User talk:Chris Calvin

Welcome!

Hello, Roni10dS, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Krasen Belev, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

• Starting an article
• Your first article
• Biographies of living persons
• How to write a great article
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Help pages
• Tutorial

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome!  — Toдor Boжinov — 15:51, 21 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Krasen Belev requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion," which appears inside of the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. — Toдor Boжinov — 15:51, 21 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Krasen Belev requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion," which appears inside of the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. — Toдor Boжinov — 15:57, 21 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The article Krasen Belev has been proposed for deletion because under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners or ask at Wikipedia:Help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. joe decker^{talk to me} 04:12, 23 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Krasen Belev requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion," which appears inside of the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. — Toдor Boжinov — 10:30, 27 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Krasen Belev is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Krasen Belev until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. — Toдor Boжinov — 14:48, 6 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Roni10dS,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Ronaldo Arabadziev da Silva for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Vanjagenije (talk) 14:34, 9 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Bulgarian Wikipedian: if you can find something in Bulgarian that might help the article Calligraphist (artist), please help! Thanks, Drmies (talk) 03:21, 25 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi.

When you update the stats in football players' infoboxes please remember that you should also update the timestamps as of when the stats are correct. This is done by updating |pcupdate= (or |club-update=) parameter when updating club appearances and goals, or |ntupdate= (or |nationalteam-update=) when updating national team appearances and goals. This shows when the stats were last updated and prevents editors from accidentally updating the stats again.

The easiest way to do this is to use five tildes, which automatically converts to the current time. For example |club-update=~~~~~.

Please keep this in mind. Thank you. Qed237 (talk) 21:55, 13 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Mihaela Fileva, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Divna. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:38, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Just thought you should know about WP:ANI#Disruptive editing by BulgariaSources since you are a frequent editor of Bulgaria national football team and have reverted BulgariaSources a couple of times. Maybe you can comment on the changes they keep making to the article and whether you think they are appropriate. -- Marchjuly (talk) 02:35, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, I hope someone will finally take actions to block this user. -- Chris Calvin (talk) 08:25, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Slavin Slavchev, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Rainbow (band). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:58, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Bulgaria national under-21 football team

added a link pointing to Ivan Kolev

FC Spartak Varna

added a link pointing to Spartak Stadium

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:08, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:48, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Alexis Ren, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://bonnymodels.com/model/alexis-ren/.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 17:02, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Alexis Ren requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. reddogsix (talk) 19:35, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Fernander Kassaï, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. GiantSnowman 19:02, 11 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Steven Achikor, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Just Another Day. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:39, 12 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Chris Calvin,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether Christiana Louizu should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Christiana Louizu .

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks, Lucky102 (talk) 17:24, 12 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Slaviša Jokanović. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Mattythewhite (talk) 23:58, 27 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Martin Dimitrov (footballer), but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! CAPTAIN RAJU ^(✉) 18:49, 5 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I saw your edits at Template:2015–16 A Group table and wanted to explain my view. First of all I do not speak any Bulgarian so I might have misunderstood some of the information. Anyway, from what I understand they will not play any more matches in the league this season so they should have the statusletter D, black background and text about being expelled. Also I modified your source to use one of the standard cite templates instead of regular brackets. The reason I reverted your second edit is because you removed the cite-template, why? You also removed the relegation for team 10, but do you have any source for that, I can not find any source saying 10th team wont be relegated? Qed237 (talk) 17:32, 20 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I added reference that explain everything. Borislav Mihaylov explain the situation. Litex is relegated to B Group from next season. Same case like in the Romanian Liga I. Also in the reference its added that the last team in the group will be send on play-offs and the 9th will be saved. Chris Calvin (talk) 17:41, 20 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, so Litex will be able to continue playing this season? And what happens if they qualify for Champions League or Europa League, will they be allowed to play those tournaments? Qed237 (talk) 17:47, 20 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

