User talk:Web SourceContent/Archive 1

This is an archive of past discussions with User:Web SourceContent. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Gerard Goalen, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

KJP1 (talk) 05:34, 28 June 2018 (UTC)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by JMHamo was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage (not just mere mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies, the golden rule and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners and Help:Introduction to referencing/1), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Pakistan Youth Change Advocates (PYCA) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Pakistan Youth Change Advocates (PYCA), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

JMHamo (talk) 09:48, 28 June 2018 (UTC)

Hello, Web SourceContent! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! JMHamo (talk) 09:48, 28 June 2018 (UTC)

What's the problem? what do you need more to correct that is not true? are you a Korean? do not run into your own standards without knowing what is true.Ewtiohw4tw4etjwroij (talk) 10:19, 28 June 2018 (UTC)

Oh wait! It's about Huh Gak? Source Content Self-Maker (talk) 10:21, 28 June 2018 (UTC)

Are you Korean? Why are you canceling?. 난 한국사람이니깐 꼬우면 한국말로해라Ewtiohw4tw4etjwroij (talk) 10:24, 28 June 2018 (UTC)

Hi! It was born in November 1984, according to information! Source Content Self-Maker (talk) 10:26, 28 June 2018 (UTC)

The information was incorrect and I brought the link. 1984년생 아니라고 존나 답답하네Ewtiohw4tw4etjwroij (talk) 10:30, 28 June 2018 (UTC)

Really? Source Content Self-Maker (talk) 10:33, 28 June 2018 (UTC)

yes. 틀렸다고 임마Ewtiohw4tw4etjwroij (talk) 10:33, 28 June 2018 (UTC)

Please verify and review! You can to deal with search results, (example:GoogleSearch) Source Content Self-Maker (talk) 10:36, 28 June 2018 (UTC)

@Ewtiohw4tw4etjwroij:1985, Sure? Source Content Self-Maker (talk) 10:41, 28 June 2018 (UTC)

http://search.daum.net/search?w=tot&DA=YZR&t__nil_searchbox=btn&sug=&sugo=&sq=&o=&q=%ED%97%88%EA%B0%81. enough?Ewtiohw4tw4etjwroij (talk) 10:44, 28 June 2018 (UTC)

@Ewtiohw4tw4etjwroij: We need amount of details. Please respond to this message. It looks unprecedented. What was wrong with birth date? Source Content Self-Maker (talk) 10:50, 28 June 2018 (UTC)

Then find out you 허각 born in 1984. is there anything more certain than a Korean portal site?Ewtiohw4tw4etjwroij (talk) 10:57, 28 June 2018 (UTC)

Koreans think age is a rank and the older you are, the more you are treated. for that reason many korean lie about their ages more older.Ewtiohw4tw4etjwroij (talk) 11:00, 28 June 2018 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with Draft:7EGAS. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. This is an automated message from a bot about this edit, where you removed the deletion template from an article before the deletion discussion was complete. If this message is in error, please report it.—^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 06:53, 29 June 2018 (UTC)

Hello Web SourceContent. Regarding WP:Sockpuppet investigations/Tikashi. I think you meant Smartestguy5 (talk · contribs) to be the master and Tikashi (talk · contribs) to be the sock. EdJohnston (talk) 18:40, 30 June 2018 (UTC)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by RetroCraft314 was:

This submission reads more like an essay than an encyclopedia article. Submissions should summarise information in secondary, reliable sources and not contain opinions or original research. Please write about the topic from a neutral point of view in an encyclopedic manner.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:रैगर and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:रैगर, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

<RetroCraft314 /> 22:22, 1 July 2018 (UTC)

Refrain from editing my user IP page again or you will be reported for harassment please, you are constantly reverting it, its not an article you can edit its my USER TALK PAGE. 136.173.162.130 (talk) 14:24, 2 July 2018 (UTC)

Oh wait! Source Content Self-Maker (talk) 14:29, 2 July 2018 (UTC)

Why you do want to blank ANON user talk page? Source Content Self-Maker (talk) 14:32, 2 July 2018 (UTC)

Hello Web Source Content. It appears you prefer 'Source Content Self-Maker' to be your signature, rather than your actual user name. This risks being confusing, though you do link to your *actual* account name, which is helpful. Did you know you could request at WP:CHU/S to change your real account name to 'Source Content Self-Maker'? This might benefit others who are trying to follow your contributions on talk pages. You wouldn't lose ownership of any of your past contributions, they would be carried over automatically. Thanks, EdJohnston (talk) 14:58, 2 July 2018 (UTC)

Hello EdJohnston! The web Signature Source Content Self-Maker may belong to Web EourceContent (me). Thanks for response! Source Content Self-Maker (talk) 15:07, 2 July 2018 (UTC)

I don't understand your answer. Why would you want to sign with a name that is not your actual account name? I am EdJohnston; I wouldn't give BobSmith as my signature. EdJohnston (talk) 15:09, 2 July 2018 (UTC)

Because my signature is Source Content Self-Maker and I would prefer to use in this cases if possible. It has been accepted for me. Source Content Self-Maker (talk) 15:13, 2 July 2018 (UTC)

The actual account name belong to me: User:Web SourceContent as username. Source Content Self-Maker (talk) 15:15, 2 July 2018 (UTC)

