User talk:ClemRutter

Hi Clem this is Katharine Lovejoy

• Draft:Tony Heaton is being worked on by User:Allan Sutherland (talk).

{{Navbox with collapsible groups}}

• "What we want: Teachers on what they need to solve the crisis in our classrooms". The Guardian. 5 September 2018. Retrieved 5 September 2018. US ref parking

Hi ClemRutter! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

• The Wikipedia Adventure Start Page
• The Wikipedia Adventure Lounge
• The Teahouse new editor help space
• Wikipedia Help pages

-- 18:45, Monday, November 12, 2018 (UTC)

ϢereSpielChequers is wishing you Seasons Greetings! Whether you celebrate your hemisphere's Solstice or Christmas, Diwali, Hogmanay, Hanukkah, Lenaia, Festivus or even the Saturnalia, this is a special time of year for almost everyone!

Spread the holiday cheer by adding {{subst:User:WereSpielChequers/Dec18a}}~~~~ to your friends' talk pages.

Thanks for uploading File:Fair use logo COBIS.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:17, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

ClemRutter (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

We have very different philosophies on editing Wikipedia. I say to my students, “ If you find a mistake on Wikipedia, change it, and if it is controversial explain what you have done on the talk page. Other editors can then join in. Don’t expect an instant reply- editors have lives” “Cover your edits with a reference” “No copyrighted material should be included, in the UK an OGL license covers a mass of material ,if in doubt discuss it with us on the talk page.” “Generally use your own words, they lead to better prose though there are exceptions. For example lists and tables, if in doubt discuss it with us on the talk page.” The blocking editor has experience in copyright violations but little experience creating and writing articles, and little experience in this field. She states in post that does not wish to. And was not willing to clarify her thoughts for WP:WPSCH. The talk page is for dialogue and not just a pin board for admin templates. Several admins have examined the text and would have made corrections if a problem was serious. Other admins User:Mike Peel have suggested that the blocking editor modifies her approach. 29 Sept 2020. Earlier this year I was contacted by the experienced editor Clive Huggins User:SCHolar44 who had discovered this block, and looked at the revision history for Northern Ireland Curriculum. “The first item I looked at was her 5 August 2021 deletion of material from https://www.academia.edu/1556978. On seeing it was a UNESCO paper, I thought “Surely this will be copyright-free?” — and so it is. https://www.unesco.org/en/publications states: "Open Access policy In order to help reduce the gap between industrialized countries and those in the emerging economies, UNESCO decided in 2013 to adopt an Open Access Policy for its publications by making use of a new dimension of knowledge sharing. Open Access means free access to scientific information and unrestricted use of electronic data for everyone.” The refererence to https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs11125-008-9044-3 is contentious. Any of the Springer Verlag articles since 2013 are tagged as Open Access, which contains the text: Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. I assumed this covered the article from their back archive , and so it too would now be considered Open Access, on reflexion, I cannot tell. If the intervening admin also had doubts, the correct procedure would have been, to revert and discuss it on the talk page which I had suggested. Given the editors previous interventions, she would have better served by declaring a conflict and to have passed the perceived issue to a more neutral admin. See also:User talk:ClemRutter/Archive/2014; User talk:ClemRutter/Archive/2013; User talk:ClemRutter/Archive/2012

• History of Palestine Wellerman Shanty on the Independant.

2014

Decline reason:

Instead of talking about others or editing philosophy, please discuss your copyright violations. 331dot (talk) 09:48, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Thanks for uploading File:Fair use Beeckestijn from 18 century engraving heavily cropped.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:07, 5 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

		Season's Greetings
		Wishing everybody a Happy Holiday Season, and all best wishes for the New Year! The Adoration of the Magi in the Snow (1563) by Pieter Bruegel the Elder is my Wiki-Christmas card to all for this year. Johnbod (talk) 17:36, 17 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:City of Norwich School logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:12, 9 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Fair use logo North East Futures UTC.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:17, 20 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Fair use logo Gymnasium München Nord.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:18, 21 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You are invited to participate in The European Destubathon in April. Almost $3000 in Amazon voucher prizes which can be used to buy books for content, though it can also be treated as an editathon if you're not interested in competing! Minimum content to be added to each article just to ensure that they're over a stub, though longer expansions also welcome. Entries at the end of the contest will be tipped into the 50,000 Destubbing Challenge and European Challenge. Previous contests were really enjoyable and I'm hoping this one will be too! Sign up if interested. Thanks! ♦ Dr. Blofeld 17:22, 6 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi ClemRutter,

Is it possible to remove the period from Thomas J Price's page title. In order to match other sources?

https://www.thomasjprice.com/

https://www.hauserwirth.com/artists/35333-thomas-j-price/

https://www.instagram.com/thomasjprice__/?hl=en

Many thanks Zen 8822 (talk) 10:53, 27 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

•  Done. Binksternet (talk) 12:18, 27 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Fair use logo Hellesdon High School.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:16, 30 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Leigh Academy Blackheath is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Leigh Academy Blackheath until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Tacyarg (talk) 19:30, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Discovery Museum (Netherlands) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Discovery Museum (Netherlands) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

GoldRomean (talk) 02:27, 13 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]