In combustion, Williams diagram refers to a classification diagram of different turbulent combustion regimes in a plane, having turbulent Reynolds number
as the x-axis and turbulent Damköhler number
as the y-axis.[1] The diagram is named after Forman A. Williams (1985).[2] The definition of the two non-dimensionaless numbers are[3]

where
is the rms turbulent velocity flucturation,
is the integral length scale,
is the kinematic viscosity and
is the chemical time scale. The Reynolds number
based on the Taylor microscale
becomes
. The Damköhler number based on the Kolmogorov time scale
is given by
. The Karlovitz number
is defined by
.
The Williams diagram is universal in the sense that it is applicable to both premixed and non-premixed combustion. In supersonic combustion and detonations, the diagram becomes three-dimensional due to the addition of the Mach number
as the z-axis, where
is the sound speed.[4]
Borghi–Peters diagram
In premixed combustion, an alternate diagram, known as the Borghi–Peters diagram, is also used to describe different regimes. This diagram is named after Roland Borghi (1985) and Norbert Peters (1986).[5][6] The Borghi–Peters diagram uses
as the x-axis and
as the y-axis, where
and
are the thickness and speed of the planar, laminar premixed flame. Since
, where
is the Prandtl number (set
), and
in premixed flames, we have

The limitations of the Borghi–Peters diagram are that (1) it cannot be used for non-premixed combustion and (2) it is not suitable for practically relevant cases where both
and
are increased concurrently, such as increasing nozzle radius while maintaining constant nozzle exit velocity.[7]
References
- ^ Williams, F. A. (2000). Progress in knowledge of flamelet structure and extinction. Progress in Energy and Combustion Science, 26(4-6), 657-682.
- ^ Williams, F. A. (1985). Turbulent combustion. In The mathematics of combustion (pp. 97-131). Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics.
- ^ Liñán, A., & Williams, F. A. (1993). Fundamental aspects of combustion. Oxford university press.
- ^ Rauch, A. H., & Chelliah, H. K. (2020). On the ambiguity of premixed flame thickness definition of highly pre-heated mixtures and its implication on turbulent combustion regimes. Combustion Theory and Modelling, 24(4), 573-588.
- ^ Borghi, R. (1985). On the structure and morphology of turbulent premixed flames. In Recent advances in the aerospace sciences: In honor of luigi crocco on his seventy-fifth birthday (pp. 117-138). Boston, MA: Springer US.
- ^ Peters, N. (1988, January). Laminar flamelet concepts in turbulent combustion. In Symposium (International) on combustion (Vol. 21, No. 1, pp. 1231-1250). Elsevier.
- ^ Song, W., Hernández Pérez, F. E., & Im, H. G. (2023). Turbulent hydrogen flames: physics and modeling implications. In Hydrogen for Future Thermal Engines (pp. 237-266). Cham: Springer International Publishing.