This is an archive of past discussions with User:Widefox. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

The article King of the Silver River was recently de-PRODed, after you PRODed it. I'm not very clear on how this is supposed to work, so suggest you take a look to see if it was removed appropriately. Cheers. N2e (talk) 14:39, 14 August 2012 (UTC)

I have removed the prod tag you placed on Rue Meridian as it has been discussed at AfD and per policy is permanently ineligible for prod. I only did this to comply with policy and have no opinion one way or the other on the merits of deletion. If you still wish to pursue deletion, feel free to open another AfD. —KuyaBriBri^Talk 20:12, 13 August 2012 (UTC)

Merge done. The lack of a merge target has stalled the result of the AfD for 6 years - fixed. Widefox (talk) 10:26, 20 August 2012 (UTC)

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

List of characters in Shannara (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to The Federation

Vaughan Smith (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Prekaz

Zero-hour contract (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to On-call

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 04:58, 19 August 2012 (UTC)

Done (where possible) Widefox (talk) 10:27, 20 August 2012 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

256-bit (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Processor

Adaptive optimization (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Hotspot

Process isolation (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to VMS

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:40, 26 August 2012 (UTC)

Done Widefox (talk) 14:43, 26 August 2012 (UTC)

I have just reverted your edit to the Bradley Manning article, per WP:OVERLINK. Please confine wikilinks to "relevant connections to the subject of another article that will help readers understand the article more fully". AndyTheGrump (talk) 15:17, 26 August 2012 (UTC)

Agree a mixed bag, although you're throwing baby out with bathwater - see my edit summary, and feel free to discuss here / elsewhere Widefox (talk) 15:46, 26 August 2012 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Grand Union Canal (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Apsley

List of public art in Coventry (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Peeping Tom

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:29, 4 September 2012 (UTC)

 Done

Clearly, you and I have very different views of what disambiguation pages are for. I consider your "cleanup" efforts to be partly okay, but that you are destroying a lot of useful information. Talk:Oak (disambiguation) is one, and Talk:Albatross (disambiguation) is another. Sminthopsis84 (talk) 14:14, 13 September 2012 (UTC)

I am confused - I thought we had just agreed to talk through these pages on you talk page. While I am preparing an answer on your talk page you've written here and on another talk page. I'm assuming you want to stay with the dialogue we have just agreed to on your page, and bear with me and continue this discussion on your talk page? rather than split this over many pages. Please Comment on content, not on the contributor (WP:NPA) - rather than making accusations about editors destroying your work, which could be seen as WP:OWN. Instead of focussing on editors with "profound" differences, you must reach consensus for your edit which goes against consensus on Albatross (disambiguation) which another editor and I agree is a partial match and should not be included. Widefox; talk 14:46, 13 September 2012 (UTC)

To be fair, while I was trying to explain it to you, you WP:CANVASed here [1] to get plant project editors to be on your side at Albatross (disambiguation). This isn't an interaction I wish to continue right now thanks. Widefox; talk 09:57, 14 September 2012 (UTC)

Stop alleging that User:Obsidian Soul was canvassed by me to the discussion of Oak (disambiguation) and Albatross (disambiguation) as you have just done once again with this edit and this edit. It has been fully explained on my talk page and at the ANI that you started that no such canvassing occurred. Sminthopsis84 (talk) 11:55, 14 September 2012 (UTC)

Fully explained? Dennis Brown said your request "It wasn't a neutral request,...". which I asked you to do in keeping with WP:CANVAS. It was closed (correctly) before any input from me...so...I do deserve my viewpoint aired! ...what wasn't discussed was - what has aircraft on Albatross (disambiguation) got to do with Wikiproject Plants? It wasn't mentioned on your talk page, so Obsidian Soul can't have seen it there! That's not only non-neutral, but the wrong forum. Instead of trying to stop me from giving my point of view, can you understand my frustration that you did that while I was trying to understand about the scope of oak from you, and me trying to explain about problems with your DAB edits (we never use piped links - the one Obsidian Soul put back in). Although I overreacted, and I'm sorry, this was out of frustration trying to understand and help. I've said I don't want to interact with you in this way, its not collaborative when multiple Wikiproject Plants editors have arrived. You mention bullying on your page, and reverting your talkpage, neither of which is true, so just stop yourself as you've created a hostile environment for me to talk to you. No thanks. Widefox; talk 13:28, 14 September 2012 (UTC)

Hi. This may just me being paranoid, but is there any reason that almost all the AfD contributions you have made today are to nominations that I have made? Don't take this message as an attack, i'm just curious.--Donkey1989 - talk 12:48, 26 September 2012 (UTC)

Hi Donkey1989, I understand completely. You have 38 edits and have AfD'ed a handful of articles, including the one I just edited Fido.net. This drew my attention. Widefox; talk 07:25, 27 September 2012 (UTC)

Ah, I see. I have been editing as an IP for quite some time, I guess I went over the top because i'd just got these new user priveleges. I'm also a tad OC, as you can probably tell. Sorry about that--Donkey1989 - talk 16:54, 27 September 2012 (UTC)

No problem. Welcome to your new account! Widefox; talk 17:19, 27 September 2012 (UTC)

I have moved DVI to DVI (disambiguation) for you. However, I have not been able to move the other page to DVI, as you didn't specify what page it was, so I will leave you to do that. JamesBWatson (talk) 11:13, 2 October 2012 (UTC)

 Done Widefox; talk 01:17, 8 October 2012 (UTC)

Hello Widefox. Not wanting to split this into three places, I responded to your comment on my talk page. IMHO if there is a known issue or concern we should take the links out, if not IMHO not. Sincerely, 00:45, 8 October 2012 (UTC)

Replied there (User talk:North8000). Widefox; talk 01:17, 8 October 2012 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on To be or not to be (Shakespeare), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Widefox; talk 11:21, 28 October 2012 (UTC)

 Done . (Twinkle bug - informing the deleting editor rather than the creating author) Widefox; talk 11:59, 28 October 2012 (UTC)

Hi. Thanks for notifying me about the changes to Driver. I've decided to take a back seat on that one :-) SamuelTheGhost (talk) 13:29, 29 October 2012 (UTC)

(snip) Pertin1x (talk) 22:48, 25 November 2012 (UTC)

moved article name discussion to Talk:To be, or not to be Widefox; talk 23:15, 25 November 2012 (UTC)

Dear Widefox, I see that you put a COI tag on Dominik tiefenthaler's article, and it has to be cleaned up, obviously. I really would like to keep this article up and not be removed. There is no IMDb ref on there anymore, and all the other information on there is all referenced with what I believe neutral websites with no UGC. The only thing I believe is not referenced (or only on IMDb and his Official Website...) is the section about his biography. Would it help to reference that to his official website www.dominiktiefenthaler.com, or is that not neutral enough? Is there anything else I can do to make this article be accepted, and not being taken down? Thank you!! I really do appreciate all the time and effort you have taken to help me. DmysM (talk) 21:31, 30 November 2012 (UTC)

...discussion copied to Talk:Dominik Tiefenthaler) Widefox; talk 15:32, 2 December 2012 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited CSipSimple, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ICE (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:05, 2 December 2012 (UTC)

 Done Widefox; talk 15:32, 2 December 2012 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Peter Rippon, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page IPM (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:05, 21 December 2012 (UTC)

 Done Widefox; talk 12:10, 21 December 2012 (UTC)

How come my name has been changed to 198.228.201.154. Before it was 173.54.17.249. Why did it change

Help me!!!!!! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.54.17.249 (talk) 01:06, 7 January 2013 (UTC)

Not that I'm debating the Proposed Deletion of No Fix, No Fee, ...

