User talk:YesI'mOnFire/Archive 1

This is an archive of past discussions with User:YesI'mOnFire. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Hello SeanTVT, and thanks for patrolling new pages! I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Draft:Rade Basta, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: A10 does not apply to drafts. You may wish to review the Criteria for Speedy Deletion before tagging further pages. Thank you. Ivanvector (^Talk/_Edits) 18:06, 4 May 2023 (UTC)

Hello I'm actually new here but how do you do things like removing edits that aren't needed? Amber colleen bridges (talk) 18:13, 6 May 2023 (UTC)

@Amber colleen bridges: reversions can be accomplished by using the undo link available when viewing a page's history; there are also several semi-automated tools that can be used instead, although I'd advise waiting until you are more experienced before trying to employ them. Sometimes intervening edits will make this impractical in which case you may always manually revert an edit, explaining your action in an edit summary. If you have further questions, the best place to inquire is probably the WP:TEAHOUSE. 74.73.224.126 (talk) 15:19, 8 May 2023 (UTC)

Hi, YesI'mOnFire. Thanks for patrolling new pages. I've declined your deletion request for Draft:Good Glamm Group, a page that you tagged for speedy deletion, because the criterion you used or the reason you gave does not cover this kind of page. Please take a moment to read the new tutorial for patrollers, criteria for speedy deletion, and particularly, the section covering non-criteria. Such pages are best tagged with proposed deletion or proposed deletion for biographies of living persons, or sent to the appropriate deletion discussion. Thanks! 74.73.224.126 (talk) 14:35, 8 May 2023 (UTC)

Hi, I've noticed that you've been tagging a lot of drafts for speedy deletion recently. Some of your tags have been OK, but others such as [1][2][3] are inappropriate and many are borderline at best. You don't have very much experience on Wikipedia, and I'd encourage you to spend less of your time aggressively policing others' contributions. Inappropriate speedy tags can discourage new users from contributing (see WP:BITE). My personal opinion is that tagging for G11 in draftspace is often a waste of time unless it's truly egregious (e.g. MegaCorp Inc. is the leading provider of high quality widgets at affordable prices! Click here to buy our products now!). One of the functions of draftspace is to keep crud in a place where readers cannot see it. Spicy (talk) 16:13, 9 May 2023 (UTC)

I agree with you. Many times I tag those drafts you mentioned without even looking through carefully. Hopefully in the future I won't make those mistakes again.

The reason for me policing new drafts aggresively, well, as many users are on the job in fighting vandalisms, I feel like there's no time for me to revert vandalisms before other users did :( 🔥YesI'mOnFire🔥^{(ContainThisEmber?)} 09:50, 10 May 2023 (UTC)

Hi @Spicy

I have just submitted a complaint/request on this user's talk page to have my Draft reinstated as I believe @YesI'mOnFire did not properly tag this draft with a G11 speedy deletion request, as you stated above.

This was my first article and I do not have a lot of time to learn the nuances of Wikipedia, but I was genuinely trying my best and taking every comment to heart. I unfortunately did not save a personal copy of this draft so I'm a little bit taken a back right now....

Is there anything I can do besides talk to this user? Because I would really like to correct this draft and have it published as quickly as possible, as it is a draft about a quite notable figure within the fitness industry. Thanks in advance! Ijohn9n9 (talk) 01:24, 14 May 2023 (UTC)

@Ijohn9n9 You can now check your talk page for further instructions from Jimfbleak. 🔥YesI'mOnFire🔥^{(ContainThisEmber?)} 10:29, 15 May 2023 (UTC)

Hi, I'm following up along with the last critique you were given about deleting pages too hastily.

The page Draft:Ben Patrick was wrongfully deleted, as this was my first article. This article had been submitted for review twice and the last comment I was given directed me to the tea house (which I was unaware existed). It also was explicitly commented that: "... IF this draft is resubmitted without being reworked, [THEN] it MAY be nominated for deletion."

I listened to this warning and was in the process of seeking help for edits, but then you deleted this draft because you thought it "seemed" promotional, despite the fact that you say: "MANY times I tag those drafts you mention WITHOUT even looking through CAREFULLY. Hopefully in the future I won't make those mistakes again."

How come instead of deleting the page, you didn't just give me some objective and constructive critiques for which parts of the article you had an issue with?

I am extremely frustrated right now, if that is not obvious, as you are new here and apparently haphazardly submitting articles for speedy deletion at inappropriate times. My request is simple, please either reinstate the draft or send me a copy of it, so I can continue working on it, as I was doing before. Ijohn9n9 (talk) 01:17, 14 May 2023 (UTC)

@Ijohn9n9 You tell this to me too late. The draft you're talking about has been deleted since 8th of May 2023. Plus, my job is to only notified deleting administrators, if my nomination for speedy deletion of Draft:Ben Patrick was wrong, a deleting administrator would decline it.

Unfortunately, administrator Jimfbleak has deleted it. If you want to recover your draft, tell this to him.

@Jimfbleak, can you restore the draft so he can improve it? 🔥YesI'mOnFire🔥^{(ContainThisEmber?)} 13:23, 14 May 2023 (UTC)

YesI'mOnFire, thanks for ping. Ijohn9n9, I see that you have attempted to declare a COI, but have used the wrong template. Could you please clarify whether you have a financial relationship with him (employed by him, or otherwise paid to write for him) or a non-financial relationship (such as you are him, or a friend or relative). Ping me if you reply here, or post on my talk page. No rush, I won't be editing again until tomorrow now. Once you've done that, I'll see what's the best way forward Jimfbleak - talk to me? 16:04, 14 May 2023 (UTC)

May I know why the change of the infobox was reverted? It was changed because the new one contained more accurate and concrete information about a public figure.