They wont play in A Group this season, their matches are listed as 0:3. They will play only in Bulgarian Cup where they are on semi-final and if they won it, they will be qualified for Europe League, they will be in B Group for 2016-17 season. Also, since the team have second squad in B Group aka PFC Litex Lovech II, all first team players will play there and represent first team in cup only. Also, no matter the final result of Litex II in B Group, team will be relegated to V Group, since first and second team can't be in same division. Just Bulgaria. Chris Calvin (talk) 18:12, 20 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Okay I undserstand, thanks. It sounds like the are still expelled and should be black, since they will not play any more games in A group this season. Qed237 (talk) 19:55, 20 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Georg Iliev. Mattythewhite (talk) 16:35, 25 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links are not references. Please remember to actually cite your sources. Mattythewhite (talk) 16:58, 25 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the remind, sometimes i can forgot to add them as a source for statistic, you could just see if this is the case, not just delete it without looking is there an actual source already, i believe i'm not the onlyone who is doing this. Thank you. Chris Calvin (talk) 17:04, 25 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Mattythewhite, I've just removed some unsourced content from a page he created. Is a 4IM warning and/or AN/I report the way to go forward now? Ches (talk) 20:26, 25 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nothing, as that unsourced content was not added after the level 4 warning was issued. Mattythewhite (talk) 20:30, 25 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Mattythewhite: Indeed, my apologies for not realising. Ches (talk) 20:45, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Kristian Kostov requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, a group of people, an individual animal, an organization (band, club, company, etc.), web content, or an organized event, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Ches (talk) 20:21, 25 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from a page you have created yourself. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the article's talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. Ches (talk) 20:33, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the Strahil Popov page, your edit caused a missing references list (help | help with group references). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:22, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not comfortable restoring a biography that was deleted at AFD just because the subject won a competition on a TV show. Your sources were [1], [2], and [3], plus her profiles on IMDB and Facebook. Why not just write a new article? When an article is deleted at AFD, G4 speedy only applies when the article is a repost: a new article on the same topic isn't subject to speedy deletion. Nyttend (talk) 02:58, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Kristian Kostov requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, a group of people, an individual animal, an organization (band, club, company, etc.), web content, or an organized event, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Ches (talk) 15:06, 29 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself, as you did with Kristian Kostov. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion, which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the article's talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you. Ches (talk) 16:26, 29 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Christiana Louizu, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Adagio and I Surrender. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:12, 30 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for participating in the Women in Music edit-a-thon
	January 2016 More than 250 articles were created Hosted by Women in Red (... check out our next event)

--Ipigott (talk) 08:33, 3 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I'm glad I could help. Chris Calvin (talk) 13:40, 3 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Borimir Karamfilov, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Devin. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 15:07, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:FCSpartakVarnalogo.png. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 17:42, 2 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:FCSpartakVarnalogo.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 11:16, 5 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited FC Rozova Dolina, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Nikolay Ivanov. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:10, 6 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Avi Benedi, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Pop. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:44, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited SIN Cars, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ruse. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:33, 26 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Bulgaria Olympic football team, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. Dl2000 (talk) 22:59, 23 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

здравей, видях че си направил нова статия за ЦСКА, който ще играе в А група, предвид че все още старият отбор не е приключил с процедурата по несъстоятелност и има възможнот двата отбора да се обединят, не е ли по-добре да изчакаме преди да правим подобни изводи че са отделни клубове? --Scroch (talk) 10:14, 8 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Няма как двата да се обединят, защото ако се обединят задълженията на автентичния ЦСКА ще останат и тогава жертването на Чавдар и Литекс ще е безсмислено. Направих го с цел, да не се омешват 2та отбора и след това да се налага да се трие и прехвърля. Да не говорим, че вече фенове от Сектор Г се разединиха и някой обявиха, че няма да припознаят този отбор. Chris Calvin (talk) 10:44, 8 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