(cut and moved to Talk:No Fix, No Fee.) pls sign your comments btw. Widefox; talk 03:25, 14 January 2013 (UTC)

Sorry, still a bit new to this. Thanks for the reply though. Funny ^Pika 13:42, 14 January 2013 (UTC)

No problem being bold. Widefox; talk 13:51, 14 January 2013 (UTC)

Hello my name is Srikanth aka (Raghusri). Thanks for increasing Column width in Firefox release history article dude. Have a lucky day and happy editing. Raghusri (talk) 12:05, 14 January 2013 (UTC)

Appreciate you dropping by to say thanks. Widefox; talk 13:02, 14 January 2013 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Mary Portas, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bedminster (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:25, 25 January 2013 (UTC)

 Done Widefox; talk 11:44, 25 January 2013 (UTC)

That if you are to persist in violating Wikipedia policies regarding reliable sources, that you at least pretend to engage on the article talk page prior to mindlessly hammering a 'anti-vandalism' tool.

Cheers! 118.92.203.57 (talk) 20:37, 25 January 2013 (UTC)

Can you point out which edit please, and which policy. Widefox; talk 21:12, 25 January 2013 (UTC)

Any intention to engage in article talk pages, before removing properly sourced information? I know you may not see this as you prefer the 'anti-vandalism game' to the 'improving Wikipedia' game, but how about some actual attempts to improve content, eh? 118.92.203.57 (talk) 20:45, 25 January 2013 (UTC)

Can you point out which edit please. Instead of focussing on my reversion of your edits, the burden is on you to justify your edits, and gain consensus for them. That should be done on the article page not here. Widefox; talk 21:12, 25 January 2013 (UTC)

Yes, and Wikipedia policy also states that 'anti-vandalism' tools should not be used to mindlessly remove proper edits. The burden is on you, the person replacing improperly sourced content in a BLP, to justify your misuse of these tools. 118.92.203.57 (talk) 21:29, 25 January 2013 (UTC)

You may be more persuasive if you indicate with edit diffs what you are talking about, else this appears like distraction from your edits to me. I note others are also reverting your edits, you would do best to seek consensus and word things neutrally or you may be banned by others. Widefox; talk 21:48, 25 January 2013 (UTC)

You would do best to follow Wikipedia policy. This is a good start. 118.92.203.57 (talk) 22:37, 25 January 2013 (UTC)

You may have a point, but unless you provide a single edit summary or something specific I can't tell. I asked twice above so I'm not asking again. Widefox; talk 22:57, 25 January 2013 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Garbage in, garbage out, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Last-in, first-out (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:37, 18 February 2013 (UTC)

 Done Widefox; talk 11:43, 18 February 2013 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Charles Ejogo, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page BT (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:38, 25 February 2013 (UTC)

 Done Widefox; talk 15:16, 25 February 2013 (UTC)

Moved to Talk:Transport Layer Security#Firefox_TLS Widefox; talk 19:15, 26 February 2013 (UTC)

Thanks for deleting some basic information about the company i work for. Fantastic — Precedingunsigned comment added by 199.83.200.58 (talk) 15:35, 28 February 2013 (UTC)

erh? Which article is that? Widefox; talk 19:22, 28 February 2013 (UTC)

Replied User talk:199.83.200.58, and see the now blocked account User:Gosfieldnorth. Widefox; talk 19:38, 28 February 2013 (UTC)

Thanks for your revert on the Escape from Furnace page. Although it wasn't a big incident, its nice to know that people are watching out! Although I originally got that series for a brother of mine who is in his late 20's but reads at a high school level, I've read that series myself and loved it! Afterword I decided to do some work on the series' Wikipage. Anyway, thanks for being Johnny on the Spot on that one! AlaskaMike (talk) 23:00, 1 March 2013 (UTC)

{{BLP unsourced|section}} just adds an article tag instead of a section tag, despite the parameter. Please use {{BLP unsourced section}} instead. Thanks for your contributions! -- Patchy1 REF THIS BLP 21:03, 3 March 2013 (UTC)

oh you mean on Róisín Murphy, sure, thanks. Widefox; talk 08:29, 5 March 2013 (UTC)

Since you are a listed member at Wikipedia:WikiProject Badminton I am inviting you to reach a consensus at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Badminton regarding the format of brackets for tournaments, particularly the Super Series competitions.--MorrisIV (talk) 15:44, 5 March 2013 (UTC)

 Done Widefox; talk 15:57, 5 March 2013 (UTC)

Unless I've misread something, we have "his love affair with the Apple Macintosh first began after first seeing an Apple Lisa at Infocom's headquarters in Massachusetts in 1983" in prose and then a direct quote of "I adore my Macintosh [and have] adored it since I first saw one at Infocom's offices in Boston in 1983." - I don't see that the article benefits from saying almost exactly the same thing twice.

Unrelatedly, the "(This must have been an Apple Lisa, since it is stated in the next paragraph that he bought the first Macintosh in Europe in 1984 - the year that they were released.)" comment immediately afterwards appears to be an editor's personal deduction. --McGeddon (talk) 17:23, 11 March 2013 (UTC)

Agree something needed doing...I cut down the change after reviewing...the editorialising after the quote had to go. I would lean towards removing the prose rather than the quote but I'm no quality article editor, so I'll leave those subtleties for others. Widefox; talk 17:40, 11 March 2013 (UTC)

On closer inspection it looks like they're actually quoting the same article, which was reprinted in Salmon of Doubt. I've merged them together and kept the fragment of the quote that seems most quotable. --McGeddon (talk) 17:49, 11 March 2013 (UTC)

Great. That's why editors like me need editors like you! Widefox; talk 17:53, 11 March 2013 (UTC)

Hi, Widefox.

For reasons that I can't explain the title of the book quoted was not showing up on the page. Then I removed the quotes around the title and the title did show up but at this time it was not italicized. Rewrote the quotes and italics reappeared. Since I do not believe in magics, I guess there was some unwanted space between the quotations.

Oraola (talk) 00:18, 12 March 2013 (UTC)

Can't see any space. Both before and after rendered OK in my browser just now. I did have something similar earlier today, so may be a server bug (or possibly client). Widefox; talk 00:46, 12 March 2013 (UTC)

(moved to User talk:98.24.160.44) Widefox; talk 22:00, 14 March 2013 (UTC)

I understand now why that edit was considered vandalism. Please forgive my son he was only trying to help. Thanks again Mr/Mrs. Widfox. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.24.160.44 (talk) 20:29, 15 March 2013 (UTC)

If you carry on like this you will be blocked. I suggest creating an account to edit. Widefox; talk 14:52, 17 March 2013 (UTC)

Hi Widefox. I added a few more information about the galaxy s4 about its made quality and specified operating system and added a source for that information. Every time I add some information to the article, that information is removed from the article and you are saying that I am involved in soapboxing, promotion or advertising, can you please tell me why can't I add a reference to a point that I made into the article? Again in the article of Sony Xperia Z, how the link I inserted is considered as a spam?Mesuperstar (talk) 03:28, 17 March 2013 (UTC)

