User talk:Wikidrone

Thought you should know that this photograph was taken in 2005. The digital billboard did not obviate it until 2006. Bahn Mi 16:22, 12 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the info. Santorummm 21:26, 12 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion moved to User_talk:Hippoking please stop posting here hippo. Thanks.

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did in C++. Wikipedia is not a mere directory of links nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include (but are not limited to) links to personal web sites, links to web sites with which you are affiliated, and links that exist to attract visitors to a web site or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam policies for further explanations of links that are considered appropriate. If you feel the link should be added to the article, then please discuss it on the article's talk page rather than re-adding it. See the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you. --Yamla 18:36, 15 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you insert a spam link, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Persistent spammers may have their websites blacklisted from Wikipedia. --Yamla 16:13, 21 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I have not inserted spam anywhere. Stop trying to abuse the wikipedian system. Wikidrone 17:18, 22 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Given your involvement with this article, I thought I should let you know that it has been nominated for deletion again given that the nominator appears not to have done so. See Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Santorum (sexual slang). Yours, WJBscribe ^{(WJB talk)} 03:32, 19 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed the article Santorummm--please delete this if u know how-thanks' and have performed the desired deletion (deleting an article requires administrator rights). In the future, please add {{Db-author}} to any article you created and desire to have deleted. The template will tag the article for review by an administrator that the person requesting deletion is the article's creator and to then perform the deletion. --Allen3 ^talk 20:35, 29 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks very much I appreciate your assistance. Wikidrone

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thumbnail_gallery_post Here you removed a reference to the valuable resource that helps webmasters learn more about TGP. Maybe you can learn more about a subject before change it? Open http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Spam and read:

Although the specific links may be allowed under some circumstances

Than read about "Links normally to be avoided".

If it repeated again, I write to abuse departament about terms violated by you.

Howdy, I was somewhat confused as to what you were trying to do here. I assumed it was an accident, and reverted it. I am struggling to think of a reason to blank an article. Cheers, --TeaDrinker 22:48, 2 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Whewps, sorry about that. I intended just to have it renamed. Thanks. Wikidrone 22:49, 2 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No worries. I also took the liberty of removing your userpage from Category:Software design patterns. Adding a colon (ie [[:Category:Software design patters]]) to the beginning of a category makes it a link rather than adding the page to the category. Hope you don't mind. Thank, --TeaDrinker 22:53, 2 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Np, thanks again. Wikidrone 22:54, 2 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have completed your nomination for deletion of signals and slots as described on Wikipedia:Articles for deletion#How to list pages for deletion. See Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Signals and slots. — Tobias Bergemann 07:43, 3 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have completed your nomination for deletion of Portland Pattern Repository. See Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Portland Pattern Repository. (PS: Please do not refer to other people's work as "crap" on wikipedia. Thanks.) — Tobias Bergemann 06:53, 4 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have completed your nomination for deletion of Prepared singleton pattern. See Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Prepared singleton pattern. — Tobias Bergemann 13:46, 4 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

A "{{prod}}" template has been added to the article Itcl, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Fram 14:30, 25 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:Itcl Wikidrone 19:04, 25 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have reverted your change to reverse-engineering. The claim about reverse-engineering being related to abduction should be verifiable. Pgr94 23:21, 10 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fine. However it seems rather intuitive to me.. Wikidrone

Well if you want to elaborate on the relationship between reverse-engineering and abductive inference that would be great. Mind WP:OR though. Pgr94 23:24, 10 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I generally think it better to look for the cite, rather than delete the text, when facing an uncited statement that I think may not be supported. A simple google search supported the claim that you had deleted. I tossed in some citations accordingly, and restored the text.--Epeefleche 04:21, 27 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Great thanks a lot. Wikidrone 16:59, 27 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

With reference to your recent edit summary, please read our Wikipedia:Civility and Wikipedia:No personal attacks guidelines. Thank you, Feezo (Talk) 13:15, 16 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thought you may consider renaming your link for Prof. Allison from Utah Valley State College to Utah Valley University. GreenwoodKL (talk) 03:19, 12 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Superclass (database theory), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

Unremarkable database theory

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. -- Collectonian (talk · contribs) 03:05, 10 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have nominated IoFTPD, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/IoFTPD. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Joe Chill (talk) 02:36, 21 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion has begun about whether the article Chuck Allison, which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chuck Allison until a consensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.

You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. D O N D E groovily Talk to me 04:12, 4 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not make statements attacking people or groups of people. Wikipedia has a strict policy against personal attacks. Attack pages and images are not tolerated by Wikipedia and are speedily deleted. Users who continue to create or repost such pages and images in violation of our biographies of living persons policy will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Thank you.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion," which appears inside of the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. KoshVorlon _Nal^uboutes _Aeria ^Gloris 19:51, 12 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Santorum (neologism) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Santorum (neologism)(4th nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. KoshVorlon _Nal^uboutes _Aeria ^Gloris 20:20, 12 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Campaign for "santorum" neologism is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Campaign for "santorum" neologism until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. KoshVorlon _Nal^uboutes _Aeria ^Gloris 11:24, 20 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The article Luscious Lopez has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

fails PORNBIO, only one qualifying nom not scene-related, no reliably sourced bio content. Claim she "starred" in a mainstream film is phony, at most, she was essentially an extra (unbilled role as "female inmate")

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 15:20, 2 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article C++/Tcl is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/C++/Tcl until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ― Padenton|✉   16:42, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The article Game Theater XP has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not meet product notability guidelines.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. SITH (talk) 16:51, 27 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Game Theater XP is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Game Theater XP until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. SITH (talk) 14:41, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Clig is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Clig (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Rublov (talk) 01:18, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The article Tcllib has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unreferenced and already summarized in Tcl; WP:NOTDIRECTORY / WP:NOT DATABASE

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Headphase (talk) 18:40, 23 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Join (SQL and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 October 27#Join (SQL until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Steel1943 (talk) 19:41, 27 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The article Itk has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable software. Unsourced and tagged for notability for 10 years.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jfire (talk) 16:36, 4 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]