User talk:Work permit/Archive 1

This was deleted as a repost; see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of non-instrumental songs with titles that do not appear in the lyrics (3rd nomination). If you want to post this article, you need to first seek a new consensus at Wikipedia:Deletion review. NawlinWiki 21:58, 26 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Moved to your userspace at User:Work permit/List of songs whose title does not appear in the lyrics per your request. NawlinWiki 00:43, 29 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please see my comments, under Talk:Naturism#Illustrations.ClemRutter 23:24, 13 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for response. When I get a moment, I will have another go at re-organising- keeping your ideas in mind.ClemRutter 13:50, 14 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

On 16 May, 2007, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Joe Baksi, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

--howcheng {chat} 06:19, 16 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

On 30 May, 2007, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Alfred Winslow Jones, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

--ALoan (Talk) 13:00, 30 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Did you know? was updated. On 3 June, 2007, a fact from the article Palestine Police Force, which you recently nominated, has been featured in that section on the Main Page. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Sean William @ 03:28, 3 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Did you know? was updated. On June 7, 2007, a fact from the article Gregory S. Martin, which you recently nominated, was featured in that section on the Main Page. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Thanks again Work permit. I should get an authorisation so that you can have the inaugural DYK_permit. Happy editing, Blnguyen (bananabucket) 08:17, 7 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for cleaning up (and adding to) Foedus Cassianum. Hopefully we will get to see it on the front page in the DYK section! Thanks again, Bmrbarre 20:51, 5 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Now that the article is featured on the front page, I am in debt to you even more. If it hadn't been for your help, I doubt it would be there. Thanks again. You deserve some credit for that. Bmrbarre 21:15, 7 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I've decided it's time to ask the Arbitration Committee to help out with the problems around articles such as List of republics, which you've been involved in editing or discussing. There's an opportunity for you to add your comment on whether the case should be heard by the ArbCom, and they'll decide if they want to take it up. --Nema Fakei 00:01, 13 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

An Arbitration case involving you has been opened: Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/List of Republics. Please add any evidence you may wish the Arbitrators to consider to the evidence sub-page, Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/List of Republics/Evidence. You may also contribute to the case on the workshop sub-page, Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/List of Republics/Workshop.

On behalf of the Arbitration Committee, David Mestel^(Talk) 19:31, 23 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This arbitration case has now closed and the decision may be found at the link above. WHEELER is banned for one year. For the arbitration committee, David Mestel^(Talk) 21:03, 24 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

New York City Meetup Next: Saturday November 3rd, Brooklyn Museum area Last: 8/12/2007 This box: view • talk • edit

The agenda for the next meetup includes the formation of a Wikimedia New York City local chapter. Hope to see you there!--Pharos 20:28, 11 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please note that WP:SPOILER now considers spoiler warnings for film plot summaries to be redundant: "A section header such as "Plot summary," "Detailed summary," or "Synopsis" can be considered a de facto spoiler notice — a synopsis will necessarily describe the entire plot, so there is usually no need to repeat the warning." Thanks. Ward3001 15:31, 28 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

...to the next New York City Meetup!

New York City Meetup Next: Sunday January 13th, Columbia University area Last: 11/3/2007 This box: view • talk • edit

In the morning, there are exciting plans for a behind-the-scenes guided tour of the American Museum of Natural History.

In the afternoon, we will hold a session dedicated to discussing meta:Wikimedia New York City issues (see the last meeting's minutes).

In the evening, we'll share dinner and chat at a local restaurant, and (weather permitting) hold a late-night astronomy event at Columbia's telescopes.

You can add or remove your name from the New York City Meetups invite list at Wikipedia:Meetup/NYC/Invite list.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 01:37, 5 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

There has been a mailing list created for Wikipedians in the New York metropolitan area (list: Wikimedia NYC). Please consider joining it! Cbrown1023 talk 21:47, 22 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

New York City Meetup Next: Sunday March 16th, Columbia University area Last: 1/13/2008 This box: view • talk • edit

In the afternoon, we will hold a session dedicated to meta:Wikimedia New York City activities, and have salon-style group discussions on Wikipedia and the other Wikimedia projects (see the last meeting's minutes).