(moved to bottom of page) On Samsung Galaxy S4, the reference added is not a WP:RS. Other edits on other articles have been removed or modified due to issues such as WP:NOPRICES. By using the same unreliable source website, it appears that you are promoting it, hence the warning. Thanks Widefox; talk 14:52, 17 March 2013 (UTC)

Thanks for being a vandal fighter.--I dream of horses @ 03:31, 25 March 2013 (UTC)

Thanks for the nice message! Well done yourself for your vandal work too! Widefox; talk 11:26, 25 March 2013 (UTC)

Aww. You're welcome. --I dream of horses If you reply here, please leave me a {{Talkback}} message on my talk page. @ 00:37, 26 March 2013 (UTC)

Hello, Widefox. You have new messages at I dream of horses's talk page.
Message added 00:56, 26 March 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Hello, Widefox. You have new messages at I dream of horses's talk page.
Message added 01:18, 26 March 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Liquefaction (disambiguation)

replied there, thanks Widefox; talk 10:52, 29 March 2013 (UTC)

Hello, Widefox. You have new messages at O.Koslowski's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

What page were you planning to move here? ⇌ Jake Wartenberg 16:30, 4 April 2013 (UTC)

 Done. Thanks. Widefox; talk 10:44, 5 April 2013 (UTC)

Hello, Widefox. You have new messages at Borvo's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

At least I didn't revert your warning lol --Borvo (talk) 14:06, 8 April 2013 (UTC)

What I hell's name are doing at my talkpage? 3rr also applies to you --Borvo (talk) 14:14, 8 April 2013 (UTC)

I was restoring so it would be easier for admins to see it, as I've reported your editing. I ask you not to comment here again, thanks. Widefox; talk 14:18, 8 April 2013 (UTC)

Why did you report me? I am new here, just give me some time to learn. --Borvo (talk) 14:21, 8 April 2013 (UTC)

Well, glad the warning has been taken back, I do take your point though. Templating the regulars when I abandoned undoing my own edits seems a little harsh. Widefox; talk 14:46, 8 April 2013 (UTC)

(moved to Osw1) Widefox; talk 14:09, 9 April 2013 (UTC) (all discussion moved to above place) Widefox; talk 14:31, 9 April 2013 (UTC)

I have left a comment for you on my talk page. Osw1 (talk) 16:40, 9 April 2013 (UTC)

I'd just like to thank you for referring to the Chavez death article in discussing the Thatcher one, thereby acknowledging my work there. I won't interfere with the 'growth phase' of the latter. Perhaps I will manage the 'consolidation phase' in a few months. Regards, -- Ohconfucius ^{ping / poke} 10:06, 10 April 2013 (UTC)

You're welcome! A pleasure to see good work being done. Widefox; talk 10:26, 10 April 2013 (UTC)

	The Anti-Vandalism + STiki Barnstar
	Congratulations, Widefox! You're receiving this barnstar because you recently crossed the 1,000 classification threshold using STiki. We thank you both for your contributions to Wikipedia at-large and your use of the tool. We hope you continue your ascent up the leaderboard and stay in touch at the talk page. Thank you and keep up the good work! West.andrew.g (talk) 05:06, 11 April 2013 (UTC)

How is it constructive to call a political ad an attack ad? Or, to use a partisan news article for a reference? The article on Ashley Judd shows bias against conservative politics and ideas. Anyone seeing the YouTube video of the ad can decide for themselves if it is an attack, or an accurate reference to Ashley Judd's ideology. Redo my edits at once! -- User:Brianhd71

reply at User talk:Brianhd71. Message to the next editor what comes here about undos - read the top notice first. Widefox; talk 10:02, 12 April 2013 (UTC)

Hey there, I noticed that you figured out an editor was formerly called 'Bitcasa'. That's so cool, you're like Wiki CSI or something... How did you figure that out?! I want to learn more about the various tools, etc. Thanks :) Synergee (talk) 03:31, 8 April 2013 (UTC)

I put the details at Talk:Bitcasa. Widefox; talk 23:04, 15 April 2013 (UTC)

So, labeling a political ad is my personal opinion? It is now a fact that American Crossroads launched an attack ad? You are so far left, you can't see straight. Go ahead and block me. I'll remember that come December when you are looking for donations. You, Widefox are the reason scholars can't trust Wikipedia as being credible.Brianhd71 (talk) 17:54, 16 April 2013 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Brianhd71 (talk • contribs)

replied talk Widefox; talk 18:23, 16 April 2013 (UTC)

Thanks for all your help at Bitcasa and for everything you do to make WP better! — Keithbob • Talk • 23:25, 16 April 2013 (UTC)

I have removed the PROD on this article as you did not provide a rationale; please take to WP:AFD. GiantSnowman 11:18, 18 April 2013 (UTC)

 Done Widefox; talk 12:28, 18 April 2013 (UTC)

Go fuck yourself WIDEFUX You aren't an editor. Your just some cheap Wiki hack. Brianhd71 (talk) 16:51, 18 April 2013 (UTC)

Hi Widefox, I just wanted to let you know that I have added the autopatrolled right to your account, as you have created numerous, valid articles. This feature will have no effect on your editing, and is simply intended to reduce the workload on new page patrollers. For more information on the patroller right, see Wikipedia:Autopatrolled. Feel free to leave me a message if you have any questions. Happy editing! INeverCry 17:10, 23 April 2013 (UTC)

Well thanks very much! Widefox; talk 17:12, 23 April 2013 (UTC)

Hi Widefox,

I don't understand why you erase the thing I wrote about Alexandre Desapties and McDonald's. (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/McDonald%27s_advertising#Current_campaign) There's my source: http://www.mcdonalds.ca/ca/en/communities/sports_sponsorships/alexandre_despatie.html

Thank You Have a good day

Feel free to add back in, but this time include that source, and the same (list) formatting, and provide an edit summary. The combination of missing those things means it was indistinguishable from a test edit or vandalism. Now you have an account it's easier too. oh, btw it's customary to sign talk pages and again provide an edit summary. Hope that helps, and there's more help I posted on your talk page. Widefox; talk 00:42, 29 April 2013 (UTC)

Hello, Widefox. You have new messages at Talk:The New Art Gallery Walsall.
Message added 13:06, 1 May 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 13:06, 1 May 2013 (UTC)

Hello

I keep trying to correct a statement on this page which says "the trans isomer is more active than the racemate".

This statment should be deleted as it makes no sense at all (I KNOW WHAT I`AM TALKING ABOUT)!!. REPEAT IT MAKES NO SENSE AT ALL

But it keeps getting changed back, WHY???

This is not vandalism!

I do not know what bio-physicists study but this is basic first year chem stuff.

I am not a registered user and do not know the ins and outs of Wikipedia etiquette.

I am just trying to be helpful here!!

If this statement is actually in the literature reference I would be very surprised and it would still not make it correct.

I have thus started a new talk section about it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.109.127.168 (talk) 04:46, 5 May 2013 (UTC)

I did explain over and over (its so simple and explained in the sterochemistry section directly below which I explained over and over its like 2+2=4 ). 

