User talk:Wikiman5676/Archive 2

You might want to watch this.--Farang Rak Tham (Talk) 11:03, 14 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I am going to nominate Luang Por Dhammajayo for GA. I think the article is only 20–30% the same as the Wat Phra Dhammakaya article, as the latter has already been significantly modified. I don't think the article will suffer as a result of the review, and if the reviewer isn't being fair we can always abort the nomination. Okay?--Farang Rak Tham (Talk) 14:54, 5 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, that works. Wikiman5676 (talk) 00:53, 6 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Dharma Bum Temple you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Carabinieri -- Carabinieri (talk) 16:21, 25 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much Carabinieri! While I have contributed to several articles that became GAs this is my first ever nomination and the first article that I was the main contributor to that I thought could make it to GA status. So I'm very excited to be working with you on this review. Wikiman5676 (talk) 17:43, 25 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

On 8 July 2018, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article 2017–18 Thai temple fraud investigations, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the 2017–18 Thai temple fraud investigations, which led to the imprisonment of high-ranking Buddhist monks, were seen by critics as being politically motivated? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/2017–18 Thai temple fraud investigations. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, 2017–18 Thai temple fraud investigations), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Vanamonde (talk) 00:02, 8 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The article Dharma Bum Temple you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Dharma Bum Temple for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Carabinieri -- Carabinieri (talk) 06:41, 11 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Your submission of Dharma Bum Temple at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Farang Rak Tham (Talk) 12:29, 25 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You might want to help out on this. I'd appreciate it. --Farang Rak Tham (Talk) 22:04, 1 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

On 2 August 2018, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Dharma Bum Temple, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Dharma Bum Temple helped organize the first Buddhist college fraternity in the United States, Delta Beta Tau (pledge class pictured), at San Diego State University? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Dharma Bum Temple. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Dharma Bum Temple), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Alex Shih (talk) 00:01, 2 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Yay, 3200 views! --Farang Rak Tham (Talk) 13:17, 4 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Visakha, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Merit (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:38, 27 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

On 28 August 2018, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Luang Por Dhammajayo, which you recently nominated. The fact was ... that the Thai Buddhist monk Luang Por Dhammajayo launched an anti-smoking campaign that won an award from the World Health Organization? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Luang Por Dhammajayo. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:01, 28 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Any ideas as to why there are two peaks in the views graph? See here.--Farang Rak Tham (Talk) 00:44, 1 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hmm. that's a good point. I havent been able to find any reason for it appearing twice. Not really any new news either. Very perplexing. Wikiman5676 (talk) 06:04, 2 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I think we should consider making a list like this. What do you think?--Farang Rak Tham (Talk) 07:02, 30 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

excellent idea. Wikiman5676 (talk) 15:40, 30 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Where shall we begin? Wikiman5676 (talk) 03:56, 31 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

We can start by making a list first in a new article, then add local news sources to confirm the existence of the branches.--Farang Rak Tham (Talk) 00:45, 1 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Farang Rak Tham I've gotten started here [1]Wikiman5676 (talk) 06:34, 3 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Great!--Farang Rak Tham (Talk) 12:07, 3 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

See Twelve Nidānas#Development of the twelve nidanas. Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 06:36, 1 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

On 2 October 2018, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Visakha, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that one of the two temples visited most often by the historic Buddha was built by Visakha, a wealthy aristocratic woman who was considered his chief female lay disciple? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Visakha. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Visakha), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Alex Shih (talk) 00:01, 2 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Wikiman5676. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 18:01, 4 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You might want to weigh in this discussion about the Dhammakaya Movement. Thanks.--Farang Rak Tham (Talk) 21:23, 7 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have recently shown interest in living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect: any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or any page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

JimRenge (talk) 18:51, 12 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Wikiman5676, the message above is just a reminder of the more stringent wp rules concerning biographies of living subjects. I have sent you a new alert because the community assumes that people may forget it after a year. My memory may be even worse. JimRenge (talk) 19:22, 12 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! I appreciate the notice. Although not related to anything I have done recently I actually did somewhat forget about this rule. Wikiman5676 (talk) 00:57, 13 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
This is a procedure-driven notice required in case an admin review of your editing becomes necessary. Please do not engage in edit war that is in part based on false statements about sources. Please do check the scholarly sources I have cited before you repeatedly dispute/revert my edits. As always, you are welcome to discuss the source and any concerns on the article's talk page. Your cooperation is requested, Ms Sarah Welch (talk) 12:19, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I thought you might want to be aware that there has been considerable editing going on at Wat Phra Dhammakaya, an article you worked on.--Farang Rak Tham (Talk) 09:15, 24 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Method for consensus building--Farang Rak Tham (Talk) 12:19, 17 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

In case you hadn't noticed.--Farang Rak Tham (Talk) 08:47, 23 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]