Well also make preparations for our exciting Wikipedia Takes Manhattan event, a free content photography contest for Columbia University students planned for Friday March 28 (about 2 weeks after our meeting).

In the evening, we'll share dinner and chat at a local restaurant, and (weather permitting) hold a late-night astronomy event at Columbia's telescopes.

You can add or remove your name from the New York City Meetups invite list at Wikipedia:Meetup/NYC/Invite list.

You're also invited to subscribe to the public Wikimedia New York City mailing list, which is a great way to receive timely updates.
This has been an automated delivery because you were on the invite list. BrownBot (talk) 03:40, 4 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I am puzzled by your edit to the map caption box in the entry on John Franklin. Franklin never made it to the mouth of the Mackenzie RIver, and the statement of distance doesn't seem related to the function of the map's key in any case. I was going to revert it, but seeing your extensive work on WP, I thought I would leave this message in hopes you'd reconsider the edit. Clevelander96 (talk) 11:14, 5 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

There wasn't a map in the article I edited. I just copied the map (lock, stock, and barrel) in the Franklin's lost expedition article to the John Franklin article. If the caption is wrong, feel free to edit it in both articles. --Work permit (talk) 13:22, 5 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, thanks for getting back to me. The edit showed up after the map was added to the new page; my mistake. I agree, though, that it is handy to have this map both in the article on Franklin and on his last expedition. Regards, Clevelander96 (talk) 13:31, 5 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Just in case you're still interested in this issue!!

I have just spent a happy hour or two editing the "Flying Ace" article - this strikes me as where your bit about Richthofen's statistics really belongs! Seriously, it may make a very useful addition to this article. Cheers --Soundofmusicals (talk) 00:47, 14 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

New York City Meetup Next: Sunday June 1st, Columbia University area Last: 3/16/2008 This box: view • talk • edit

In the afternoon, we will hold a session dedicated to meta:Wikimedia New York City activities, elect a board of directors, and hold salon-style group discussions on Wikipedia and the other Wikimedia projects (see the last meeting's minutes).

We'll also review our recent Wikipedia Takes Manhattan event, and make preparations for our exciting successor Wiki Week bonanza, being planned with Columbia University students for September or October.

In the evening, we'll share dinner and chat at a local restaurant, and (weather permitting) hold a late-night astronomy event at Columbia's telescopes.

You can add or remove your name from the New York City Meetups invite list at Wikipedia:Meetup/NYC/Invite list.

Also, check out our regional US Wikimedia chapters blog Wiki Northeast (and we're open to guest posts).
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 00:53, 20 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have permit/Archive 1 granted rollback rights to your account; the reason for this is that after a review of some of your contributions, I believe I can trust you to use rollback correctly by using it for its intended usage of reverting vandalism, and that you will not abuse it by reverting good-faith edits or to revert-war. For information on rollback, see Wikipedia:New admin school/Rollback and Wikipedia:Rollback feature. If you do not want rollback, just let me know, and I'll remove it. Good luck and thanks. PeterSymonds (talk) 09:33, 1 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you Work permit for your message! I do not know the Thai designation for the 1688 Siamese revolution, neither do I know the Siamese date for 1688, but, as far as I know, this is the way this event is designated (and dated) in Western literature, so I would think it is the proper way to designate it (and date it) on the English Wikipedia as well. What do you think? PHG (talk) 18:06, 3 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

On 6 June, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Siamese revolution (1688), which you recently nominated. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

--BorgQueen (talk) 16:10, 6 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

On 13 June, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Medieval Bulgarian Army, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

--JayHenry (talk) 02:10, 13 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

On 17 June, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article History of Confederate States Army Generals, which you recently nominated. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