You should not mess with subjects you do not understand.--122.109.127.168 (talk) 10:42, 5 May 2013 (UTC) How was my comments to you disruptive (I thought they were informative and polite!!)--122.109.127.168 (talk) 10:57, 5 May 2013 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited ZRTP, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page SATCOM (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 00:40, 20 May 2013 (UTC)

Hi Widefox, I'd like to improve the quality of a page that you flagged as being in need of footnotes/inline citations. I've made some suggestions on its talk page. Do my suggestions address the issue you flagged? I hope I'm taking the right approach contacting you - I work for Siemens so I'd rather not just wade in and make changes! Please leave a message on my talk page if you'd like to discuss further. Thanks! Jon Rimmer (talk) 09:53, 28 May 2013 (UTC)

I commented on the talk page after reviewing the article and edits. Widefox; talk 12:07, 28 May 2013 (UTC)

(indent) Thanks for the quick feedback and advice. I'll take a close look and respond asap Jon Rimmer (talk) 17:18, 28 May 2013 (UTC)

You're welcome, I notice that related article(s) are notable but lack the secondaries, so feel free to add them too. Widefox; talk 17:30, 28 May 2013 (UTC)

Hello Widefox. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Sapphire Software, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: A7 does not apply to software. Thank you. Salvio ^{Let's talk about it!} 16:44, 29 May 2013 (UTC)

OK, I prodded it, all the other articles created by that user has been CSDed, so let's hope WP:SNOW prevails. Widefox; talk 00:03, 30 May 2013 (UTC)

(moved to Talk:Robert Stuart Nathan) Discussion of articles best on their own talk page. Widefox; talk 11:43, 29 May 2013 (UTC) (restored deleted section heading/reply by User:RSN813)

Dear Widefox, I tried to send you a lengthy reply to you incorrect assumptions and multiple misstatements of fact. When I posted it, it vanished. Just disappeared in an instant. Perhaps that instant erasure says it all -- all one has to know about how Wikipedia is edited. This might explain a great many mysterious things -- for example, how airbrushed biographical sketches of some of the most heinous people in society remain in Wikipedia untouched. Your questions and statements about my biographical sketch were all wrong or implicitly dishonest; in particular, if you are going to make accusations of "self-published" sources, perhaps you should explain what you mean. That is simply a flat-out lie. This entire experience is another discouraging example how Wikipedia is run. If you insist on demeaning the accuracy of my biographical sketch, with apparently no knowledge of American publishing, the entertainment industry, or reliable sources, perhaps I should reconsider this entire enterprise. I assume you do know that in the end your behavior is not merely shameful, it is, under American law, nearly libelous. Robert Nathan (unsigned by User:RSN813)

(talk page stalker) I have replied to this comment at User talk:RSN813. --Drm310 (talk) 22:49, 29 May 2013 (UTC)

Editor Drm310 correctly pointed out here that they added the "self-published" sources tag with this edit. It was not me. Was the comment intended for that editor? I'm sorry you are frustrated with your Wikipedia experience, and there is a known path this is going down of a person not familiar with the intricacies of Wikipedia trying to (arguably justifiably) report (or fix) something with their own WP:BLP. It is better to have an insight into that path, so I will look for an example. Widefox; talk 15:22, 30 May 2013 (UTC)

Given the latest [2], do you think it's now something for WP:DRN? (unsigned by User:Drm310)

Both of you, if you leave a message here, please sign it. Drm310 WP:ANI is the right place, I will post. Widefox; talk 01:53, 31 May 2013 (UTC)

(moved to Talk:China Marine Surveillance) Dear Widefox, I appreciate your help on improving CMS articles I created. But CMS is a civil administration agency instead of an armed forces branch. The name should be East China Sea Fleet to distinguish itself from East Sea Fleet of PLA Navy. SummerRat (talk) 16:16, 3 June 2013 (UTC)

(reply on article content on its own talk page). Widefox; talk 18:29, 3 June 2013 (UTC)

(another article content discussion moved to the article talk page) Widefox; talk 21:56, 3 June 2013 (UTC)

Hi Widefox, Is it possible to get the content of the OVPsim page that was deleted into my userspace so that I can work on it? thanks Duncgrah (talk) 10:08, 30 May 2013 (UTC)

Yes we've been waiting for you, so now you've asked at User_talk:Kww#Your AfD closure - OVPsim, the closing admin said they'd consider it. I'm not an admin so can't myself (and would still be the closing admin's role even if I was). Widefox; talk 11:05, 30 May 2013 (UTC)

I have been away from Wiki for a bit (obviously) so missed your WP:TBACK - I tend to dip in and out as time an priorities allows. I'm glad this one has got sorted, I don't like to see people loose their work. As regards to WP:SPA maybe I did misinturpret your comments, however it seems to me that too often round here SPA = bad (WP:COI, WP:PROMO, WP:SOAP etc) before any real assessment of the users contributions has been made. Anyway I hope that User:Duncgrah will wish to contribute in other areas as well some day and no longer be a SPA. --wintonian ^talk 00:48, 8 June 2013 (UTC)

No prob, I see transparency with SPA / COI editors as beneficial for all parties, and the earlier the better. The issue of biting newcomers, or perceived negative labels is tricky to solve, but that should be taken up with the guideline/templates rather than with editors that use them (I believe) correctly. Widefox; talk 19:03, 8 June 2013 (UTC)

At Aaron Swartz, with regard to (References: ref cols) edit of 11:41, 31 May 2013, I am not understanding the reason for the edit. --Dervorguilla (talk) 06:57, 9 June 2013 (UTC)

For info on columns see Template:Reflist#Columns, a fixed no (2 in this case) of columns isn't scalable with browser window widths. Widefox; talk 13:51, 9 June 2013 (UTC)

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect PRiSM. Since you had some involvement with the PRiSM redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). Widefox; talk 18:43, 14 June 2013 (UTC)

Hmmm, an automated message from myself to myself! Widefox; talk 11:04, 17 June 2013 (UTC)

You don't need to drop a note on SummerRat's page every time he socks. He's already aware of the fact that it's against the rules, and putting the notice there kind of highlights him (in his mind) "getting away with" editing, at least temporarily. Qwyrxian (talk) 10:56, 17 June 2013 (UTC)

Agreed. My reasoning was of transparency rather than for him. Widefox; talk 11:03, 17 June 2013 (UTC)

Hello Widefox,

Please accept my apologies for the incivility shown by previous members of OWASP the vast majority are good people. I think that once a community gets past a certain size however, you do get a few people on the fringes as it were. I would really like to ensure that OWASP has a page in good standing that is of use to readers of Wikipedia. Incidentally, we have six strong UK chapters. Please reach out so we can discuss how to get things into better shape. DennisGroves (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 16:38, 18 June 2013 (UTC)

(title my own "OWASP - COI, advert -> vandalism" comment moved from unsigned comment at top of this page)
Hi Widefox, you should first learn about security then start to make changes in Wikipedia, by looking at your tweets it's clear that you are using your this Wikipedia account for your own promotional purposes and making changes what according to you seem to believe.(review your changes to all security products against COI). (unsigned by User:117.198.19.68/User talk:117.198.19.68)

Maybe you should try teaching me security, and I'll try teaching you English ;) Seriously, you need a WP:CLUE to edit here, I undid your edits for the bad English and incorrect removal of maintenance templates. Next time you feel like scribbling on my page with bizarre WP:OUTING violating creepy comments, please do so at the bottom, and sign it. Thanks Widefox; talk 12:33, 18 June 2013 (UTC)