Martinenriquearg (talk) 16:11, 1 June 2023 (UTC)

Recently you moved the page User:PersonalityAI to User:Ludovic Blecher. However, the account "Ludovic Blecher" does not exist; and this content is not appropriate for a userpage anyway. This should have gone to the draft article space, so I have moved it to Draft:Ludovic Blecher. --Drm310 🍁 (talk) 14:46, 25 July 2023 (UTC)

I'am writing the article about Ludovic Blecher on his behalf, its is my first time editing and publishing articles on wikipedia so I am sorry for any inconveniance PersonalityAI (talk) 14:48, 25 July 2023 (UTC)

It's my fault tbh, I forgot to put it in Draft.

Plus, you need to declare COI as you are writing this draft 'on his behalf'. 🔥YesI'mOnFire🔥^{(ContainThisEmber?)} 14:51, 25 July 2023 (UTC)

F, guess I have made a mistake then, I intended to draft it but probably forgot to change the title above to Draft.

Sorry for any inconvenience @Drm310 🔥YesI'mOnFire🔥^{(ContainThisEmber?)} 14:49, 25 July 2023 (UTC)

@YesI'mOnFire: No worries, all is fixed now.

@PersonalityAI: As YesI'mOnFire noted, if you're writing on Ludovic Blecher's behalf, then you have a conflict of interest. Please ensure that you read and understand Wikipedia's conflict of interest guide. Also, is he paying you for your work here? If so, then you must disclose this in accordance with Wikipedia's mandatory policy on disclosure of paid editing. --Drm310 🍁 (talk) 14:55, 25 July 2023 (UTC)

why did I get a speedy deletition?

Minakshishah (talk) 15:48, 25 July 2023 (UTC)

I know I’m not them but, the reason is probably because you linked organization in your sources or you didn’t add sources at all (ps. deletion, not deletittyon) Sapphoandherfriend (talk) 03:33, 26 July 2023 (UTC)

Hello YesI'mOnFire,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Arnav Kapur for deletion, because it's a redirect from an article title to a namespace that's not for articles.

If you don't want Arnav Kapur to be deleted, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

𝙳𝚛𝚎𝚊𝚖𝚁𝚒𝚖𝚖𝚎𝚛 ^{𝚍𝚒𝚜𝚌𝚞𝚜𝚜} 12:09, 26 July 2023 (UTC)

@DreamRimmer

Uhh, I move Arnav Kapur to draft space because I felt it was not ready to be published to mainspace. Guess I should have tagged it for speedy deletion earlier then. 🔥YesI'mOnFire🔥^{(ContainThisEmber?)} 13:13, 26 July 2023 (UTC)

You may use MPGuy2824's MoveToDraft script for draftification. 𝙳𝚛𝚎𝚊𝚖𝚁𝚒𝚖𝚖𝚎𝚛 ^{𝚍𝚒𝚜𝚌𝚞𝚜𝚜} 14:25, 26 July 2023 (UTC)

Thanks for your enthusiasm in reporting accounts to WP:UAA. However, admins won't consider accounts that have no edit history. The instructions at the top of the page include a condition that "Promotional names require evidence to be blocked. Do not report a username merely because it "appears" promotional." So, please first check that the account has made edits and that they were related to the company/organization/group. Thanks. --Drm310 🍁 (talk) 16:11, 27 July 2023 (UTC)

Brother, what is the problem, what is the problem, what problem are you facing in the page created by me that you had put the tag of speedly deletion on it. Now everything that I had written has been deleted. This page was being created as per the orders of Nainika. What do you see wrong in this that you have taken this step, tell me what should I do now and what should I not do so that there is no problem in creating the page, I want to create the same page again, I want to write her biography in the name of Nainika, I want to write about her. Please help me please. Pradeepkoli (talk) 10:35, 28 July 2023 (UTC)

What organizations I can use as sources? Sapphoandherfriend (talk) 01:57, 29 July 2023 (UTC)

@Sapphoandherfriend

I don't understand your question.

If you are talking about which sources are reliable and which are not for your draft, you can read:

WP:RS (full guide on what sources are considered reliable)

WP:RSP (list of sources that are discussed about their reliability) 🔥YesI'mOnFire🔥^{(ContainThisEmber?)} 03:09, 29 July 2023 (UTC)

Thank you! Sapphoandherfriend (talk) 15:41, 29 July 2023 (UTC)

Thanks for the reports at WP:UAA but please note that some wikis allow organisation accounts - see Commons policy for an example, the German wiki is another. Please don't report users at WP:UAA if they haven't edited on this wiki. Cabayi (talk) 10:30, 29 July 2023 (UTC)

hello my text about a fictional city was deleted is there any way to retrieve it ? FercasSN (talk) 23:02, 29 July 2023 (UTC)

Hello YesI'mOnFire,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Aurionpro for deletion, because it's a redirect from an article title to a namespace that's not for articles.

