User talk:JForget

Hello: As you are a user who has edited the Aspen Dental page in the past, I’d like to solicit your input on sections that have been added to the page that lack citation, and potentially violate neutral POV. As a COI user I’d like to avoid making edits to the page myself, and so was hoping you could take a look. Here is the discussion: Talk:Aspen Dental. Thank you. - Amanda aspendental (talk) 20:01, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please modify Tetrasil. It is patented here by US government , http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO1&Sect2=HITOFF&d=PALL&p=1&u=%2Fnetahtml%2FPTO%2Fsrchnum.htm&r=1&f=G&l=50&s1=5676977.PN.&OS=PN/5676977&RS=PN/5676977 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Amourcratez (talk • contribs) 07:58, 5 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I'm confused why you deleted "I'm kind of a big deal" WHY? MAKE THE PAGE! There are no copyright violations, and it is hugely popular among other entities such as FPS russia (second most popular youtube channel, most popular among subscribers). I'll make it, just unlock it. THanks.

I'm requesting the undeletion of an article. You deleted the article and looking at the discussion, it was not particularly favourable for being a WP article. Care to share your thoughts on my talk page? Thanks. Scoutstr295 sDrewth 9:21, 29 January 2011 (UTC)

Hello, JForget. You have new messages at Billinghurst's talk page.
Message added 10:03, 11 August 2010 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

A user has requested the undeletion of an article and move to their user space. You deleted the article and looking at the discussion, it was not particularly favourable for being a WP article. Care to share your thoughts on my talk page? Thanks. billinghurst sDrewth 10:03, 11 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Since you are in Category:Wikipedia administrators who will provide copies of deleted articles, could you please provide me with a copy of my deleted article Geonext? Either via Email or by restoring the article in my user space. I believe the subject is notable for Wikipedia and therefor I wish to see what WP:RS I included and which I forgot to include. Kind regards, --Church of emacs (Talk) 10:06, 12 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I was wondering why this article was deleted and if i might be able to get a copy of the album art. I am a collector of sorts and it came up in my tagging

Thank you very much for your help! —Preceding unsigned comment added by ThexxPeach (talk • contribs) 08:49, 13 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi JForget, I've just noticed that Crimsonland is still knocking about with an AfD notice from June. I had added it to the discussion at Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/10tons_Entertainment, which you closed as Delete. The concensus was to delete Crimsonland too. No improvement on the article since then. Could you do the honours? Thanks, Marasmusine (talk) 13:41, 13 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

... but your intervention is not required. Hamfatter is indeed a failed Cmbridge pop/rock band and I have amended their entry accordingly. There is no need for you to intervene again, nor to explain the rules or ethos of Wikipedia, with which I am fully familiar.

If you yourself are unfamiliar with the broad and differing nature of the Internet - and the opinions expressed therein which reflect this - then please feel free to ask, and I will be happy to explain. Until then, please do not revert the Hamfatter entry until you can provide evidence to back up your position. Until then, welcome to Wiki, and let me state that your enthusiasm is most welcome also. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.12.192.73 (talk) 23:45, 14 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Although other people have reverted it again. You might at well take a look at WP:NPOV if you have a chance. Sure criticism of the band can be added in the article as long as it has reliable sources but not personal opinions especially on the first sentence (well anywhere in the article). JForget 23:48, 14 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

For deleting a funny page for me. AboundingHinata (talk) 00:30, 15 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sure you're welcome. JForget 00:31, 15 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Is dare i state as such - basically on care and maintenance these days - so any removal of deleted BLPS or anything like that is appreciated - cheers - SatuSuro 01:10, 15 August 2010 (UTC) In fact when you start looking too close the project is cursed by lists with red links :) SatuSuro 01:27, 15 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello there - thanks for your efforts in cleaning up the Indonesian lists. Much appreciated. I've done much over the years - but it's like laundry - it always returns. cheers --Merbabu (talk) 01:28, 15 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

