User talk:Johnluisocasio

Hi, Johnluisocasio, Welcome to Wikipedia!

Thanks for adding the subdivision of the Laotian provinces, it was something I planned to do for quite some time already but always too busy with other tasks. Do you have any direct sources for these, or is it basically the information from statoids.org? I ask because for Xaisomboun there was apparently a change, two districts might have been reassigned to Vientiane province. But it is very hard to find good English sources on Laotian topics. See also Talk:Xaisomboun. andy 20:18, 8 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Of course, your help is definitely welcome and appreciated. I just hoped you'd have more information, Laos is still a widely covered topic here, due to lack of interest of editors here, lack of Laotians with Internet access and English knowledge, but also due to lack of English information sources about it. Anyway, keep on editing... andy 22:12, 8 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, John! I am sorry, but I had to revert your change to administrative divisions of Perm Krai again. The krai is not divided into "former Perm Oblast" and "former KPAO" as your edit leads to believe; rather, it is a single entity which includes Komi-Permyak Okrug (which itself is a transitionary unit). However, I can see that the current layout could use some improvement. If you want to help, modelling the list after administrative divisions of Adygea would be a lot more useful (and consistent). Let me know if you have any questions and thank you for your interest.—Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); 14:44, 29 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Dude, I appreciate that and I respect it. But for those who understand Russian subdivision classifications, is the "rural settlement" or "rural locality" the same level as the "selsovet" or is it below the selsovet? I just want to be sure of it, just in case. Reply if necessarily possible. Johnluisocasio 13:09, 15 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I realize we keep responding to one other in one year increments, but, assuming you are still interested, I am going to answer this question (because I happened to notice it today completely by accident).

The way the terminology used in the English Wikipedia is now established, the term "rural settlement" refers to a type of municipal formation, while "rural locality" refers to a type of an inhabited locality. Rural settlements are municipal units which, more often than not, correspond to selsoviets (which are administrative-territorial units) one to one, while rural localities are populated places of rural type (i.e., villages, selos, auls, and such). On some (mostly older) pages, however, these two meanings are mixed up. Hope this helps!—Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); 19:03, 3 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I see your point. But could you make a diagram that explains each territorial unit by level? jlog3000 (talk) 15:20, 4 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'm afraid that with my graphics skills the result is going to be quite ghastly, although if anyone is willing to make such a diagram, I'll be more than willing to help with the definitions, hierarchy, and explanations (although the bulk of information is already available in articles such as subdivisions of Russia, federal subjects of Russia, and types of inhabited localities in Russia).—Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); 15:50, 6 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No wonder in some federal subjects that the average is like 1.2 rural localities (inhabited and uninhabited) per selsovet. How come? jlog3000 (talk) 16:38, 14 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

A selsoviet is supposed to be a fairly compact unit. If there are quite a few villages located in the vicinity of one another, then the selsoviet may include many of them (minding the population caps, though). If villages are separated by large distances (as is the case in Siberia and in the Russian Far East), then a selsoviet is usually organized around just one village (minding the population caps again). Does this answer your question?—Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); 18:19, 14 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Can't argue with that, but just to be sure, can you post an example of a selsoviet with some rural localities? And how come most cities/towns correspond in districts and selsoviets while a few correspond "independently" by other subdivisions' jurisdictions? jlog3000 (talk) 12:14, 17 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ashevskaya Volost in Pskov Oblast, for example, includes 36 rural localities (a volost in Pskov Oblast is the same as a selsoviet in some other federal subjects). As for you second question, there are two types of cities/town in Russia. Larger ones tend to be in direct jurisdiction of a federal subject (such as Pskov and Velikiye Luki in Pskov Oblast). While they sometimes serve as administrative centers of the districts (Velikiye Luki, for example, is the administrative center of Velikoluksky District), administravely they are never a part of them. Smaller towns are normally subordinated to the districts directly (Sebezh, for example). In other words, if you look at the administrative divisions of any given federal subject (ignoring closed cities as to not overcomplicate the example), the first level is districts and the cities/towns under jurisdiction of the federal subject, and the second level is, for districts, selsoviets, towns under jurisdiction of the districts, and sometimes urban-type settlements. The second level for the cities/towns under jurisdiction of the federal subject is city districts and occasionally selsoviets which are under the city/town's jurisdiction (but are not a part of it). I haven't just confused you even more, have I? :)—Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); 16:06, 17 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Any maps of some federal subjects with all the subdivisions within it? jlog3000 (talk) 14:03, 21 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

There's one of Moscow Oblast. Note, however, that it is the map of municipal, not administrative divisions (Moscow Oblast no longer has selsoviets). Most (although not all) of the municipal divisions correspond to administrative divisions 1:1, and municipal rural settlements mostly correspond to the old selsoviets.—Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); 15:17, 21 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, Ëzhiki. To continue our talk, but in a different section, I found some links that are now defunct:

• Конституция Российской Федерации, Статья 65 (Constitution of Russia, Article 65) (in Russian). In 1993, when the constitution was adopted, there were 89 subjects listed. Some of them were later merged.
• Федеральная служба государственной статистики (Federal State Statistics Service) (2004-05-21). "Территория, число районов, населённых пунктов и сельских администраций по субъектам Российской Федерации (Territory, Number of Districts, Inhabited Localities, and Rural Administration by Federal Subjects of the Russian Federation)". Всероссийская перепись населения 2002 года (All-Russia Population Census of 2002) (in Russian). Federal State Statistics Service. Retrieved 2008-04-18.
• Федеральная служба государственной статистики (Federal State Statistics Service) (2004-05-21). "Численность населения России, субъектов Российской Федерации в составе федеральных округов, районов, городских поселений, сельских населённых пунктов – районных центров и сельских населённых пунктов с населением 3 тысячи и более человек (Population of Russia, its federal districts, federal subjects, districts, urban localities, rural localities—administrative centers, and rural localities with population of over 3,000)". Всероссийская перепись населения 2002 года (All-Russia Population Census of 2002) (in Russian). Federal State Statistics Service. Retrieved 2008-06-23.

I was wondering if you know someone that still has or had them after 2002. jlog3000 (talk) 12:38, 23 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The Census site may be down every now and then, but I was able to follow these links just now without a problem. Perhaps you tried the links during the downtime? The Consultant site (at least its main database portion, to which the link above leads) only works in IE, so you wouldn't see the text if you tried accessing it with any other browser.—Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); 14:50, 23 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

OK, I've changed the Constitution link to a more static text on the Consultant site; should work in all browsers now. As for the Census links, come to think of it, they look as if they were done with ActiveX, so it is probably an IE thing as well. There should be a link to an Excel version (which is still restrictive); I'll see if I can dig it up.—Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); 14:56, 23 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Well then, if possibly done, could you post the sub-links related with those above? Hope there's another to contact with you. jlog3000 (talk) 13:59, 21 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I forgot all about it. I have made the changes now, though (you may need to purge your browser's cache to see the changes). Also, the best way to reach me is via my talk page—while I do keep your talk page on my watchlist, it's very easy to miss your follow-ups to older threads. Cheers,—Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); 14:12, April 21, 2009 (UTC)

Sure: [1] and [2]. You are welcome to muck around my contributions as well.—Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); 15:09, April 21, 2009 (UTC)

Haha, good one! Muck around... lol What does that mean? jlog3000 (talk) 15:16, 21 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

According to Wiktionary, apparently the same thing as muck about :)—Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); 15:54, April 21, 2009 (UTC)

Please use the move function, instead of copy-and-paste, when renaming a page. This avoids splitting the page history in several places. Thank you. --Geniac 20:52, 7 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have been reverting some of your good faith conversions of lists back from alphabetical to taxonomic order, and also some double linking (from common and scientific name. It's possible that I've also unintentionally reverted other edits that you have made, if that's so my apologies, but it's difficult to restore without using rollback at some stage. jimfbleak 19:27, 24 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, John! I have reverted your edits which re-added Ust-Orda Buryatia. Please note that as of January 1, 2008 is no longer a federal subject, but merely an administrative division of Irkutsk Oblast. Please see Ust-Orda Buryat Okrug for further information. Thanks.—Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); 16:05, 4 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

John, please stop adding the quote marks to articles on administrative divisions of federal subjects of Russia. I had to revert your yesterday's additions because these quote marks make no sense where you are adding them to—they are ungrammatical, look ugly, and make readers wonder just why they are there in the first place. If you wish to emphasize the section titles, please consider other methods. Thanks.—Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); 21:35, 23 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Now that you mentioned it, what do you mean by "considering other methods"? jlog3000 (talk) 14:10, 21 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article List of mergers in Miyagi Prefecture, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Stifle (talk) 20:43, 19 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

All I wanted to do is make a page of articles of mergers of each prefecture that are needed to be yet complete. That's all. And I accidentally put Iwate Prefecture on the article List of mergers in Miyagi Prefecture. Now I fixed that part. Let me know if there are corrections for me to put or revert back to. jlog3000 (talk) 20:52, 19 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You've removed the proposed deletion template, as you're entitled to do. There's nothing else for you to do for now. Stifle (talk) 11:40, 21 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

As of now, is it allowed then and what do you mean by "you're entitled to do"? jlog3000 (talk) 13:32, 22 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for splitting out the merger histories from all the prefecture articles. I created Category:Lists of mergers in Japan in order to keep them all together. I also made a page for Tokyo, and am getting ready to do the same for Hokkaidō's subprefectures. At this point, List of mergers and dissolutions of municipalities in Japan is almost redundant to the category, except for the external links that point to more info in each section. Those should probably be verified, and moved to the new pages as references. I'll start on that, if you don't beat me to it. Thanks again. Neier (talk) 10:48, 4 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I appreciate your respect and gratitude for this accomplishment. jlog3000 (talk) 14:14, 4 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Great job dude. Sorry I can't be on much. --Hirohisat^(Talk) 05:06, 14 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

With due respect to all the activities to improve all merger related articles, I would like to ask for your opinion as better experienced/educated contributor than myself, about the word choices of the Japanese municipality mergers. I found Municipal mergers and dissolutions in Japan and judged "merge" is the preferred word usage than "amalgamate". so I edited Niigata (city) Merger subsection according to this standpoint. that undid most of the immediate previous edits that harmonized "merge" usage to "amalgamate". in my humble opinion, "amalgamate" is just a bit over dramatized nuance compared to the plain "merge" thus the latter is preferable.

of course I have not studied all other references in other articles, of primarily prefectures, cities and towns of japan, so I would accept if the vast majority of the usages prefer "amalgamate", but just wanted to have someone better knowledge on this topic in Wiki editing context to see if there is any standards that I missed.

thank you, Rararakagaku (talk) 16:59, 19 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi - I'm wondering why you changed all the "Senboku" references to "Semboku". Although the town of Semboku may be using the "m" instead of the "n" on their website (a fact I find surprising and I think that actually is a mistake on their website), the Senboku Region (Senboku-gun) has not changed. I am in Misato-cho right now and all the road signs here that mention either the town or the area all use "Senboku". I plan on double-checking at the Misato-cho town hall this week, but I was wondering where you got this information. Thanks! BWH76 (talk) 10:59, 10 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

To answer your question, I did those just to match the context of the articles in Wikipedia. jlog3000 (talk) 16:11, 12 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Regions of China, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. jo.de (talk) 09:38, 9 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed you've replaced several {{defaultsort}} tags with macronned versions, like this edit. In order for the sorting mechanism to work properly, you should not ever include macrons in the defaultsort. The changes you've made are likely a result of a search/replace that has gone unchecked, but, if possible I think it would be good if you could fix the articles so the sorting is correct again. You can refer to Wikipedia:MOS-JA#Category link sorting of names and macronned titles if you have any questions. Neier (talk) 00:31, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Please don't forget to provide an edit summary, as you forgot on your recent edit to Tsuge, Nara. Thank you. --Ericdn (talk) 14:33, 8 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome. One thing though can you follow my example and put each county into 4 tidy columns, this way it doesn't make the page so extremely long. If you follow my example you'll see how it works. Thanks Dr. Blofeld ^{White cat} 20:27, 20 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Not bad for a starting point! ~RayLast ^«Talk!» 21:01, 25 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. We no longer link dates, per WP:MOSNUM. Thanks, Dabomb87 (talk) 16:06, 8 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Johnluisocasio! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. Please note that all biographies of living persons must be sourced. If you were to add reliable, secondary sources to this article, it would greatly help us with the current 329 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

1. Mitsuhiro Matsunaga - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 23:30, 2 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Template:Administrative divisions of the federal subjects of Russia by federal district requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{transclusionless}}</noinclude>).