--Bedford ^Pray 00:49, 17 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings! You are invited to attend the second annual New York picnic on August 24! This year, it will be taking place in the Long Meadow of Prospect Park in Brooklyn. If you plan on coming, please sign up and be sure to bring something! Please be sure to come!
You have received this automated delivery because your name was on the invite list. BrownBot (talk) 20:45, 13 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you very much for your good edits to the Oil shale economics. Oil shale economics is an one of the oil shale series articles. The purpose is to bring all this series articles to the FA level (currently only the main article Oil shale has FA status and the Oil shale extraction is under FAC review). As you see, the Oil shale economics is still far away from the FA and even GA status. I think that the first target should be the GA status and the FA after that. Unfortunately I am myself a quite "wikitired" at the moment and not very creative for editing this series articles. I also feel that "fresh" editors with fresh look and ideas could be great help for developing this article. Looking your edit history, I am wonder if you may be interested to take a care of bringing the Oil shale economics as also Oil shale reserves to the GA level? I would like apology if this not your area of interest, but I really hope you could assist with these articles. Thank you. Beagel (talk) 15:15, 24 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much. Actually this article did not got a much attention (well, at least not enough) after spin-off from original Oil shale article. As I said, all fresh ideas are welcome. I don't have a clear view about the structure — probably some restructuring is needed, but I am not sure how. As of reviewers, I personally had a very good experiences with User:4u1e and User:JMiall. There is also list of the peer review volunteers.Beagel (talk) 20:46, 24 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't understand you mean GA review and not peer review. For the GA review, I recommend to contact user:Johnfos, who is experienced editor of energy-related articles.Beagel (talk) 12:04, 25 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. With reference to the Belgian politics article IJzerwake, I wonder how notability may be established in the circumstances applying to this case. Belgian national media regularly bring coverage of e.g. IJzerwake's annual mass event etc. (In part based on reprting by the Belgian ofiicial news agency Belga.) These articles may be easily referenced, but are only carried on the media web sites for a couple of days. After that, such links will point to web nirwana. I was wondering whether you might have a suggestion. Currently available pages could also be stored as image or pdf, but then I have doubts about copyright issues.

Thanks for any suggestions (here, on subject or my talk page, ...). My apologies if this isn't the right place for discussing this. --Marc Goossens (talk) 06:19, 26 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your top notch webcite suggestion. And your response within seconds of me posting this question. --Marc Goossens (talk) 07:09, 26 August 2008 (UTC

Meanwhile added some references on recent press coverage. Who decides whether this is sufficient to establish notabilty? --Marc Goossens (talk) 08:13, 26 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

And again thanks for your help and suggestions. By the way: your Flemish is quite OK! --Marc Goossens (talk) 15:25, 28 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

a lower case 'r' on 'oil reserves' is preferred please. — RHaworth (Talk | contribs) 16:40, 30 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, since there seems to be a controversy over that second lowest thing, would you mind checking out the talk page (Talk:Sarah_Palin#A_.28different.29_comparison) so that hopefully we can come to a compromise? Thanks, and sorry to post this on your user talk page, I just wanted to make sure you knew there was a controversy--danielfolsom 00:14, 1 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Wikis Take Manhattan Next: Saturday September 27 This box: view • talk • edit

WHAT Wikis Take Manhattan is a scavenger hunt and free content photography contest aimed at illustrating Wikipedia and StreetsWiki articles covering sites and street features in Manhattan and across the five boroughs of New York City. The event is based on last year's Wikipedia Takes Manhattan, and has evolved to include StreetsWiki this year as well.

LAST YEAR'S EVENT

• Wikipedia:Wikipedia Takes Manhattan/Spring 2008 (a description of the results, and the uploading party)
• Commons:Wikipedia Takes Manhattan/Gallery (our cool gallery)

WINNINGS? Prizes include a dinner for three with Wikipedia creator Jimmy Wales at Pure Food & Wine, gift certificates to Bicycle Habitiat and the LimeWire Store, and more!

WHEN The hunt will take place Saturday, September 27th from 1:00pm to 6:30pm, followed by prizes and celebration.