(reply to both messages) : No problem at all Yep there are a lot of it (red links), but when I usually make maintenance work it is usually on list pages in which all have blue links except a couple of red links or index/list of topics pages. If it is consisting in majority of red links - I don't touch them generally. So I might just touch a few Indonesia list pages only. JForget 01:31, 15 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

And note too, it was by luck that I stomp on that page as I was removing red links following the deletion closure of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Budi Santoso JForget 01:35, 15 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks again from us - it is appreciated !!! SatuSuro 01:32, 15 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I would like to appeal the deletion of Brandon Stacy. He is Spock in the Phase 2 series which gets over 4,000,000 hits per month. I don't think this is "not a notable" achievement. Please let me know if I need to work the article differently to allow it to stay on Wiki. I suppose adding that he is Zachary Quinto's body double in Star Trek would assist?

Thank you!

Miss Kat —Preceding unsigned comment added by Rynnakat (talk • contribs) 20:02, 21 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

To appeal a deletion you would have to go at WP:DRV as it was the result of this Checking out the edits and it does mention briefly that but I suspect that since he only did that role for three episodes and only in the fan series, they thought it wasn't notable enough to warrant its own article. Most of the other actors in the fan series don't even had their own articles. Stacy seems to have multiple roles although they don't look significant for the most part aside from Spock but an actor must have multiple significant roles in multiple productions according to WP:ENT. Looking at the list of roles, many of them look minor and also many of them for just 1 or 2 episodes so even though he played in TV series such as the O.C., Joey or Hannah Montana, they looked to be minor roles in only a few episodes (if not more then one). Not sure if his role in Dead Man Walking and other film were significant though. Though the list is from IMDB so more sources would be needed for the filmography. I can userfy the article so you can make the additions as well as copy-editing/clean-up per WP:MOS, although it might be a long shot for him to have an article unless he gets a major role in the Reaper. Lots of Google hits but little significant/reliable/tertiary sources.JForget 16:29, 28 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I noticed that you were the deleting admin in a page I created, List of sponsored sports competitions in this AFD, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of sponsored sports competitions. Now the main verdict for it's deletion was because the criteria was too unwieldy and could have included any club to create an unessicary huge list. Well after having it userfied, I have limited the inclusion criteria to only include top level competitions that top level teams play for. The work I have done on it in improvement is here User:The C of E/List of sponsored sports competitions. Please let me know if you think this is acceptable to be brought back to the main page or if it would be better going to Deletion Review? The C of E. God Save The Queen! (talk) 07:49, 31 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

[1] -- Y not? 22:31, 6 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the revert, I could have close it but prefered a couple more comments to ensure consensus (if there will be one)... but doesn't sound it will be deleted though. JForget 22:34, 6 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This was just discussed at ANI. I'm surprised you weren't informed but the thread's now been marked "resolved". I almost closed the AFD in question because I didn't think that the two delete !votes were that strong (but they did put it slightly out of NAC range) and it's not a discussion I would have relisted but the suggestion that you relisted it in bad faith because "you wanted it deleted" was completely uncalled for. --Ron Ritzman (talk) 13:03, 7 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Will you please close this discussion as I have withdrawn my deletion request. I would appreciate it. ---RepublicanJacobite_{The'FortyFive'} 00:50, 13 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! ---RepublicanJacobite_{The'FortyFive'} 01:28, 13 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Wishing JForget a very happy adminship anniversary on behalf of the Wikipedia Birthday Committee! Armbrust ^Talk _Contribs 00:00, 20 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

JForget, I left a message with IronGargoyle about him possibly reviving the 'Scott Free (musician)' page. I realize now that editing a page about yourself is a conflict of interest - but I did not create the page, and Wikipedia encourages updating pages to keep them current. I was going to add that I am being inducted into the City Of Chicago Gay & Lesbian Hall of Fame http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chicago_Gay_and_Lesbian_Hall_of_Fame and is referenced at The Advocate and Huffington Post http://www.advocate.com/News/Daily_News/2010/09/20/G_and_L_Hall_of_Fame_Honors_15/ http://www.huffingtonpost.com/chicago I'm not sure if that is enough to revive the page - I tried to request a reviving of the page, but not sure if it went through.