Thanks. Mhiji (talk) 18:04, 12 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mitsuhiro Matsunaga is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mitsuhiro Matsunaga until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Raymie (t • c) 18:58, 6 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, why did you create all thos redirect and then blanking the pages? -- KTC (talk) 16:53, 18 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Because I accidentally wrote the wrong name to make those redirects, and I couldn't delete them back. :/ jlog3000 (talk) 16:57, 18 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

UC Riverside Highlanders men's basketball (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Highlander

University of Massachusetts Dartmouth (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Equestrian

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 04:05, 19 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited East Coast Conference, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Southampton, New York (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:19, 26 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Pennsylvania State Athletic Conference new logo.png. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 02:05, 8 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Pennsylvania State Athletic Conference new logo.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:38, 9 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Centenary College of New Jersey (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Centenary College

Empire 8 (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Canton, New York

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:08, 13 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Liberty League, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Clinton, New York (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:13, 20 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! I see that you've been creating a bunch of disambiguation pages and redirects, which are great. One thing I wanted to mention, though, is that once you've got one disambiguation page created (say Buffalo Bulls basketball), there's no need to create more disambiguation pages for the same subject. On the alternate titles (SUNY-Buffalo Bulls basketball for example), just redirect them to the disambiguation page that you created. That way everyone looking for the topic will go to the same disambiguation page, so that if any changes need to be made to that disambiguation page, it only has to be done in one place. Keep up the great work! -Niceguyedc ^{Go Huskies!} 04:31, 27 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I notice that you've boldfaced the names of a number of college sports teams within the "Athletics" sections of articles on the colleges, e.g. at Peru State College. According to MOS:BOLD, this isn't correct Wikipedia style: the policy states that boldface is acceptable "only for certain usages", which are listed. None of those usages seems to apply to this case; so I'd encourage you to discontinue the practice, and to revert boldfacing that you've already done in inadvertent contravention of WP style. Thanks -- Ammodramus (talk) 21:23, 11 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Could I take exception to a phrase that you've introduced to a number of articles on colleges, in the "Athletics" section? The phrase is, to quote one incidence of it, "Dana College teams, nicknamed athletically as the Vikings..."

First, "Vikings" isn't the team's nickname; it's their actual name. Second, "nicknamed athletically" is a very strange phrase in English. I can run athletically up a flight of stairs, or lift a heavy box of books athletically; but nicknaming something doesn't generally require a great deal of physical exertion and sweating.

I'd suggest an alternative like "Dana College's sports teams, the Vikings..." or "...teams, known as the Vikings,..." Ammodramus (talk) 14:37, 29 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Ok. Thanks for the warning of advice. I'll try re-correct those as I possibly can. jlog3000 (talk) 14:44, 29 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there. As you have edited some related articles, would you like to join WikiProject Okanagan. Thanks, and happy new year! TBrandley ^{(what's up)} 16:54, 3 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Johnluisocasio. When you want to change the name of a page, please don't simply copy and paste the contents, as you did from UBC Okanagan to University of British Columbia Okanagan. Doing so violates the cc-by-say license that all Wikipedia pages are authored under. Instead, we need to move the page. Since the latter page already existed as a redirect, it did need to be moved by an admin, which you can do by leaving a request at WP:RM. I've gone ahead and done that change for you. Qwyrxian (talk) 22:26, 3 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I have reverted a couple of your edits to the article for the following reasons:

• You keep adding the abbreviations for NCAA, ACC, and FBS, when the terms are not used in the rest of the article. We do not need to signify that these entities are known by these abbreviated names unless the names come up again. If you are adding them because you feel people should know that they are known by these names, readers can go to the NCAA and ACC pages linked to in the article.
• You also seem fit to remove links to the various sports that the teams participate in. While you may very be well aware that "Football" means "American football" and the like, there should be links to lead to the proper pages.

Please do not institute these changes again.—Ryulong (琉竜) 15:04, 29 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I meant no disrespect about it. But if you don't believe me, then back off. Thank you. jlog3000 (talk) 15:07, 29 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I have not said anything about not believing you. I just simply think the changes you are making are not necessary. You do not need to give the abbreviation for something unless that abbreviation is used on the same page in another instance.—Ryulong (琉竜) 15:10, 29 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Okay I'm seeing you're doing this across the project. You do not have to add this information to every article. And also when you put parentheses inside something already in parentheses you use brackets.—Ryulong (琉竜) 15:13, 29 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

But at least it should be necessary. If my help isn't enough, then it won't be worth it. jlog3000 (talk) 15:16, 29 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You don't have to add "National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA)" and "Football Subdivision Level (FBS)" to every article on American colleges that have football teams. It's not necessary so stop doing it. Just fix the articles in other ways that do not include adding abbreviations for these entities when they're not used on the page.—Ryulong (琉竜) 15:18, 29 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop making these changes to university and NCAA team articles. They are not helpful.—Ryulong (琉竜) 15:23, 29 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Then where else can I edit changes for the project besides the articles here on Wikipedia? Then I'll stop. jlog3000 (talk) 15:25, 29 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

What are you talking about? What project?—Ryulong (琉竜) 15:28, 29 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The one that I'm recently editing the schools'/teams' articles with the basic specific info. And to make everyone happy, undo every other change that I've done of the ACC, Big East, Big Ten and Big 12 schools/teams that I've thought it was necessary (but in your humble opinion, it was not). That way, this argument should be over. I'm tired of being mocked because of something that I thought it was helpful for me to do. End of discussion. It won't happen again. jlog3000 (talk) 15:31, 29 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not mocking you. Is there some sort of language barrier thing going on? All I did was say "This isn't useful" and then asked why you were doing it when you continued to do it. No one gets to unilaterally decide to change the formatting of every article in a topic area without explaining why when asked about it.—Ryulong (琉竜) 15:38, 29 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

And I asked you where else can I put my edits, but you avoid that question, with you stating that I should stop those, which I did. And the others have been reverted back before my changes? jlog3000 (talk) 15:41, 29 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You just shouldn't make the changes period. I'm not here to give youan alternative location to enact this project you have in your head.—Ryulong (琉竜) 15:50, 29 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep it up. And I won't make those changes. And as far as I'm concerned, this argument is over. jlog3000 (talk) 15:52, 29 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep what up? What argument? Seriously, I'm having problems understanding you, and it seems you are having the same problems as I am.—Ryulong (琉竜) 15:54, 29 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

See? You're doing it again. That's the argument. I've seen everything you said about not making the changes and stuff, but you kept talking about it after everything I've said about it and stopped. I just wanna end this in peace. jlog3000 (talk) 15:56, 29 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A proposal has been initiated on the Drew University talk page regarding how notable alumni, faculty, and presidents should be listed. Feel free to join the discussion. DavidinNJ (talk) 17:52, 30 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Gateway Collegiate Athletic Conference, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Missouri Valley (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:41, 12 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Patriot League may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 12:08, 7 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Atlantic Sun Conference may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 13:17, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited California Collegiate Athletic Association, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Phoenix (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:00, 11 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Lone Star Conference may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• Texas State University (now [[University of North Texas|North Texas]]), Sam Houston State College (now [[Sam Houston State University]], Southwestern State College (later '''Southwest Texas State

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 18:09, 14 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Ogachi District, Akita may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• br><br>Light Blue - to others<br><br>10. Nishinaruse (now part of Yokote-shi)<br>11. Komagata (northwest portion now part of Yokote-shi<br>23. Meiji (northern portion; now part of Yurihonjo-shi)<

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 18:49, 13 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Nanjō, Okinawa may have broken the syntax by modifying 4 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• a [[Cities of Japan|city]] in the southern part of [[Okinawa Island]] in [[Okinawa Prefecture]], [[Japan[[.
• ** Nakama (仲間))

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 21:45, 23 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Hidaka District, Hokkaido may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• Hokkaido|Shinhidaka]] - merger of the former towns of [[Mitsuishi, Hokkaido|Mitsuishi]] (from the former [[Mitsuishi District, Hokkaido|Mitsuishi District]] and [[Shizunai, Hokkaido|

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 15:23, 25 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Lone Star Conference may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• affiliated with the [[National Collegiate Athletic Association]] (NCAA) [[Division II (NCAA)|Division II]. Member institutions are located in the [[southwestern United

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 21:04, 25 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Rocky Mountain Athletic Conference may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• in [[Colorado]] with some members in [[Nebraska]] and [[New Mexico]]. It participates in the [[National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA)'s [[Division II (NCAA)|Division II]] level.
• PlotArea = right:20 left:0 bottom:50 top:5 #> to display a count on left side of graph, use "left:20" to suppress the count, use "left:20"<#

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 21:31, 25 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to South Atlantic Conference may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• athletic conference]] which operates in the [[Southeastern United States]]. It participates in the [[National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA)'s [[Division II (NCAA)|Division II]] level. The SAC
• PlotArea = right:20 left:0 bottom:50 top:5 #> to display a count on left side of graph, use "left:20" to suppress the count, use "left:20"<#

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 21:31, 25 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Arakawa, Saitama may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• along with the town of [[Yoshida, Saitama|Yoshida]], and the village of [[Ōtaki, Saitama|Ōtaki]] (all from [[Chichibu District, Saitama|Chichibu District]] (all from [[Chichibu District, Saitama|

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 21:40, 28 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Kitsuregawa, Tochigi may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• On March 28, 2005, Kitsuregawa, along with the town of [[Ujiie, Tochigi|Ujiie]] (also from [[Shioya District, Tochigi|Shioya District]], was merged to create the city of [[Sakura,

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 12:13, 29 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Fujihara, Tochigi may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• District, Tochigi|Kamitsuga District]]), and the village of [[Kuriyama, Tochigi|Kuriyama]] (also from [[Shioya District, Tochigi|Shioya District]], was merged into the expanded city of [[

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 12:36, 29 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to List of mergers in Aichi Prefecture may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• *On January 4, 2012 - the town of '''[[Nagakute, Aichi|Nagakute]]''' (from [[Aichi District, Aichi|Aichi District]] became a '''''city status'''''; leaving Aichi

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 13:18, 29 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Shimoyama, Aichi may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• along with the town of [[Fujioka, Aichi|Fujioka]], the village of [[Obara, Aichi|Obara]] (both from [[Nishikamo District, Aichi|Nishikamo District]], and the towns of [[Asuke, Aichi|Asuke]],

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 14:06, 29 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Mochizuki, Nagano may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• District, Nagano|Minamisaku District]]), and the village of [[Asashina, Nagano|Asashina]] (also from [[Kitasaku District, Nagano|Kitasaku District]], was merged into the expanded city of [[

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 18:49, 30 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Jinsekikōgen, Hiroshima, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Yuki, Hiroshima (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:19, 22 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Aira City in Kagoshima Prefecture Ja.png. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 22:05, 22 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I got this from the Japanese Wikipedia version of the Aira City, Kagoshima article. Take a look: [3] But I don't know how to credit it. Any advice? jlog3000 (talk) 10:54, 23 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Azuma, Gunma (Tone) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Sonohara

Gozenyama, Ibaraki (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Ogawa, Ibaraki

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:35, 29 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Kameda, Niigata may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• [[Tsukigata, Niigata|Tsukigata]], all from [[Nishikanbara District, Niigata|Nishikanbara District]]), was merged into the expanded city of [[Niigata, Niigata|Niigata]]. As of April 1, 2007, the area

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 14:10, 1 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Washima, Niigata may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• Teradomari]] and [[Yoita, Niigata|Yoita]], all from [[Santō District, Niigata|Santō District]]), was merged into the expanded city of [[Nagaoka, Niigata|Nagaoka]].

