User talk:JForget/Archives 9

This is an archive of past discussions with User:JForget. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Hi - thanks for the close. I've looked into the spelling of the name, and the correct one appears to be MARSHACK, not Marshak. This was determined a while ago and lost when the article was deleted I think. I've corrected the text, but I don't want to mess up the redirect stuff - it should be MEGAN MARSHAK renamed to MEGAN MARSHACK (so the history remains intact) and the current MEGAN MARSHACK redirect page should become MEGAN MARSHAK and redirect to MEGAN MARSHACK. That was the most convoluted sentence I've written in a long time - hope the meaning is clear. MARSHACK is the correct spelling. thanks Tvoz |talk 19:57, 15 April 2008 (UTC)

Thanks - glad you could suss out what I was attempting to say... Tvoz |talk 05:40, 16 April 2008 (UTC)

Hello! :) In March, Death dog was nominated for deletion. At the time, there was no suitable page for this article to be redirected to, so based on the consensus, you deleted the article. I have created a new page, List of Advanced Dungeons & Dragons 1st edition monsters, which would be a proper destination to merge and/or redirect the article to. I'm wondering if it's possible to restore the original article, and turn it into a redirect, thus preserving the edit history?

Also, if you are amenable to it, I would like Blood hawk, Jermlaine, Boobrie (Dungeons & Dragons), Thessalmonster, and Pech (Dungeons & Dragons) restored and redirected to List of Advanced Dungeons & Dragons 1st edition monsters, which were all deleted at the same time as Death dog under the same circumstances. Thanks!  :) BOZ (talk) 00:30, 16 April 2008 (UTC)

Thanks - much appreciated!  :) BOZ (talk) 03:00, 16 April 2008 (UTC)

Were you going to restore the edit histories for those articles as well? BOZ (talk) 03:09, 16 April 2008 (UTC)

Thanks - much better!  :) BOZ (talk) 03:13, 16 April 2008 (UTC)

Danke! BOZ (talk) 03:21, 16 April 2008 (UTC)

Hello again! :) Would you also mind restoring the edit histories of Pterafolk, Choldrith, Loxo, Ahuizotl (Dungeons & Dragons), and Dark tree and redirecting them to List of Advanced Dungeons & Dragons 2nd edition monsters? Thanks! Sorry if I've been asking too much of you lately... :) BOZ (talk) 00:17, 23 April 2008 (UTC)

Y Done There's no problem at all, it only takes a few seconds to deal with each one.--JForget 00:25, 23 April 2008 (UTC)

Well thanks again, regardless. You've been excellent in dealing with me! BOZ (talk) 00:36, 23 April 2008 (UTC)

Hello again! You've been so helpful to me so far. Would you also mind restoring the edit histories of Aspect (Dungeons & Dragons), Corpse Gatherer, Ethergaunt, Feytouched, Nerra, Ocean Strider, Vashar, and Volodni (Dungeons and Dragons) and redirecting them to List of Dungeons & Dragons 3.0 edition monsters? Thanks! BOZ (talk) 18:08, 2 May 2008 (UTC)

No problem all redirects are done, I've been able to have a lull from the tornado activity in Arkansas for a bit.--JForget 18:19, 2 May 2008 (UTC)

Oh boy, take care! And thanks once again! I'll probably have one more batch, in a week or two, and then I'll have caught them all. :) BOZ (talk) 18:32, 2 May 2008 (UTC)

No it's not my area, but I'm a member of the Wikipedia:WikiProject Severe Weather team tracking severe weather outbreaks. Thanks to webcasts and frequent news and warnings from the weather authorities articles, it is easy to rapidly update here.--JForget 18:35, 2 May 2008 (UTC)

I'm currently browsing "recent changes" for vandalism reversion and almost every time i click a link you've reverted it already! much impressed with your speed, so a quick thanks for rv'ing! Ironholds (talk) 00:47, 22 April 2008 (UTC)