WHO All Wikipedians and non-Wikipedians are invited to participate in team of up to three (no special knowledge is required at all, just a digital camera and a love of the city). Bring a friend (or two)!

REGISTER The proper place to register your team is here. It's also perfectly possible to register on the day of when you get there, but it will be slightly easier for us if you register beforehand.

WHERE Participants can begin the hunt from either of two locations: one at Columbia University (at the sundial on college walk) and one at The Open Planning Project's West Village office. Everyone will end at The Open Planning Project:

• Wikis Take Manhattan page at The Open Planning Project

349 W. 12th St. #3

Between Greenwich & Washington Streets

By the 14th St./8th Ave. ACE/L stop

FOR UPDATES

Check out:

• Wikis Take Manhattan main website

This will have a posting if the event is delayed due to weather or other exigency.

Thanks,

Pharos

You can add or remove your name from the New York City Meetups invite list at Wikipedia:Meetup/NYC/Invite list.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 00:36, 24 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

New York City Meetup Next: Sunday November 16th, Columbia University area Last: 6/01/2008 This box: view • talk • edit

In the afternoon, we will hold a session dedicated to meta:Wikimedia New York City activities, finalize and approve bylaws, interact with representatives from the Software Freedom Law Center, and hold salon-style group discussions on Wikipedia and the other Wikimedia projects (see the June meeting's minutes and the September meeting's minutes).

We'll also review our recent Wikis Take Manhattan event, and make preparations for our exciting successor Wikipedia Loves Art! bonanza, being planned with the Brooklyn Museum for February.

In the evening, we'll share dinner and chat at a local restaurant, and (weather permitting) hold a late-night astronomy event at Columbia's telescopes.

You can add or remove your name from the New York City Meetups invite list at Wikipedia:Meetup/NYC/Invite list.

To keep up-to-date on local events, you can also join our mailing list.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 22:56, 7 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, just so you know db-web tags cover comics, blogs and so on as well as standardised websites :). Ironholds (talk) 03:26, 25 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

New York City Meetup Next: Sunday January 18th, Columbia University area Last: 11/01/2008 This box: view • talk • edit

In the afternoon, we will hold a session dedicated to meta:Wikimedia New York City activities, look at our approval by the Chapters Committee, develop ideas for chapter projects at museums and libraries throughout our region, and hold salon-style group discussions on Wikipedia and the other Wikimedia projects (see the November meeting's minutes and the December mini-meetup's minutes).

We'll make preparations for our exciting museum photography Wikipedia Loves Art! February bonanza (on Flickr, on Facebook) with Shelley from the Brooklyn Museum and Alex from the Metropolitan Museum of Art.

We'll also be collecting folks to join our little Wikipedia Takes the Subway adventure which will be held the day after the meeting.

In the evening, we'll share dinner and chat at a local restaurant, and generally enjoy ourselves and kick back.

You can add or remove your name from the New York City Meetups invite list at Wikipedia:Meetup/NYC/Invite list.

To keep up-to-date on local events, you can also join our mailing list.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 07:26, 12 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

New York City Meetup—Museum Extravanganza Next: February 6-7, at the Met Museum and the Brooklyn Museum Last: 01//2008 This box: view • talk • edit

Join us the evenings of Friday February 6 and Saturday February 7 around Wikipedia Loves Art! museum photography events at the Metropolitan Museum of Art and the Brooklyn Museum.

There will also be a special business meeting on Saturday dedicated to discussing meta:Wikimedia New York City issues with guests from the Wikimedia Foundation.

You can add or remove your name from the New York City Meetups invite list at Wikipedia:Meetup/NYC/Invite list.

To keep up-to-date on local events, you can also join our mailing list.
This has been automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 23:13, 31 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

New York City Meetup Next: Sunday March 29th, Columbia University area Last: 01/18/2009 This box: view • talk • edit

In the afternoon, we will hold a session dedicated to meta:Wikimedia New York City activities, sign official incorporation papers for the chapter, review recent projects like Wikipedia Loves Art and upcoming projects like Wikipedia at the Library, and hold salon-style group discussions on Wikipedia and the other Wikimedia projects (see the January meeting's minutes).