Qwyrxian I presume you're watching my page, that amused me slightly that I got an edit conflict with you on OWASP as we fixed the EXT at the same time! Do you know why the url (on the talkpage, and EXT) was blacklisted? Widefox; talk 13:20, 18 June 2013 (UTC)

Yeah, I am watching your talk page, from when I left the message wrt SummerRat. When I see random IPs flinging around insults, I take a look, when I have time. Finding an article badly in need of pruning, I figured I'd do some initial cutting. As for the blacklisting, you'd have to check the talk page archives at WP:BLACKLIST. Qwyrxian (talk) 13:30, 18 June 2013 (UTC)

== I don't know if this is the appropriate place to discuss this == Widefox, you just posted a puzzling message on my page(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Viybel). I asked a question in http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:OWASP (read it here: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk%3AOWASP&diff=523681550&oldid=515811278) about why a website is blacklisted and you're accusing me of spamming Wikipedia??? From what I remember (it was 8 months ago), I found a page on a website useful and I was just curious to know what rules were involved in blacklisting it. I could not care less wether or not this link is on Wikipedia, I don't know anything about the site and I'm just vaguely interested in the subject. But I found your message on my page particularly aggressive. I suppose it is a template message for spammers. You should either rephrase it so that non-spammers don't find it insulting, or use another message for cases where the user deserves the benefit of the doubt. I hope this behavior does not reflect the whole Wikipedia community's tone. Vianney

Thanks for your apology. You can delete this previous message Viybel (talk) 16:36, 19 June 2013 (UTC)

At your suggestion I have posted Land Reform Ordinance at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2013 June 20. Incidentally, I did not find any original research in the Kerala Education Bill, 1957 article, but there were a large number of books and articles where it was discussed. I tried to be selective in documenting the article. I tagged the one sentence that seems to be opinion as needing citation. --Bejnar (talk) 04:59, 20 June 2013 (UTC)

I've got a message on my page. Who's the one in "war" with my edits? Should i remove the "Undid" string in the "Edit Summary" to solve the problem? If it was a genuine message (and so you're not a bot) this mean that it's supposed to be YOU the one i'm "in war" with. Please note that i modified all my edits (LESS chars/lines AND the text is LOWER in the section, now) according to what were your arguments. I cant see the same action by you. You're only UNDOing my edits, without posting useful advice/critics. 87.2.112.110 (talk) 17:22, 21 June 2013 (UTC)

(I'll reply on your page..) Widefox; talk 17:25, 21 June 2013 (UTC)

why? isnt it better if you write here?87.2.112.110 (talk) 17:27, 21 June 2013 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Heligan estate, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ancestral home (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:19, 24 June 2013 (UTC)

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Coeliac disease. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 12:15, 30 June 2013 (UTC)

Hi, There is a discussion about Reliable Sources on the article Wayne Madsen [[3]]. If you'd like to participate. Capitalismojo (talk) 03:49, 2 July 2013 (UTC)

Would appreciate your comments here after your recent participation in this discussion. --Rob Sinden (talk) 10:33, 3 July 2013 (UTC)

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Acupuncture. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 12:15, 3 July 2013 (UTC)

Hello Widefox -- thanks for cleaning up the Oxford sex gang article. I'm still learning Wiki-code and left the article in a bit of a mess. CurrentUK (talk) 09:18, 4 July 2013 (UTC)

I would normally say "my pleasure" but I think I'll stick with "you're welcome". Widefox; talk 09:24, 4 July 2013 (UTC)

No ref yet. I am just testing preview and noticed that it eventually turned on. It is ON by default without any conditions. IE11 is only for W8.1, so there it is not applicable for W7 or W8. Only W8.1 (unsigned comment by User:Chaliy 08:02, 6 July 2013)

(Moved to article talk page Talk:Transport Layer Security) please sign your talk page comments, thanks Widefox; talk 12:32, 6 July 2013 (UTC)

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Creation Museum. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 12:15, 6 July 2013 (UTC)

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:List of F5 and EF5 tornadoes. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 13:15, 9 July 2013 (UTC)

I know it's a while ago, but per this edit, please see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/南山 (2nd nomination). --Rob Sinden (talk) 08:33, 11 July 2013 (UTC)

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Smallpox. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 13:15, 12 July 2013 (UTC)

Why don't you join WikiProject Microsoft?

It seems that you have been editing Microsoft related articles, so why don't you consider joining WikiProject Microsoft, not to be confused with WikiProject Microsoft Windows. WikiProject Microsoft is a group of editors who are willing to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Microsoft, its technologies, web properties & its people. This WikiProject is brand new and is welcoming editors to help out. Add your name to the list at Wikipedia:WikiProject Microsoft/Participants and/or add the userbox {{Template:User WikiProject Microsoft}}. Thanks! jcc (tea and biscuits) 10:26, 13 July 2013 (UTC)

Hello Widefox. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of DNS (disambiguation), a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Deletion of this page may be controversial or is under discussion. Thank you. — Malik Shabazz ^Talk/_Stalk 00:36, 14 July 2013 (UTC)

Taken to RM Widefox; talk 11:14, 15 July 2013 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Coventry Cross, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Henry VII (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:54, 14 July 2013 (UTC)

 Done Widefox; talk 11:14, 15 July 2013 (UTC)

Dear Widefox: I have been editing the Banjo Newsletter article, and I believe that I have dealt with the issued for which you tagged it last year. I am not connected with the proprietors, and I have managed to find independent confirmation of everything except the name of the software used to play music on the web site, and I don't think that this is very controversial. I even rewrote some sentences which had been copied from a published article about the newsletter. Would you agree to having the tags removed? —Anne Delong (talk) 05:17, 15 July 2013 (UTC)

 Done. Thanks for the nice message, and well done Anne Delong! Widefox; talk 11:14, 15 July 2013 (UTC)

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Ireland. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 13:15, 15 July 2013 (UTC)

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Featured article candidates. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 13:16, 18 July 2013 (UTC)

comment by Yellow Lilt (talk • contribs) 01:23, 18 July 2013 (UTC) moved to Talk:Transport Layer Security Widefox; talk 11:19, 18 July 2013 (UTC)

there's no need to post here too, moved Talk:Transport Layer Security Widefox; talk 05:57, 19 July 2013 (UTC)

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Mars sample return mission. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 14:15, 21 July 2013 (UTC)

I came across your comments from September 2012 at Talk:Grey oak, and made some of my own comments there, then came across the broader context you saw at the time at Talk:Oak (disambiguation). Ugh. Looks like you were butting heads with WikiProject Plants people (which I'd describe myself as). And I've butted heads with WikiProject DAB people (which I'm thinking I could fairly describe you as). Dealing with ambiguous common names for plants is messy. My sense is that SIAs are usuallt more appropriate than DABs for plant common names cases (but sometimes DABs are unavoidable). A recent request at Template_talk:Disambiguation#Edit_request_-_use_disambiguation-specific_category_names suggests a change that could more clearly distinguish DABs and SIAs about plant common names. Plantdrew (talk) 04:54, 23 July 2013 (UTC)

Erm yes. As my participation got off on the wrong foot due to my attempt to have a one on one (if I remember correctly), this is best discussed at Talk:Oak (disambiguation). Certainly before commenting again, I'd have to review the whole thing as if I remember correctly other editors had proposals to fix the logjam. The goal of keeping DAB pages small, consistent, with reasonable entries (rather than authoritative ones) and focussed on navigation, necessitates pressure on all the different projects/editors (including some of my favourites personally and professionally like biology). Widefox; talk 10:43, 23 July 2013 (UTC)

