User talk:Wikideas1

Archives

Archive 1 Archive 2 Archive 3 Archive 4

This page has archives. Sections older than 14 days may be auto-archived by Lowercase sigmabot III if there are more than 4.

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Propetual motion wind powered vehicle concept.jpeg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you.

A tag has been placed on Online–IDE requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section R3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a recently created redirect from an implausible typo or misnomer, or other unlikely search term.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. 1234qwer1234qwer4 21:29, 28 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to Capital Factory. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 10:43, 29 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of tools and equipment, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Harvester.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:56, 2 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

List of tools and equipment

added a link pointing to Car lift

Auto mechanic

added a link pointing to Car lift

Automobile repair shop

added a link pointing to Car lift

List of Python software

added a link pointing to Framework

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:56, 9 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello @Wikideas1! I am a new page reviewer on Wikipedia. I have taken a look at your list article, List of PHP software and tools, and it appears to be entirely sourced by GitHub. GitHub, to my knowledge, is a self-published source which ordinarily means it should not be used on Wikipedia. I am unaware of whether GitHub is an acceptable source when it comes to software specific articles, so for this review I am relying on the information that is available in this discussion. Specifically the following:

'Github itself isn't a source, it's just a place for people to create accounts and upload code and other stuff. All content is entirely user generated. If it's GitHub documentation itself about Github as an entity or service, maybe, but otherwise no. The only reason I can think of is X provides the source code for Y on GitHub. Maybe A code does B, but I think that would be better to have a third party reliable source make the statement about what the code does rather than the, possibly, original research of reading the code and making the claim.'

With this knowledge, I am going to ask that you replace the GitHub sources with reliable secondary sources from reputable websites and publications. I have left the relevant template tags on the article so that other editors are aware of this. Thank you and happy editing! 11WB (talk) 10:20, 13 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]