If you don't want Aurionpro to be deleted, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

𝙳𝚛𝚎𝚊𝚖𝚁𝚒𝚖𝚖𝚎𝚛 ^{𝚍𝚒𝚜𝚌𝚞𝚜𝚜} 12:00, 30 July 2023 (UTC)

Generally, there is no reason to report usernames with no edits whatsoever. Per WP:UAAI: "Only report accounts with edits and do not report those with no edits in the preceding 2 weeks. Do not report a user that has not edited or has not edited in the preceding 2 weeks, except for an instance of an egregious name violation. We do not want to welcome productive editors with a report at UAA, nor do we want to waste time dealing with accounts that may never be used." The exceptions are obvious hate speech or names that attack a living person/Wikipedia editor, those are blockable even without any edits, but other run-of-the-mill violations such as names of organizations or products need not be reported unless and until they at least attempt to edit, and you should be able to clearly explain what the problem is if it is not immediately evident.

For whatever reason, every day dozens, if not hundreds of accounts are created that never make one single edit. It is our responsibility as admins to conscientiously review every report a user makes at UAA, so we have to check for contribs, deleted contribs, and tripping of the edit filter for every one of these reports, only to find out there's nothing there and therefore no problem to be solved. That's time that could be spent doing more productive things, but you basically obligate admins to do it by making such reports. Beeblebrox (talk) 15:18, 4 August 2023 (UTC)

YesI'mOnFire, please read the speedy deletion policy:

If an editor other than the creator removes a speedy deletion tag in good faith, it should be taken as a sign that the deletion is controversial and another deletion process should be used.

The appropriate response to a speedy deletion tag is either to discuss with the person who declined it (me), or to follow what the policy says and seek another way to delete it (miscellany for deletion in this instance), or perhaps take your declined tag as an indication that deletion was not warranted. It is not to revert the declination of the tag.

You were previously warned by Spicy about your speedy deletion tags, and back then you admitted that you tagged many drafts "without even looking through carefully" and that you aggressively patrolled those drafts because "as many users are on the job in fighting vandalisms, I feel like there's no time for me to revert vandalisms before other users did :(".

This needs to stop. Some of your tags are good, and I have deleted pages that you have tagged. But fundamentally, as someone who was active tagging pages for speedy deletion before I became an administrator, you cannot go into speedy deletions with an attitude that it's all about speed. We have a duty to be welcoming to newcomers. Not every page that you dislike meets the criteria for speedy deletion. Please work more carefully. Sdrqaz (talk) 11:02, 8 August 2023 (UTC)

Hello, I noticed that my article on Liza Morales-Crespo was deleted and it did not specify why.

I am participating in a research class called Writing Women into the Canon of Architecture and Landscape Architecture led by Tijana Vujosevic at the University of British Columbia. The main objective of the class is to shed light on women architects in the global scale and publish as many Wikipedia pages as we can during the course. So far, there are about 80+ profiles that are in the works.

I acknowledge that the article may not be 100% ready. However, the goal of the class is to get as many articles published to open up the floor for further collaboration and contribution. J0708x (talk) 16:39, 8 August 2023 (UTC)

@J0708x It's why you should put it in draft space. Other editors can help you with preparing the article to be published in main space, such as finding reliable sources, etc. 🔥YesI'mOnFire🔥^{(ContainThisEmber?)} 00:40, 9 August 2023 (UTC)

I hope you think my edits [4] on User talk:Washingtonwindsor777 are a good compromise. The issue is the copyright material, which I've now removed, but I've left the surrounding discussion, so that the record of discussion makes more sense. Cheers. _signed, Willondon (talk) 02:34, 11 August 2023 (UTC)

Well, I did thanked you, you know :)) 🔥YesI'mOnFire🔥^{(ContainThisEmber?)} 02:36, 11 August 2023 (UTC)

Thank you. Yes. I do have a neutrality concern as I am the subject of the entry. However, I am unclear why the double major I had from Indiana University Bloomington was omitted in the source story. My Bachelors degree is a double major in Political Science AND Religious Studies. That omission could cost me consideration in jobs that I am seeking. Please I hope this can be restored. I also had a career in public service at the local level for thirty five years and served on the staff of a member of Congress before that. I think these would be of interest. How then do I get these added to that entry consistent with the protocol and ethics of Wikipedia (which I fully endorse.) I welcome your help. My curriculum vita I could supply. I could supply the questionare that I returned to Dan Cardin whose NWI Times piece was the source of the entry. Also, I was not aware that I had a Wikipedia entry. I am pleased. I welcome your assistance. ImoRenGriff (talk) 04:04, 11 August 2023 (UTC)

🔥YesI'mOnFire🔥^{(ContainThisEmber?)} 08:21, 11 August 2023 (UTC)

Hello, YesI'mOnFire,

I see you are an active patrolling but are not an official member of the New Page Patrol (Wikipedia:New pages patrol). You might consider applying to do that job since you are basically doing it any way. It's great to have a community of editors doing similar tasks that you can ask questions of if they arise. They are a very dedicated group of editors.

Right now though, I'd like to ask you to please not tag for deletion pages minutes after they have been created. It's not fair to the content creator and it's unrealistic to expect an editor in their first few edits to a page to have a perfectly toned, non-promotional, well-referenced article. Usually the first edits are just to get content on the page and then the editor works polish it up and track down references. Give the editor time to polish their prose! I think the NPP standard is to give editors at least an hour before considering tagging a new article or draft for deletion. Additionally, it is extremely discouraging for a brand new editor to try to write an article and then immediately be informed that it will be deleted. Mostly, they leave and never come back which is bad for a platform like ours that needs a constant influx of new editors in order to build a lasting project. Please consider my request. Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:34, 15 August 2023 (UTC)

Hi I saw you nominated a page for speedy deletion under G5 but did not file an SPI report for the article's author. G5 exists to enforce WP:BMB. Unless you establish that the page's author is a sockpuppet of a blocked master, and that the page was created after the master was blocked, we cannot delete the page under G5. The SPI report needs to precede the G5 request.

