Also, new users are not allowed to edit or discuss the Israel–Palestine conflict. Here's some more info about that below. JensonSL (SilverLocust) 10:57, 4 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Introduction to contentious topics
You have recently edited a page related to the Arab–Israeli conflict, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.
A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have an expanded level of powers and discretion in order to reduce disruption to the project.
Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:
Additionally, you must be logged-in, have 500 edits and an account age of 30 days, and are not allowed to make more than 1 revert within 24 hours on any page within this topic.
Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures, you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.
American politics
You have recently made edits related to post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people. This is a standard message to inform you that post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people is a designated contentious topic. This message does not imply that there are any issues with your editing. For more information about the contentious topics system, please see Wikipedia:Contentious topics. JensonSL (SilverLocust) 10:57, 4 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I'm very sorry to have to do this and hope very much you will come back in a rew years and ask for an unblock. I'm sure in time your skills will increase enough to be a good editor. Doug Wellertalk13:10, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Fill in the unblock request as it says. If you do, other Admins will see it. If you don't, they won't. You are of course allowed to vanish from Wikipedia. Doug Wellertalk08:44, 6 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).
i want to be unblocked because doug weller has made a ridiculous block all because of me not being ready to edit. Another reason is i did a contentious topic. But the thing is, i am new. how am i ment to know what a contentious topic is?
Decline reason:
While I'm here, I'm declining your appeal, because it, or for that matter anything else I've seen here, does not convince me that unblocking you at this time would benefit the project. If you wish to make further appeals, in the fullness of time, please read and understand WP:GAB and WP:CIR, as well as WP:CTOP. DoubleGrazing (talk) 08:26, 7 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
You needn't worry about blocking anyone, a) because you're not an admin, and b) you're blocked yourself.
Please don't edit this page unnecessarily. As a blocked user, you're only allowed to appeal or discuss your block here. Unnecessary edits may get you blocked from editing this page as well. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 08:22, 7 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Wikipedia does not usually allow you to use multiple accounts, and we specifically disallow using a new account to circumvent a block, as you have done. The relevant policy is at WP:SOCK; please read it. I appreciate that you are enthusiastic about Wikipedia, but you need to show that you can follow our rules. If you would like to edit here again, please take a bit of a break, and file an unblock request when you come back explaining what you would do differently. If you make more new accounts they will be found and blocked, so don't do that. Best, Vanamonde93 (talk) 17:18, 9 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
thanks. although i don't neesd info i didn't use my other accound for what u said. i used it to see how many edit reviews i had got.u Wikalevi (talk) 06:02, 14 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry, of course you have. You changed the initials of a football club incorrectly, you changed using a standard template {{cvt|120|km} to 120km (75 miles) which you shouldn't have done.
Oh, and your first edit was "The use of ipads date back to the 1940s. Ipas were very cheap baack then.".
So basically, you go to ur home page. and then click on ' my impact' then,scroll down on that and you'll see a title called: most viewed edits. Wikalevi (talk) 05:07, 18 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I needed some assistance in figuring out what you refer to, but this is a new feature rolled out for new users, which shows how many people have read the pages you have edited after you edited them. It does not indicate anything about whether those edits were good, and it is completely irrelevant to your misuse of multiple accounts. I will repeat, for emphasis: you may not use multiple accounts on Wikipedia in the way that you were doing. If you wish to return to editing you will need to file an unblock request showing that you understood what problems you caused and convincing us that you will avoid them. Anything else is a waste of the community's time. Vanamonde93 (talk) 19:55, 18 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
[ unblock request 2: i want to be unblocked because i totally understand that what i did wrong was against the rules. please will you unblock me?} Wikalevi (talk) 04:45, 2 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
also, what i would do differently would be that i would think about my edits and edit page choices so they fit my style. Wikalevi (talk) 04:51, 2 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
(talk page stalker) you didn't do an unblock request. For that, please use the template and fill out your reasoning there. While we appreciate your enthusiasm to help wikipedia, competence is unfortunately required if you want to have any chance actually getting to edit wikipedia with a good reputation. Which you unfortunately do not seem to have, and it's taking out the patience of the admins. Shall you tread this path for too long, you'll get revoked of your talk page access. I advise you to take the standard offer where you'll have to not touch wikipedia in any way for atleast 6 months, though not doing anything for more time helps, and in the meantime, edit other wikimedia projects to show you can change via the proof of your edits on the other projects, the most common picks being simple English wikipedia and wikimedia commons. We don't actually want to lose another potential editor, please show us you do have enough competence to edit here and help the project in the process. Thanks Yelps ᘛ⁐̤ᕐᐷ critique me16:22, 18 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
It is obvious that that account is not "for your sister"; you are using it. This is a violation of the sockpuppetry policy, and so I have blocked that account as well. If you want to return to editing, you need to ask for an unblock with this account, and explain what you will do differently in the future. Vanamonde93 (talk) 18:33, 26 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, Wikalevi. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Experience of a lifetime: Italian food and drink, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Drafts that go unedited for six months are eligible for deletion, in accordance with our draftspace policy, and this one has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission, and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you read this, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions here. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the draft so you can continue to work on it.