И все пак още не е минал периода за предлагане оздравителният план, след това в зависимост дали ще се приеме такъв или не има голяма вероятност да се обединят двете АД-та или ЦСКА от А група да изкупи активи на ЦСКА от В и по този начин да се получи юридическо припознаване. За това те помолих да не бързаш с цялото разделяне на страниците. За Ботев не виждам да да има две страници при положение че оригиналният отбор съществува все още --Scroch (talk) 07:12, 10 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ботев е друг случай, в регистрите го припознават като един отбор, не съм стигал до него. Много отбори установих, че не са оригиналните, а са основани нови с добавена година в името и се опитвам да ги разделя. Причината да го направя с ЦСКА е, че в момента има 2 действащи, който няма как да се обединят, каквото и да стане, защото двата отбора се ръководят от хора който няма да се обединят никога. Ако Ганчев искаше да оздрави оригиналният ЦСКА, щеше да си стисне ръката с Божков, да платят набързо и да ръководят отбора заедно. Няма да се случи това обаче. Пък ако се случи някакво чудо, 5 минути работа ми е да ги обединя страниците. Chris Calvin (talk) 09:29, 10 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Божков не конторлира отбора във В група, той също е на Ганчев. А и виж какво пише примерно в днешният 24 часа - ще се изкупуват футболните дългове. По отношение на другите отбори, държа да отбележа че спортният клуб няма нищо общо с фирмата която го управлява, виж например Парма и Фиорентина, никой не се опитва да твърди че това не са същите отбори като фалиралите фирми --Scroch (talk) 11:52, 10 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ПФК ЦСКА София АД в момента няма собственик, това е клуб в несъстоятелност. Собственик ще бъде този, който плати, а никой не плаща, следователно отбора не е нито на Ганчев нито на Божков, а Ганчев в момента си прави собствен отбор, който няма как да има нещо общо с оригиналният освен трите букви. Не случайно футболистите на Литекс ще са основата, защото това си е отбора на Литекс, със сменено име. Абсолютно съм съгласен с това, че фирмата която го управлява, няма нищо общо с отбора и съм мислил по въпроса с Парма, но там случаят е друг и разликата е, че фирмата управител (на Ганчев) няма как да купи оригиналният ЦСКА. За да се случи, трябва отбора да започне на чисто от дъното, а не от А група (вече Първа Лига). Всички тези глупости с отборите в момента е подигравка с феновете и отборите на ЦСКА и Литекс. За момента обаче варианта двата клуба да са разделени е най-добрият, до уточняване на случващото се. Защото иначе в момента се пише как Китанов отива в оригиналното ЦСКА, а то е невъзможно, защото това ЦСКА има забрана за трансфери и се получава една измислица на хора който не са наясно. Chris Calvin (talk) 15:22, 10 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

"Собственик ще бъде този, който плати", Ганчев плати, а ти продължаваш да настояваш --Scroch (talk) 07:52, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article PFC CSKA 1948 Sofia is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PFC CSKA 1948 Sofia until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Ronhjones  ^(Talk) 21:32, 10 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Erik Pochanski, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Sir Sputnik (talk) 02:25, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from Erik Pochanski, a page you have created yourself. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the article's talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. Sir Sputnik (talk) 21:32, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Здрасти, а как искаш да ти пиша културно, като не разбираш? Пробвах няколко пъти, но ти пак едитваш при положение, че още нищо не е решено, но мога да ти кажа, че съм достатъчно близо до събитията в ЦСКА, за да знам повече от теб. Не го приемай, като заяждане. Ако искаш да помагаш няма проблем, ако искаш направи нова тема за божковото ЦСКА, но когато стане факт. Извинявам се, че реагирах остро последния път, но ми омръзна през ден да си губя времето да оправям страницата. Поздрави! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kzl1948 (talk • contribs) 20:52, 4 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ако има Божково ЦСКА, то няма да има нова страница, а ще се продължи тази на ЦСКА. Не е случайно, че Гришовото ЦСКА има тире. Оставям всичко така, но ако Божков вкара оздравителен план и ЦСКА започне сезона във Втора лига, няма как да стане страницата да остане за Гришовото ЦСКА и да се прави нова за Божковото. -Chris Calvin (talk) 22:01, 4 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed that you have posted comments in a language other than English. At the English-language Wikipedia, we try to use English for all comments. Posting all comments in English makes it easier for other editors to join the conversation and help you. If you cannot avoid using another language, then please provide a translation into English, if you can. For more details, see Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines. Or communicate by email. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 05:57, 5 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Erik Pochanski is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Erik Pochanski (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Sir Sputnik (talk) 13:35, 5 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I have declined your nomination for speedy deletion of this article. WP:G4 applies only to pages that recreation[s] of a page that was deleted per a deletion discussion. The article on Atanasov was not previously deleted, so the criteria doesn't apply. That being said, I agree that the article should be deleted, since it does not meet the relevant notability guidelines, so I have proposed it for deletion. Sir Sputnik (talk) 19:52, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you are going to involve yourself in the deletion process, could you please first read up on the relevant policies and guidelines, because in this case, you are consistently getting it wrong. Both of the edits from kzl1948 that you reverted were perfectly legitimate. For the first edit, the author of a page with no substantial changes from other editors may request the deletion of their page by blanking it per WP:G7. This stems from the notion that self-reverts should always be permitted. For the second, proposed deletion may be objected to by removing tag, and it should not be reinstated if this is done. The reasoning here is that proposed deletions are for uncontroversial matters only. The movement there is evidence of controversy, the process no longer applies. May I suggest you read the Wiki pages on deletion policy, proposed deletions (including ones for biographies of living people), deletion discussions, and the criteria for speedy deletion. Cheers. Sir Sputnik (talk) 14:07, 18 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited PFC Septemvri Sofia, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Puma and Reusch. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:35, 9 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Chris Calvin. When you changed PFC Spartak Varna into a disambiguation page, you may not have been aware of WP:FIXDABLINKS, which says:

When creating disambiguation pages, fix all resulting mis-directed links.