The page in question was deleted under a different criterion. Cabayi (talk) 10:56, 18 August 2023 (UTC)

Go read the article on their website please. Stop reverting. ManchesterUnitedOfficial (talk) 11:00, 18 August 2023 (UTC)

@ManchesterUnitedOfficial

According WP:Primary, section 2: "Any interpretation of primary source material requires a reliable secondary source for that interpretation." Your only source is from High-up Entertainment, which were not covered by any media coverage just yet. I suggest you find any reliable secondary sources to add to the information, or just wait if they are covered in media.

If you think I am wrong, I will considered taking to talk page to discuss this further. 🔥YesI'mOnFire🔥^{(ContainThisEmber?)} 11:05, 18 August 2023 (UTC)

That makes zero sense. High-Up literally announced themselves. That's THEIR label. What better source is there than that?

They even announced it on one of their WeVerse lives. ManchesterUnitedOfficial (talk) 11:36, 18 August 2023 (UTC)

I have made some edits but you have removed it can i please know the reason You have also stated "The edit could not be undone due to conflicting intermediate edits; if you wish to undo the change, it must be done manually." Can you please remove the page edits done by you and as you have stated The tone is still the same it will be changed and is being worked upon. Utsav Malik (talk) 08:42, 23 August 2023 (UTC)

@Utsav Malik

Firstly, you have removed the "Controversy" section, which has a reliable source to back up its claim.

Secondly, there are no source to back up your "early life" section, "education" section, and "political career" sections.

Third, your wording, such as "prominent", "tragically", "notably", "commitment to the well-being of his constituency is noteworthy", "even in the face of life threats", etc. (I can go on if you want) are considered by me as a very promotional tone. 🔥YesI'mOnFire🔥^{(ContainThisEmber?)} 15:38, 23 August 2023 (UTC)

Can it be done i provide you with all the information and you make his wikipedia page i will also provide you with all the sources and information regarding the same if that is possible. Utsav Malik (talk) 12:44, 24 August 2023 (UTC)

@Utsav Malik

Then you should take it to the talk page so I and other editors can help you. And please provide all the sources that you can use to support your claims. 🔥YesI'mOnFire🔥^{(ContainThisEmber?)} 15:01, 24 August 2023 (UTC)

I have started a discussion out there please do help me out Utsav Malik (talk) 06:02, 26 August 2023 (UTC)

Hi there. I noticed your comments on sockpuppetry at User talk:Burgermac. Upon closer inspection, Burgermac is the older account and WikiPacster is the newer/sockpuppet account.

You can check the global account information of any user (including when the account was registered) at Special:CentralAuth. --Drm310 🍁 (talk) 20:59, 30 August 2023 (UTC)

Hi,

I am Deepti Naval's manager. She wants to update her career information as well as add information about films, writings and paintings. And she wants to keep selected information on the page and not give every aspect about her life. Do we need to give sources for every information because it is coming directly from her? Santanibedita (talk) 10:01, 10 September 2023 (UTC)

@Santanibedita Firstly, if you are Deepti Naval's manager, then you may have a conflict of interest regarding to your edits. I have posted a warning about COI to ask you to comply with what's written on there

Secondly, you must provide reliable, secondary sources for all of your claims. 🔥YesI'mOnFire🔥^{(ContainThisEmber?)} 10:05, 10 September 2023 (UTC)

What was the purpose of deleting my edit? Ydarbnevets (talk) 11:46, 10 September 2023 (UTC)

@Ydarbnevets Your edits do not cite any sources regarding to your claims. Most information must be backed up with reliable sources. That is why I have reverted your edits. 🔥YesI'mOnFire🔥^{(ContainThisEmber?)} 11:49, 10 September 2023 (UTC)

I guess I should have quoted Mr. Heisler, who is sitting next to me. Ydarbnevets (talk) 12:09, 10 September 2023 (UTC)

@Ydarbnevets Um, that is what we considered as primary source (Many information should be supported by secondary sources, which means that your source must be other, independent publications.) 🔥YesI'mOnFire🔥^{(ContainThisEmber?)} 12:12, 10 September 2023 (UTC)

Hello, YesI'mOnFire,

This page would only qualify for a CSD G7 if the page creator blanked the page. In this case, a different editor blanked the page which is improper so I reverted the edit and removed the CSD tag. Please notice WHO blanked a page before tagging it for speedy deletion. Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:20, 11 September 2023 (UTC)

Given the content that's being added into the lede, that user is bravely defending the integrity of that article an WP:3RRNO applies. Remarks about discharge (mentioned nowhere else in the article) have absolutely no place in an article about dairy. I have, for that reason, reverted your 3RR notification. Kleuske (talk) 15:27, 12 September 2023 (UTC)

@Kleuske I believe that he is acting on good faith, but if he keeps reverting, then he might be scrutinized for 3RR and not waiting. I am just giving him a heads up that other editors can revert the IP too, not just him. (If I'm doing wrong, feel free to correct me) 🔥YesI'mOnFire🔥^{(ContainThisEmber?)} 15:30, 12 September 2023 (UTC)