Hello Widefox

Sorry, I've been away from Wikipedia for a while. Thanks again for your feedback on the D-Cubed page. As I understand it, to establish notability, we should keep all the external links to academic papers as you suggest, but add (subscription required) where appropriate (plus I have a fix for 1 broken external link). Then the inline citations I proposed on the talk page could be added (only one of these is secondary - I hope this is sufficient). I would like to double-check with you whether this is something I can do myself though. I haven't made any direct edits because as you've observed, I'm employed by Siemens who develops the D-Cubed software. I disclose this and refrain from making direct edits to try and ensure I don't violate WP policies. Regarding the conflict of interest and related policies that you referenced, I fully recognise the concerns and would like to clarify my intentions - although my purpose for engaging in Wikipedia is (currently) limited, I am genuinely trying to improve quality and help verify notability for this page by supplying citations/external links that were requested by the Wikipedia community. I do not plan to revise content. Please let me know if I can provide more information. Thanks. Jon Rimmer (talk) 17:07, 23 July 2013 (UTC)

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:SkyDrive. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 14:15, 24 July 2013 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article VisualEditor is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/VisualEditor until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. John Vandenberg ^(chat) 02:33, 26 July 2013 (UTC)

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:University of Dar es Salaam. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 14:16, 27 July 2013 (UTC)

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to VisualEditor may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• sites originally conceived as being rolled out first.<ref name="theverge-previews">{{cite web|work=[[The Verge]|url=http://www.theverge.com/2011/12/15/2637734/wikimedia-previews-simplified-editor |

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 00:18, 29 July 2013 (UTC)

 Done Widefox; talk 00:24, 29 July 2013 (UTC)

Hello, Widefox. You have new messages at Talk:MediaWiki.
Message added 06:18, 30 July 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Northamerica1000^(talk) 06:18, 30 July 2013 (UTC)

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Genetically modified food controversies. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 15:15, 30 July 2013 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Transport Layer Security, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page DES (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 16:21, 1 August 2013 (UTC)

 Done Widefox; talk 16:52, 1 August 2013 (UTC)

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Mazda B-Series. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 15:15, 2 August 2013 (UTC)

This is in response to the recent comments made on the John Babcock (musician) article. I'd like to clear up a few things, the first being the "close connection" issue. Regardless if I am related to the person in question, I am the one who maintains and keeps his article current. I feel this is a needless concern and should be dismissed. The information in this article is without bias, or COI in this case, as all the information in the article is comprised of information previously provided from various sources, largely off the internet. Having that been said, it's highly unlikely that any secondary sources will attempt to further edit or update the information on Wikipedia. I do understand the need for varying sources, though my hands are pretty much tied (at least for now).

I'd like to ask the probability of the article getting removed any time soon so I may document the information therein. Furthermore, I'd appreciate the "close connection" portion of the maintenance template to be removed as I've explained all the information is not personal views or bias, but information received from multiple third parties which assisted in the completion of this article.

In addition to that, I don't understand how the article features "intricate detail". The amount of information isn't even a lot compared to many other articles. The information also helps in the notability department of which you're concerned, so any elaboration on what's excessive would be helpful. (-unsigned by User:MegaMacX/User talk:MegaMacX )

replied User talk:MegaMacX Widefox; talk 13:02, 30 July 2013 (UTC)

Hello, Widefox. I've done what you've suggested and re-posted my reply in the other pages. However, you've yet to answer my question about the intricate detail issue. Also, may I ask what happens if no other users decide to converse about it on the deletion discussion page any time soon? — Preceding unsigned comment added by MegaMacX (talk • contribs) 00:32, 3 August 2013 (UTC)

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:North American Water and Power Alliance. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 16:15, 5 August 2013 (UTC)

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Conceptualization (information science). Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 17:15, 8 August 2013 (UTC)

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia:Did you know/Good Article RfC. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 17:16, 11 August 2013 (UTC)

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Race and intelligence. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 18:15, 14 August 2013 (UTC)

Hi, would you please be able to point me to the part of MOSDAB that requires you to do this http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=ROO&curid=38069391&action=history ? Thanks! Azylber (talk) 21:13, 15 August 2013 (UTC)

See WP:DPAGE Widefox; talk 21:26, 15 August 2013 (UTC)

cool, thanks Azylber (talk) 11:05, 16 August 2013 (UTC)

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Ashkenazi Jews. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 18:15, 17 August 2013 (UTC)

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Anime and manga. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 18:15, 20 August 2013 (UTC)

Hello! Due to a security update to the wiki software, older versions of STiki are no longer functional. You've been identified as a user of STiki, and are kindly asked to upgrade to the current version at Wikipedia:STiki#Download before continuing with use of the tool. Continuing to use older versions will be detrimental to the STiki project. Please see Wikipedia talk:STiki#Errors for a discussion of this issue or to respond to this message. Thank you! 04:59, 21 August 2013 (UTC)

Hi Widefox. I added the inline citations and updated the reference section on the D-Cubed page. I left the issues in the header panel alone, but if you're satisfied that we could remove any of these, please let me know. Thanks, Jon Rimmer (talk) 14:53, 11 August 2013 (UTC)

Hi, I saw your note about adding independent sources to the Article for Deletion discussion and I've started looking into this. Some sources may be offline and may take a couple of days to track down, but I will respond before the end of the week. Thanks. Jon Rimmer (talk) 16:11, 13 August 2013 (UTC)

Hi Widefox, I've added some additional secondaries to the D-Cubed AfD page and obtained some citation counts for the academic references. Due to current concerns about SPA/COI, I haven't made any direct changes to the D-Cubed page yet. Please let me know if I ought to anything else at this stage. Thanks.Jon Rimmer (talk) 15:38, 15 August 2013 (UTC)

Hi Widefox. Deletion of the D-Cubed components article is still under discussion and I wondered whether you would like to comment on whether the references I posted are sufficient or not. I since found some additional references about their use in academic projects which I think shows how widely they're known/used, but they're often only brief mentions and I don't want to clutter the discussion with lots of short references - I'm happy to post these on my talk page if you think it's worthwile. Since the technology is specialised and integrated into bigger systems, it isn't often covered in a lot of depth by commentators, even though it's more notable in its field. Speaking of which, if the article won't stand, I was thinking about developing a new stub for the field of research/technology itself (geometric constraint solving). This has plenty more references as a field of research in its own right. Thanks.Jon Rimmer (talk) 15:57, 22 August 2013 (UTC)

Hi Widefox - thanks for your feedback on the above and the useful suggestions. Jon Rimmer (talk) 16:13, 23 August 2013 (UTC)

Hello, Widefox. You have new messages at Insulam Simia's talk page.
Message added 09:05, 30 August 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Thanks, Insulam Simia (talk · contribs) 09:05, 30 August 2013 (UTC)

Ping. Thanks, Insulam Simia (talk · contribs) 15:23, 30 August 2013 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of defragmentation software, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page SGI (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:01, 30 August 2013 (UTC)

 Done Widefox; talk 18:47, 30 August 2013 (UTC)

If the merger you proposed at hendl goes through, the target for the merge will be the actual article at roasting, not the redirect at roast. So just to let you know, I've moved both your merger template and your talk page rationale to the correct place. Bearcat (talk) 17:35, 31 August 2013 (UTC)

