User talk:Herodyswaroop
Hello, Herodyswaroop, and Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the help desk, or place Getting started
Finding your way around
Editing articles
Getting help
How you can help
Your submission at Articles for creation: Kalyana Rajya Pragathi Paksha (March 3)![]() This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (March 26)![]() We're sorry, but we cannot accept blank submissions. If in fact you did include text within the article, but it isn't showing, please make sure that any extra text above your entry is removed, as it may be causing it to hide and not be shown to the reviewer. Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
1. Add the template. — Preceding unsigned comment added by [[User:{{{2}}}|{{{2}}}]] ([[User talk:{{{2}}}#top|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/{{{2}}}|contribs]]) Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!![]()
-- 06:08, Wednesday, April 26, 2023 (UTC)
Links to draft articles
Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!![]()
-- 07:04, Friday, May 5, 2023 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Kalyana Rajya Pragathi Paksha (May 15)![]() Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at Kalyana Rajya Pragathi Paksha instead. The comment the reviewer left was:
Please compare and combine draft and article. Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
AfC notification: Draft:Chittam Maharani has a new comment![]() Your submission at Articles for creation: Chittam Maharani (September 2)![]() This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources. Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Your draft article, Draft:Kalyana Rajya Pragathi Paksha![]() Hello, Herodyswaroop. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Kalyana Rajya Pragathi Paksha". In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it. Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. ✗plicit 06:25, 15 November 2023 (UTC)
Use the history of an article to find the last good known versionHi, Herodyswaroop! You can always use the history of an article to find the last known good version of an article & then restore that. 92.50.99.194 had vandalized the Lauren Hutton article, but the previous version was okay. Peaceray (talk) 17:17, 19 December 2023 (UTC)
CS1 error on V. V. Lakshminarayana
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 09:45, 28 December 2023 (UTC) Your draft article, Draft:Chittam Maharani![]() Hello, Herodyswaroop. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Chittam Maharani". In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it. Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. ✗plicit 14:01, 2 March 2024 (UTC) Prasannavadanam moved to draftspaceThanks for your contributions to Prasannavadanam. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while. Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Liz Read! Talk! 06:01, 5 May 2024 (UTC)
Karthik Tallam moved to draftspaceThanks for your contributions to Karthik Tallam. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while. Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. C F A 💬 00:41, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Vinay Maloo (executive)![]()
A tag has been placed on Vinay Maloo (executive) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable. If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. BoraVoro (talk) 07:55, 16 July 2024 (UTC) ![]() The article Vinay Maloo (executive) has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article. If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Whpq (talk) 11:34, 16 July 2024 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Vinay Maloo![]()
A tag has been placed on Vinay Maloo requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable. If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Pridemanty (talk) 08:06, 18 July 2024 (UTC) Vinay Maloo moved to draftspaceThanks for your contributions to Vinay Maloo. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while. Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 10:30, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Vinay Maloo 2 (July 19)![]() This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources. The comment the reviewer left was:
Note: The draft is largely identical to Draft:Vinay Maloo which was created by another user and was declined in AfC in April. Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
There are two problems with the sourcing: 1) a lack of reliable, independent, and secondary sources; 2) several sources that are clearly paid promotion, including multiple copies of the same recently published promo piece. --bonadea contributions talk 16:12, 19 July 2024 (UTC) AfC notification: Draft:Vinay Maloo 2 has a new comment![]() Pottel moved to draftspaceThanks for your contributions to Pottel. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because not ready for mainspace. only if released. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while. Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. DareshMohan (talk) 00:40, 6 August 2024 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Karthik Tallam (September 16)![]() The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations. Please cite your sources using footnotes. For instructions on how to do this, please see Referencing for beginners. Thank you. This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Fitpass moved to draftspaceThanks for your contributions to Fitpass. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it is promotional and reads like an advertisement and Please read WP:CITEKILL and WP:ORGDEPTH. There are plenty of sources, but almost nothing that's independent and secondary, and very little depth.. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while. Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. bonadea contributions talk 10:52, 7 October 2024 (UTC) Your submission at Articles for creation: Pottel (October 7)![]() This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of films). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Nomination of Fitpass for deletion![]() The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fitpass until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.bonadea contributions talk 20:00, 10 October 2024 (UTC) Concern regarding Draft:Teri Baaton Mein Aisa Uljha jiya
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it. Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:07, 13 October 2024 (UTC) Your submission at Articles for creation: Pottel (October 13)![]() This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Pottelafter release when reviews are released. It will be notable. DareshMohan (talk) 07:29, 19 October 2024 (UTC)
Concern regarding Draft:Prasannavadanam
