If you are autoblocked repeatedly, contact your network administrator and request it contact Wikimedia'sXFF project about enabling X-Forwarded-For HTTP headers on its proxy servers so that blocks will affect only the intended user. Administrators: review contributions carefully if blocking this IP address or reverting its contributions. If a block is needed, consider a soft block using Template:Anonblock. In the event of vandalism from this IP address, abuse reports may be sent to its network administrator for investigation.
In the event of vandalism from this IP address, anonymous editing may be disabled. If you are an unregistered user operating from this address, note that it may be possible for your agency or facility's administration to determine who was making contributions from this address at any given time and abuse reports may be sent to its network administrator for further investigation.
Some government IP addresses are considered sensitive. If blocking this IP address, determine if Wikipedia:SIP applies; if so, follow directions.
Officials and network administrators, to monitor this IP address for vandalism, can subscribe to a web feed of this page in either RSS or Atom format.
Welcome to Wikipedia. At least one of your recent edits, such as the edit you made to Over-the-air programming, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at the welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make some test edits, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. BitBusTalk16:23, 21 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
December 2014
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page European Parliament Committee on International Trade has been reverted. Your edit here to European Parliament Committee on International Trade was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (https://twitter.com/ep_trade) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a blog, forum, free web hosting service, fansite, or similar site (see 'Links to avoid', #11), then please check the information on the external site thoroughly. Note that such sites should probably not be linked to if they contain information that is in violation of the creator's copyright (see Linking to copyrighted works), or they are not written by a recognised, reliable source. Linking to sites that you are involved with is also strongly discouraged (see conflict of interest). If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 11:15, 15 December 2014 (UTC)[reply] If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice.
January 2015
Hello, I'm XLinkBot. I wanted to let you know that I removed one or more external links you added to the page European Citizens' Prize, because they seemed to be inappropriate for an encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page, or take a look at our guidelines about links. Your edit here to European Citizens' Prize was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (https://toleranzdrachenboot.wordpress.com/) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 11:01, 26 January 2015 (UTC)[reply] If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice.
February 2015
Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Kostas Chrysogonos. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include, but are not limited to, links to personal websites, links to websites with which you are affiliated (whether as a link in article text, or a citation in an article), and links that attract visitors to a website or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the page, please discuss it on the associated talk page rather than re-adding it. Your edit here to Kostas Chrysogonos was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (http://chrysogonos.blogspot.be/) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a blog, forum, free web hosting service, fansite, or similar site (see 'Links to avoid', #11), then please check the information on the external site thoroughly. Note that such sites should probably not be linked to if they contain information that is in violation of the creator's copyright (see Linking to copyrighted works), or they are not written by a recognised, reliable source. Linking to sites that you are involved with is also strongly discouraged (see conflict of interest). If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 16:10, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply] If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice.
If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under license allowed by Wikipedia, then you should do one of the following:
If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted "under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), version 3.0", or that the work is released into the public domain, or if you have strong reason to believe it is, leave a note at Talk:Emma McClarkin with a link to where we can find that note or your explanation of why you believe the content is free for reuse.
If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at this temporary page. Leave a note at Talk:Emma McClarkin saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved.
Thank you for this notification. The text in question and the website you list is the MEP's own website, and we have been given approval to use this content. Please advise.
create an account for each person ("we" implies that there are several of you, right?)
declare your connection to McClarkin on your various user pages
refrain from editing any article about or relating to her
if you want to try to donate the contents of the website, follow the instructions above; but such content is essentially never found to be suitable for inclusion in an encyclopaedia, so you could probably save yourselves the bother
if your intention here is to improve and expand our project, please do so (thank you!)
but if your only purpose is to promote McClarkin and her views, please find somewhere else to do it.
Whilst I do not personally see the content as promotional in its nature (it simply outlines the work that Miss McClarkin is doing in the EP and committees/policy and comes across with no agenda/views on political issues. Just simple facts). However, If you feel the original edits have violated those terms above then I am happy for that content to be deleted. But considering this violation was flagged on the 5th, can this be rectified? Even if that means the content is deleted that is ok, as long as this copyright violation has been removed so others are able to make edits if theys ee fit in the future.