Before moving an article to a qualified name (in order to create a disambiguation page at the base name, to move an existing disambiguation page to that name, or to redirect that name to a disambiguation page), click on What links here to find all of the incoming links. Repair all of those incoming links to use the new article name.

It would be a great help if you would check the other Wikipedia articles that contain links to "PFC Spartak Varna" and fix them to take readers to the correct article. Thanks. R'n'B (call me Russ) 10:01, 12 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Krisko, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Spens. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:49, 20 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Chris Calvin. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:FCSpartakVarnalogo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:40, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Kévin Koubemba, without citing a reliable source using an inline citation that clearly supports the material. The burden is on the person wishing to keep in the material to meet these requirements, as a necessary (but not always sufficient) condition. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. GiantSnowman 20:09, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Fareed Sadat. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. GiantSnowman 06:59, 31 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please Can You Stop To Change The Details of my Cousin Yassine AMRIOUI . NDSY (talk) 06:22, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I just chat with him, soccerway has not updated his profile, he is not lending by vereya because vereya has not homologated his contract. Actually it is to tsarsko selo. He play 12 games with lokomotiv . NDSY (talk) 22:35, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Tita (singer) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. St0n3 BG (talk) 01:19, 27 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Mihaela Marinova requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. St0n3 BG (talk) 01:21, 27 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!

Hello, Chris Calvin. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Avi Benedi is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Avi Benedi until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Quickfingers (talk) 15:58, 13 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Fcspartakvarnanewlogo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:39, 25 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. RonBot (talk) 17:05, 12 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. RonBot (talk) 17:28, 12 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:FCArda2018.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 16:10, 13 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Nadir Salifov, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 12:56, 11 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Is it about the sorces or just there is too much unreferenced stuff? I'm really looking to turn back the article quick as spending few months in waiting for aproval is strange for me, as I never had such experiance with articles. Chris Calvin (talk) 17:46, 11 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nadir Salifov, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Bkissin (talk) 20:54, 26 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Chris Calvin. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 18:03, 25 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Luan Viana Patrocínio, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Macedonia (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:36, 6 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, 2018–19 Third Amateur Football League (Bulgaria), does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 08:08, 12 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

Georgi Pashov (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Ireland national football team

Wanderson Cristaldo Farias (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Ireland national football team

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 07:49, 28 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Chris Calvin. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "2018–19 Third Amateur Football League".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 05:19, 20 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:OFCPirinBlagoevgrad.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:35, 15 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:14, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ava Aashna Chopra, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page New York (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:50, 18 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Sandy Ese Idigbe, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Praxidicae (talk) 14:09, 13 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Stefania Lo Gatto is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stefania Lo Gatto until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Praxidicae (talk) 14:32, 13 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Brian Condenanza is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brian Condenanza until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Praxidicae (talk) 14:34, 13 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Kirill Korshikov, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Praxidicae (talk) 14:36, 13 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Chris Calvin. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially egregious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat SEO.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists, and if it does not, from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Chris Calvin. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Chris Calvin|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. Praxidicae (talk) 14:54, 13 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

My latest edits and page creations are based on my own researches and with the idea to help wikipedia with creating articles for people who I find for notable. I'm not affiliated with any company that provides promotion of people and i'm not creating articles because someone asked me, but because I decided. And of course i'm not paid for them, I understood the rules of wikipedia and always keeping my point of view as neutral. I understand that my decision to create articles for such different people might seems as advertisement, but it is nothing more than a random choose of articles. I'm reading some online news sites and got inspired from there about the articles. I haven't received any warnings since I contribute to wikipedia, so I would keep my good work and will look again for creating articles by using articles for creation process to get feedback from another wikipedians and order to find if the articles I have working on are good enough for wikipedia. — Chris Calvin (talk) 22:58, 13 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

