{{helpme}}
Hi, I was going to leave a welcome notice myself, but noticed it was already done. Just a couple of things I wanted to let you know about. The two logos and the image of the armbar on your user page are only being used on Wikipedia under something called "fair use". You can read about that at Wikipedia:Non-free_content, but one thing that it means is that we use them only in as limited a way as is necessary to contribute to the encyclopedia. Their use in user space is not allowed.
Thanks for your work on the MMA articles. Sancho 13:42, 23 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I see, it´s fixed now. Thank you.--Wikikidboy 14:27, 23 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
You are clearly a sockpuppet of the blocked vandal, Verdict (talk · contribs), who is not welcome on the Wikipedia. You have been blocked and all edits will be reverted. --Yamla 16:34, 24 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Wikikidboy (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I am denying being Verdict. Look through all my contributions. Requesting review by another admin. I will contact Jimbo Wales and anything else if this Yamla, tryes anything else.
Decline reason:
I trust Yamla's judgment here; I've seen him successfully identify many Verdict sockpuppets. Your arguments are not convincing. Sean William @ 16:52, 24 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Before I even make another request for unblocking, excactly what vandalism (since your calling me a vandal) have i´ve done? Excactly what of my contributions have been vandalism?--Wikikidboy 17:03, 24 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
That dosen´t make any sence at all. You have just said that you cannot explain how any of my edits have been vandalism to the articles. So how makes that me likely to Verdict or even an user that cannot be free to edit?--Wikikidboy 17:38, 24 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
No, none of any single edit of mine has vandalised any article. Show any of my contribution that can be indentified as vandalism before you block. You are just jumping to conclussion.--Wikikidboy 21:09, 24 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
What does trolling mean? You are avoiding to fix your own conclussion. Where is your proof of me being a banned user and where is your proof of me being a vandal? You don´t have to protect anything or block just beacuse you can. Just beacuse you are an admin dosen´t mean your always right or always doing the right thing.--Wikikidboy 21:15, 24 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Again, I am requesting this unblock request to be reviewed by another admin (not the blocking one), and that the admin looks through all my contributions to see if any edit is indentified as vandalism or can recognize me as being a vandal, and if not, the right thing would be to unblock me.
According to WP:BAN, any edits through block evasion are vandalism. — Sr13 22:00, 24 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Despite claiming here that he was not Verdict (talk · contribs), this user emailed me after the block and confirmed that he was indeed. This sort of behaviour is typical of this banned vandal and demonstrates why it would be inappropriate to unblock him. --Yamla 05:05, 25 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Where is the text that I have done that? You lie about everything like the fact that I am a vandal well then show the contributions that are vandalism ones well you dont have that either now do you.--Wikikidboy 20:49, 28 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