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 19:34, 1 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Fukude, Shizuoka may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• the village of [[Toyooka, Shizuoka|Toyooka]] all from [[Iwata District, Shizuoka|Iwata District]]), was merged into the expanded city of [[Iwata, Shizuoka|Iwata]] and thus no longer exists as an

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 22:01, 1 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Fuchu, Toyama may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• 1, 2005, Fuchū, along with the towns of [[Ōsawano, Toyama|Ōsawano]] and [[Ōyama, Toyama|Ōyama]] (both from [[Kaminiikawa District, Toyama|Kaminiikawa District]], the town of [[Yatsuo, Toyama|

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 14:17, 2 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Yasutomi, Hyōgo may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• (both from [[Shikama District, Hyōgo|Shikama District]]), and the town of [[Kōdera, Hyōgo|Kōdera]] (from [[Kanzaki District, Hyōgo|Kanzaki District]], was merged into the expanded city of [[Himeji,

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 21:06, 2 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Amata District, Kyoto may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• ], along with the town of [[Ōe, Kyoto|Ōe]] (from the town of [[Kasa District]], Kyoto|Kasa District]]), were merged into the expanded city of [[Fukuchiyama, Kyoto|Fukuchiyama]]. Amata District was

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 11:55, 3 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Ureshino, Mie may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• On January 1, 2005, Ureshino, along the town of [[Mikumo, Mie|Mikumo]] (also from [[Ichishi District, Mie|Ichishi District]], and the towns of [[Iinan, Mie|Iinan]] and [[

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 13:36, 3 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Kawahara, Tottori may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• ], and the village of [[Saji, Tottori|Saji]], all from [[Yazu District, Tottori|Yazu District]]), was merged into the expanded city of [[Tottori, Tottori|Tottori]].

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 12:11, 5 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Mizokuchi, Tottori may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• to create the town of [[Hōki, Tottori|Hōki]] 9in [[Saihaku District, Tottori|Saihaku District]]).

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 12:13, 5 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to List of mergers in Ehime Prefecture may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• the towns of [[Mima, Ehime|Mima]], [[Tsushima, Ehime|Tsushima]] and [[Yoshida, Ehime|Yoshida]] (all from [[Kitauwa District, Ehime|Kitauwa District]] to create the new and expanded city of '''[[

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 17:02, 5 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Yoshino, Tokushima may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• (both from [[Awa District, Tokushima|Awa District]]), and the town of [[Donari, Tokushima|Donari]] (also from [[Itano District, Tokushima|Itano District]], to form the new city of [[Awa, Tokushima|

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 18:03, 6 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to List of mergers in Kagoshima Prefecture may have broken the syntax by modifying 3 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 15:11, 7 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Chiran, Kagoshima may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• of [[Kawanabe, Kagoshima|Kawanabe]], also from [[Kawanabe District, Kagoshima|Kawanabe District]]), was merged to form the new city of [[Minamikyūshū, Kagoshima|Minamikyūshū]].

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 18:00, 7 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Kawaura, Kumamoto may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• {nihongo|'''Kawaura'''|河浦町|Kawaura-machi)}} was a [[List of towns in Japan|town]] located in [[Amakusa District, Kumamoto|Amakusa District]],

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 21:38, 7 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Kitahata, Saga may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• ] located in [[Higashimatsuura District, Saga|Higashimatsuura District]], [[Saga Prefecture]]], [[Japan]].

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 18:54, 8 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Esashi District, Iwate may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• [List of Provinces of Japan]] > [[Tōsandō]] > [[Rikuchu Province]] > '''Esashi District'''
• Iitoyo]], [[Futago, Iwate|Futago]], [[Saraki, Iwate|Saraki]] and [[Oniyanagi, Iwate|Oniyanagi]] (all from [[Waga District, Iwate|Waga District]](, and the village of [[Aisari, Iwate|Aisari]] (from Isawa District) to create the '''city of [[

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 12:05, 12 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Ichinoseki, Iwate may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• *September 26, 2011 - the town of [[Fujisawa, Iwate|Fujisawa]] (also from [[Higashiiwai District, Iwate|Higashiiwai District]] was merged into Ichinoseki.

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 12:59, 12 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Kazo, Saitama may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• towns of [[Kisai, Saitama|Kisai]], [[Kitakawabe, Saitama|Kitakawabe]] and [[Ōtone, Saitama|Ōtone]] (all from [[Kita-Saitama District, Saitama|Kitasaitama District]] to create the current and expanded

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 15:46, 14 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Ichinomiya, Aichi may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• * Aichi Prefecture]]
• * [[Gifu Prefecture]

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 13:19, 15 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Tahara, Aichi may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• to city status on August 20, 2003 when the former town of Tahara absorbed the village of Akabane (both from Atsumi District. On October 1, 2005, the town of Atsumi (also from Atsumi District) was

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 15:01, 15 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Nagahama, Shiga may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• On February 13, 2006, the towns of [[Azai, Shiga|Azai]] and [[Biwa, Shiga|Biwa]] (both from [[Higashiazai District, Shiga|Higashiazai District]] were merged into the old city of

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 16:34, 17 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Kirishima, Kagoshima may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• ]. It is a crossroads for commerce between Kagoshima and [[Miyazaki Prefecture|Miyazaki]] {refectures. It is also the home of the [[Kagoshima Airport]], the terminus for the JR Hisatsu line,

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 15:13, 29 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Question: what's the reason for the numerous removals of metric conversion in Japan municipality articles, e.g. 86 kilometres (53 mi) to 86.00 km² in Uruma? ---> Prburley (talk) 01:50, 30 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Only just because I wanna make things fairly balanced. Nothing offensive. jlog3000 (talk) 10:59, 30 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Cool. But the metric/customary conversions are standard across all articles, specifically geography-related articles--that's why the convert templates exist. Please read MOS:CONVERSIONS. Thanks. ---> Prburley (talk) 12:28, 30 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Now that you say that, do this favor for me. Try putting that template on ALL of the edits I did on all of Japan's current and defunct municipalities. jlog3000 (talk) 12:44, 30 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This is across all current and defunct municipalities? And, did you remove them throughout the entirety of the articles, or just in the opening sentences? ---> Prburley (talk) 13:59, 30 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

On all current and defunct municipalities, yes. BUT, on the sentences that say "As of 2012, the municipality has an estimated population of ??,??? and a population density of ???.?? persons per km². The total area is ??.?? km²" jlog3000 (talk) 14:20, 30 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I'd revert/correct them all--the article for Tokyo will give you an idea of how to use the conversion templates of all kinds.

Johnluisocasio

automatically supplies the per km²/per mile that you can use in the body text. ---> Prburley (talk) 14:36, 30 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Also "has" should be in the past tense--I've never seen a population statistic current to the day viewed on the prefectural/municipality site. And if the population given is pre-2013 you could update that by going to the municipality website, it's standard on those websites in Japan. ---> Prburley (talk) 14:36, 30 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Oh ok. Hope you didn't re-modify the "population density part as "density". jlog3000 (talk) 14:47, 30 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I wouldn't use "population" + "population density" within the same sentence, it seems like overkill. But I wouldn't modify it either from what's already there. ---> Prburley (talk) 15:17, 30 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Back to reverting/adding back the Convert templates -- how many articles did you modify, and how can they be reverted? ---> Prburley (talk) 15:17, 30 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Academy of Art Urban Knights requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 00:22, 20 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

John, I love the Timeline you put on The Sun Conference. How did you do that? Thanks!Jacona (talk) 12:52, 11 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

No prob. But who are you? Anyways, I didn't create it. I copy/paste the timeline format and re-modify it. jlog3000 (talk) 12:21, 11 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I need your help on this article https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Walter_Veith As it needs work to keep it from being deleted from Wikipedia. Any help would be appreciated. Thanks. Simbagraphix (talk)

Also if could get your input on this related article for Amazing Discoveries....https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Amazing_Discoveries

....Thanks.Simbagraphix (talk)

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to American Mideast Conference may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• | [[Mountain East Conference|Mountain East]] in 2013)<br>(NCAA Division II)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 21:46, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited North Georgia College & State University, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page NAIA (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:54, 16 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited South Atlantic Conference, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Anderson University (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:53, 5 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Iwaki-kuni, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.cyclopaedia.es/wiki/Iwaki_province.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 19:17, 27 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Henan may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 16:01, 31 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Inner Mongolia may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• , seventeen [[County (People's Republic of China)|counties]], forty-nine [[Banner of Inner Mongolia)|banners]], and three [[autonomous banner]]s. Those are in turn divided into 1425 [[Administrative

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 20:14, 31 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Gansu may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• ] and two [[Autonomous prefectures of the People's Republic of China|autonomous prefectures]]):

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 14:47, 1 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello and thanks for your recent edits on articles of some of Macedonia's municipalities. I was just wondering where you had discovered that Lozovo Municipality and Sveti Nikole Municipality are in the Eastern Statistical Region and not Vardar. This is contradictory to what I've seen thus far. Regards. --Local hero ^talk 01:13, 10 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and you're welcome. And I'm trying my hardest to edit at almost every current municipality (except those that existed between 1996 and 2003 or 2004). About the Lozovo and Sveti Nikole municipality articles, I knew that they were part of the Eastern Macedonia statistical region and not within the Vardar statistical region. Then, I got a bit confused about that. So I'll try to revert those back to its rightful place. jlog3000 (talk) 11:05, 10 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Lezhë County, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Blinisht. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:17, 18 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Phnom Penh, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Krom. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:14, 4 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to COROP may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• ||30|| South West South Holland<br>(Zuidoost-Zuid-Holland || [[Alblasserdam]], [[Dordrecht (Nederland)|Dordrecht]], [[Giessenlanden]], [

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 17:21, 14 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited COROP, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Reimerswaal and Scherpenzeel. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:17, 15 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nagi,_Okayama--On this page you wrote:

"Masashi Kishimoto (Japanese manga artist) - Notable for creating the anime/manga series Naruto. The town of Nagi was the inspiration for the village of Konoha, where most of the protagonists of Naruto live."

But you didn't provide a source. I would like to ask how is it that you know that Kishimoto used the town of Nagi as inspiration for the village of Konoha in the manga Naruto. M-droid (talk) 15:44, 14 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This user's request to have autoblock on their IP address lifted has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Johnluisocasio (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

127.0.0.1 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)

---

Block message:

Autoblocked because your IP address was recently used by "JeanilynD16". The reason given for JeanilynD16's block is: "Vandalism-only account".