thanks! Mrscottfree (talk) 03:46, 21 September 2010 (UTC)Mrscottfree[reply]

An AFD you slightly participated in, by relisting, (Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Tony_Sokol), is at DRV here. It would be interesting to see your thoughts on it. Thanks, Bigger digger (talk) 00:53, 25 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed that jordan schaul is no longer available on wickipedia's site. He has a huge following. We love his show in the zoo world and it indicates that you deleted his page based on the talk page commentary. It further mentions that we contact you for consideration of uploading a new bio. I prepared the following.

"Jordan Schaul is the producer and host of Zoo Talkin' Radio Cite error: A <ref> tag is missing the closing </ref> (see the help page)."

May we upload it. Thanks J.M.> USER NAME Zookeeper4u (talk) 16:25, 25 September 2010 (UTC) Please let me know if I can upload it.[reply]

See Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Jordan_Schaul and Wikipedia:Conflict_of_interest/Noticeboard/Archive_44. I've tagged Jordan Schaul it for deletion per WP:CSD#G4. Zookeeper4u - you need to start a thread at WP:DELREV to recreate an article and demonstrate that they meet the notability requirements of WP:BIO. Smartse (talk) 17:06, 25 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You closed the first AfD, but the article re-created with some additional sources. I've sent it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joseph Salama (2nd nomination), and you may wish to comment there DGG ( talk ) 19:43, 26 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You closed Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Arborophilia as no consensus, but I'd like to relist or review the AfD since all the editors who participated were blocked as Appel sockpuppets. As you are semi-retired, I'm not sure if I should take this up at WP:Deletion review or just renominate it, but the directions noted to contact the closing admin first. I've added a few links to new and existing references, but a recent search provides no indication of coverage beyond regional theater productions. Flowanda | Talk 01:07, 8 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please note that this is factually inaccurate. AfD was closed as KEEP not no consensus. 79.142.65.53 (talk) 11:15, 8 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

for some reason I am a talk page stalkerI don't think deletion review is appropriate, as the consensus at the time (Feb 2010) was to keep so consensus was clear before the socking was revealed. You should just straight relist it if you don't think it's notable. Bigger digger (talk) 23:17, 8 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, thanks, it looks like renomination is the right way to go, but talking with the closing admin seems to be universal first step. Flowanda | Talk 07:45, 11 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a deletion review of DragonFable. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. —Ғяіᴆaз'§Đøøм • Champagne? • 4:25pm • 05:25, 16 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,

I'm recreating a page similar to a page that has been deleted. As suggested, I'm contacting the deleting administrator first. The article is for holidaylettings. The company has grown in notability and facts can be backed up with references from The Guardian and The Times newspapers in the UK. The content has been rewritten to provide a neutral tone with citations.

How would you suggest proceeding?

Thanks,

Silnerhenun Silnerhenun (talk) 11:22, 20 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This article was about a television project and game that I created and worked very hard on throughout the years, why was it deleted? I'd like it restored please. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mrtv1 (talk • contribs) 08:44, 11 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Courcelles 04:46, 10 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Premiership of Stephen Harper. NW (Talk) 02:30, 8 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I am creating articles to address the number of redlinks associated with director Lewis Milestone. The next on my list is User:MichaelQSchmidt/Lucky Partners, but I discovered that an article by that same name had been deleted in 2008.[2] However, in reading that AFD discussion, my impression is that the original article my have been about something other than the 1940 film. I wish your approval to continue, as my own offering will be a properly sourced article about the 1940 film, and not some other topic. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 22:47, 30 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

JForget,

I know you're not around much, but maybe you can consider fulfilling my request. You deleted the Anna Ayala article based on Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anna Ayala, which provided two opinions to delete the article, and one opinion to move the information to Wendy's. Over 20 different editors worked on this article, and it seems to me unfair to them to delete it based on the opinions of two editors who wanted it deleted. Really, an AfD with so little activity (especially regarding an article of such size and such care in its development) should have been extended another week.