You could have helped him. The IP's are acting in bad faith, here. Kleuske (talk) 15:37, 12 September 2023 (UTC)

@Kleuske Last time I checked, I only saw that he had reverted the ip. That is why I left him a warning of 3RR as I can't find any better way to help him. 🔥YesI'mOnFire🔥^{(ContainThisEmber?)} 15:41, 12 September 2023 (UTC)

request page protection, revert that IP-editor, bring it up at AN/I... I already opened a discussion on the TP, to no avail, so I took it to AN/I. Kleuske (talk) 15:44, 12 September 2023 (UTC)

@Kleuske (I will take that in mind next time) But I still think we can give the ip a last chance. Currently I have left a warning message right at the article that if the ip inserting it again, I'm reporting to WP:AN3. Is that alr with you? 🔥YesI'mOnFire🔥^{(ContainThisEmber?)} 15:47, 12 September 2023 (UTC)

The IP already had a final warning, but they're an IP-hopper, so that does not really help. Kleuske (talk) 15:49, 12 September 2023 (UTC)

@Kleuske Well, an admin had protected the page so that's that. 🔥YesI'mOnFire🔥^{(ContainThisEmber?)} 15:52, 12 September 2023 (UTC)

Yeah... If the anon does not simply switch targets. But for now, the situation is handled. Kleuske (talk) 15:54, 12 September 2023 (UTC)

Whack! You've been whacked with a wet trout. Don't take this too seriously. Someone just wants to let you know that you did something silly.

🔥YesI'mOnFire🔥^{(ContainThisEmber?)} 01:04, 13 September 2023 (UTC)

This article is not your businness. Unsourced? And what's this:

• www.elpais.com.co/contenido-premium/carlos-lehder-el-preso-que-simbolizo-la-lucha-de-ee-uu-contra-el-narcotrafico.html
• www.eltiempo.com/unidad-investigativa/carlos-lehder-que-paso-con-su-fortuna-su-isla-y-sus-lujos-509788
• http://www.revistaarcadia.com/Imprimir.aspx?idItem=23108
• www.univision.com/noticias/narcotrafico/al-cumplir-30-anos-en-prision-carlos-lehder-es-hoy-el-espejo-en-que-se-mira-el-chapo-guzman

181.237.84.229 (talk) 18:39, 13 September 2023 (UTC)

Well, I might have made a bit of an error in stating in the wrong edit summary, but the reason I revert is WP:BANREVERT, so go talk to Barry Wom, I only act accordingly to his reason of reverting. 🔥YesI'mOnFire🔥^{(ContainThisEmber?)} 00:57, 14 September 2023 (UTC)

This IP (and the others which have been reverted) is a sockpuppet of user JeanCastì [5]. I haven't bothered to report the latest sockpuppet IP addresses as the semi-protection granted to the Carlos Lehder article will keep him at bay for a while, but if there are any further personal attacks I'll seek admin intervention. Barry Wom (talk) 13:19, 14 September 2023 (UTC)

(Redacted)--181.237.84.229 (talk) 13:43, 14 September 2023 (UTC)

Reported. Barry Wom (talk) 13:53, 14 September 2023 (UTC)

@Barry Wom Thanks for the heads up. 🔥YesI'mOnFire🔥^{(ContainThisEmber?)} 14:59, 14 September 2023 (UTC)

Hi there,

You have stated a few times that the information added to Mohamed Lachemi's page did not have a neutral pov. The research section most recently added speaks to completed and published research and achievements, which by definition are not neautral - they are accomplishments. In response to previous feedback I have scaled back on adjectives to make the passage more neutral.

At the same time, many post academic leaders have similar listings - I am not sure why this page continues to get that feedback when so many others of the same ilk are written in the same manner and not repeatedly rejected.

Any specific feedback you have to improve the neautrality of the content would be helpful to know.

Thank you. Johanna412 (talk) 12:44, 2 October 2023 (UTC)

HI YesI'mOnFire🔥,

I just wanted to thank you for adding a COI tag to the recent Draft:Government People Group page.

However, I also wanted to remind you that this tag is not applicable unless the article uses puffery or other non-complying languages. Just because it is written by an authour with a COI, does not mean it has to have the tag. The tag implies the article does not comply with rules.

If you still feel the article warrants it, then feel free to keep it, however you must add a reason in the talk page as per the When to use rules or it may be removed. Thanks :) GPG Communications (talk) 10:32, 4 November 2023 (UTC)

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:51, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Hello, YesI'mOnFire. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Off The Wax Records, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:06, 1 January 2024 (UTC)

Hello,

Would you remove me from the Signpost talk page message list? I tried to do it myself but could not find my name.

Thank you so much!

Sincerely, JuxtaposedJacob (talk) 00:54, 1 February 2024 (UTC)

I made those edits you reverted on Star Crime because all the information I borrowed there was about Fox Crime, not Star Crime. What's the matter? 80.116.182.136 (talk) 12:23, 6 February 2024 (UTC)

My fault there. I thought you were vandalizing as you have reverted the bot. My apologies. 🔥YesI'mOnFire🔥^{(ContainThisEmber?)} 12:25, 6 February 2024 (UTC)

Hello, YesI'mOnFire,

If a draft is a recognizeable article draft, no matter how poor, it can not be considered a "test edit". Bad articles aren't test edits unless there is no sentence structure and it is gibberish. Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 00:45, 23 February 2024 (UTC)