• Blocking administrator: Coffee (talk • blocks)

---

Accept reason: Done. — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 23:06, 9 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

jlog3000 (talk) 22:21, 9 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited West Java, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Parigi. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:25, 13 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Peshawar Division, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Charsadda District. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:06, 20 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Nghệ An Province, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hoàng Mai. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:47, 27 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Gôh-Djiboua District

added a link pointing to Divo

Zanzan District

added a link pointing to Bouna

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:47, 22 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:21, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Sub-prefectures of the Central African Republic, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ouango. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:43, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi John! I have recently made some updates to the Mid-South Conference, and as you and Corky have previously done a lot of work, I thought I would defer to the two of you to possibly update it further. The conference has expanded from 13 to 20 members by adding the football members from The Sun Conference plus another school, and I have done some work, but don't know how some of those tables should be handled. I thought you might have a better idea of how to handle it than I do, Thanks! Jacona (talk) 14:33, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Bagh District, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bagh. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:20, 5 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Roman Catholic Diocese of Hyderabad in Pakistan, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hyderabad District. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:38, 12 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

List of talukas of Sindh

added links pointing to Hyderabad District and Gulberg Town

List of tehsils of Punjab, Pakistan

added a link pointing to Nishtar

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:00, 8 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Local government areas of Queensland, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page City of Maryborough. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:11, 4 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

	Queensland Barnstar
	Thanks for all your work on those former local government areas in Queensland! Kerry (talk) 04:00, 30 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, I try my best. But still, I wish I could find a precise list or source of info of knowing about the gazetted suburbs & localities (as well as its cattle/farm stations/locations) of every local government area (LGA; past & present) every state & territory in Australia though. jlog3000 (talk) 04:24, 30 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I have the current suburbs and localities for Queensland in an Excel spreadsheet (courtesy of the Qld Govt) but not sadly the historic ones (I wish I did). If you would like it, I can send it to you via email (send me your email address via Wikipedia email for your privacy). It does not cover the pastoral stations as their naming is not a Qld Govt responsibility, but it does cover towns, suburbs, localities, mountains, rivers, small puddles etc if the Qld Govt has assigned an official name to it. Having said that, you will probably find some homestead names in there too. Kerry (talk) 04:32, 30 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sounds fair to me. :) However though, I don't know how to private message users on Wikipedia mail. lol Plus, when I meant historic ones, I meant the former LGAs (of which suburbs, localities, etc. belonged to them before the amalgamations/mergers). Hope this clarifies a bit more. jlog3000 (talk) 04:46, 30 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I understood what you meant about historic ones; I just don't have the information. To email a Wikipedia user, go to their User or User Talk page and in the left-hand tool bar, you should see "Email this user" (unless the user has set their preferences to not receive email). So if you email me, it will disclose (to me) your email address and I can reply adding the Excel file as an attachment. Kerry (talk) 04:51, 30 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Got it. Just sent to you back. Plus, thanks in advance. To be honest, it's an honor to be part of this project, because I admire "local government-style" geography. You know, involving knowing of how each local administrative subdivision/unit (from municipalities to settlements, etc.) were created to exist, etc. jlog3000 (talk) 05:02, 30 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Johnluisocasio. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The article Pomona-Pitzer Sagehens has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable sports team, appropriately covered at Pomona College, Pitzer College, and Claremont Colleges per WP:SUMMARYSTYLE

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. James (^talk/_contribs) 04:45, 28 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Pomona-Pitzer Sagehens is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pomona-Pitzer Sagehens until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. The Banner talk 21:28, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Claremont-Mudd-Scripps Stags and Athenas is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Claremont-Mudd-Scripps Stags and Athenas until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. James (^talk/_contribs) 02:16, 30 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Johnluisocasio. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I presently work on the rural areas of eastern India and have put up many pages in Wikipedia, but I have little knowledge about the administrative divisions in other parts of India. There is a lot of confusion and there is a lot of unreferenced material in Wikipedia on the subject. The only administrative unit that is stable and accepted throughout the country is the district. In the 2011 census all data has been provided community development block-wise, but there are one or more levels in between the district and the CD Block. I am not sure about what those divisions are country-wise. I appreciate the interest you have on the topic but I am sorry that I am not in a position to help you. Cheers. - Chandan Guha (talk) 16:42, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings. And no worries, I understand. However, what are those sub-division level names between the districts & the C.D. blocks? jlog3000 (talk) 17:07, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Horowhenua District, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ohau (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:38, 20 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Johnluisocasio. I just got your email regarding subdivisions in the country of Nepal. I'm afraid that I really know very little about Nepal. The only edit I recall making on a Nepal-related subject was correcting a disambiguation link. I can only suggest that you dig through Nepali categories for the information you are looking for. Sorry I couldn't be more help, Leschnei (talk) 21:59, 24 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I was going to revert your large addition of the table, as it is literally duplication of the tables above, just in one table. Can you explain why this table is necessary? Vaselineeeeeeee^★★★ 21:31, 28 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Go ahead, revert it. Maybe I will make a small fix by adding those additional layers (in regards with the sub-regions part) on the original tables. Sounds about alright? jlog3000 (talk) 21:38, 28 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ok. I wouldn't add Brant vs Brantford and Haldimand vs Norfolk in the tables, but maybe include their populations along with the note that's already there. Vaselineeeeeeee^★★★ 21:40, 28 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Sounds fair enough to me, but can you like guide me a bit? As my intention was to add the column layers for which census division corresponds to which primary & secondary region within the province. jlog3000 (talk) 21:42, 28 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

What do you mean by primary and secondary region? They are already broken into counties, regional municipalities, Single-tier municipalities, and districts. Vaselineeeeeeee^★★★ 21:59, 28 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Well, doesn't Ontario have non-official/administrative sub-division units that group the census divisions (i.e.: counties, regional municipalities, single-tier municipalities and districts)? Making reference to the regions of Northern Ontario and Southern Ontario (with their respective sub-regions). jlog3000 (talk) 22:29, 28 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I see what you mean. That looks fine to me. Vaselineeeeeeee^★★★ 22:55, 28 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Glad that we have understood now, after the latest fixes I had to put into since you reverted my last edit. I thank you for that. jlog3000 (talk) 23:03, 28 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The article CZW Death Match Championship has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Short-lived championship, I cannot find any coverage from reliable sources - either wiki mirrors or mentioned that "this guy held the Death Match Championship". Fails the General Notability guideline.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.  MPJ-DK  14:00, 29 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Pomona-Pitzer Sagehens is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pomona-Pitzer Sagehens (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. The Banner talk 09:18, 17 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Johnluisocasio. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You sent me an email saying:

About your deletion request on the Wikipedia page of Wellesley, Ontario, may I ask why? It's an active local municipality as the Township Municipality of Wellesley within the Regional Municipality of Waterloo within the Province of Ontario.

Presumably this is about my administrative deletion which I then followed a minute later by undeleting all but the oldest version. As I described in the deletion summary, this was setting up for a history merge. See WP:HM for details on what I was doing. I admire your quick typing, as the page was only fully deleted for one minute. Wikiacc (¶) 18:24, 12 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, this is in response to your email you sent me. Here is a good source map for the former municipalities (you'll have to scroll around): https://www.topoquest.com/map.php?lat=45.42500&lon=-75.67500&datum=nad83&zoom=8&map=50k&coord=d&mode=zoomin&size=xl Cheers. -- Earl Andrew - talk 18:12, 2 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Are you sure that we should add a column for zones? Zones haven't been functional since 30 years ago. They are completely defunct. Also, as you have probably read in the history section, Thimphu didn't belong to any zone. TryKid (talk) 00:07, 23 August 2019 (UTC) Just saw the note on your page, I'm also very interested in subdivisions of countries, specially in the Indian subcontinent; that's why I developed Districts of Bhutan and nominated it for featured list, I'm really happy that's it's on the front page today. About Nepal, it's pretty unstable and they can't decide on the names of their provinces, it's a very political issue, information changes fast and news comes out slow. TryKid (talk) 00:14, 23 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, John! Thanks for creating the Tokyo ward templates! Anyhow, I'd like to suggest adding all Tokyo railway stations: JR, Tokyo Metro, Toei, and Keisei, to their respective Tokyo ward templates. There should be enough room, I think. WhisperToMe (talk) 03:27, 27 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Mompach, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Born and Herborn (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:04, 7 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Bascharage (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Linger

Bascharage (commune) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Linger

Käerjeng (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Linger

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:30, 14 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Johnluisocasio,

Thank you for creating Sawata, Niigata.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Please add references.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Boleyn}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Boleyn (talk) 19:39, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Johnluisocasio,

Thank you for creating Ogi, Niigata.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Please add clear references to all articles you create.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Boleyn}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Boleyn (talk) 19:44, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:08, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Nevada-Reno. Since you had some involvement with the Nevada-Reno redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 01:24, 26 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi John, in response to your email, see Local government areas of Queensland, Category:Former local government areas of Queensland, List of former local government areas of Queensland, Category:Local government areas of Queensland. To my very limited knowledge, this is a start. LGA articles past and present would have some of the settlement names you want. The names of properties and cattle stations is probably beyond scope. I'll have a scrounge around for a suitable portal/group where you might attract a more knowledgeable response. If you want, reply here, I'll watch. Bleakcomb (talk) 22:55, 28 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! Your opinion is welcome at Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Pakistan#Does_Sheikhupura_Division_exist?. Thanks! – Uanfala (talk) 02:39, 24 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sheikhupura Division is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sheikhupura Division until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Sheriff | ☎ 911 | 04:56, 27 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Gbudwe State, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tambura (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 13:43, 7 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Saw you making changes to this page, and I was curious if you could go take a look at the Talk:Chiefdoms of Sierra Leone and the questions I left, and see if you know the answer? Thanks. --Criticalthinker (talk) 07:53, 9 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I saw your response on the article. And to be quite honest, I got no clue. That is beyond me. jlog3000 (talk) 10:04, 9 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Johnluisocasio

Thank you for creating St. Thomas (Minnesota) Tommies.

User:Whiteguru, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Nice work.

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Whiteguru}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Whiteguru (talk) 08:20, 21 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

In response to your e-mail.
If you add up all -han that still existed in August 1871 to be turned into -ken, and add all -fu/-ken that had been created under the fu/han/ken system and were still around in August 1871, then you have the 300+ prefectures in August 1871 (according to the MIC, the exact number was 305 prefectures and that agrees with what I have read, and with what the ja.wikipedia article on prefectures of Japan says; but with changes happening almost with every sunrise in those days, it always depends on when and how exactly you count; and watch out for the Japanese/Gregorian calendar difference, some sources are very sloppy about it).
So, you could take together List of han and Fuhanken sanchisei#Established prefectures, take what remains by 1871 and it should add up to 305 prefectures. This link that I also added to the fu/han/ken article also contains lists by region of 1868– ex-shogunate-prefectures and 1871 domains-turned-prefectures and things in between – but I don't know if it adds up to 305. For a good old printed list or map, I'd need an afternoon in a good library or a stroll through the bookstores of Kanda; but that is something I haven't been able to do for a very long time, so I can offer you no good answer.
It is much easier, in my experience, to go backwards from a single of today's prefectures towards its precursor prefectures. In many cases, prefectural government websites or prefectural libraries, prefectural archives etc. have some kind of history portal/section/page and some material about the prefecture's creation and territorial evolution. Good, internet-accessible maps are rare, though, which is sad because that would be self-explanatory (but it is hard to create good maps in the first place, it was really very entangled territorially, especially in some central parts of Japan, less so with some of the more powerful "outer"/tozama rulers who still controlled more or less entire provinces under the Tokugawa, so there was much less ex-/enclave mess to clean up when their domains became prefectures). I've found only one pretty decent, comprehensive, online set of historical maps showing the territorial evolution in the restoration so far during my Japan-related Wikipedia editing: the Hyōgo prefectural government features on its history pages one pre-restoration map of the 130+ major and minor (shogunate/han/han exclaves/hatamoto/shrines/temples) territories in what is today Hyōgo and three maps of the prefecture 1868–1871, 1872–1876 and 1876–. (Though, if I get a wish for free, I'd wish they had included other early Meiji prefectures containing areas now part of Hyōgo in the 1868–71 map or in a separate same-period map for an even higher self-explanatory-score. If I get two, I'd wish for a better resolution of the bakumatsu map.) But at least, it gives a glimpse of how 1868 prefectures were everything but "approximately their current forms".
I'm sorry, but these meagre starting points are all I can offer you instantly. --Asakura Akira (talk) 03:29, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The article Northern Illinois-Iowa Conference has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unsourced stub since 2006