Hello, I'm Rivertorch. I noticed that you recently removed content from José Ignacio Salafranca Sánchez-Neyra without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. RivertorchFIREWATER15:07, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, I'm Jim1138. An edit you recently made to Ma Huateng seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want more practice editing, the sandbox is the best place to do so. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Jim1138 (talk) 08:25, 24 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Warning
I first now see your edits ar Soraya Post. We do not censor information, even though controversial. Please do not do it again. --BabbaQ (talk) 12:55, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Jørn Dohrmann, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Jim1138 (talk) 10:12, 7 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).
Also please note that editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Jim1138 (talk) 10:12, 7 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, I'm XLinkBot. I wanted to let you know that one or more external links you added to Janice Atkinson have been removed because they seemed to be inappropriate for an encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page, or take a look at our guidelines about links. Your edit here to Janice Atkinson was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (https://www.facebook.com/janice.atkinson.MEP) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 13:00, 13 November 2018 (UTC)[reply] If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice.
Hello. Your edit has been reverted since the event as such (an individual MEP having a chat with someone) isn't notable. What was said at that event might be notable, though, but there was no mention of that in the material you added, making it nothing more than promotional name-dropping... - Tom | Thomas.W talk10:33, 6 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, I'm XLinkBot. I wanted to let you know that one or more external links you added to Esther de Lange have been removed because they seemed to be inappropriate for an encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page, or take a look at our guidelines about links. Your edit here to Esther de Lange was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (https://twitter.com/Esther_de_Lange?ref_src=twsrc^google%7Ctwcamp^serp%7Ctwgr^author) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a blog, forum, free web hosting service, fansite, or similar site (see 'Links to avoid', #11), then please check the information on the external site thoroughly. Note that such sites should probably not be linked to if they contain information that is in violation of the creator's copyright (see Linking to copyrighted works), or they are not written by a recognised, reliable source. Linking to sites that you are involved with is also strongly discouraged (see conflict of interest). If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 14:23, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply] If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice.
June 2022
Hello, I'm 73.22.122.66. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions have been disallowed by an edit filter as they did not appear constructive. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. If you believe the edit filter disallowance was a false positive, please report it here. Feel free to ask for assistance at the Teahouse whenever you like. Thank you. 73.22.122.66 (talk) 11:16, 2 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Je me permets de vous notifier à la suite de votre blocage sur la Wikipédia en français. Je me permets de contester, non pas le blocage lui-même, mais son ampleur, notamment l'impossibilité de laisser ce message sur la page de discussion correspondant à cette IP ainsi que l'absence de notification qui y est faite du blocage et de son motif.
Vous le comprendrez, cette adresse IP est en partie utilisée par les personnes connectées au réseau wifi du Parlement européen. Wikipédia a donc affaire ici à une série de personnes avec des connaissances du projet très diverses ainsi qu'à quelques hurluberlus du genre de celui ou celle qui a laissé un message sur la PdD de Gemini1980 (je soupçonne un extrême, mais de quels côtés, je ne sais pas et nous ne le saurons jamais).
Dans tous les cas, vous constaterez que globalement les dernières contributions indiquées sous IP n'ont pas été problématiques. La majeure partie des récentes : celle-ci, ici, ici, cette wikification, ici, le retrait de ce vandalisme, etc. ont d'ailleurs été faites par la personne qui vous écrit présentement.
Concernant spécifiquement le message sur la PdD de Gemini1980, je pense que le message - insultant (bête et méchant) - laissé par la personne utilisant cette IP ce 12 juin à 21h était en fait l'IP 2a02:a03f:64cf:e00:e0dc:18fd:932f:da68 dont on voit ici la modif précise.
Un blocage proportionné aurait été à mon avis un blocage limitée aux pages concernées : à savoir fr:Mont Blanc, l'article sur la fr:Frontière entre la France et l'Italie et éventuellement fr:Relations entre la France et l'Italie. Ainsi que peut-être la protection de la page de Gemini1980 par un message de l'IP que j'utilise actuellement plus de celle que je vous indique ci-dessus.
Notez qu'avant votre blocage général l'IP était bloquée déjà de manière limitée sur Valérie Hayer (justifiée, probablement son bureau), Parlement européen, Président du Parlement européen (je n'en vois pas la raison car l'info c'est avérée juste ici), Liste des présidents du Parlement européen (idem que précédemment), etc.