Thank you. After you draftified this, a new account popped up to submit it for AFC review. Quack, quack. I declined the draft and filed the SPI. Robert McClenon (talk) 03:58, 2 March 2024 (UTC)

Hi! I am Craig Mokhiber who submitted edits to my wikipage since it is an ECP page, but they are forever pending review. Therefore I would like to keep my biography on my user page for a correct record, if possible. Thank you. CraigMokhiber (talk) 10:56, 1 May 2024 (UTC)

@CraigMokhiber Your userspace is not a place for hosting your article. I have moved your article to a draft here: Draft:Craig Gerard Mokhiber - Wikipedia. Please consider working on it. 🔥YesI'mOnFire🔥^{(ContainThisEmber?)} 10:59, 1 May 2024 (UTC)

Thanks. The draft is completed. Would you be able to publish it and list it as ECP please? According to ArbCom, the content related to the Arab–Israeli conflict topics has been explicitly specified for use of ECP. Thank you. CraigMokhiber (talk) 11:18, 1 May 2024 (UTC)

@CraigMokhiber It still needs a bit of work, and additionally I will ask another editor to review it if it is okay to publish. 🔥YesI'mOnFire🔥^{(ContainThisEmber?)} 11:30, 1 May 2024 (UTC)

Thank you for the advice. Draft in neutral tone submitted. Please let me know if any further questions about the content. And could you kindly keep in mind that the page shall be listed under ECP? Thanks. CraigMokhiber (talk) 15:08, 1 May 2024 (UTC)

@CraigMokhiber One more problem, the references. Currently I am working on it to try to make it easier to read, but in the process I found out that some of your references are inaccessible. Can you find other sources? 🔥YesI'mOnFire🔥^{(ContainThisEmber?)} 15:31, 1 May 2024 (UTC)

Hi YesI'mOn Fire, I'm Arthur and added some info to the Robert Wolders page that you promptly deleted. May I ask you why? It seems to me that info on when and why Wolders went to the USA would be welcomed, since it is a missing part of his life path. Hijslijst23 (talk) 10:46, 13 May 2024 (UTC)

@Hijslijst23 Can you find other sources to support your claim? I don't think that blogspot is reliable enough alone to be included in your claim. 🔥YesI'mOnFire🔥^{(ContainThisEmber?)} 10:53, 13 May 2024 (UTC)

Lots of other sources, but this is the one where the man himself speaks, which makes it the best source in my opinion. But I will add some vaguer ones. Hijslijst23 (talk) 11:00, 13 May 2024 (UTC)

Thank you for fixing up my user page a bit and thanks for the thanks (You're welcome!). Soapforduck(Say what?)(Did what?) 14:00, 31 May 2024 (UTC)

@Soapyduck Ur welcome, but the issue is still here >:( 🔥YesI'mOnFire🔥^{(ContainThisEmber?)} 14:01, 31 May 2024 (UTC)

But you tried, someday I'll actually try to fix things up. When I get the time(⁠╥⁠﹏⁠╥⁠) Soapforduck(Say what?)(Did what?) 14:06, 31 May 2024 (UTC)

@YesI'mOnFire Woah(⁠・⁠o⁠・⁠). Idk about your screen but on my screen you totally improved it. Actually looks more orderly. Thanks!

P.S I tried 2 different screens,still looked great. Lemme me know if it looks ok on your side. Soapforduck(Say what?)(Did what?) 15:10, 31 May 2024 (UTC)

Ok so this is the first suggestion, Soapforduck(Say what?)(Did what? and this is the second Soapforduck(Say what?)(Did what?). Ok the link is working. Glad to clear things up. Sorry for the misunderstanding (So embarrassed(⁠╥⁠﹏⁠╥⁠)) Soapforduck(Say what?)(Did what?) 13:49, 1 June 2024 (UTC)

		The Good Heart Barnstar
		Thanks for helping me with my messy user page and my signature,when you didn't need to and when my slow mind took a while to get things. You have a good heart.Soapforduck(Say what?)(Did what?) 13:57, 1 June 2024 (UTC)

Hi! I just put cluebot into my talkpage and like the 1 thing I see when I click 1 in the archive is your 1st archive of your talk page. Is this an error? Ned1a Wanna talk? 15:36, 12 June 2024 (UTC)

@Nedia020415 I'm confused as you are. I looked into your talk page (source code) and find nothing of unusual here (its quite packed so its hard to read, may be i am missing something). 🔥YesI'mOnFire🔥^{(ContainThisEmber?)} 12:58, 15 June 2024 (UTC)

@Nedia020415 Restoring the talk page to LGV, I can DEFINITELY see what is wrong with the edit. You literally copied and pasted the code without even looking at it. I am working on fixing it right now, but next time, please do research before copying and pasting codes, as not all codes work the same. 🔥YesI'mOnFire🔥^{(ContainThisEmber?)} 13:14, 15 June 2024 (UTC)

Ok. Thank you!@YesI'mOnFire Ned1a Wanna talk? 14:35, 17 June 2024 (UTC)

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that User:Mthobisi Masilela, a page that you created, has been tagged for deletion. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

• It is unambiguous vandalism or an obvious hoax. (See section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please do not introduce inappropriate pages to Wikipedia. Doing so is considered to be vandalism and is prohibited. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges.
• It is a recently created redirect from an implausible typo or misnomer. (See section R3 of the criteria for speedy deletion.)

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 16:48, 23 June 2024 (UTC)

Hey🔥YesI'mOnFire🔥, I've edited the GreyB page, you asked me to proof read the article before submission. Could you please do that, and let me know if any changes are required?