No problem! Ironholds.--JForget 00:51, 22 April 2008 (UTC)

JForget, thank you for reverting that vandalism on my talk page, the user that is doing it has been disruptive for quite sometime, they are vandalizing other pages too. Again my much thanks. Simon Bar Sinister (talk) 00:53, 22 April 2008 (UTC)

You're welcome, I've blocked him for his troubles, trolling and other disruption.--JForget 00:55, 22 April 2008 (UTC)

I am trying to help the community and you keep hating me, is it because I'm black? I'm trying to help my man Wesley Snipes and you keep deleting everything I sayz. Whats the dealyo? Just tell me (and be nice about it) and I will leave you alone and shoot my face. Grits207 (talk) 00:26, 25 April 2008 (UTC)

OK Buddy, thanks for the clarification. I promise I will stop. By the way my friend, funny story I didn't think you were a real person until you replied to me LOL! Is there anyway I could become a moderator? I was just kidding with my posts and I will be really good now. I can help you out with stuff if you want, just send me an email at grits207(at)hotmail.com Grits207 (talk) 00:35, 25 April 2008 (UTC)

By the way how do you respond so quickly?

Thats not fair that there is no way I can be mod. MAybe if I create a new account? Oh and I'm sorry about the newest Snipes edit, that was my brother being a jerk :(. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Grits207 (talk • contribs) 00:42, 25 April 2008 (UTC)

An article that you have been involved in editing, Bright Lands, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bright Lands (2nd nomination). Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Gavin Collins (talk) 05:53, 22 April 2008 (UTC)

It's me again :p I was wondering if I would be allowed to make a page on wikipedia about my website that I own? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Grits207 (talk • contribs) 00:47, 25 April 2008 (UTC)

Hello JForget:

Please see this.

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Fallowfield_Station_%28OC_Transpo%29&diff=prev&oldid=155469206

I'm puzzled how a bus travels at a corner. Is there a typo in this, or a concept I don't get.

Thanks, Wanderer57 (talk) 01:21, 29 April 2008 (UTC)

I've fixed the bit, maybe the word intersection could have been used (but many uses the word corner to describe an intersection particularly for locations of businesses or other stuff), unless you were wondering why it is not entering the station, that would be according to this--JForget 01:27, 29 April 2008 (UTC)

Why was this deleted DURING a major edit and before the discussion concluded?

In this major edit each sentence mistakenly assumed to be a mere opinion of the suthor "Will Geist" was being deleted. All that remain will have their relevant references attached.

This article owes NOTHING to the ideas of Will Geist Will Geist, as a newcomer to Wikipedia, is merely trying to report how the theory has arisin from the interfisciplinary interaction betweeen the references.

The major edit was interrupted by a failure ("Data Loss") reported by your system and was to resume today. Will Geist (talk) 07:55, 2 May 2008 (UTC)

Myself and several other editors have been compiling a list of very active editors who would likely be available to help new editors in the event they have questions or concerns. As the list grew and the table became more detailed, it was determined that the best way to complete the table was to ask each potential candidate to fill in their own information, if they so desire. This list is sorted geographically in order to provide a better estimate as to whether the listed editor is likely to be active.

If you consider yourself a very active Wikipedian who is willing to help newcomers, please either complete your information in the table or add your entry. If you do not want to be on the list, either remove your name or just disregard this message and your entry will be removed within 48 hours. The table can be found at User:Useight/Highly Active, as it has yet to have been moved into the Wikipedia namespace. Thank you for your help. Useight (talk) 02:57, 3 May 2008 (UTC)

1. Another reader has already complained about this on Talk:El-Mahalla El-Kubra without any reply. I suppose that could count as a discussion in the sense that the other party had ample opportunity to defend their side.