In the evening, we'll share dinner and chat at a local restaurant, and generally enjoy ourselves and kick back.

You can add or remove your name from the New York City Meetups invite list at Wikipedia:Meetup/NYC/Invite list.

To keep up-to-date on local events, you can also join our mailing list.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 00:19, 22 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

New York City Meetup Next: Sunday May 17th, Columbia University area Last: 03/29/2009 This box: view • talk • edit

In the afternoon, we will hold a session dedicated to meta:Wikimedia New York City activities, establish a membership process for the chapter, review the upcoming Wiki-Conference New York 2009 (planned for ~100 people at NYU this summer) and future projects like Wikipedia at the Library, and hold salon-style group discussions on Wikipedia and the other Wikimedia projects (see the March meeting's minutes).

In the evening, we'll share dinner and chat at a local restaurant, and generally enjoy ourselves and kick back.

You can add or remove your name from the New York City Meetups invite list at Wikipedia:Meetup/NYC/Invite list.

To keep up-to-date on local events, you can also join our mailing list.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 22:54, 3 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, the Hard Hat Riot section in Brennan's article is a near-copy of much the Hard Hat Riot article. I was thinking of simplifying keeping them both in sync by adding a {{main|Hard Hat Riot}} to Brennan's article and cutting most of the detail there. Any thoughts on that? Cheers, CliffC (talk) 03:27, 4 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It is not gibberish as you can see ... I made this page designated to be redirected to the United States of America. It is a spelling correction for EEUU regarding on the Spanish language spelling. Spaceillusion02 (talk)

I wasn't familiar with that, I've already withdrawn the speedy request and posted your talk page. thanks--Work permit (talk) 04:56, 26 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Work permit, and thanks for your work patrolling new changes. I am just informing you that I have changed a page you tagged (Irrespectable) from being tagged for speedy deletion to being tagged for proposed deletion. The speedy deletion criteria are very narrow to protect the encyclopedia, and do not fit the page in question. Please review the criteria for speedy deletion before tagging further pages. If you have any questions or problems, please let me know. Thanks again! Closedmouth (talk) 09:11, 27 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Was Stein Austrian or German? Paulatim (talk) 14:08, 27 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, but who is Streicher??Paulatim (talk) 17:59, 27 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

the Stein family's original name--Work permit (talk) 18:00, 27 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Correct. Streicher confusingly has the same name as his father in law. So the original, which said he was Viennese, was correct, although Streicher was originally from Stuttgart, i.e. was German. Regards Paulatim (talk) 22:05, 27 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, Nanette Streicher (daughter of Johann Stein) was the builder of the pianos. The firm was alternatively known as "Geschwister Stein" , "Frere et Soeur Stein", "Nannette Streicher nee Stein" , and "Nannette Streicher, geb. Stein und Sohn". Andreas Stein (her husband) was the businessman. References and changes to follow--Work permit (talk) 22:27, 27 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Good. You might find the articles on Nannette Streicher, and on Johann Andreas Streicher on the German Wikipedia useful. Amazingly Wikipedia, which strives to be so politically correct, has no separate article on Nannette, despite her being a successful and notable teacher, composer, and builder of pianos. Paulatim (talk) 08:25, 28 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

PS Care required on whether Nannette or her husband sent the piano. The original source was Cooper's recent book on Beethoven which is still there. The reference implies that it was the husband and you shouldn't keep that if you think it was wrong. There was no copy of Cooper's book in my local Waterstone's when I went to check. Alternatively, since they were both friendly with Beethoven, one could say that it was 'the Streichers' that sent the piano. I will do some more research myself, also. Paulatim (talk) 08:34, 28 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

