User talk:Atterion

User Page	Talk	Email	Activity	Info	Contributions

Please know I will answer to my talk page with Atterion and AtterionAlternative, if I am editing with public computers.

I have reverted practically all of your edits to Green Leaves, which you made during the last few minutes. Please will you stop introducing your own point of view into this article. There are cited sources and if you read them then you will see, for example, that Fourniquet did indeed get the place in 1836 (not 1838 as you said). We say what the sources say here, not what we would like them to say or know from our own family etc. I have been through this with your once or twice before recently and cannot understand why you are still persisting in doing this. But, in any event, don't - please. - Sitush (talk) 21:40, 1 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I undid your recent edit to the address. WP:MOSNUM states that commas are not used after house numbers. I will leave another thing that you changed but please note for future reference that you should not usually change the type of English used in an article after that type has been established. I pretty much wrote the thing and adopted UK English, so changing "remodelled" to "remodeled" as you did was incorrect. - Sitush (talk) 16:45, 4 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I have previously referred you to the NRHP Project guidelines for the infobox. Do not mess about with it as you have just done. It might look better for you but it does not have the community consensus which is required. - Sitush (talk) 16:48, 4 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Why did you revert my edits to Bloons TD? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dog6776 (talk • contribs) 10:39, 2 August 2011 (UTC) Why also did you do [1] that? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dog6776 (talk • contribs) 10:46, 2 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I reverted your edits because they were vandalism, and vandalism is not tolerated on Wikipedia. Also I tagged Toilets overflowing for deletion because the mission of Wikipedia is to build an online encyclopedia, and Wikipedia is not the place to tell about that kind of stuff. "Anyone can edit" does not mean "anyone can put whatever they want". Atterion Talk•Contribs 10:56, 2 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Green Leaves. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

In particular, Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made; that is to say, editors are not automatically "entitled" to three reverts.
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you continue edit warring, you may be blocked from editing. Sitush (talk) 16:49, 4 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You are suspected of sockpuppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the notes for the suspect, then respond to the evidence at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Atterion. Thank you. Sitush (talk) 18:34, 4 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for creating sock-puppets with the specific intention of disrupting Green Leaves and the associated AfD discussion which you opened. Creating socks to make it look like there is more support for a particular decision is extremely disruptive to Wikipedia processes., as you did at Green Leaves. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Qwyrxian (talk) 00:03, 5 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

For your reference, I have opened a discussion on WP:AN regarding this block, at WP:AN#Block review. While you can't edit that discussion directly while blocked, if you have anything you wish to add there, please post it here and I will copy it over for you. Qwyrxian (talk) 00:22, 5 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Green Leaves. When removing content, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the content has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Sitush (talk) 00:56, 12 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• It seems, Atterion, that you have a less than stellar record on Green Leaves. Esp. this, with a rather deceptive edit summary ("fix"), that cannot be. I urge you to step away from the article, especially since it seems to be clear that you may actually have a conflict of interest. Thank you. Drmies (talk) 02:16, 12 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please reply. FlashingYoshi! ^{Come at me, bro} 22:06, 1 August 2012 (UTC) , you know, the one with Bloons? BTW, this guy looks like he got hacked, unless if somebody can prove me wrong by pulling a CHECKIP or something.[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Wikipedia is not facebook. Since you had some involvement with the Wikipedia is not facebook redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. TheChampionMan1234 07:51, 11 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Template:User blocking has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Alakzi (talk) 16:21, 5 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Bloon and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 November 29#Bloon until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. — Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung, mellohi! (投稿) 03:18, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]