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Another Believer _(Talk) 18:10, 1 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:31, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I see that you sent me an e-mail. I prefer to correspond about Wikipedia-related matters on Wikipedia so that those matters can be viewed by all interested editors. You are welcome to post on my talk page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 22:16, 18 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Kintampo District, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kintampo.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:20, 31 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

While you're updating Ghana pages, please remove the duplicative numerals in parentheses. There is no reason to say "nine (9)" at all. Thanks, Reywas92^Talk 21:35, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

It will take some time, but I will try my best. On a sidenote, are you from there too? jlog3000 (talk) 21:42, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

No, I came across this from an outside topic. and you just happened to be editing them at the same time. I belive I've gotten most of them fixed. Reywas92^Talk 22:34, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hold on. Don't get me wrong. I respect and understand your concern. But I got a reason that I'm trying to keep up-to date on how each MMDA (metropolitan, municipal and district assembly-level) unit is upto date, which so far there are 260 districts, and I'm trying my hardest to have that part upto date. And if I see a number in parenthesis, I will remove. Hope you're not being blunt and blatant against me about this. jlog3000 (talk) 22:44, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Chicky Starr, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page International Wrestling Association.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:21, 13 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Pru District, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Prang.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:11, 26 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Rangpur Division, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Rangpur.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:57, 25 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for putting together the article on the New England Collegiate Conference. I understand there are actually two versions of this conference, the one that covered Division II teams and was disbanded about the year 2000, then the conference was either reinstituted or the same name used for a Division III conference.

I do have a couple questions. The article has an official site in the external links, but that site appears to be only related to the more recent Division III conference. Did I miss something?

I do not see any references.

I'm guessing you use the fandom site to help fill out the information. https://basketball.fandom.com/wiki/New_England_Collegiate_Conference

As you probably know, that doesn't qualify as a reliable source. I did some brief poking around and did not find a good source for the information.

My main reason for writing is that I'm working on New Hampshire Wildcats women's basketball. I've added the coaching history back to 1988 and now want to work on the earlier years. According to the NCAA, between 1981 and 1987 New Hampshire was a Division II team. Some of the data posted, for example the 1984 year, clearly indicates that the school was part of the New England Collegiate Conference. However, the article about the conference makes no mention of the University of New Hampshire.

Any chance I could get you to help track down what's going on? Many schools have media guides which provide a lot of relevant information but I haven't yet tracked him down for UNH.--S Philbrick(Talk) 11:32, 11 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't perform cut-and-paste moves like you did on Bunkpurugu-Yunyoo District. I have fixed these by doing a history merge.

Also, I moved Talk:Bunkpurugu-Yunyoo District to put it back in sync with the article. Generally, articles and their talk pages should be moved together, and if you cannot do this due to lack of administrator or page-mover privileges, you should ask an admin for help. Thanks, wbm1058 (talk) 18:23, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

And in regards with the other articles in regards with those ending with "?" Municipal only? Plus, how come some MMDA's are fine without a hyphen? jlog3000 (talk) 18:29, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

1) As to whether Ashaiman Municipal District should be Ashaiman Municipal, the former sounds better to me, but I have no strong opinion. There should probably be a consistent naming convention for the Districts of Ghana.

2) As to whether Bunkpurugu Nyankpanduri District should be Bunkpurugu-Nyankpanduri District, I have no opinion on the matter, and suggest researching sources for the most common usage. At 19:18, 5 June 2021‎ Natsubee moved page Bunkpurugu-Nyankpanduri DistrictBunkpurugu-Nyankpanduri District to Bunkpurugu Nyankpanduri District: "no hyphen in name of district". Perhaps they can explain. – wbm1058 (talk) 19:18, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Then it leads me to the following questions, but before I ask them, I believe the Districts of Ghana article should be renamed in the future as MMDAs of Ghana, when MMDA stands for Metropolitan, Municipal and District Assembly or basically Local Assemblies of Ghana. Your thoughts? Anyways, here are some questions:

1) For all MMDA articles that have municipal assembly status, shall each of those end as "?" Municipal?

2) For all MMDA articles that have metropolitan assembly status, shall each of those end as "?" Metropolis?

3) If not, shall each of those end as "?" Assembly, regardless of MMDA status type? For instance: Cape Coast Municipal Assembly or Tamale Metropolitan Assembly, etc.

4) For all active MMDAs, which of those have the proper use for a hyphen within a MMDA name that has more than one sub-area? For instance: Weija Gbawe Municipal District instead of Weija-Gbawe Municipal District, etc.

Lemme know your thoughts or feedback about this. jlog3000 (talk) 19:31, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not super familiar with Ghana so I don't have any answers and this is the sort of thing that shouldn't really be decided by just you and me on your talk page. You could review Wikipedia:Naming conventions (geographic names), but that doesn't have much in the way of specific guidance for Africa. I think the best option is to ask your questions at WT:WikiProject Ghana, and hopefully you'll get some responses from members of that project. – wbm1058 (talk) 11:40, 15 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, came across this chat by accident. What I have been following generally is the names of the MMDAs on ghanadistricts.gov.gh which is the official Ghana government website which lists these districts.--Natsubee (talk) 00:17, 18 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Johnluisocasio! Your additions to State University of New York Athletic Conference have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.

• You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
• Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
• We have strict guidelines on the usage of copyrighted images. Fair use images must meet all ten of the non-free content criteria in order to be used in articles, or they will be deleted. To be used on Wikipedia, all other images must be made available under a free and open copyright license that allows commercial and derivative reuse.
• If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into either the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Such a release must be done in a verifiable manner, so that the authority of the person purporting to release the copyright is evidenced. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
• Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps described at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. See also Help:Translation#License requirements.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. DanCherek (talk) 13:50, 26 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Then do you have any better ideas for me to post the history of that conference without causing any of those issues? Because that link was the source I could possibly find. jlog3000 (talk) 13:51, 26 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

It's fine to use it as a source and summarize information from it, but there is a copyright notice at the bottom of the website that reads "All Rights Reserved 2018 SUNYAC", which means that copying verbatim is not allowed. DanCherek (talk) 13:53, 26 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I see. But I wasn't aware of that aspect. However, the only reason I wanted to add a history section was to put a timeline on how each member school joined or left that conference in a certain standpoint. If that makes sense. jlog3000 (talk) 14:00, 26 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A history section certainly makes sense! It would be a nice addition to the page if it's written in your own words. Until then, it would be better to leave it out rather than add something that is copied from a copyright source. I appreciate your understanding DanCherek (talk) 14:02, 26 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Gotcha and understood. Like I said, the main focus of purpose for my attempt to add a history timeline for that athletic conference is for other readers or viewers to understand how certain member schools were associated and their tenures, either with full membership (as of all sports being available or provided) or with temporary membership (as of competing on certain sports when those schools' primary athletic conferences couldn't provide). I'll see what I can do to try to make it summarized. jlog3000 (talk) 14:17, 26 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Kansas Collegiate Athletic Conference, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kansas City Cowboys.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 9 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit to Crossroads League has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. The apparent source of the copyrighted information is http://www.crossroadsleague.com/d/2020-21/CL_HistoryTimeline_8-3.pdf Indyguy (talk) 15:52, 15 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Was it something I said or did? All I just did was simply moved the history sub-section on top over the current members sub-section, within the same article. jlog3000 (talk) 16:03, 15 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Oh my! I really goofed. That'll teach me not to look at the entire edit. However, in my defense, it would have helped if you had included a comment about what you were doing. I'll delete the material in question. Indyguy (talk) 16:24, 15 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Upon further investigation, perhaps my apology was somewhat overblown. The history of the article shows that this edit which you made on 15 March 2015 was the one that added the history. I realize that one can easily forget making an edit over six years ago, but it is ironic that indeed it was something that you did. Indyguy (talk) 16:43, 15 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hold on. Don't get me wrong. I understand your motive and reason. But I wasn't intentionally added another comment within the membership history sub-section. Plus, I the only other edit I only added was like another bar on the membership timeline graph table to group which eras were the MCCC and the CL. But now that you mention that part, is there a way that I can summarize as a re-edit to avoid of the link source to be mirrored in a sense, in regards with the membership history sub-section? jlog3000 (talk) 16:59, 15 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:11, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

4 template-redirects you created are up for discussion at: Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 January 8#Zones and woredas of the Afar Region (template-redirects). Please join in the discussion. Platonk (talk) 02:08, 8 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding your questions a) to d) I will try to answer them:

Do you have a full and complete list of the following subdivisions within the country of Georgia (as of 2020)?:

Question a.) regions (mkhare) & autonomous republics (avtonomiuri respublika) & occupied territories (ok'up'irebuli t'erit'oriebi) & the direct-controlled city municipality of Tbilisi
Answer: All regions (mkhare) are listed on this official page (gov.ge Regions), including the two Autonomous Republics as recognized by the constitution

Question b.) districts (raioni) & municipalities (munits'ipaliteti) [i.e.: city-type (k'alak'i) & community-type (t'emi)] within each region & autonomous republic & occupied territory & the direct-controlled city municipality of Tbilisi
Answer: All municipalities (either city type or community type) are listed in the link at point a), but a separate official registry is here Municipal Registry. It also lists all administrative subunits (communities, temi) and settlements within these subunits. It also lists, just like above, a few "temporary territorial units" that were formed in 2006 with the local governance reform, which transformed districts (raioni) into municipalities. These temporary territorial units were formed to govern the territories that Georgia still controlled in South Ossetia and Abkhazia in 2006 (and lost control of in 2008). These are entirely located in these regions, and since 2008 they exist pro-forma with administrative bodies in Tbilisi or in the IDP settlements composed of residents of the occupied settlements. These are Upper Abkhazia (Kodori gorge), and in South Ossetia: Akhalgori, Kurta, Eredvi and Tighvi. See Law on Local Governance, Article 164.

Question c.) administrative units [administ’ratsiuli erteulebi; urban-type (urbanuli) & rural-type (sopelis)] within each district (raion) & municipality within each region & autonomous republic & occupied territory & the direct-controlled city municipality of Tbilisi
Answer: The full list of all settlements (and administrative units, temi) per municipality is available in for example the Census of 2014.Main results 2014 census in Georgian This is for all settlements in Georgian controlled territory and not the occupied territories.

Question d.) populated places [dasakhlebuli adgilebi (i.e.: towns (kalakebi), villages (sopeli), localities (adgilobrivebi), settlements (dasakhlebebi), communities (temebi), neighborhoods (ubnebi), hamlets (hamleti), etc.)] within each administrative unit within each district & municipality within each region & autonomous republic & occupied territory & the direct-controlled city municipality of Tbilisi
Answer: See above. A complete list of all ubnebi or hamleti I have not at hand at the moment.

