User talk:Wikipedian339

Welcome! (We can't say that loudly enough!)

Hello, Wikipedian339, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might find helpful:

• Be Bold!
• Learn from others
• Be kind to others
• Contribute, Contribute, Contribute!
• Tell us a bit about yourself
• Our great guide to Wikipedia

If you have any questions or problems, no matter what they are, leave me a message on my talk page. Or, please come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{Help me}} on your user talk page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.

Please sign your name on talk pages and votes by typing four tildes (~~~~); our software automatically converts it to your username and the date. We're so glad you're here! Meatsgains^(talk) 01:57, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Josve05a were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

The subject's notability is not clearly established with significant coverage in reliable, secondary sources. The article relies heavily on primary sources and mentions from media appearances, which may not sufficiently demonstrate notability per Wikipedia's guidelines. Some references are weak or non-independent, such as social media and primary sources. More independent, reliable secondary sources are needed.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Darien Sutton and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Hi Wikipedian339. Thank you for your work on Crime Victims Treatment Center. Another editor, Klbrain, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thanks for creating this page about a rape crisis centre - one with a significant history and coming up to 50 years! It's appropriately referenced and clear.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Klbrain}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Klbrain (talk) 10:17, 22 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Klbrain thank you SO much for your comment! This really made my day that you left such a positive comment. I'm sure you're already in the habit of this, but I just want to say please keep leaving editors positive messages like this; it means a lot! :) Wikipedian339 (talk) 12:53, 22 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Wikipedian339. This message concerns the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Darien Sutton".

Drafts that go unedited for six months are eligible for deletion, in accordance with our draftspace policy, and this one has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission, and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you read this, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions here. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the draft so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! from Piperium (chit-chat, i did that) at 23:06, 29 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the heads up, @Piperium! I wasn't ultimately able to find any more news articles about him after it's first rejection in AfC. (And I think I've learned a lot more since then about what is necessary to have a page be accepted as article-worthy.) I think he may be on his way up in notability and may get a page at some point, but I don't personally have anything I've found to help make that case any stronger right now. So, I'm letting that page go. But thank you again for giving me a warning/a heads up! Have a great day! Wikipedian339 (talk) 04:08, 1 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, I was just patrolling the G13 soon page and throwing around CSD’s willy-nilly—no harsh feelings on you specifically! I too have started on drafts and have never been able to complete them. Hopefully more outlets write about Sutton, as it would be great to have a dedicated article for him. Have a great day! from Piperium (chit-chat, i did that) at 06:38, 1 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]