if that’s true, please explain this, which is uploaded to a Flickr account under your name (as disclosed on your userpage). Praxidicae (talk) 12:18, 14 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It is nothing more than a try to upload a picture of her. Found that she had a photo session with a photographer with whom I contacted since i'm a photographer too and use specific photography sites. I uploaded it into flickr, due to finding it is a way to upload pictures, as i'm not very familiar with the wikipedia file upload and finding it way too hard to provide an image that was given to me by other and not uploaded in any website and sending a dosen mails to administrators ect. Probably I have to keep myself on uploading only my own images, made by me, because I clearly cant understand the copyright rules and what I could upload or cannot. Still, this doesn't change the fact that i'm not taking money for creating or editing articles and i'm doing it on my own. I don't find wikipedia as place for advertising and would not try to use it that way. Chris Calvin (talk) 01:02, 15 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Aishwarya Bhende, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Praxidicae (talk) 15:01, 13 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Sandy Ese Idigbe, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Praxidicae (talk) 20:33, 18 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a suspected sock puppet of F121212 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · logs · block log · arb · rfc · lta · SPI · cuwiki) that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this is a sock puppet account, and your original account is blocked, please also note that banned or blocked users are not allowed to edit Wikipedia; and all edits made under this account may be reverted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. TonyBallioni (talk) 17:38, 23 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Chris Calvin (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Hello. As you can see, this F121212 account was blocked almost 6 years ago, for a joke I had made in the Spain National Football Team by adding Tom Cleverley in the squad. Indeed, by the talk then I had admit my stupid joke and regret it. As you can see, except this i'm doing my best to keep Wikipedia clean from vandalism and helping with adding information, updating articles and creating new. As you can see, these accounts are not sock puppets, because they are not active for 6 years now, and I have 0 intense to return them or something. I believe you can look for all of mine articles and contribute and you will see for sure i'm here to help, I love helping Wikipedia and i'm sure anyone will see that this bad behavior was one time 6 years ago, and i'm here to contribute to the encyclopedia. - Chris Calvin (talk) 18:15, 23 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Accept reason:

Unblocked per conditions below. TonyBallioni (talk) 18:58, 28 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I’m somewhat sympathetic, but I won’t lie and say that the recent G11s didn’t have an impact on my choice to block here. There’s block evasion plus recent promotional content, which makes me less sympathetic to the “I was an idiot kid” argument. Is there anything you can say to address the spam articles? TonyBallioni (talk) 18:21, 23 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, so because I made a edits that look like a promotional, but as I said I'm not doing it for money and actually noone could contest it or proove me wrong you decide to block me for other thing made 6 years ago? I have like 10,000 edits and 2 edit jokes and these 3 are all people see. I have never managed to use the accounts for gaining advantage on argument for articles or something. I believe you could check all this and see that I never helped myself or did anything more that having an account, did a new as I didn't know how to change my name and 4 years after I did a joke edit as a Manchester United fan who was pissed off that player. And here we go 6 years after explaining myself again for the same as I haven't done it again or something. Just took my time to contribute and prove that I do all the best and beeing here to contribute as back then noone answered me how I could prove i'm here to help. So I did an account, start editing again and you can see if i'm here to contribute or not. Abouth the promotional articles accusations. I believe I explained everything, yes, I agree I did articles that didn't covered the criteria and I agreed that I should keep doing edits and creating articles in the sphere I know better. I did not, or did non intend to get money or anything in return for creating or editing articles. I'm happy to see that the persons articles I have made are now getting great, like the bulgarian players that are now in the national teams and in bigger clubs, i'm happy that I had a, probably, very little contribute to this. Same with football teams, I have build my own few football clubs articles and i'm so happy for helping in nothing in return. Same with models, singers and personalities. For me it is great to help people. And i'm doing my best to help. As I said, i'm not going to do articles by my own and would look to give them for review first. I don't know what more I could say, I believe my history of edits would prove you my contribute here. I'm sorry if my explanation is a little bit messed up, I totally understand you, you don't know me, you see things that are looking suspicious and you are doing your job. I just want you to check closer on my account and see that like you, i'm here to contribute and I love doing it, I do it for fun and with the idea i'm helping someone. That is why I might sound a little passionate in my explanation, but I really don't want to loose my rights to edit, because i'm here to help. Chris Calvin (talk) 18:48, 23 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The sockpuppetry is pretty old news at this point although I did find a deleted autobiographical article (I'm guessing) that all of your identified accounts had created & recreated years ago so the sockpuppetry did happen. I agree that the bigger issue is your creation of new promotional-looking articles. Would you be willing to cease creating new articles for a period of time and just edit existing articles & pages? I think that would be a start to regaining some trust. But I defer to Tony on this appeal. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:06, 24 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