Hope this helps. --Labrang (talk) 14:24, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

About question C, where else can I find a list of administrative units/settlement groups for the occupied territories I mentioned prior? For the rest, I will check each one out and I want to thank you for your time and effort in that regard. jlog3000 (talk) 14:33, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited American Mideast Conference, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Carlow College and Wilmington College.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not introduce links in actual articles to draft articles, as you did to Ohio University and Ohio Regional Campus Conference. Since a draft is not yet ready for the main article space, it is not in shape for ordinary readers, and links from articles should not go to a draft. Such links are contrary to the Manual of Style. These links have been removed. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 12:57, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ok. Thanks for the fair warning. However, then how come this particular draft isn't yet an official article as it should be? jlog3000 (talk) 12:58, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Interstate Intercollegiate Athletic Conference, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Augustana Vikings.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:09, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You've been editing several articles about colleges and universities to change and update their section about athletics and that has been very helpful. Could you please change from using the formulation "<institution> athletic teams are nicknamed as the <team name>" when you make these edits? It's a really awkward phrase and I don't think that "nicknamed" is correct either. It would be simpler and more correct to just say "<institution> athletic teams are nicknamed as the <team name>." Thanks! ElKevbo (talk) 02:51, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I would gladly try to do that. But can you give me an example of such? So I can re-edit some of them? jlog3000 (talk) 02:54, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You're very consistent so it's easy to find examples: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=North_Greenville_University&curid=7262427&diff=1084013890&oldid=1076203706, https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Newberry_College&diff=prev&oldid=1084013674, and https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Guilford_College&diff=prev&oldid=1083988916. ElKevbo (talk) 03:18, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Not sure if I take it as a compliment or as an insult. But my intention isn't to cause harm about it based on my edits. If you know what I mean. My other use for a 'past participle' verb aside from "nicknamed" would be "known", without making the context or way of expression in an awkward or weird manner. jlog3000 (talk) 03:35, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Neither compliment nor insult; just an observation.

This specific phrasing isn't harmful, just a little bit clunky. I wouldn't use anything complex at all. Keep it simple: "North Greenville athletic teams are the Crusaders." I think that's more accurate - these aren't "nicknames" - and it's easier for readers, many of whom read languages other than English as their first language. ElKevbo (talk) 03:41, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I hear ya. That would make sense. I will consider it on my future edits. Thanks for the hint of advice. Will begin on some right away, although it would take a while for some articles on some active and defunct institutions when it comes to athletics sections. jlog3000 (talk) 03:44, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Curious as to why you think this version is better prose? It repeats the awkward "Saint Mary (CSM)" twice unnecessarily, mentions "women's sports" which is redundant since it is a women's only college. My edit seems to provide improved readability and brevity. Your thoughts? ZimZalaBim ^talk 20:01, 3 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No comment. jlog3000 (talk) 20:04, 3 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Yet, you proceed to incorporate much of what I edited. Whatever. --ZimZalaBim ^talk 20:06, 3 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

So? Let it be. Readable or not, it is how it is. jlog3000 (talk) 20:12, 3 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I have noticed that you often edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. To help yourself remember, you may wish to check the "prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" box in your preferences. Thanks! Corky 01:55, 9 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I’m not sure why you’re getting defensive with everyone (maybe because you’re guilty?), but no I’m not “scrutinizing”. It is Wiki guidelines that you should be using the summary. Maybe be more courteous towards your fellow Wikipedians give a summary. Just a thought. Corky 02:07, 9 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Me? Guilty of what? I'm just like a bit bothered to a degree that some of my edits were or are not adequate per se. Like in the case of the institutions or universities with athletic programs. I was just trying to add some conference names based on their past tenures, which most are accurately fact. Why all of a sudden it's becoming an issue because of a lack of a summary? Just an honest question. jlog3000 (talk) 02:28, 9 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This is a collaborative project with tens of thousands of people who only communicate by what we write in this project. Using edit summaries is one of the primary ways in which we communicate with other editors when making edits. The summaries don't have to be long or complex; they just need to say enough to help others understand what you're doing and why you're doing it. If you're making the same edits or the same kind of edits to many articles, it may be helpful for you and for others to use the same edit summary when making those edits; that helps us all know what you're doing and, over time, many editors will learn to trust your edits and not worry about those edits because they trust that you're being consistent and truthful in those edits. ElKevbo (talk) 20:15, 9 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reminder that "M" in Template:Main is uppercase. Changing to lowercase isn't fixing anything, per this edit. • Sbmeirow • Talk • 20:28, 10 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This article is at GAR, mostly for big sections being a decade out of date or more. I'd appreciate it if someone experienced could look at the athletics section and see what is worth mentioning and what needs updating. Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 02:57, 9 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, thank you for the email. Hope it is ok to reply here.

Unfortunately, nothing like what you are asking about exist. At least not anything up-to-date. There are a number of ways to get a lot of the information about the administrative divisions, but most will be offline or old and out of date. There will be inaccuracies you will need to solve in them. Such as knowing a ward was moved to another district, and tracking it and all of its villages and hamlets along with the move. That requires many different sources to figure out, and they are all from different dates in which places belonged to different divisions .... and such.

Some useful sources are the 2016 and 2012 censuses. The postal pages. Some GIS shape files (maps). And any region or district councils official guides, plans, socio-economic profiles, or anything like that. The postal pages are very helpful for what you are asking, but please keep note they are very outdated and that is what I was referring to above about needing to figure out what has moved where on your own.

Also please keep in mind the 2022 census was just performed (technically still in progress). This is a much larger one, similar but bigger than 2012. I would expect to start seeing updates coming out from it by December. And over the following year many of the guides and other documentation will be updated. Tanzania operates under a phase type government system. The expectation is 10 years per phase (2 x 5 year terms for a president). Obviously that was complicated in 2021. So phase 6 (President Samia) is now.

For maps, there is nothing I know of online that is current to how things are today. There are the districts shapefiles linked above. Nothing smaller that is current I know of online. Sorry. City population has some good map interface that includes wards, but it is not fully current. So need to make sure to check everything you use on it.

Hope some of that helps! Please feel free to visit my talk page and ask me anything anytime you want. Amani kwako. BevoLJ (talk) 10:05, 8 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Another thing that is important to know is some native language if you need to track wards, villages and hamlets over the various moves they have made. For example a village that is promoted to a ward is likely to change its name a little. You can discard the first to letters (such as any 'ki', 'gi', 'bu/a/...' and so on) and look at the actual word used by the village for its name. Same with the letter 'I' at the start of many of the central and southern regions wards/villages. Also never assume anything when you see a 'l' or 'r'. Rs and Ls are pretty much interchangeable. Especially near the ends of words, including names. BevoLJ (talk) 10:19, 8 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This article needs new information. It appears from https://www.patten.edu/accreditationandlicensure and https://www.patten.edu/affiliations that the Patten Educational Foundation who ran the previous Patten University have now in some way taken responsibility for American Graduate University and renamed it as Patten University. AGU was, and Patten now is, run in a strategic partnership with the Defense Acquisition University which appears to be closely connected in some official way to the US military. I am British and do not understand these things. But someone needs to get to the bottom of it and update the Patten University article. PeterR2 (talk) 22:56, 3 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Template:NCAA Division I independent schools navbox has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 20:27, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:36, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! You don't need to email me to ask why I reverted your edit – you can ask on my talk-page or indeed anywhere else in the project as long as you ping me (using {{u|Justlettersandnumbers}}) when you do so. I reverted it because on balance it didn't improve the page – you altered the url of the college to one that is wrong (http not https), you added bold text in the History section where it was out of place, you put parentheses round some dates that were fine before. None of these is a serious problem, just no net improvement. Regards, Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 21:40, 18 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of municipalities of Brazil is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of municipalities of Brazil until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

MrMeAndMrMe_{Let's talk} 00:21, 27 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited House of Chiefs (Fiji), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Roko.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:08, 6 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Alabama Community College Conference, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Evergreen, Alabama.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 17 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I need help. Two editors on this page (Reinhardt University) keep deleted "notable alumni" and "notable staff" - I am not sure I agree with their reasonings. The items they deleted have been on the page for years and years. They keep pointing to vague reasoning. "Jeff Clemmons" was removed because they think he needs an entire page dedicated to him; there are many pages with people listed that don't have full blown pages. The other reason for deleting a former professor is vague. Can you weigh in? 23.31.129.3 (talk) 18:44, 9 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

With all due to respect, I have no say in those regards jlog3000 (talk) 19:21, 9 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks 23.31.129.3 (talk) 20:49, 9 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome. No worries and I tried. Maybe a small hint, but could you try contacting to those folks that had the reason to remove your edits? jlog3000 (talk) 20:50, 9 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Johnluisocasio, I noticed your revert of my rollback use here. The rollback was part of undoing edits by an IP sock of an indefinitely blocked editor; one reason that editor was blocked was because of persistent, disruptive editing consisting solely of altering links through redirects. These sorts of redirect links do not need to be "fixed" per WP:NOTBROKEN, so please be aware that generally speaking, your edit summary "current name for article in question is X, Y is a redirect" does not show a reason to reinstate changing things to direct links. (In this case, WP:ERA also tells us to go by WP:RETAIN and not switch era to period or vice versa, but I know you did not alter the running text here.) Best, Dekimasuよ! 03:48, 10 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Then why not change or move the article to "Meiji (era)" from "Meiji era" so that there wouldn't be any redirects? jlog3000 (talk) 07:13, 10 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

One reason is our preference in policy natural disambiguation, but more broadly, that would just create a different set of links targeting the article through the new redirect Meiji era. The underlying idea is that there is no problem with a link that arrives at the right place via redirect. Dekimasuよ! 04:10, 11 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Then why bother to 'fix something' when it's not technically broken? jlog3000 (talk) 04:18, 11 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

In the case of the editor who I was reverting, that is exactly the correct question. In my case, I was performing reversions as part of an attempt to discourage WP:BLOCKEVASION. Dekimasuよ! 11:08, 11 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

But here is the link that led to Meiji era as a redirect: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Meiji_(era)&redirect=no Your thoughts?

P.S.: I assume that you're an administrator. If that's the case, by any chance do you read or understand or even "transliterate" Japanese texts? Because I'm trying to like add some translations of some of the defunct and current districts of Japan, alongside their timelines when it comes to modern municipal unit mergers and establishments prior and since the 1889 reforms. jlog3000 (talk) 11:47, 11 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I am not sure what the question is regarding the redirect link, but it appears to be functioning properly. I do know Japanese (and I am an administrator, for what it's worth). If you have any specific questions about sources in Japanese I may be able to answer, time permitting. Best, Dekimasuよ! 12:13, 17 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

About the link, the actual article name should be 'Meiji era' instead of 'Meiji (era)' where your edit somehow reverted the case, hence it defeats the purpose to avoid any redirects in case any viewers or readers would click on the link.

And about the Japanese stuff, I was wondering to suggest a small idea for the Japanese Wikipedia sub-site if it's possible to have a "Latin" version (as of 'transforming' the letters from hiragana & katakana & kanji to normal English-style letters while keeping the Japanese text without actually being translated). As it's impossible for me to like add or share some texts from the Japanese versions of the articles involving the defunct and current districts of Japan, alongside their timelines when it comes to modern municipal unit mergers and establishments prior and since the 1889 reforms, as well as the modern prefecture mergers and establishments since the 1869 reforms (when the Meiji era began) back it was like 3 "fu" and 302 "ken". Looking forward to hear your thoughts about this matter or subject. jlog3000 (talk) 17:52, 17 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Recently I updated the page List of college athletic programs in Puerto Rico to include the athletic programs in the LAI, in addition to the three that maintain dual membership in the NCAA. In regards to branding and team names, I tried my best to piece together what I believed the team names to be, using the existing LAI page, the universities' athletics page, and exhibition match recaps against NCAA universities on the mainland. However, there just isn't that much information on Puerto Rican college athletics out there, so I'm a bit unsure if I really got the team names right (like Puerto Rico-Cayey Bulls vs UPR Cayey Little Bulls vs. Puerto Rico-Bayamon Toritos). I've seen you around a lot of the college athletics pages on here though (appreciate the thanks you've given on some of my edits, btw!), and you're also a native Puerto Rican, so I was wondering, could you look over my recent edits to the page and see if there's anything I got wrong if that you would change? I understand if you'd rather not, this is my first time talking with you, but you seem really passionate about the college athletics pages on here and I think it would be a huge benefit to see what you think. Thanks! Finchwidget (talk) 16:52, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings. It's an honor chatting with you. About your proposed suggestion, I will consider it. And for starters, do you have any recent edited posts about the LAI teams? So I can check each one out. And for example, the UPR Bayamon nickname is the "Vaqueros & Vaqueras" (meaning "Cowboys & Cowgirls" in Spanish). The "Toritos" one does mean Little Bulls in a literal translation standpoint. Although I must contact to each university/college within here in Puerto Rico, to see if they adapt a "dubbed" version of their nicknames (meaning the English translated versions), otherwise, their original versions are in Spanish, like the UPR (or UPR Rio Piedras or Puerto Rico-Rio Piedras) Gallitos (meaning Bantams in Spanish) and so on, among others.