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it. Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 10:08, 19 October 2024 (UTC) Murivu (Film) moved to draftspaceCreate films with only 2+ reliable reviews. For now, you can expand Draft:Murivu. DareshMohan (talk) 07:50, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
There is Draft:Murivu (Film) and Draft:Murivu. Can you do Template:Db-author on the first one? There is only need to have one article not two. DareshMohan (talk) 16:20, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Murivu (November 14)![]() This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of films). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was:
2 or more multiple reviews please. Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Your submission at Articles for creation: Shahkot (film) has been accepted![]() Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions. Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation. If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .Thanks again, and happy editing! Safari ScribeEdits! Talk! 17:05, 14 November 2024 (UTC)ArbCom 2024 Elections voter messageHello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add Arbitration Committee Voting@Jayanthkumar123 @DareshMohan @Ab207 Hi, any Indian Wikipedians or Good Editors to whom I can vote. So, that it would be for a larger good. As many usernames in the candidates list are very new to me and seems not from India - Herodyswaroop (talk) 08:13, 19 November 2024 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Devendra Rajesh Kothe (November 27)![]() Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at Devendra Rajesh Kothe instead. Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Promotion of free South IndiaHi @DareshMohan @Jayanthkumar123 @Ab207, Hey, Hi I have seen a newly created account spunning articles about,
Your submission at Articles for creation: Karthik Tallam (December 3)![]() Resubmitted without any improvement, previous decline still stands.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
I should probably be rejecting this outright, it is extremely unlikely that an honorary consul is notable in any sense, but let's give it one more chance. Please cut down on the WP:REFBOMBING, that short lead paragraph certainly does not require 13 citations!
I have sent you a note about a page you startedHi Herodyswaroop. Thank you for your work on Rahasyam Idam Jagath. Another editor, North8000, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with North8000 (talk) 15:01, 7 December 2024 (UTC)
Happy New Year - 2025@DareshMohan @Jayanthkumar123 Happy new year, to my mentors both of you. On a fun note, Jayanth bro is not leaving any small films too. Whatever I watch in prime or netflix and I think, this week I will write about this. Jayanth would have written, that already. Lol. - Herodyswaroop (talk) 10:48, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
Concern regarding Draft:Vinay Maloo 2
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it. Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:06, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
Your draft article, Draft:Vinay Maloo 2![]() Hello, Herodyswaroop. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Vinay Maloo 2". In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it. Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 21:06, 19 January 2025 (UTC) REDIRECTCan you redirect some articles to respective channels? Star Pravah
Colors Marathi
Zee Marathi
Sun Marathi
Sony Marathi 2409:40C0:107B:B375:8000:0:0:0 (talk) 02:00, 2 February 2025 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Paraypora (February 28)![]() This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Your submission at Articles for creation: S. Naga Vamsi (April 5)![]() This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Concern regarding Draft:Rashi Singh
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it. Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 12:06, 6 April 2025 (UTC)
Your draft article, Draft:Rashi Singh![]() Hello, Herodyswaroop. This message concerns the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Rashi Singh". Drafts that go unedited for six months are eligible for deletion, in accordance with our draftspace policy, and this one has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply , and remove the If your submission has already been deleted by the time you read this, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions here. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the draft so you can continue to work on it. Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! DreamRimmer bot II (talk) 08:26, 4 May 2025 (UTC) Concern regarding Draft:Karthik Tallam
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it. Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 09:08, 5 May 2025 (UTC) Nomination of Devdutta Manisha Baji for deletion![]() The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Devdutta Manisha Baji until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.CNMall41 (talk) 16:48, 12 May 2025 (UTC) Undisclosed paid editing block![]() Your account has been blocked indefinitely for advertising or promotion and violating the Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use. This is because you have been making promotional edits to topics in which you have a financial stake, yet you have failed to adhere to the mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a form of conflict of interest (COI) editing which involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is strictly prohibited. Using this site for advertising or promotion is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, please read our guide to appealing blocks to understand more about unblock requests, and then add the text As this block is based off of private evidence, it can additionally be appealed to the Arbitration Committee by email to arbcom-en For an unblock to be considered, you must:
Administrators: if this block includes a Volunteer Response Team ticket number, this block was placed as part of the conflict of interest VRT queue and the user must not be unblocked without the express consent of a user with access to the queue. For users with access to the queue, please see ticket:2025051810007001. Moneytrees🏝️(Talk) 16:25, 19 May 2025 (UTC)
As all my articles are usually film subjects, like Favourie Heroine, a music director who song I have listened or a netflix movie where I loved the film editing some thing like that. Apart from it, Being a Developer in startup company , coming from a region where we treat film stars as Demi-gods. No such relation I have with them and nor I am in a stage where I can talk to film people. Sir, to be frank when one admin from Wikimedia commons said, " Dude, you should get permission from the subject if you want to upload picture of them". I always used to think, If I have access to them, to get permission. Why do I upload some downloaded pictures of them? I will directly ask them to upload or give me best picture right? .
