello, Kaki joe, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Tutorial
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! --Bejnar (talk) 17:43, 18 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you have revised population figures, please provide a citation for them when changing an article. --Bejnar (talk) 17:43, 18 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your changes to the Pashto language article on 24 September 2010, deleting population estimates by reliable sources and their citations and substituting a different figure with a reference to Central Statistics Office, a non-existent article, constitutes vandalism. --Bejnar (talk) 22:25, 24 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edit to the page Laghman Province appears to have added incorrect information and has been reverted or removed. All information in this encyclopedia must be verifiable in a reliable, published source. If you believe the information that you added was correct, please cite the references or sources or before making the changes, discuss them on the article's talk page. Please use the sandbox for any tests that you wish to make. Do take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thank you. AtticusX (talk) 19:58, 20 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Afghanistan. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. AtticusX (talk) 20:03, 20 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did to Nuristan Province, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. AtticusX (talk) 20:08, 20 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Evlekis (Евлекис) 02:14, 1 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. -Regancy42 (talk) 02:22, 1 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This is the final warning you will receive regarding your disruptive edits. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. TeaDrinker (talk) 02:22, 1 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Every time I run across your edits, such as your recent edits to Afghanistan, you are either deleting large amounts of sourced content or replacing sourced ethnic statistics with obviously fictional numbers. Have you done any constructive edits? I haven't seen them. This message is intended as your fair warning that continuing to engage in such disruptive behavior will eventually get you permanently blocked from editing. AtticusX (talk) 09:42, 6 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|Your reason here}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. TeaDrinker (talk) 09:48, 6 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

you son of a bitch, you don't know anything about the Afghan culture. Pashto poetry has a main role in afghan culture not stooped Iranina culture. Pashtuns are the majority. i will contiune to change the ethnic numbers. do what ever you can do. §kaki joe§

Do you have a source for those numbers. You're quite correct, I am not an expert. I can only judge sources. --TeaDrinker (talk) 17:28, 7 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

yes I have a source but it is in Pashto langauge. this source is pritty correct about Pashtuns the site says that Pashtuns are 56%- 62 and this number is same for speakers as well. Tajiks are 25% - 27%. Uzbeks are 6-8% and Hazaras are 7-8%. the rest pecentage goes to minorities. another good example is presinditial electitions of 2009. president Karzai who is pashtun got 62% of votes, although all pashtuns didn't vote. all other ethinic groups voted for thier own leader like Tajiks and Aimaks voted for Abdullah. Hazaras voted for Ramazan Bashardost. even there were top five other pashtun candidates. the site address is as following:

(http://taand.com/index.php?mod=article&cat=taand2&article=21367&highlight=څوک%20څومره&match=)

In Culture section, you should change that Iranian poetry has a big role, that is not correct, each child of Pushtuns are a poet. there are millions of Pashtun poets in Wikipdia, just go to Pashtun poets you will find some famouse Pashtun poets.

I hope you understand it if not i will continue to change the numbers and delete stuped iranian culture and poetery. --Kaki Joe--

Please remain civil. Another comment like this will result in an indefinite block of your account. Materialscientist (talk) 00:29, 11 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The article Mulavi Murad Ali Khan Sahibzada has been proposed for deletion because under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners or ask at Wikipedia:Help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Usb10 ^Connected? 00:42, 11 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Your test on the page Mohammad Musa Shafiq worked, and has been removed. If you would like to experiment further, please use the sandbox. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing and its related help page for more information. Thank you. 5 albert square (talk) 01:18, 11 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I have started a discussion on your numbers and source. My own feeling is they are dubious in terms of reliable sourcing, but we can see what others think. I could find no support in the article for your large removals of text. In any event, you're welcome to contribute to that discussion (but keep no personal attacks and civility in mind. Thanks, --TeaDrinker (talk) 01:36, 11 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Changing information contrary to the included citation is not acceptable. Your editing is rapidly becoming tendentious and counterproductive. Please do not make controversial changes to articles until you gain consensus on the talk page. Thanks, --TeaDrinker (talk) 20:10, 12 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

why my remarks are taken from dicussion? I think you are a Iranian.

Kaki Joe

Please do not add unsourced or original content, as you did to Afghanistan. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia.

Stop removing the sourced numbers of the language and ethnic groups. There are discussions on Talk:Afghanistan#languages and Talk:Afghanistan#Ethnic_groups, and a couple of more sections complaining about those changes. Please go to those discussions and provide the sources that you are using. --Enric Naval (talk) 15:05, 13 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your comment to the talk page of the Afghanistan article was removed because you violated policy. However if you persist in adding claims contrary to consensus, you will be blocked. And for the record, I am not Iranian. --TeaDrinker (talk) 15:24, 13 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|Your reason here}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Toddst1 (talk) 15:35, 13 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

In preparation to resuming your editing on 20 October, I urge you to consider the Wikipedia policy at Wikipedia:Consensus. Where differing views on a topic exist, such as the relative impact of Persian poetry on Afghan culture, or the ethnic percentages in various places in Afghanistan, it is appropriate to discuss such issues on the talk page of the article in question, rather than getting involved in an edit war. --Bejnar (talk) 15:46, 16 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I note that many of your edits relate to ethnic data. Please do not change or insert ethnic data into articles unless you provide proper citation to published source material which is reliable. Ethnic data is inherently controversial. (WikiProject Ethnic groups says: "Let's be clear: ethnicity is a minefield.") "The policy on sourcing is Verifiability, which requires inline citations for any material challenged or likely to be challenged" (Wikipedia:Citing sources) and "Remove immediately any contentious material about a living person that is unsourced or poorly sourced". (Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons) Definitely, once ethnic data is removed or contested by another editor it must be properly sourced before reintroduction. Additionally, "Ethnicity or sexuality should not generally be emphasized in the opening unless it is relevant to the subject's notability." (Wikipedia:Manual of Style (biographies)#Opening paragraph) If you, or others, have a question about the reliability of source, you may ask about it at the Reliable sources Noticeboard. If something is controversial, and ethnic data always is, then before making a change (1) have a reliable source (preferably vetted on the noticeboard and (2) present your source and argument on the appropriate talk page so that (3) a consensus can be reached. Remember, a convincing argument is more effective than a disruptive edit. --Bejnar (talk) 15:46, 16 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|Your reason here}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. TeaDrinker (talk) 17:07, 24 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Mulavi Murad Ali Khan Sahibzada requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Capitalismojo (talk) 12:47, 12 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]