This page is within the scope of the Wikipedia Help Project, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's help documentation for readers and contributors. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks. To browse help related resources see the Help Menu or Help Directory. Or ask for help on your talk page and a volunteer will visit you there.Wikipedia HelpWikipedia:Help ProjectTemplate:Wikipedia Help ProjectHelp
the tool just displays an application error on launch and has been like this for a long while. So I suggest it should be removed from the page. KaraLG84 (talk) 11:58, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Many Wikipedia pages are quite specialist. Contributing to adding a section for those who are novices in the subject could be valuable. Giving the resources to get started. This would complement the see also pages that support the knowledgable or expert reader.
This doesn’t need foreign language skills. It does need skills that many teachers, trainers or support workers have.
Note, I am a naive Wikipedia editor. I want to encourage Wikipedia to be more accessible, both in their audience and the writers / editors who contribute.
I find there is a lot of material I SHOULD read and understand before making changes, but I get overwhelmed. So far, this means I have mainly contributed to talk pages. CuriousMarkE (talk) 07:38, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
A new task could be added - "Adding Images"
It could say, "Take some images with your camera for an article, upload them to Commons, then add them to the related Wikipedia article." Félix An (talk) 04:19, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I think that the current links are adequate. Including a link to Special:RecentChanges could lead some to mistakenly believe that everything or the majority of what appears there is suspected vandalism. signed, Rosguilltalk20:55, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Izno, I forgot to check back, and just saw that you did respond to the request on Discord about improving the shortcuts box and header display here. I still think it looks pretty awful on desktop to have the shortcuts box below. Is there any way to put it to the side on desktop, but then for smaller screens to have it above? Or maybe we could do as the Teahouse did and embed it in the header itself? Sdkbtalk06:24, 23 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The relevant bits of what I said:
The image is positioned absolute. There's no fundamental way to preserve this appearance on any meaningful resolution smaller than the max width of the construct. It's an issue regardless of the location of the shortcuts.
How do you actually want the entirety of this space to display at a given resolution? "I think it looks ugly at X resolution" isn't helpful. Izno (talk) 15:07, 23 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
How do you actually want the entirety of this space to display at a given resolution? Sorry if I wasn't clear enough above. At desktop resolution, I'd like it to display the way it previously did — with the main header in the center and the shortcuts box to the right in its normal spot. (It'd be even better if the shortcuts box didn't push the main header a bit off-center.) At resolutions too small for that to happen, having the shortcuts box be either below (as currently) or above the header box would make sense. Does that help? Sdkbtalk16:00, 23 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
That was not the question. You need to answer how you want the actual header to display. I think that was why the other user disagrees with the location of the shortcut box. Izno (talk) 17:21, 7 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I'm a bit confused. I thought I directly answered above how I wanted the header to display. What specific info are you seeking that I haven't provided? Sdkbtalk06:06, 8 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]