Keep in touch when you can.

P.S.: Hope you try create or design more maps of current and defunct athletic conferences. jlog3000 (talk) 17:50, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It's an honor chatting with you too, thank you! I'm glad we can finally meet formally! I don't have any other recent edits about LAI teams, other than editing the LAI page to reflect the closure of American University this year. There's definitely less of an emphasis on college athletics in general in PR, so even for the PR university pages that are more than just a stub, I don't think it's worthwhile to add anything about their athletic teams to them.

I was also wondering about whether to represent the team names in English or Spanish too. I chose Spanish ultimately, because that's what the LAI uses, but it's nice to have that reaffirmed; although it is worth noting that Caribbean University uses the English "Gryphons" for their team name, instead of the Spanish "Grifones", so I wonder if that's the case for any others. The other main sticking point for me was how to represent the name of the university itself. For the UPR campuses, it was easy to just follow the lead of the NCAA and do Puerto Rico–[campus] [team name], but for the others it was a little trickier. For example, I was pretty split between Polytechnic Castores and La Poly Castores for Polytechnic University, as I could see a case for either one, and there wasn't much in the way of official sources to clarify. Or alternatively, just represent the entire name in Spanish for all of them (Castores de Politécnica for example), since it is a Spanish speaking league ultimately... there's a bunch of different ways to go about this, so maybe you can see where I was sort of starting to doubt myself (especially as someone who doesn't speak any Spanish!) Finchwidget (talk) 20:22, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You mean the American University of Puerto Rico? I never heard any news about the university closing down. Meaning that this school year would be their last.

For the non-UPR campuses, I was thinking of the following title names for their articles, such as: "Ana G. Méndez Taínos y Taínas", "Bayamón Central Halcones", "Caribbean Gryphons", "Sacred Heart Delfines", "American Piratas", "PUCPR Pioneros", "Interamerican Tigres" and "Polytechnic Castores".

However, for English reader purposes, they could be the following: "Ana G. Méndez Taínos and Taínas" (assuming that nickname has no direct English translation), "Bayamón Central Falcons", "Caribbean Gryphons", "Sacred Heart Dolphins", "American Pirates", "PCUPR Pioneers", "Interamerican Tigers" and "Polytechnic Beavers".

Your thoughts?

For the UPR campuses, they should follow the Puerto Rico–[campus name] [team name] format, such as: Puerto Rico–Aguadilla Tiburones, Puerto Rico–Arecibo Lobos y Lobas, Puerto Rico–Bayamón Vaqueros y Vaqueras, Puerto Rico–Carolina Jaguares, Puerto Rico–Cayey Toritos y Toritas, Puerto Rico–Humacao Buhos y Buhas, Puerto Rico–Mayagüez Tarzanes y Juanas, Puerto Rico–Ponce Leones y Leonas, Puerto Rico–Rio Piedras Gallitos y Jerenzanas and Puerto Rico–Utuado Guaraguaos.

And for the English reading folks, they could be: Puerto Rico–Aguadilla Sharks, Puerto Rico–Arecibo Wolves and Lady Wolves, Puerto Rico–Bayamón Cowboys and Cowgirls, Puerto Rico–Carolina Jaguars, Puerto Rico–Cayey Little Bulls and Lady Little Bulls, Puerto Rico–Humacao Owls and Lady Owls, Puerto Rico–Mayagüez Tarzans and Juanas, Puerto Rico–Ponce Lions and Lady Lions, Puerto Rico–Rio Piedras Bantams and Lady Bantams (or Hens) and Puerto Rico–Utuado Guaraguaos.

Lemme know your feedback when possible. jlog3000 (talk) 21:13, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah I meant American University of Puerto Rico. I came across an article saying as much as I was doing my research on the team names, and sure enough, someone already updated the Wikipedia page for it citing a university source stating it would shut its doors. Kind of a shame, always sad to see a university go.

I think the names you have written would work phenomenally, that works great! The only thing I'd suggest is using Pontifical Catholic Pioneers/Pioneros instead of PUCPR-- I was able to find a fairly recent article on the athletics site for the University of Minnesota-Crookston (link here), where the two schools faced off against each other in men's basketball, and the Crookston site uses Pontifical Catholic whenever referring to them. I know it's not necessarily an official source, since Crookston and PUCPR don't even play in the same league, but it's as close as I could find, so I'm somewhat partial to "Pontifical Catholic" myself. It could go either way though, so if you think "PUCPR" would work better, I'm all ears.

Otherwise, this looks fantastic, I'm completely on board. Maybe we could use the Spanish name under the team column and add a translation column for the English name? Some of these names definitely don't lend themselves to English quite that well (Toritos & Toritas definitely has a better ring to it than Little Bulls & Lady Little Bulls), so I think keeping them in Spanish and adding the translation elsewhere would probably be the way to go, in my opinion. However, I think the NCAA section can probably be left as is in regards to names, as those are the official names that the NCAA uses to refer to those universities when they participate in NCAA play, which is reflected by their respective member pages on the NCAA website. Finchwidget (talk) 03:38, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, I thought so. Because all I know that there's the OG American University located in DC. But overall, I'm with ya in regards with some universities and colleges having to either remove their athletic programs or being shut down altogether due to lack of funds or accreditation or even being merged to a nearby but a bit bigger institution (with a potential to rebrand a bit and have an athletics program but not as an independent instutition), which has been occuring in recent years like a bit before COVID began (but a bit rough since after COVID), mostly private schools than public ones. :(

About the small debacle with the Pontifical Catholic University of Puerto Rico codename in an athletics standpoint, it would be normal to use "Pontifical Catholic" instead of "PUCPR", although the latter would be shortened, like on some other sample institutions, such as UTEP (instead of Texas–El Paso) or UTSA (a.k.a. Texas–San Antonio) or USCB (a.k.a. South Carolina–Beaufort) or UCSB (a.k.a. California–Santa Barbara), etc.

And as far as I know of, I have seen articles of some local pro sports teams in Puerto Rico that used their original language like Vaqueros de Bayamón. Only the difference for the college sports names of PR should be [university name] [team name in Spanish] to avoid any other messes.

Your thoughts? jlog3000 (talk) 17:02, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

So like doing Ana G. Méndez Taínos y Taínas, Polytechnic Castores, and so on? I'm totally on board with that. Should the UPR campuses be referred to as Puerto Rico-[campus] [team name] though? I was originally fine with that, but if local news articles are just referring to them by the campus name alone and omitting the preceding "Puerto Rico-" part, maybe that's the way to go. Finchwidget (talk) 02:48, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

On the non-public or non-UPR institutions, correct. As far as the UPR campuses, I never seen one that only shows the campus names only. I mean, it aint like Omaha (a.k.a. Nebraska–Omaha) or Kansas City (a.k.a. Missouri–Kansas City) or Green Bay (or Wisconsin–Green Bay) or Milwaukee (a.k.a. Wisconsin–Milwaukee), etc. But the other alternate way to name them as separate articles if it go under this format: "UPR [campus] [team name]". jlog3000 (talk) 03:13, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ahh ok I get what you're saying now. I think leaving it as Puerto Rico-[campus] works fine then, I don't particularly favor one style over the other. I'll update the page to reflect all the changes we settled upon, thank you once again for all the help and insight! I really appreciate having a fellow college athletics frequenter to bounce all of this off of :) Finchwidget (talk) 03:23, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Fair enough. And you're welcome. I always try my best, when it comes to certain things. :) jlog3000 (talk) 03:52, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! Got your email. So far I can't find anything that the Purdue programs at IUPUC will become their own Purdue campus. The article itself says there's only one Purdue program there anyway, so it might just be administered by the Purdue Polytechnic that's already there despite the program being engineering and not technology. Even then, there is just above zero news about how IUPUC will be affected by the IUPUI split. The only source I saw just said that IUPUC is becoming IUC, and it didn't mention anything about the Purdue programs. I'm assuming that the Purdue programs are going to be administered by Purdue in Indy in a similar way that the IU Fort Wanye programs are admin'ed by IUPUI now, since there are so few. Speaking of that, from what I can tell is that IUPUI is, almost in its entirety, becoming IU Indy. Purdue is turning its school of science there over to IU and just taking engineering/technology and computer science. Seems like the plan is to build a new 28-acre Purdue University in Indianapolis campus somewhere else in addition to what it already has there. They keep saying it's going to be a "direct extension of the flagship West Lafayette campus," and from what is said in the FAQs here it seems like that's the case. Basically it'll be a second Purdue main campus, kinda like how Purdue Northwest is two campuses too despite being one university. Invinciblewalnut (talk) 20:40, 24 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You're saying that there isn't a chance for a Purdue University at Columbus? I'll give you credit though, on the fact that there aren't any sources to back up these changes.

And with the ones in Fort Wayne, with the Purdue side getting the athletics stuff and the Indiana side getting the rest, since that split occured in 2018 or 2019, IUFW eventually has gotten a mascot, but no established program of athletics (either in a club level or an intercollegiate level yet by far). So I wonder if PUI would eventually pull a IUFW, while IUI gets the athletics stuff and other programs. Your thoughts? jlog3000 (talk) 20:55, 24 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Probably no chance, no. I believe there just isn't the need for it, and starting a new Purdue campus there completely from scratch would be super expensive, and Purdue is already a bit strapped for cash with the tution freeze having been going on for so long. I'm pretty sure the IU system owns everything on the IUPUC campus... at least Purdue owns some stuff already at IUPUI. Purdue Indy might "pull an IUFW," though again it seems like it's not going to be an separate campus from PWL in the same way IUFW is to IUPUI. In all likelihood they'll probably have their own club sports, but the "official" sports teams will remain in WL. Invinciblewalnut (talk) 21:54, 24 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Then in all fairness, and before all the splits, how come the IUPU system begin in the first place, especially in these particular campuses of Fort Wayne, Indianapolis and Columbus? When you said the sports teams will remain in WL, does that mean that the FW campus doesn't count, and it was originally IUPU-FW (a.k.a. IPFW)?

P.S.: And I assume you mean IUFW is to IU Bloomington, in regards with the PUI to PWL analogy. jlog3000 (talk) 22:04, 24 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I saw your e-mail asking for advice about EasyTimeline. Sorry but I don't know anything about it! ElKevbo (talk) 02:46, 21 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I see what you mean. But thanks for your honest though. However, do you know anyone who can help with my request? jlog3000 (talk) 02:51, 21 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Not offhand, no. If I were in your position, I'd probably begin by following some of the links at Wikipedia:EasyTimeline. If that doesn't prove fruitful, you might get someone to help at WP:VPT. ElKevbo (talk) 02:58, 21 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I will consider that hint on your behalf. And for context, here is what the graph would suppose to be or look like:

 Run with option -b (bypass checks) when this is correct.