To answer your questions, no, there is no compensation, I'm the employee of the company and want to contribute about it on Wikipedia. And no, the username is not associated with the company it is my personal account.

Siez18 (talk) 08:19, 9 July 2024 (UTC)

Hi - kindly give editors time to add ref info. You were way too quick on the trigger here. https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Daniel_Bluman&diff=prev&oldid=1235845655 2603:7000:2101:AA00:B140:31F4:C7B1:B597 (talk) 14:45, 21 July 2024 (UTC)

My mistake there. Thanks for the heads up. 🔥YesI'mOnFire🔥^{(ContainThisEmber?)} 14:46, 21 July 2024 (UTC)

	The Teamwork Barnstar
	Thanks for helping each other out from AIV reports and UAA reports! Myrealnamm (💬pros · ✏️cons) 15:06, 10 August 2024 (UTC)

Hello and thank you for recently undoing unconstructive edits on Paneer. In the future, when you undo unconstructive edits, could you please use the appropriate template to warn the user (IP or registered) to stop their behaviour?

There are many different warning templates available to use. Here are some common ones; please see their documentation pages for instructions:

• {{subst:uw-test1}} – For the first case of what appears to be a test edit
• {{subst:uw-subtle1}} – For the first case of editing in a manner that is difficult to distinguish from vandalism
• {{subst:uw-disruptive1}} – For the first case of disruptive editing
• {{subst:uw-vandalism1}} – For the first case of clear vandalism

Each time we use these warnings they should be placed under the title "==September 2025==" (updated to the current month and year), on the user's talk page. Beyond those listed above, there are also higher level warnings for continued unconstructive editing (see the template documentation for details); if previous warnings have been given under that title, add the next level warning beneath the others, within that section. Individual cases must be dealt with as seems appropriate. If the user has not been actively unconstructively editing for a few weeks or months, start a new section. It may sometimes be appropriate to cut to the chase and use:

• {{subst:Uw-vandalism4im}} – Last or only warning

The value of warning is three-fold:

• Firstly – it may be heeded
• Secondly – it allows other editors to quickly see if that user has been vandalizing frequently or recently
• Lastly – administrators require that warnings have been given before they can or will act against persistent vandals

If a vandal is on a spree or has reached a level 4 vandalism warning and is currently active, waste no time in reporting them to Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism.

Thanks again for helping to protect articles on Wikipedia. Happy editing! 🙂 Fred Gandt · talk · contribs 13:40, 19 August 2024 (UTC)

Help me with the Brian Draper and Torey Adamcik article Interaham (talk) 15:07, 20 August 2024 (UTC)

Can you please put the Simple English article of Draper and Adamcik in "Other Languages" Interaham (talk) 16:45, 20 August 2024 (UTC)

Hey – I see you've come across an edit-warring vandal. As the issue isn't on a high-traffic page or severe enough to require repeated reverts (there's no obscenities, etc.), consider ignoring them entirely until they're blocked. Constant reversions after it's clear the person is not going to stop generally only serve to make them have more fun. They can't have fun reverting if there's nothing to revert. See also WP:BRI. (I saw this might now be resolved just before I was about to hit publish but this is still useful advice for the future.) Tollens (talk) 08:51, 23 August 2024 (UTC)

@Tollens Thanks a lot. 🔥YesI'mOnFire🔥^{(ContainThisEmber?)} 08:53, 23 August 2024 (UTC)

		The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
		You deserve this barnstar. Pachu Kannan (talk) 09:15, 23 August 2024 (UTC)

I was improving and correcting that article in good faith by editing and removing all mistakes in it and perfecting it only, but other users are now disrupting my good faith edits and i want you to solve that problem for me and all other users on Wikipedia and I can't edit the Royal Challengers Bangalore article as it is corrupted now by other users also now. 2409:40F4:3F:13D5:8000:0:0:0 (talk) 18:26, 23 August 2024 (UTC)

Hello. You reverted my last edit where I swapped images containing identical subject matter in order to use a clearer, sharper image. I’d appreciate understanding your objection(s) to the image which I intended replace the faded/grainy image which currently appears on the article. Kind regards. 2A00:23C6:B808:7701:79E0:2ED:753A:916F (talk) 12:38, 25 August 2024 (UTC)

Your revert to suggested image noted. Thank you! 2A00:23C6:B808:7701:B9FF:4562:7456:4D53 (talk) 13:00, 25 August 2024 (UTC)

Hi Sir, we wish to check about the content, it is claimed as promotional but instead we are correcting the content based on the factual information of the organization. Most of the articles published are factually incorrect and aimed to degrade the college. Please help to revert to the latest edit. Thank you and really appreciate your cooperation on this. Zaf8888 (talk) 13:08, 25 August 2024 (UTC)

@Zaf8888

You clearly have a conflict of interest with this institution. Please disclose your affiliation with the organization via your talk page.

Most of the articles published are in fact verifiable with reliable, secondary sources, and interestingly enough, you removed the controversy that the institution had, which of course, is supported with reliable, secondary sources.