First of all, let me point that this sockpuppetry happen 6 years ago and was bring on only to get a reason to delete my recent created articles. Because this, the sockpuppet account has nothing to do with the articles I created recently and they were deleted immediately like i'm the biggest criminal in wiki history. So, I believe everyone would agree, that blocking me for things happen 6 years ago is a bit of harsh. For the last 6 years I had proven myself in editing for the good of wikipedia and I have helped for building numerous articles. Isn't it? About the recent articles that were pointed as promotional. I did not intend to make that as that. I never got paid for making them or getting anything in return. And I didn't made them because somebody asked me to do it. I did it by my own and I do take the responsibility for creating articles that are not meeting the notability criteria. But some of the articles were discuses and proven to meet the criteria for notability, so deleting them moments after I got ban for things I did 6 years ago and blocking my option to challenge the deletion process is quite harsh and I feel it like a personal attack. What i'm going to do when I got unblocked? I'm going to keep my good work on editing Bulgarian football articles, teams and players stats ect. I'm also editing a lot of football articles at all, so i'm going to do the same. Also, I was going to create articles for Bulgarian actors and singers, but if administrators want a trial for me, i would keep myself away from creating articles outside the football aspect or at all if needed. I'm also doing a photography and as you can see in my recent uploads I would help with my fresh photography of Bulgarian cities and articles. Creating articles for people who are not from Bulgaria and could not prove notability is not my thing since it got me a bad vision, so i'm not going to create articles. I personally just wanted to give more new articles, but it is way too hard for my acknowledges, so I would not do it again and keep myself in the comfort zone i'm in in the last 6 years and before. -Chris Calvin (talk) 19:40, 24 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for the delay. I had been thinking about this.

So first, the sockpuppetry was not something that happened six years ago. It was ongoing: you were blocked and never connected the accounts or requested an unblock. That's block evasion and against the policy on use of multiple accounts, plain and simple. Every edit you made since the first block was active socking.

Next, we have a history of issues with this account, noted through the many AfDs and speedy deletions going up to a few weeks ago. It's one issue, but with the socking suggests that there were underlying issues with understanding of policy that needed to be addressed

That being said, I would be willing to unblock on the condition that any article you create must go through review at WP:AFC. If you're willing to abide by that, I'm willing to unblock as you've now connected the accounts publicly. If you are fine with this restriction, I'll unblock you and make a note of it in your block log. TonyBallioni (talk) 01:29, 27 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I agree, the reason happen 6 years ago, but I do understand I broke the rules by using new account rather than wait to get another appeal and to complete by the right way and I'm really understanding my mistake in that and regret it. AfDs were mostly for images or logos or about the articles who were discussed and then proven by other members that the articles met the criteria for notability, except the latest ones who I agree were not meeting the criteria, but I really didn't make them with promotional purposes and I agree I should keep on the areas I have better acknowledges. So yes, If you unblock me I would create new articles only by going through review at WP:AFC as I already said I would do it in order to gain back the trust. I would only ask if this would go for footballers, I make articles for players who have played in the Bulgarian First League, rules for footballers are a bit clear, if he have played for a professional team in a fully professional league he is meeting the criteria for notability. I'm just asking, if you say all my articles to make it through review I will do it that way without any question. I don't know what is the policy about the other accounts, if you can please just delete them, I don't remember passwords or anything and I would never want to have more problems with them, so I would never try to use them or use any other account rather then mine. If they are going to stay and be linked I would just never use them. I would be very grateful if you are willing to unblock me and I would do my best to never do same mistakes, but only to contribute the encyclopedia getting better. Chris Calvin (talk) 21:46, 27 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Denislav Angelov, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Willbb234^Talk (please {{ping}} me in replies) 21:09, 2 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Zivert, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Sulfurboy (talk) 05:45, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Zivert, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Cosmopolitan and Shazam (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:54, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by MurielMary was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Does not seem to meet the notability criteria. Also, note that YouTube is not a reliable source for a biography.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Misha Miller and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Misha Miller, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

MurielMary (talk) 11:31, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Chris Calvin! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! MurielMary (talk) 11:31, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Chris Calvin. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Konstantin Trendafilov".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Nathan2055^{talk - contribs} 00:39, 28 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:25, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Chris Calvin. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Misha Miller".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 20:58, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Svetoslav Vutsov, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Georgi Petkov.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:07, 21 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, when updating a player's stats, please remember to also update the date. Thanks. Nehme₁₄₉₉ 22:39, 8 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:29, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Emre Emin, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Emre Emin until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:03, 12 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Government of Bulgaria, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Atanas Atanasov.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:56, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited FC Tsarsko Selo Sofia, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Plamen Krumov.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:56, 24 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Georgi Dimitrov (racing driver) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Georgi Dimitrov (racing driver) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ivaylo Angelov is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ivaylo Angelov until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 11:43, 18 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Onel5969 was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