![]() Herodyswaroop (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log)) Request reason: Your reason here Herodyswaroop (talk) 17:12, 19 May 2025 (UTC) Small town movie buff, with no connections with film fraternity, As it requires high circles. Love films, Love Wikipedia simple Herodyswaroop (talk) 17:12, 19 May 2025 (UTC) Decline reason: I have examined the information in the COIVRT ticket, and I can say that this request does not address the concerns raised. I am declining your request. As very few people have access to the ticket to be able to review additional appeals, it's likely your next best avenue of appeal is to the Arbitration Committee. 331dot (talk) 08:59, 20 May 2025 (UTC) If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked. Unblock Request![]() Herodyswaroop (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log)) Request reason: Your reason here Herodyswaroop (talk) 15:54, 22 May 2025 (UTC) I understand that " wall-o-text bludgeoner" on a deletion discussion was my mistake. My intention was only to defend my subject. But still mistake is a mistake. With 772 edits, I assure that, I further wont defend or write content in deletion discussions and will continue to contribute articles in my genre. Consider this as my first mistake. Thank you. Herodyswaroop (talk) 15:54, 22 May 2025 (UTC) Decline reason: I have reviewed the evidence that you are an undisclosed paid editor and concur with the block. Yamla (talk) 17:19, 22 May 2025 (UTC) If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked. Note that the main reason for the block is undisclosed paid editing. 331dot (talk) 16:10, 22 May 2025 (UTC) 331dot Sir, I really didn't get paid and as i said before too. I dont even know that people pay to get featured in Wikipedia. Because everyone know that this is free, I never even attempted or looked Wikipedia in such a way. I dont know, how admins got concluded I am paid writer, And you can guide me, how should I prove my innocence. And you can go through my edit pattern once. - Herodyswaroop (talk) 16:14, 22 May 2025 (UTC)
Reaching Arbitration Comittee@Moneytrees @331dot Hi Sir, I have gone through Arbitration Comittee page, but as I am blocked I am unable to request on their talk page?. Or Should I email ? Please guide with process - Herodyswaroop (talk) 10:18, 26 May 2025 (UTC)
Transparency - EvidenceHi @Moneytrees @331dot, " It is our decision entirely whether to release evidence or not, and we will not be in this case. " - Arbitration Comittee. Keeping it simple - " I have allegations, you claim you have evidence. I am crystal clear that I never took a penny to write. I am okie to be blocked, But I am just asking on what basis or evidence I was blocked or what is the basis of it". Even In real life if i get arrested, the onus lies on the police to show me evidence to keep in prison. Thats a basic right. Here also my question is, where is the evidence? If there is no evidence? on what basis I was called a paid writer? . If I say, I have evidence on @CNMall41, but I wont show. you block him, Will it happen? - Herodyswaroop (talk) 09:26, 28 May 2025 (UTC)
Bye Bye - Wikipedia - AdviceDear @Moneytrees @331dot @Cabayi @Daniel Hi Sir, I understand that there's a deadlock and I’m unlikely to get unblocked. My only suggestion is:
In the case of my article, not a single writer from the Marathi community participated in the deletion discussion. All the votes came from Westerners, who are making decisions about regional languages without local context. Please consider strategies to involve more community writers from local Indian languages. This will help generate more grassroots content and ensure better representation. Thank you - Herodyswaroop (talk) 15:44, 28 May 2025 (UTC) Your draft article, Draft:Karthik Tallam![]() Hello, Herodyswaroop. This message concerns the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Karthik Tallam". Drafts that go unedited for six months are eligible for deletion, in accordance with our draftspace policy, and this one has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply , and remove the If your submission has already been deleted by the time you read this, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions here. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the draft so you can continue to work on it. Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! CptViraj (talk) 09:00, 3 June 2025 (UTC) Your draft article, Draft:Devendra Rajesh Kothe![]() Hello, Herodyswaroop. This message concerns the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Devendra Rajesh Kothe". Drafts that go unedited for six months are eligible for deletion, in accordance with our draftspace policy, and this one has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply , and remove the If your submission has already been deleted by the time you read this, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions here. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the draft so you can continue to work on it. Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! CptViraj (talk) 15:32, 27 June 2025 (UTC) |