Your "factual information", on the other hand, does not include any verifiable sources, therefore it is removed. Not only that, your information has a promotional tone, which is not what Wikipedia is for. 🔥YesI'mOnFire🔥^{(ContainThisEmber?)} 14:27, 25 August 2024 (UTC)

@Zaf8888 And what do you mean by "we", is this account used by many people? 🔥YesI'mOnFire🔥^{(ContainThisEmber?)} 14:28, 25 August 2024 (UTC)

Just wanted to bring recent vandalism to your attention. As this is the second time 193.124.146.233 has vandalized https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fort_Knox it looks as he is unwilling let up with the trash edits. Could you revert it? As I do not have the relevant permissions/knowledge for reverting properly. Mikal N (talk) 17:36, 5 September 2024 (UTC)

Hi. This is Brent Roberts. I tried to edit the page that had been put up on my behalf, but you reversed all of the changes. While I cannot prove that I am actually who I say I am, if you compare the text to my faculty web site: https://psychology.illinois.edu/directory/profile/bwrobrts You'll see that I mostly copied and pasted. In addition, I added details, like my students, which would be great to keep up there. All of the information is true and accurate and can be gleaned from my CV which can also be found on the faculty web page. Brent Bwrobrts (talk) 00:29, 9 October 2024 (UTC)

I was improving and correcting that article in good faith by editing and removing all mistakes in it and perfecting it only, but other users are now disrupting my good faith edits and i want you to solve that problem for me and all other users on Wikipedia and I can't edit the Royal Challengers Bangalore article as it is corrupted now by other users also now. 2409:4072:711:5110:E8D4:CE98:141D:B304 (talk) 11:50, 23 October 2024 (UTC)

I want you to answer this for me now itself. 2409:40F4:19:4002:8000:0:0:0 (talk) 19:01, 25 October 2024 (UTC)

I want you to answer this for me now itself. 2409:40F4:19:4002:8000:0:0:0 (talk) 19:01, 25 October 2024 (UTC)

	The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
	You've done a good job dealing with vandalism/LTA action. Good on you! Synorem (talk) 14:08, 25 October 2024 (UTC)

Hey, please do not move an article to the draft space just a minute after the article has been created. The draft space is for articles that no one is actively improving, so wait an hour before draftification.

And the article PurpleRP wasn't eligible at all because it could have been tagged for speedy deletion as it's obviously WP:G7, now that it's in the draft space and thus not checked for notability probably the draft will stay here for at least the next six months. Killarnee (talk) 15:11, 25 October 2024 (UTC)

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

I would like to setup a company page that is not promotional but informative. could I provide content for proofread. Thank you Job Kiprop Kwonyike (talk) 12:24, 30 October 2024 (UTC)

If this is a company you have a connection to or are being paid to write an article about, you must make a WP:PAID disclosure on your user page. Your current user page appears to be a copyright violation, so you should replace that with your disclosure.

Whether or not you have a conflict of interest, you should start creating a draft using the WP:Article Wizard. Once you've reached a point where you don't know how to make it better, you can submit it for review or ask for help at the help desk. — jmcgnh^{(talk) (contribs)} 15:41, 30 October 2024 (UTC)

Add @Job Kiprop Kwonyike:. I failed to notice that asker was not asking own on talk page. — jmcgnh^{(talk) (contribs)} 02:11, 1 November 2024 (UTC)

Hi @YesI'mOnFire. This user is quite disruptive with his edits, he doesn't even take the time to read before undoing. I do not understand why he takes it so personally. 194.38.172.194 (talk) 16:15, 8 November 2024 (UTC)

Replied in IP's talk page. 🔥YesI'mOnFire🔥^{(ContainThisEmber?)} 16:24, 8 November 2024 (UTC)

Apologies, I gtg. Hopefully you two will work sth out. 🔥YesI'mOnFire🔥^{(ContainThisEmber?)} 16:40, 8 November 2024 (UTC)

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:40, 19 November 2024 (UTC)

Hi, YesI'mOnFire! I noticed you moved Axe Brand Universal Oil to the draft space earlier today, noting that it was likely being edited by a blocked user. When draftifying an article, please make sure to look at the page history. If it has already been draftified and moved back to the main space, it should not be moved back to the draft space (per WP:DRAFTOBJECT) unless that decision is made via consensus at Articles for Deletion. Thank you! Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 13:27, 19 November 2024 (UTC)

Thanks for informing me @Significa Liberdade! So should I nominate it for deletion or keep it there? Because I find this article pretty well worked out, even though the editor probably has COI and probably evading blocks. 🔥YesI'mOnFire🔥^{(ContainThisEmber?)} 13:35, 19 November 2024 (UTC)

Do not nominate it for deletion unless you believe it is non-notable. If you believe the subject is notable, I think the best course of action would be to add a tag, such as {{COI}} and potentially {{POV}} if you think that applies. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 13:43, 19 November 2024 (UTC)

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give a page a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into Electoral performance of Aam Aadmi Party. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases for registered users, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Requests for history merge. Thank you. – bradv 14:03, 19 November 2024 (UTC)

Hey @Bradv, so the article was already moved to a draft space, but the original contributor, Humormap, decided to paste the whole section continuously, so I decided to move the content to the draft space, where it was supposed to be in. Have I done anything wrong here?

. 🔥YesI'mOnFire🔥^{(ContainThisEmber?)} 14:07, 19 November 2024 (UTC)

@Bradv Seeing my watchlist here, I apologized for causing you trouble :( 🔥YesI'mOnFire🔥^{(ContainThisEmber?)} 14:12, 19 November 2024 (UTC)

Yes, you need to move page using the "move" button, and not by copying and pasting the text. We need to keep the history intact for attribution purposes. I believe I have it all fixed now. – bradv 14:14, 19 November 2024 (UTC)