Thanks that fixes what happens when you try to be clever to show the validity of the merge with a redirect, resulting in obfuscating the merge target. Widefox; talk 17:49, 31 August 2013 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited OpenCandy, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page KMPlayer (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:32, 6 September 2013 (UTC)

 Done Widefox; talk 11:36, 6 September 2013 (UTC)

(unsigned by User:Thompor)

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Old may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• *[[Lloyd J. Old]] (1933–2011) ), cancer researcher

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 15:57, 19 September 2013 (UTC)

What's up Widefox? Due to the Nairobi thing the name of the White Widow has been speculated but not conclusively proved as being involved. As an assist to people trying to look who the person is and what has been known and proved about her up to the time, a link has been put in to refer directly to Samantha Lewthwaite where the opening line itself reads lso known as Sherafiyah Lewthwaite or the White Widow, is the widow. Not many people would be immediately aware of Samantha/Sherafiyah's name but would want to see what is up with White Widow.Foofbun (talk) 22:40, 26 September 2013 (UTC)

Hi Foofbun, I replied on your page. Widefox; talk 08:40, 27 September 2013 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited OpenStack, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bare metal (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:17, 1 October 2013 (UTC)

DAB moved -  Done Widefox; talk 12:28, 1 October 2013 (UTC)

I eliminated the copyvio text in Cairo Festival City and added some references. I think the article is okay now, so I removed the speedy. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 11:26, 8 October 2013 (UTC)

Yeah, good job - it's looking better now. I msgd you on the talk there. Widefox; talk 12:08, 8 October 2013 (UTC)

Hi, I've put my thoughts down re possible future of Sky Blues at Talk:Sky Blues.--A bit iffy (talk) 20:11, 9 October 2013 (UTC)

Thanks, I'll reply there. Widefox; talk 21:57, 9 October 2013 (UTC)

Hi Widefox - I've added (probably too long) a comment at Talk:Buckethead (disambiguation). Apologies if it sounds grumpy - it wasn't intended to be (you just caught me when I was tired). Grutness...wha? 14:17, 9 October 2013 (UTC)

I replied there. Personally I think this place is very complicated to edit nowadays as it's matured, so much so that it takes specialists to get anything done, and almost everything runs risk of falling foul of some guideline. Widefox; talk 21:56, 9 October 2013 (UTC)

Looks like everything's pretty much sorted out - thanks for the clarifications. Grutness...wha? 23:34, 10 October 2013 (UTC)

Thanks for being patient, and successfully adding sources, regards Widefox; talk 20:26, 12 October 2013 (UTC)

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you 213.37.84.214 (talk) 22:27, 10 October 2013 (UTC)

...a discussion that you would be wise to drop out of. Continually calling for a block again and again is the surest way to get the overall report ignored with no action being taken. Also note: if you personally are using wordpress other similar links, stop and remove them ASAP or else you have nothing to be complaining about :-) ES&L 10:59, 12 October 2013 (UTC)

Be quiet about blocking - yes, point taken. My involvement in the article is simple - I haven't added any EXT or refs to the article. Period. ([4] says my first edit was 2013-09-21 this uncontroversial quick formatting fix. Only after being strangely reverted did I notice and remove the multiple EXT to the same (commercial product) site per WP:ELNO 4. and WP:ELPOINTS 4 . IP editor is referring to my talk page comment [5] where I'm trying to evaluate importance of why ERPXE has been added previously...where I say "EXT don't need sources either -see WP:EXT". My first talk page edit being the one before that [6] where I fillout the wikiproject. I neither know nor care about any of these projects, apart from PXE and iPXE which my only connection with is that I use them both daily, and would be considered an expert - which I've not felt the need to say until now :) Widefox; talk 22:33, 12 October 2013 (UTC)

The real question for WP/this article is how seemingly tolerant of this one commercial promo EXT it has been since February when despite the good work of User:COIBot/LinkReports/vercot.com, Billinghurst and Matthiaspaul have removed these links and in October they were still here. Widefox; talk 23:07, 12 October 2013 (UTC)

<harassment deleted>

User:213.37.84.214 do not post to my page again. If you ignore that request I will report you for WP:HARASS. If you use words like defamation anywhere or any legal term again I will report you per WP:LAWSUIT. If that is not clear please ask any admin for an opinion. Goodbye. Widefox; talk 14:29, 17 October 2013 (UTC)

I seen your reports at AIAV, however you could use WP:SPI to report those vandals you know?! ///EuroCarGT 01:29, 25 October 2013 (UTC)

Sure can, AIV quicker for me - SPI more effort with evidence. Not obvious which is the bigger problem so went with initial problem. Widefox; talk 01:41, 25 October 2013 (UTC)

Thanks for your message on my talkpage. Please see the talkpage for the Editing article. Regards, Desertroad (talk) 12:11, 28 October 2013 (UTC)

Regarding the revert under ie: I linked Iniezione Elettronica to Electronic injection in the same manner that ionization energy links to Ionization potential. What's the difference?

--Sstrader (talk) 18:54, 20 November 2013 (UTC)

These dab pages are not like normal articles, the style and what's allowed to link is different - it's explained here WP:MOSDAB. Regards Widefox; talk 09:44, 21 November 2013 (UTC)

User:Sstrader I gave specific reasoning when I first removed it "no mention in article per WP:DABMENTION , .. (style: only 1 link per entry)". You need to check WP:BRD for how when Boldly adding something, then being Reverted the next step is Discuss (not BRRRRD which some may see as edit warring). Widefox; talk 21:03, 21 November 2013 (UTC)

You did give specific information, and I appreciate that, but your reasoning conflicted directly with another entry (ionization energy) that you did not remove and that is still there. My addition appears to match the style of that other entry. Am I missing some difference in the two? I hesitate to remove the ionization line because you had left it, and it may represent an aspect of dab pages that I do not understand. Thank you again for your help (and, apologies if these questions are considered an edit war). --Sstrader (talk) 12:54, 26 November 2013 (UTC)

Sstrader Yes you're right, I must have missed that one before...here's how to do it...Ionization energy didn't mention "IE" per WP:DABMENTION so it shouldn't have been listed until it is in the article first. To fix that we either remove from the dab (like with Iniezione Elettronica) or add the initialism in the article if it is used in WP:RS. The latter is true so I've added it to the article Ionization energy and the entry in the dab needed fixing too.  Done Thanks. The same applies to Iniezione Elettronica. This is covered in WP:DABMENTION / WP:MOSDAB. Widefox; talk 13:34, 26 November 2013 (UTC)

Ah, now I see. Thanks for the walk-through on that! I'll look closer at the dab rules to get those straight in my head. --Sstrader (talk) 04:59, 27 November 2013 (UTC)

Regarding your edit to PDF (disambiguation) in September, THANK YOU!! Pdfpdf (talk) 11:12, 2 December 2013 (UTC)
(I had come to the conclusion that I was the ONLY person on the planet who had read WP:MOSDAB.)

