User talk:F121212

Welcome!

Hello, F121212, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Tutorial
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! GiantSnowman 17:17, 7 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. We always appreciate when users upload new images. However, it appears that one or more of the images you have recently uploaded or added to an article, specifically Dimitar Berbatov, may fail our non-free image policy. Most often, this involves editors uploading or using a copyrighted image of a living person. For other possible reasons, please read up on our Non-free image criteria. Please note that we take very seriously our criteria on non-free image uploads and users who repeatedly upload or misuse non-free images may be blocked from editing. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. doomgaze (talk) 21:30, 4 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The section Borussia Dortmund#Current squad means that it lists the players that are currently with Borussia Dortmund. Nuri Şahin will transfer at the end of the season, but the season has not ended yet (there is still one match day to play). So please do not remove Şahin from the squad list. --Jaellee (talk) 17:11, 9 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Are you using a translator? If so you must stop it, because your sentences are unreadable.--Oleola (talk) 09:14, 12 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The article Kiril Ognyanov has been proposed for deletion because under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners or ask at Wikipedia:Help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Regards, SunCreator ^(talk) 16:24, 26 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The article Skrita Sila Mudrevo has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unreferenced orphaned article, which does not assert notability.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Cloudz679 12:54, 12 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Skrita Sila Mudrevo is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Skrita Sila Mudrevo until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Cloudz679 20:20, 16 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Quatara Mamadu is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Quatara Mamadu until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Sir Sputnik (talk) 21:07, 21 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm JMHamo. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Tom Cleverley because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! JMHamo (talk) 22:04, 2 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Spain national football team. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Thank you. JMHamo (talk) 22:06, 2 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on User:F121212 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free Web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. JMHamo (talk) 02:00, 21 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please consider this your final warning - Wikipedia is not a webhost or a social network. This lists the things you are allowed to do with your userpage. Creating fake articles is not one of them. If you continue down this path, your account will be blocked. §FreeRangeFrog^croak 22:22, 21 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You kiddding me???Read the rules i can use my user page about PROJECTS!!!!!!!!!!!! K. Belev (talk) 03:03, 22 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

Drafts are fine, but fake articles and what you call "projects" are not. You had some good contributions in 2011, but if you feel you can flaunt our guidelines, you're mistaken. You're free to appeal the block and see if another administrator agrees with you. I made your block indefinite given you have a three-year editing hiatus. §FreeRangeFrog^croak 03:43, 22 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet of F121212 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · logs · block log · arb · rfc · lta · SPI · cuwiki) that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. TonyBallioni (talk) 17:37, 23 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kiril Ognyanov is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kiril Ognyanov until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 19:23, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]