• in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
• reliable
• secondary
• independent of the subject
  

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Not enough in-depth coverage to pass WP:GNG.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Krasimir Miloshev and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Onel5969 ^{TT me} 20:10, 29 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:12, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Template:FC Tsarsko Selo squad has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Pelmeen10 (talk) 09:31, 10 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Rodrigue Nanitelamio Elcapuche4 (talk) 03:52, 11 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Arlind Dakaj, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) WP:NFOOTY is no longer a valid SNG, so GNG must be met. It needs several refs from independent, reliable, secondary sources to pass WP:GNG. It should have at least 3 of those. Please remember that routine sports coverage does not satisfy GNG, and that interviews, being primary sources, do not go to notability either. Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 12:19, 16 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Mark-Emilio Papazov, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) WP:NFOOTY is no longer a valid SNG, so GNG must be met. It needs several refs from independent, reliable, secondary sources to pass WP:GNG. It should have at least 3 of those. Please remember that routine sports coverage does not satisfy GNG, and that interviews, being primary sources, do not go to notability either. Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 10:01, 21 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Chris Calvin (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Caught by an open proxy block but this host or IP is not an open proxy. My IP address is 213.130.93.60. I never used VPN or any other IP covering things. I'm based in Varna, Bulgaria with having a standard internet from one of the biggest internet providers in Bulgaria. Chris Calvin (talk) 21:32, 24 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Procedural decline as, while your account is not directly blocked and you can edit from other IPs, I'm not likely to get the block on the IP lifted (and it really isn't your fault). I suggest instead that you follow the instructions at WP:IPECPROXY and request IP block exemption so this won't be a problem. — Daniel Case (talk) 06:09, 25 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited PFC Septemvri Sofia, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ivaylo Mihaylov.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:00, 30 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:40, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The article 2023–24 Third Amateur Football League (Bulgaria) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

WP:CRYSTALBALL. No evidence of anything more than routine/primary coverage.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Fermiboson (talk) 15:06, 4 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Chris Calvin. Thank you for your work on WFC Paldin Plovdiv. SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Hello my friend! Good day to you. Thanks for creating the article, I have marked it as reviewed. Have a blessed day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 14:06, 19 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Chris Calvin. Thank you for your work on Vanessa Gajdek. SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Hello my friend! Good day to you. Thanks for creating the article, I have marked it as reviewed. Have a blessed day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 03:55, 4 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

• in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
• reliable
• secondary
• strictly independent of the subject
  

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Jögel and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 19:19, 10 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Chris Calvin. Thank you for your work on Abdoulaye Traoré (footballer, born 2003). Bastun, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Hi Chris, nice work on your new article. Please consider adding it to appropriate Wikiprojects, such as Biography.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Bastun}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Bastun^{Ėġáḍβáś₮ŭŃ!} 11:46, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Chris Calvin!

• The New Pages Patrol is currently struggling to keep up with the influx of new articles needing review. We could use a few extra hands to help.
• We think that someone with your activity and experience is very likely to meet the guidelines for granting.
• Reviewing/patrolling a page doesn't take much time, but it requires a strong understanding of Wikipedia’s CSD policy and notability guidelines.
• Kindly read the tutorial before making your decision, and feel free to post on the project talk page with questions.
• If patrolling new pages is something you'd be willing to help out with, please consider applying here.

Thank you for your consideration. We hope to see you around!

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:20, 22 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Chris Calvin. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Arlind Dakaj, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 00:40, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Bulgaria national under-21 football team, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Marin Petkov.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 18:02, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Chris Calvin. Thank you for your work on OFC Kostinbrod. Another editor, SunDawn, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Good day! Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia by writing this article. I have marked the article as reviewed. Have a wonderful and blessed day for you and your family!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 03:02, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2024–25 FC Fratria season, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ruse.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 18:28, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:FC Lovech 2024 logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:15, 19 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give a page a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into FC Benkovski Isperih. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases for registered users, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Requests for history merge. Thank you. jlwoodwa (talk) 15:18, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Chris Calvin. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:2025 Formula One World Championship, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:49, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2024–25 Bulgarian Cup, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Ruse and Radomir.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:53, 25 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kristiyan Stoyanov is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kristiyan Stoyanov until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Dclemens1971 (talk) 16:31, 25 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to Kristiyan Stoyanov. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because of the result of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kristiyan Stoyanov. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Owen× ☎ 17:32, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Kristiyan Stoyanov. Thanks! Dclemens1971 (talk) 10:33, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Chris Calvin. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "2025 Formula One World Championship".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:35, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Spiderone was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

