Share to: share facebook share twitter share wa share telegram print page

Template talk:Philips

More stakes

Under former and defunct JVs and shareholdings, shouldn't we list the following companies?

The Seventh Taylor (talk) 00:39, 2 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Sure, why not.Rangoon11 (talk) 00:44, 2 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Done. The Seventh Taylor (talk) 01:26, 30 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

B&O

user:R'n'B wrote: there is nothing in either the Philips or Bang & Olufsen articles documenting any joint venture or ownership relation between the two companies.

You may be right here. I also cannot find evidence of it elsewhere, other than a "strategic alliance" which apparently involved a temporary flow of money from Philips to B&O. [1] The Seventh Taylor (talk) 04:43, 3 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Overstyling

I have fixed the overstyling per WP:DEVIATIONS and to match the format used by Template:Siemens and all the others. Frietjes (talk) 21:02, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Prefix: a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

Portal di Ensiklopedia Dunia

Kembali kehalaman sebelumnya