2. My edit was not vandalism, and therefore I don't see why your revert was justified. Do you think that every time somebody comes along and adds a large chunk of unreadable material to an article we have to start discussing it before removing? I don't recall the guy adding this rubbish discussing any of it in the first place. So adding rubbish requires no discussion but removing it does?--128.139.104.49 (talk) 23:34, 3 May 2008 (UTC)

It is not from wikitravel and there doesn't seem to be any copyright problems, it's simply an automatic translation of the Arabic Wikipedia article, possibly using Google. I didn't know it was an acceptable practice on Wikipedia to copy-paste entire articles from other languages, translate them using bots into unreadable text and just leaving them there for somebody else to decypher them. Furthermore, this is the first time I see an administrator defending this practice.

Now, this was the course of events up until now: two months ago somebody added this auto-translation to the article (followed by some minor vandalism by a few anon-IP's). Today I removed this rubbish and you reincorporated it (with a couple of tags thrown in for good measure). If you think this material is Wikipedia-worthy -- then I suppose it will stay there, I don't care and I don't intend to argue about it any more.--128.139.104.49 (talk) 23:56, 3 May 2008 (UTC)

Funny. It says that "the general consensus of Wikipedia contributors is that an unedited machine translation, left as a Wikipedia article, is worse than nothing".--128.139.104.49 (talk) 00:32, 4 May 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading Image:Star Academie 2.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 12:27, 5 May 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading Image:Coupable-Lapointe .jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 12:31, 5 May 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading Image:Stephanie Lapointe.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 12:34, 5 May 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading Image:Remy girard.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 12:35, 5 May 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading Image:Gregory Charles - Loin de la lumiere.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 12:41, 5 May 2008 (UTC)

On 8 May, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article May 2008 tornado outbreak, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

--Bedford 18:58, 8 May 2008 (UTC)

I just saw that you closed this AfD as a redirect to Modernist poetry. First, a technical comment. There seems to be some kind of formatting error at the AfD page right now since the closure box that you created only encompasses about half of the actual AfD. Second, could you please explain why you closed as a redirect to Modernist poetry rather than a plain delete or a redirect to something else? By looking at the AfD, I can see that only one editor actually was specifically in favor of redirecting to Modernist poetry. There were two more "Delete and redirect" votes that did not specify the destination and did not discuss where it should be redirected to and why. There were two more plain delete votes, one "Strong delete with no redirect", one "strong delete rather than redirect", one "Redirect to history of poetry" and one more vote (mine) "Delete", where I argued against redirecting to Modernist poetry. It is hard for me to see how one can interpret these results as a consensus for Modernist poetry as a redirect destination. There was a clear consensus to delete but regarding whether or not to redirect and if yes, where to, I don't think there was any consensus. It seems to me that a plain delete would have been a more appropriate close under these circumstances. Could you take another look? Thanks, Nsk92 (talk)

What happened here? Kww (talk) 17:05, 15 May 2008 (UTC)

OK. Any particular reason that you undid 150K of archiving on my talk page? Kww (talk) 17:20, 15 May 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for correcting I may have stomp edits, there--JForget 17:29, 15 May 2008 (UTC)

...I put a 15 min block on that IP...but he/she continues to do it. Can you figure out what is going on? Kukini ^{háblame aquí} 23:32, 17 May 2008 (UTC)

Duh...I should have done that...sorry. --Kukini ^{háblame aquí} 23:33, 17 May 2008 (UTC)

Understood...thanks! --Kukini ^{háblame aquí} 23:35, 17 May 2008 (UTC)

Why should unsourced info be allowed to stand with just a disclaimer? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.3.120.30 (talk) 23:10, 18 May 2008 (UTC)

I've been talking with this IP regarding the edits made. The IP has said "I'm the only one who uses this computer if that's what you mean. The Internet is thru my college so I don't know if that affects it. I didn't make any disruptive edits so I'm sorry you think that." I was wonderig if you know about how to get a tag on the talk page for colleges or how to prove this is a college IP. Meaty♠Weenies (talk) 00:00, 19 May 2008 (UTC)

Thanks! Meaty♠Weenies (talk) 00:04, 19 May 2008 (UTC)