No improvement since being sent to draft.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Kristiyan Stoyanov and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 20:23, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sergio Castañeda is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sergio Castañeda until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 20:27, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:27, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2024–25 FC Fratria season, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Anton Ivanov.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:53, 9 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Chris Calvin. Thank you for your work on Georgi Lazarov. Another editor, North8000, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Good start

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 15:37, 16 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@North8000: Appreciate the good words, will do my best, for sure! Chris Calvin (talk) 07:19, 17 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Mackenzie Hunt. GiantSnowman 17:34, 12 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kristiyan Stoyanov is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kristiyan Stoyanov (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Star Mississippi 20:32, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ivan Raychev, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bulgaria national under-23 football team.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:57, 18 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Kristiyan Stoyanov requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kristiyan Stoyanov (2nd nomination). When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. CycloneYoris ^talk! 21:41, 10 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing certain pages (Kristiyan Stoyanov) for abuse of editing privileges.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Star Mississippi 00:19, 11 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This discussion literally just closed and this is the second time you've disruptively recreated it. Your opinion does not override community consensus. As such you have lost access to edit this page. Star Mississippi 00:20, 11 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Star Mississippi I would only ask this article to be returned as draft, because other could contribute to make it good enouth for you. Neverless, we talk about player, who will probably make his debut in a official national UEFA match, so an article is needed. Chris Calvin (talk) 09:13, 11 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I am declining to do so because the last time it was available as a draft, you simply moved it back and it was deleted again. It's not whether it's good enough for me. The community has decided clearly and you have shown you don't respect that simply because you believe an article is needed. You're welcome to file an unblock to request it, or a deletion review if you believe consensus was wrong. You may not continually and disruptively recreate the same article. Star Mississippi 12:23, 11 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Star Mississippi I do not want to be unblocked about editing this specific article, in order to prove my point I wont be returning it. I just want all the info I added to be available for the next person who is going to complete it and submit it. I've been here for a long time and I believe I have proven i'm here to help and was always in a good talk with everyone here, but in that case, I gave enough reasons to keep the article and enough refrences, but simply got "different references" are not enough. So i'm leaving it to the other people, but I believe the draft is a good point and could be useful in the next few days, when someone will again decide to submit it. Chris Calvin (talk) 12:46, 11 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Chris Calvin. I'm glad to hear that. ANyone who wishes to edit the article is able to request a refund to draft or request it directly from an admin. The issue is that being called up, or appearances on the junior squad are not sufficient for notability which is defined differently here since WP:NSPORTS2022. When he has sufficient coverage, an article will be created. Star Mississippi 02:16, 12 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited PFC Ludogorets Razgrad II, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Brayan Angulo.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:54, 9 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The article FC National Sofia has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Searches did not turn up enough in-depth coverage from independent, reliable sources to support meeting WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 22:39, 19 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Filip Kolev is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Filip Kolev until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

satsuma^talk_(she/they) 21:37, 7 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Martin Milkov is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Martin Milkov until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 15:17, 31 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,

Could you please provide a source for your edit on Samed Yesil's page? You say he scored 95 goals in 24 matches for ATS Krefeld, but this seems completely ludicrous.

Thanks! Ice Warmed (talk) 14:37, 1 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• I'll add it, now. The question is, if we actually need that stat for the amateur leagues. Chris Calvin (talk) 21:00, 3 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited FC Fratria, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Varna.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:55, 4 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to Erik Manolkov. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 11:04, 14 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Chris Calvin,

Thank you for creating Atanas Chernev.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Nice work! See my comments about the citation format. Have a great day!

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Mariamnei}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Mariamnei (talk) 08:36, 29 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Chris Calvin. Thank you for your work on Bertrand Fourrier. Another editor, Mariamnei, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Nice start! Please add more details to the references, such as where they were published. I recommend using the {{cite web}}: Empty citation (help) and {{cite news}}: Empty citation (help) templates (among others) to make sure all of the details are formatted correctly. Thanks and have a great day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Mariamnei}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Mariamnei (talk) 08:37, 9 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]