 

 Full member (all sports)   Full member (non-football)   Associate member (sport) 

But it would result as an error, which you would notice above. But when you click on to 'edit' it, it would show the scripted stuff. jlog3000 (talk) 03:08, 21 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your email from 26 August 2023. You requested:

full and complete list of sub-divisions within the country of New Zealand (before 1989 and since 1989 upto the present)?

a.) regions (or regional councils) & unitary authorities
b.) territorial authority units (district councils/district or city councils/city municipality) within each region (or regional council) & unitary authority
c.) wards within each territorial authority unit within each region & unitary authority

d.) populated places (suburbs, towns, villages, localities, communities, settlements, neighborhoods, etc.) within each ward within each territorial authority unit within each region & unitary authority

Land Information New Zealand has a website called the Gazetter which shows the entire list of official regions/districts/towns/cities/wards/etc, including others such as lakes. I am not sure if there is an official list of authorities before the 1989 reorganisation, but please reference List of former territorial authorities in New Zealand and you may find one. Land Information New Zealand is where you'd most likely find it. Panamitsu (talk) 02:57, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings. Thanks for the info. I will check that link out LINZ. At least it wasn't like Statistics New Zealand, because it's mostly a different type of data that's almost not compatible. Because at some point in the future, when I use the LINZ website, I would like to try to add every populated place (from important ones to less important ones), depending on the territorial authority unit/area it's being assigned to. jlog3000 (talk) 09:33, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The article List of mergers in Kagoshima Prefecture has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This topic does not pass WP:LISTN.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Devonian Wombat (talk) 14:48, 3 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hey @Johnluisocasio! Thank you for your email regarding the sub-divisions of Uganda. Unfortunately, I don't think I can really help. I also have not found much of any in-depth information about Uganda past the district level. One good place to start though may be the Ugandan Bureau of Statistics (https://www.ubos.org/). I think they have some provincial data, but there's quite a bit to comb through. These links (1 and 2) look promising though. BaduFerreira (talk) 00:57, 8 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings @BaduFerreira Thanks for your prompt response. Also my apologies to hear, although I appreciate your honesty. However, I will consider check out these links or sources you have provided, despite my main focus is to find how each district was formed or created from its parent district, plus the lower level administrative subdivision territorial units/areas within the nation. Regardless, thanks for reaching out. jlog3000 (talk) 01:05, 8 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of mergers in Kagoshima Prefecture is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of mergers in Kagoshima Prefecture until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Devonian Wombat (talk) 22:57, 8 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Then why not do it for the OTHER articles for the other prefectures of Japan that are similar to List of mergers in Kagoshima Prefecture, if it worries you so much or if you have found a problem? jlog3000 (talk) 22:59, 8 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I want to get consensus using this one as a baseline before doing a mass-nomination, since mass-nominations are very controversial and a lot of people don't like them. Devonian Wombat (talk) 23:05, 8 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

As if it's good enough to prove your point. jlog3000 (talk) 00:55, 9 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Johnluisocasio. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Wisconsin–Stout Blue Devils, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 07:02, 19 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Johnluisocasio. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Wisconsin–Platteville Pioneers, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 07:02, 19 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Johnluisocasio. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Wisconsin–Stout Blue Devils".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 07:11, 19 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Johnluisocasio. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Wisconsin–Platteville Pioneers".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 07:11, 19 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:30, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for adding these to the North Shore City! I'd put them into the article in a draft I'd made, but somehow they went missing. --Prosperosity (talk) 23:53, 14 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome. And I try, when it comes to the former TLA unit of North Shore City. Plus I had seen on the templates of some (if not, all) of the other territorial authority units (or TLA's: territorial local authorities), with their current wards based on the recent local election representation formats in a three-year basis, having some or few populated place units/areas (or P.P.U.'s as I would abbreviate them). And I'm just speaking upon or expressing from a local administrative geographical standpoint.

I can understand if there are just only a few listed as major P.P.U.'s or top towns or settlements or villages, etc.; while implicitly not showing the rest of the localities or hamlets or communities or farmsteads, etc. due to their status of minor importance. And for the record, I slowly realized that the P.P.U.'s do not necessarily become conterminous towards the 'area units' according to StatsNZ. Hence I see the P.P.U.'s being located almost accurately within a digital topographic map like: http://www.topomap.co.nz or from a gazetteer like the LINZ: http://gazetteer.linz.govt.nz as outside sources. Your thoughts? jlog3000 (talk) 00:34, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page List of municipalities in New Hampshire, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 23:42, 21 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Manukau City, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Burswood.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:47, 5 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for the revert, I thought you had just put UNC Pembroke as a former associate member, but as they will continue for another season, so I reversed the edit, but when we do that we revert the entire edit, I hadn't seen that you had made other changes, it reversed everything automatically, it wasn't my intention, sorry, and keep up the good work! Luks25 (talk) 19:08, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No worries. Wasn't your fault. It was my bad that I missed out any changes (outside of any other edit) in regards to only UNC Pembroke, because I thought they ended after the 2023 fall season (which was until spring 2024), before its football program would possibly join its other sports in the CVAC... I mean the CC (Conference Carolinas), since they are now a full member there for a few seasons now since they returned back to said league. jlog3000 (talk) 19:12, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! Don't worry too, CC will add football in 2025 fall season (2025-26 academic year), so Barton, Chowan, Erskine, UNC Pembroke, North Greenville and Shorter will remain this season (2024 season) in the conferences that they currently have affiliate membership. Luks25 (talk) 01:00, 2 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

The Wikimedia Foundation is conducting a survey of Wikipedians to better understand what draws administrators to contribute to Wikipedia, and what affects administrator retention. We will use this research to improve experiences for Wikipedians, and address common problems and needs. We have identified you as a good candidate for this research, and would greatly appreciate your participation in this anonymous survey.

You do not have to be an Administrator to participate.

The survey should take around 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement .

Please find our contact on the project Meta page if you have any questions or concerns.

Kind Regards,

WMF Research Team

BGerdemann (WMF) (talk) 19:28, 23 October 2024 (UTC) [reply]

Hello,

I recently invited you to take a survey about administration on Wikipedia. If you haven’t yet had a chance, there is still time to participate– we’d truly appreciate your feedback. The survey is anonymous and should take about 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement.

Take the survey here.

Kind Regards,

WMF Research Team

BGerdemann (WMF) (talk) 00:41, 13 November 2024 (UTC) [reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:17, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of towns and villages in Kiribati, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Eten and Betania.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:52, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

John, I'm the official web developer for the HBCUAC, and had permission from both the Commissioner and Director of Communications to have Women's sports listed first. I restored that order back to that page yesterday. Just wanted to give you a heads up as to why I did. If you have any questions, you can get my contact info from the Staff page on the main site. I'll be more than happy to discuss this with you. :)

Thanks! BearlyDoug (talk) 00:25, 9 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings. Are you accusing me of something directly? jlog3000 (talk) 00:28, 9 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

No, not an accusation. Just explaining why I reverted the change you made from December, 2024, to HBCU Athletic Conference. :) BearlyDoug (talk) 00:32, 9 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Then my mistake for misunderstanding then, regardless. I appreciate the belated headsup though. jlog3000 (talk) 00:36, 9 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi John, I got your email. The 2024 law establishing Angola's present administrative divisions is here. I have not seen an official list of all populated places in Angola. Cobblet (talk) 16:38, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

About the list of the populated places within Angola, that's a shame. But about the updated decentralization of the municipios and communes per each province, did some 'comunas' merged into within to become newer 'municipios' and some of those municipios have only one comuna? jlog3000 (talk) 16:55, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

There are now more municipalities than before, while the number of communes has been reduced.[4] Many communes were promoted to municipality status. Some municipalities are subdivided into communes, but others have no communes underneath them, and none have only a single commune. Cobblet (talk) 20:39, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I see. And which of the links that you have shared contains the list of the about 600+ communes merged to earn or achieve municipality status? And so the ones don't have a single commune is the same of being a non-divided municipality (although containing villages, quartiers and neighborhoods within)? Looking forward to hearing your thoughts in that regard. jlog3000 (talk) 20:45, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

There is no list explicitly outlining the changes; the law simply tabulates the new administrative structure in each province. I do not have a complete official list of Angola's former administrative divisions, but have been relying on City Population and the archived 2014 Angolan census site (look under the menu "Províncias"). Comparing the maps in these sources with those provided as part of the 2024 law, it appears that even for municipalities or communes that did not change status, there may have been some border changes. You are correct in understanding that some of the current municipalities are not subdivided. Cobblet (talk) 21:06, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Aww, that's a shame. Because I would be interested on the context. But even with the 2024 law being implemented by most of those former communes to form new municipalities while other communes that had 'upgraded' to become new municipalities also, each of those still contain populated places (i.e.: villages, quartiers, neighborhoods, etc.) within their new municipal borders. And in hindsight or foresight or oversight, wouldn't be easier to 'abolish' (a.k.a. remove or eliminate) the commune system by eventually having them become future municipalities? jlog3000 (talk) 21:20, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, pal, the logo is already updated! Thanks for your support, regards Fma12 (talk) 21:06, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings. And no prob. I try my best when I can. Oh, I believe that current logos on conferences' articles is on the infoboxes while the past logos would be put within said articles but on some area. Look at the latest edit on the East Coast Conference article. jlog3000 (talk) jlog3000 (talk) 21:10, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

P.S.: You put the current logo by overwriting the former logo by the way. :/ jlog3000 (talk) 21:27, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

yes, I overwrote the logo on purpose because this is a non-free image. If this had been a pd-text logo, i would have uploaded it to commons as a separate file. Excessive use of non-free logos at the same article is not acceptable according to WP policies about use of images. Fma12 (talk) 20:06, 14 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

But will the other logo be uploaded in a separate file name? jlog3000 (talk) 20:17, 14 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Not from my part, pal. Fma12 (talk) 20:51, 14 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Then may u explain to me how can I upload a new file for a conference logo? jlog3000 (talk) 20:58, 14 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I really don't know the answers to your questions. I don't know Vietnamese, and I learned about this major shake-up of administrative divisions mainly right here in Wikipedia. I know next to nothing about it that isn't already here. And I've never heard of those units you asked about.

I don't think I ever got a Wikipedia email before. Yours came to my personal email, with the note that the sender did not find out my personal email by sending it, along with the warning that if I answered directly, the sender would know it. If I happen not to want that, which I think I typically would, then answering is a little inconvenient. I prefer to keep my Wikipedia communications to my own Talk Page here. Uporządnicki (talk) 18:12, 21 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.

Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.

See also:

• Wikipedia:Reviewing pending changes, the guideline on reviewing
• Wikipedia:Reviewing pending changes#Requirements to accept an edit, when to accept an edit
  

ϢereSpielChequers 21:44, 21 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Excuse me, but may I ask why I have gained this "title" as a "pending changes reviewer"? jlog3000 (talk) 21:47, 21 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi JohnLuisOcasio, normally I personalise that template, but you beat me to it. I don't know if any of the pages you currently watch are under pending pages protection, but if you haven't already encountered it you probably will in the future. So I have set your account as a "pending changes reviewer", this isn't just a title, it is an extra userright which comes into play if one of the pages you watch becomes protected under pending changes. ϢereSpielChequers 21:58, 21 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, I see. It's all I ask because I thought I was like in "hot water" or in "dire trouble" due to the page editing on some articles of this website. Hence the doubt and concern on my behalf. jlog3000 (talk) 22:03, 21 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Oh no, almost the opposite. You are the sort of active and uncontentious editor who really should have a few extra buttons. ϢereSpielChequers 22:29, 21 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Ah ok. I appreciate the clarification. I was worried for a bit. I could consider it as a compliment and a privilege. I thank you for the reminder. I just try when I can to edit or add some types of information and sometimes add a source to an extent to help some articles become readable or what not. jlog3000 (talk) 23:04, 21 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]