User talk:Help.Football.History

Hello, Help.Football.History, and Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia.

First of all, why me? And second of all, it is done: Template:Campeonato Regional Centro.

I have set to myself the challenge of spending the whole month of March exclusively creating wiki pages (as you can see on my contributions); fortunately I am now creating your talk page, but after this, I can only talk to you in April (sorry), so I am going to try to help you as much as I can now.

In order to create pages, you need to click on the red links (for example, 1904 Campeonato de Madrid or 1939 Campeonato Mancomunado Centro) write the article and then publish it. If you are unable to do it, it's because you account is too recent (I think you have to wait around 5 days). Until then, you can keep doing small edits or perhaps expand the history section of the Campeonato Regional Centro (this page also exists in the Spanish Wikipedia, so you can use it for guidence).

When you start creating, I recommend you use my 1903 Campeonato de Madrid as a blue print (without the background section). Try to always find at least 3-5 references (https://www.rsssf.org/tabless/span-centrchamp.html, https://web.archive.org/web/20190819152048/http://www.leyendablanca.galeon.com/tempo04.htm, https://www.zerozero.pt/competicao/campeonato-del-centro/2929), because if you don't, they are going to delete the page for not being "notable". I know that pages such as 1928–29 Campeonato Regional Centro do not have any references, but that page was made in 2012, when the surveillance of the rules was not as strict as it is today. Before publishing a page, always check if there are no major mistakes by using this botton that says "preview".

I also recommend that you start with the 1939 Campeonato Mancomunado Centro (the result of all the matches are here: https://www.bdfutbol.com/en/c/temporada.html?id=479&tab=results), because it has more refs and because it does have his own page in the Spanish Wikipedia (here), so you can take the blueprint from there. It is also bigger than the first editions, so it will serve as a nice first challange for you.

If you have doubts, you will have to fend for yourself or wait until April. Kind regards, Barr Theo (talk) 16:30, 6 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Barr Theo (talk) 16:30, 6 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not introduce links in actual articles to draft articles, as you did to 1985–86 Divizia C. Since a draft is not yet ready for the main article space, it is not in shape for ordinary readers, and links from articles should not go to a draft. Such links are contrary to the Manual of Style. These links have been removed. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 12:32, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by IgnatiusofLondon was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

• in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
• reliable
• secondary
• independent of the subject
  

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Please review WP:GNG. We need to see significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject. IgnatiusofLondon (he/him • ☎️) 22:39, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Zimbrul Siret and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

IgnatiusofLondon (he/him • ☎️) 22:39, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Help.Football.History! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! IgnatiusofLondon (he/him • ☎️) 22:39, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Help.Football.History. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Zimbrul Siret, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:10, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DoubleGrazing was:

Resubmitted without any improvement, previous decline still stands.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Zimbrul Siret and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 17:57, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to 1929–30 Campeonato Regional Centro. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit for review" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. I dream of horses (Hoofprints) (Neigh at me) 03:44, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Done! Sorry for the delay. You must always add at least three references if you want to give your articles a better chance to stand. You now have a new blueprint for the others Campeonato Regional Centro. You can even elaborate on important matches as an excuse to add more references and make the article look better.

By the way, I am glad that my biggest fan has stuck around. I would also like to thank you for all of the edits that you make on my creations. They might be small, but are just as important because they usually correct the mistakes that I leave behind during the haste of my streaks. I should have thanked you for this back in May, but I just never did.

Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date.

Kind regards. Barr Theo (talk) 15:17, 1 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

1905 Copa del Rey final

added a link pointing to Antonio Alonso

1906 Copa del Rey

added a link pointing to Antonio Alonso

1906 Copa del Rey final

added a link pointing to Antonio Alonso

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 07:54, 10 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to 1905 Campeonato de Madrid. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit for review" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Hey man im josh (talk) 16:37, 10 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Help.Football.History

I edit here too, under the username Toadspike and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I've asked for a discussion about the redirect Coupe Dewar, created by you. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 January 15 § Coupe Dewar.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Toadspike}}. And don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Toadspike [Talk] 12:24, 15 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Rahmatula786 was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

• in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
• reliable
• secondary
• strictly independent of the subject
  

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Zimbrul Siret and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Rahmatula786 (talk) 05:33, 23 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by SafariScribe were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission provides insufficient context for those unfamiliar with the subject matter. Please see the guide to writing better articles for information on how to better format your submission.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:1905 Campeonato de Madrid and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 12:35, 17 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Help.Football.History. Thank you for your work on André Durbec. Another editor, MPGuy2824, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

"André" isn't mentioned in the target page

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|MPGuy2824}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

-MPGuy2824 (talk) 07:48, 23 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You have been constantly following me for over a year now. Always correcting my tiny little mistakes and creating redirects to my articles. You are surely my No. 1 fan, and I just want you to know that your work is much appreciated. I will take a closer look at Zimbrul Siret tomorrow.

Kind regards. Barr Theo (talk) 02:10, 1 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Help.Football.History. Thank you for your work on Francisco Torréns. Another editor, MPGuy2824, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

the francisco mentioned in the target page has a different last name

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|MPGuy2824}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

-MPGuy2824 (talk) 09:39, 1 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by NeoGaze was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

• in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
• reliable
• secondary
• strictly independent of the subject
  

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

From the provided sources, it doesn't appear the draft's subject is notable enough. Please add more substantial reliable and independent sources, not just statistics and brief mentions in periodicals.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Zimbrul Siret and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

NeoGaze (talk) 13:55, 6 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

1905 Campeonato de Madrid, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

🇵🇸‍🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦‍🇵🇸 18:45, 8 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Help. I turned one of your many redirects (Juan Ochoa) into a disambiguation. Kind regards. Luis7M (talk) 16:06, 16 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 1988–89 Nemzeti Bajnokság II, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page BVSC.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:54, 2 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 1906 Campeonato de Madrid is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/1906 Campeonato de Madrid until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Govvy (talk) 09:26, 3 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Greenman. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Highlanders F.C., but you didn't provide a reliable source. On Wikipedia, it's important that article content be verifiable. If you'd like to resubmit your change with a citation, your edit is archived in the page history. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Greenman (talk) 20:26, 8 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

https://www.rsssf.org/tablesz/zimbcuphist.html I did provide a ref. Can you help improve the Cup of Zimbabwe article? Thank you! Help.Football.History (talk) 20:38, 8 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]