The story still has significant internet coverage.

As in the case of Jennifer Wilbanks, which now redirects to Runaway bride case, maybe the article would serve Wikipedia best if it were renamed Finger hoax or something like that.

Thoughts? Kingturtle = (talk) 16:08, 20 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:WikiProject Prescott-Russell, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:WikiProject Prescott-Russell and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Wikipedia:WikiProject Prescott-Russell during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Skeezix1000 (talk) 13:04, 3 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

User:Matthew wright/MWICPS, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Matthew wright/MWICPS and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:Matthew wright/MWICPS during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. » SkyyTrain (talk) 10:00, 5 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Following a community discussion in June 2011, consensus was reached to provisionally suspend the administrative permissions of users who have been inactive for one year (i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in over one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions will be removed pending your return if you do not return to activity within the next month. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated should this occur, please post to the Wikipedia:Bureaucrats' noticeboard and the userright will be restored per the re-sysopping process (i.e., as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised and that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions). This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. –xeno^talk 15:51, 1 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I know your scared but please dont delete this and give me an actual reason. I know there is no reason for it and you are probably just doing it because you are pmsing. HE IS A LEGITIMATE RAPPER. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.229.185.25 (talk) 20:49, 16 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Following a community discussion in June 2011, consensus was reached to provisionally suspend the administrative permissions of users who have been inactive for one year (i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in over one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions will be removed pending your return if you do not return to activity within the next several days. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated should this occur, please post to the Wikipedia:Bureaucrats' noticeboard and the userright will be restored per the re-sysopping process (i.e., as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised and that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions). This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. –xeno^talk 12:30, 27 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Following a community discussion in June 2011, consensus was reached to provisionally suspend the administrative permissions of users who have been inactive for one year (i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in over one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions have been removed pending your return. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated , please post to the Wikipedia:Bureaucrats' noticeboard and the userright will be restored per the re-sysopping process (i.e., as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised and that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions). This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. –xeno^talk 12:59, 3 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a deletion review of Bloody Knuckles. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. Thinker jones (talk) 22:32, 12 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

St. David School (Richmond, California) an article that you have participated in editing has been nominated for deletion a second time, the first time in 2006 resulted in no consensus and, it can be reviewed here. The current discussion on the removal of the article is located here should you wish leave your comment.LuciferWildCat (talk) 05:14, 22 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

PLEASE NOTE:

• I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions. If you have questions, please post them here.
• I will automatically remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
• If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
• To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
• If you believe the bot has made an error, please ask an admin to turn it off here.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:40, 20 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

PLEASE NOTE:

• I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions. If you have questions, please post them here.
• I will automatically remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
• If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
• To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
• If you believe the bot has made an error, please ask an admin to turn it off here.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:41, 20 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

PLEASE NOTE:

• I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions. If you have questions, please post them here.
• I will automatically remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
• If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
• To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
• If you believe the bot has made an error, please ask an admin to turn it off here.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 13:34, 20 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

PLEASE NOTE:

• I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions. If you have questions, please post them here.
• I will automatically remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
• If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
• To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
• If you believe the bot has made an error, please ask an admin to turn it off here.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 13:36, 20 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

PLEASE NOTE:

• I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions. If you have questions, please post them here.
• I will automatically remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
• If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
• To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
• If you believe the bot has made an error, please ask an admin to turn it off here.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 01:07, 21 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

PLEASE NOTE:

• I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions. If you have questions, please post them here.
• I will automatically remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
• If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
• To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
• If you believe the bot has made an error, please ask an admin to turn it off here.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 01:08, 21 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You have deleted an article titles Urimai Kural in august 2009. Now I would like to start the article with fresh content. So Please Unlock the page. Balaji ^{(Let's talk)} 09:44, 11 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. VernoWhitney (talk) 19:37, 19 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]