You're welcome. I undid your removal of postdoc fellow per WP:DABABBREV. Widefox; talk 13:13, 2 December 2013 (UTC)

added to article per WP:DABABBREV - please be careful not to remove valid abbrevs just because not in the article yet

What absolute nonsense! Go read WP:MOSDAB.
By definition, if it's not in the article, it's not valid. I don't have a crystal ball that might predict what you might do at some indeterminate time in the future. The onus is on YOU "to be careful" and add it to the article BEFORE adding it to the dab.
And while you are reading WP:MOSDAB, please read WP:CIVIL, WP:AGF and Emily Post. Pdfpdf (talk) 12:25, 3 December 2013 (UTC)

Pdfpdf you've only just praised me for knowing MOSDAB! Did you read WP:DABABBREV ? "If an abbreviation is verifiable, but not mentioned on the target article, consider adding it to the target article and then adding the entry to the disambiguation page. " . As I didn't add it to the dab page, I have no burden, but I did however follow WP:DABABBREV and fix someone else's MOSDAB error. You're right this isn't in MOSDAB, but it is a guideline experienced editors should know about and certainly not get pointy about when informed of it. Accusing someone of a bunch of things when you have no evidence is, however, quite aggressive. Widefox; talk 02:32, 4 December 2013 (UTC)

Dear Pot, I hope you have a Merry Christmas, and a Happy New Year. I intend to enjoy my break, and I hope you enjoy the period too. Best wishes, Kettle. Pdfpdf (talk) 03:22, 4 December 2013 (UTC)

Pdfpdf This sounded so definitive "rmv per WP:MOSDAB - ZERO evidence that Postdoctoral fellow is referred to by any-one, any-where, as PDF" but it's not right is it? If you consider us similar, sorry I'm at a loss to know why, could you point out the mistake I've made so I may improve? cheers Widefox; talk 09:11, 4 December 2013 (UTC)

Certainly. However, if you don't mind, not now - I'm on a break, and also (as it happens, I'm rather busy).

If you do mind, and it can't wait, say so - and, when I get a chance, I will reply more quickly. Cheers, Pdfpdf (talk) 13:10, 4 December 2013 (UTC)

No problem, regards Widefox; talk 17:44, 4 December 2013 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited HTree, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hash (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:24, 1 January 2014 (UTC)

Hallo, I came across Céline (1992 film) while stub-sorting, found a fairly confusing set of name and dab pages, didn't realise that Celine (disambiguation) existed (you hadn't left a hatnote!), did some work, undid some of it after I found the dab page, and have now left one combined dab page for Celine/Céline, and the two separate name pages with a merge proposal. I doubt that we need two separate name pages, but I'm sure that we don't need two separate dab pages for the non-name items. I'm not 100% sure where the pseudonymous surname belongs, but I hope you find the current situation an improvement. You'd done a good job on creating the dab page, but unfortunately just didn't then make it accessible from Celine (unless I missed something). PamD 17:57, 5 January 2014 (UTC)

thanks, yes looks like I missed the hatnote. I commented on the merge - my thought as well. Merging both dabs and SIAs seems better. Widefox; talk 18:59, 5 January 2014 (UTC)

Hello, Widefox. You have new messages at Chemi42's talk page.
Message added 18:23, 21 January 2014 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Cyphoidbomb (talk) 18:23, 21 January 2014 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Stephen Gough, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Perth Prison (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:09, 14 February 2014 (UTC)

Hello Widefox, i see you reverted my edit. The page on Sharia really needs to be changed. Because it is untrue and promotes Islamaphobia. It seems to be written by somebody that has a bias towards Islam and purposefully misconstrues facts.

For example the opening statement of, "The origin of sharia is the Koran". This is false and misleading and the source it uses does not actually put forth this idea. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Draicoon (talk • contribs) 11:57, 20 February 2014 (UTC)

Reply is on your page. Widefox; talk 13:48, 20 February 2014 (UTC)

Hello there! I'm wondering why did you perform this revert on the Linux kernel article? Sorry, but that makes little sense... Please advise. — Dsimic (talk | contribs) 22:26, 2 March 2014 (UTC)

(as per your talk page - best to let others do what they're doing). Widefox; talk 18:54, 9 March 2014 (UTC)

Once again, sorry for the confusion. — Dsimic (talk | contribs) 01:22, 10 March 2014 (UTC)

Good watch on the article Iran Air Flight 655.

Revision on page done after proper research on the issue, for your references, please check:

(copyright violation links removed)

Nice Job though! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Swamyss95 (talk • contribs) 23:50, 15 March 2014 (UTC)

Do not post links to potentially copyright violations on wikipedia. I replied on your talk page. Widefox; talk 02:26, 16 March 2014 (UTC)

Hi Widefox, in this edit[7] you turned a dab page into a SIA. I beleive that as an SIA if an editor refers to Capital FM in an article they won't get a warning notification (like they would if it was a dab page). Can you explain your reasoning for changing it from a dab to a SIA? DexDor (talk) 22:17, 17 March 2014 (UTC)

Yes. It may be made an SIA or a dab as it is of one type. This was a while ago, and at that time the MOSDAB wording implied dabs of only one type must be made an SIA. We changed the wording after I questioned the validity of it. I believe the wording is now more clear that an SIA may be used or a dab.

If converted back to a dab, the redlinks entries will have to be removed (if not mentioned anywhere). I'd have thought it's more useful as a dab than an SIA as it's unlikely to have any value as a set (no supporting text) and non-notable entries can be removed. I will fix. Maybe you'd like to take the SIA linking issue up with the dab project? Widefox; talk 23:38, 17 March 2014 (UTC)

Thanks, I'm trying to gather a few views before proposing a detailed change. DexDor (talk) 06:33, 18 March 2014 (UTC)

Hi Widefox, I exapnded the SPARC T5 article and added several secondary references. Check it out and let me know if the primary sources tag can be removed. Looks like you added it back in July 2013. Regs, PeraKM (talk) 19:58, 18 March 2014 (UTC)

Good work. The majority are still primary. I'm in no rush to remove the primary tag. Discussions of this are best suited on the article talk page so others may voice their opinions. Regards Widefox; talk 01:01, 19 March 2014 (UTC)

Thanks, I'm a newbie as a Wikipedia contributor and need to learn the ropes. Yes, 6 of the 11 references are primary, and 100% of the citations in the wikitable are primary. Did a little better with the citations in the text where 9 of the 14 are secondary. Have some ideas how to use more secondary sources. Will initiate the discussion on the article talk page when I get a change to revise the citations. Regs, --PeraKM (talk) 17:54, 19 March 2014 (UTC)

You probably did the right thing. I was having trouble figuring out which one to use.

Here's my source. I don't know whether it's online.

Bajaria's Plan May Be Crazy Ambitious--But It's Not 'Nuts'. Full Text Available

Periodical By: Grego, Melissa. Broadcasting & Cable. 12/2/2013, Vol. 143 Issue 44, p30-30. 1p.

— Vchimpanzee · talk · contributions · 17:17, 3 April 2014 (UTC)

OK. We just go with the ambiguous term. Regards Widefox; talk 23:30, 3 April 2014 (UTC)

You are so right. My editing ain't what it used to be. Maybe I should think about retiring. --Jameboy (talk) 16:58, 5 April 2014 (UTC)

I saw the WP convention in Wikipedia itself, e.g. 2010 World Series#Game 2. I obviously can't use Wikipedia as a source, but I thought the abbreviation was widespread and that I wouldn't have any trouble finding it elsewhere. But so far I haven't, apart from in unreliable sources. --Jameboy (talk) 17:14, 5 April 2014 (UTC)

The more mature and complex it is here, the more we're all wrong. ;) Widefox; talk 21:37, 5 April 2014 (UTC)