PPS I have pictures of both husband and wife on my talk page. Paulatim (talk) 08:38, 28 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Good point. While it was built by Nanette, it was sent by her husband. I will cite and correct--Work permit (talk) 21:47, 28 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

according to Wikipedia:Don't restore removed comments you can only restore declinded unbanned requestst if im still banned so dont mess wirth my taLK page. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.225.165.20 (talk) 00:16, 6 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding this, I just wanted to remind you that G4 can only be used when there has been a deletion discussion. In this case, it was deleted the first time via PROD. It was incorrectly deleted using that rationale afterwards. While I'm sure it should have been deleted, it was not eligible under G4. Cheers, Enigma^msg 22:16, 16 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there. I do own all of the DVDs actually. And I have been working to add new things to the Ally McBeal article, as it was looking a bit dry. I could make a screenshot. How about one from the opening? Unless there is an episode you want in particular. Evil silence (talk) 05:52, 2 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I do actually, it's looking great. Um, I have been trying to find exactly what episode she breathed fire at Ally, and I know it was the second season, but there's alot of episodes to go through. Any ideas? And I have one from the main titles of her, I'll upload it. I'll take a screenshot of her breathing fire as soon as I can find the episode. Evil silence (talk) 06:33, 2 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, so I uploaded the picture and added it to the article. What do you think? I really like that shot of her. Evil silence (talk) 06:44, 2 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not one to make such accusations, but I think Gorrillasapiens may be trying to evade the block as 98.212.175.158. See this edit. -Rrius (talk) 20:35, 3 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe it's him, but it's only one edit (so far).--Work permit (talk) 01:41, 4 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I guess it was him. I he got blocked for another 2 weeks--Work permit (talk) 03:03, 5 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

that you just restored a personal attack on me at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Criticism of Human Rights Watch (2nd nomination)? This user Noloop is following me to several articles/discussions I contributed to. Note that I am NOT a sockpuppet and none of the alleged sockpuppets accounts of mine have shown up at this deletion discussions. Pantherskin (talk) 04:31, 5 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You are a relatively new user, less then a week on Wikipedia. You had contributions to only two articles and spent most of your time on ANI boards, AFD and the like, flirting with wp:3rr. I reverted only reversion you made, but you posted a complaint on my talk page for doing so. I probably didn't give you the benefit of the doubt. You are well versed in conflict resolution and obviously a quick study on such issues. My first week, I was struggling to figure out how to add a reference to an article. I wish you the best--Work permit (talk) 04:26, 6 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for another great uplift to an article!-- The Red Pen of Doom 00:18, 16 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The article World domination has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This article is strictly original research. No evidence is given that any of the real historical information is related to the topic of "world domination." No references are given for fictional "world domination", or that it has even been discussed in secondary sources.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Steve Dufour (talk) 02:16, 16 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

WP:RS does not require an inline source to be given for every sentence of an article. Regarding the tags I removed, no one has questioned on the talk page any of those tagged sentences. If you believe some of those sentences are in error, please discuss them on the talk page. Thanks, JMG (talk) 05:01, 17 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I don't want to talk to you nor I have to listen to whatever you have say. So, stop being a loser and don't leave messages on my page. I will do what I want to do and when I want to. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.20.195.239 (talk) 16:59, 18 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Why did you revert my edit on Convergence? The version you reverted to contains the phrase "a sequence of which the partial sums have a limit", which doesn't make any sense, and has a link to Convergent series when it should really link to a more general page. You don't appear to be a mathematician, so why do you think you know better than I do what should go in the "Mathematics" section? 216.160.76.121 (talk) 04:55, 30 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Neither do you. We'll give each other the benefit of the doubt. My recent edit should satisfy us both.--Work permit (talk) 05:09, 30 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I'm responding to your message about me attacking an editor? You got the wrong guy I just made a minor change and did not attack anyone. Please do not accuse me of attacking again unless it is truly justified, as editing an article is not an attack. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.176.184.44 (talk) 07:25, 30 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

My mistake, I mean to say don't edit test. You continued to break links in the article, for example substituting Beverly Crusher with Doctor Beverly Crusher.--Work permit (talk) 07:32, 30 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]