Thank you for reporting vandals but please use WP:AIV to do so and not WP:ANEW. WP:AIV reports are easier to do and will get a faster response. --NeilN ^{talk to me} 13:59, 3 July 2018 (UTC)

Hi there. We appreciate your enthusiasm but you do not have sufficient experience just yet for any of the tasks usually associated with special user rights. These operations include reviewing pages and drafts for deletion, reverting and reporting vandals, and submitting SPI reports. There are plenty of encyclopedia articles on Korean topics - perhaps you can help improve those until you have more experience. If you have any questions or need help, don't hesitate to ask at the Teahouse. Happy editing! Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 00:39, 5 July 2018 (UTC)

Thanks for your counter-vandalism work and keep it up! You are also welcome to join WP:CVU :) ~ Abelmoschus Esculentus (talk to me) 08:14, 5 July 2018 (UTC)

Dictionary of Newfoundland English, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Bkissin (talk) 15:34, 2 August 2018 (UTC)

Facto Post – Issue 15 – 21 August 2018 The Editor is Charles Matthews, for ContentMine. Please leave feedback for him, on his User talk page. To subscribe to Facto Post go to Wikipedia:Facto Post mailing list. For the ways to unsubscribe, see the footer. Back numbers are here. Neglected diseases To grasp the nettle, there are rare diseases, there are tropical diseases and then there are "neglected diseases". Evidently a rare enough disease is likely to be neglected, but neglected disease these days means a disease not rare, but tropical, and most often infectious or parasitic. Rare diseases as a group are dominated, in contrast, by genetic diseases. A major aspect of neglect is found in tracking drug discovery. Orphan drugs are those developed to treat rare diseases (rare enough not to have market-driven research), but there is some overlap in practice with the WHO's neglected diseases, where snakebite, a "neglected public health issue", is on the list. From an encyclopedic point of view, lack of research also may mean lack of high-quality references: the core medical literature differs from primary research, since it operates by aggregating trials. This bibliographic deficit clearly hinders Wikipedia's mission. The ScienceSource project is currently addressing this issue, on Wikidata. Its Wikidata focus list at WD:SSFL is trying to ensure that neglect does not turn into bias in its selection of science papers. Links Wikipedia, Wikidata, and citations, a census, August 2 2018, blogpost by Magnus Manske The rise of Wikidata as a linked data source August 6, 2018, by Karen Smith-Yoshimura on OCLC Research blog Where do Mayors Come From: Querying Wikidata with Python and SPARQL, August 1 2018, Parametric Thoughts blog Newspapers On Wikipedia Update: Initial Wikidata Pass 9 August 2018, Mike Caulfield Google Scholar, Web of Science, and Scopus: a systematic comparison of citations in 252 subject categories Alberto Martín-Martín, Enrique Orduna-Malea, Mike Thelwall, Emilio Delgado López-Cózar, arxiv.org, submitted on 15 August 2018 If you wish to receive no further issues of Facto Post, please remove your name from our mailing list. Alternatively, to opt out of all massmessage mailings, you may add Category:Wikipedians who opt out of message delivery to your user talk page. Newsletter delivered by MediaWiki message delivery

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:23, 21 August 2018 (UTC)

Hello

Sorry to use English if that's not your favorite language.

You are receiving this message because you were reading the Collaboration team newsletter.

The Collaboration team doesn't longer exists. That team was working on building features that encourage collaboration. This is the latest message for that newsletter.

The Growth Team, formed in July 2018, supports some former Collaboration projects. The Growth Team's main objective is to ease new editors' first steps on wikis, through software changes. You can discover all objectives and missions of the Growth team on its page.

If you wish to be informed about Growth team's updates about easing new users first steps, you can subscribe to the new list to get updates. The first message from Growth –with a call for feedback on a new project– will be posted in a few days!

If you have questions or you want to share experiences made on your wiki about new users' first steps, please post them on the team talk page, in any language.

On behalf of the Growth team, Trizek (WMF) (talk) 10:29, 22 August 2018 (UTC)

Generally, there is no reason to report usernames with no edits whatsoever. Per WP:UAAI: "Wait until the user edits. Do not report a user that hasn't edited unless they are clearly a vandal. We do not want to welcome productive editors with a report at UAA, nor do we want to waste our time dealing with accounts that may never be used." The exceptions are obvious hate speech or names that attack a living person/Wikipedia editor, those are blockable even without any edits, but other run-of-the-mill violations need not be reported unless and until they at least attempt to edit, and you should be able to clearly explain what the problem is if it is not immediately evident.

For whatever reason, every day dozens, if not hundreds of accounts are created that never make one single edit. It is our responsibility as admins to conscientiously review every report a user makes at UAA, so we have to check for contribs, deleted contribs, and tripping of the edit filter for every one of these reports, only to find out there's nothing there and therefore no problem to be solved. So we add the {{UAA|wait}} tag to the report, it goes to WP:UAA/HP for a week or more, and must then be reviewed again to see if the account has since become active before removing it. That's time that could be spent doing more productive things, but you basically obligate admins to do it by making such reports. Beeblebrox (talk) 18:58, 22 August 2018 (UTC)

Ioan Buteanu, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Kpgjhpjm 10:30, 25 August 2018 (UTC)