Je laisse donc à votre soin la considération de ma demande qui est en fait de réduire l'ampleur du blocage à un certain nombre de pages plutôt qu'à la totalité de Wikipédia en français (ou de le réduire au moins afin de permettre la contribution sur la page de discussion de l'IP, ce qui permettrait de notifier un contributeur si nous constatons une coquille ou une erreur dont nous apportons la preuve), au regard notamment des contributions positives faites par certains (si cela pouvait être tous, ce serait idéal) des contributeurs connectés à la wifi du PE (qui ne contribuent pas nécessairement contre une rémunération, mais parfois en faisant une pause ou de leur plein gré).
Bonjour, les insultes sont sanctionnées et n'ont pas lieu d'être sur wikipédia, et même dans ce message, dire (je soupçonne un extrême, mais de quels côtés, je ne sais pas et nous ne le saurons jamais). est juste un écart de langage qui lui n'a pas n'a pas lieu d'être - Il y a des règles de savoir vivre à respecter ! et surtout [https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikip%C3%A9dia:Supposez_la_bonne_foi|Supposez la bonne foi à appliquer - Maintenant, ce n'est pas parce que l'adresse IP appartient au Parlement européen que les règles ne s'appliquent pas - Donc, je vais faire un pas vers vous, je vais débloquer la possibilité de création de compte, pour que vous puissiez contribuer (en déclarant évidement votre conflit d'intérêt (parlement européen) et/ou vos contributions rémunérées) - — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lomita (talk • contribs) 13:59, 23 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Bonjour Lomita, Je comprends parfaitement votre commentaire (même si je suis en désaccord au niveau personnel sur ce que vous qualifiez d'un écart de langage de ma part - qui n'était pas une insulte - toute proportion gardée par rapport à ce que l'autre utilisateur de cette adresse IP a laissé sur la page de Gemini1980). Mais vous avez raison de me rappeler la règle : supposons la bonne foi, j'en prends bonne note (ancien contributeur moi-même, mes usages sont rouillés, un rappel ne fait jamais de mal). Je vous remercie pour votre pas en avant, j'hésite encore à créer moi-même un compte (je vous tiendrai au courant si tel est le cas). Bien à vous et excellente contribution 136.173.162.129 (talk) 14:10, 23 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style, as you did in European Diplomatic Academy, disturbs uniformity among articles and may cause readability or accessibility problems. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia.
Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for making (or attempting to make) disruptive edits that triggered the edit filter.
If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.
January 2024
Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I noticed that in this edit to Karen Melchior, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 11:54, 8 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page European Free Alliance, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:
A bare URL error. References show this error when one of the URL-containing parameters cannot be paired with an associated title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)
Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page European Free Alliance, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:
A bare URL error. References show this error when one of the URL-containing parameters cannot be paired with an associated title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)
avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{edit COI}} template)—don't forget to give details of reliable sources supporting your suggestions;
In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.
Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you.
Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. However, please do not use unreliable sources such as blogs, wikis, personal websites, and websites and publications with a poor reputation for checking the facts or with no editorial oversight. These sources may express views that are widely acknowledged as pushing a particular point-of-view, sometimes even extremist, being promotional in nature, or relying heavily on rumors and personal opinions. One of Wikipedia's core policies is that contributions must be verifiable through reliable sources, preferably using inline citations. If you require further assistance, please look at Help:Menu/Editing Wikipedia, or ask at the Teahouse. Thank you. :Jay8g [V•T•E] 07:17, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Copyright problem: Dimitrios Papadimoulis
Hello 136.173.162.129! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Dimitrios Papadimoulis, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted material from other websites or printed works. This article appears to contain work copied from https://www.papadimoulis.gr/en/curriculum-vitae/, and therefore to constitute a violation of Wikipedia's copyright policies. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. While we appreciate your contributions, copying content from other websites is unlawful and against Wikipedia's copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators are likely to lose their editing privileges.
If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under license allowed by Wikipedia, then you should do one of the following:
If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted "under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC BY-SA), version 4.0", or that the work is released into the public domain, or if you have strong reason to believe it is, leave a note at Talk:Dimitrios Papadimoulis with a link to where we can find that note or your explanation of why you believe the content is free for reuse.
Otherwise, you may rewrite this article from scratch. If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at this temporary page. Leave a note at Talk:Dimitrios Papadimoulis saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved.
Hello, I'm Twistedmath. I noticed that you recently removed content from Parthon de Von family without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. twisted. (talk) 15:11, 6 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
