User talk:Warren Whyte/Archive 1
Superchips
Superchips is now back as an article. Warren (talk) 11:10, 10 February 2011 (UTC)
Various electric vehicle argumentsWhile I don't always agree with you entirely, sometimes I think you are the only editor with any sense at all. ⊂| Mr.choppers |⊃ (talk) 06:23, 20 January 2011 (UTC)
BrillianceIf you'll look closely at the Brilliance Auto page, I believe you'll see that all the cited information you added was retained. The only thing removed was the phrase "[Brilliance sold its Zhonghua branch] to its ultimate shareholder Huachen Automotive Group Holdings Company Limited who continue to sell the Brilliance branded vehicles". While I believe that is a true statement, the citation provided for it (Reuters.com stock overview) does not support that assertion. I encourage you to find a citation that does support it, as I remember coming across more-or-less the same information in a Brilliance annual report. Fleetham (talk) 16:11, 6 April 2011 (UTC)
Ferrari FFI just wanted to qualify my argument for the FF to be included on the hot hatch list. A shooting brake design is a hatchback in essence and the car, while a grandtouring hatchback is still a hatchback and is referenced as such on the Ferrari FF page. I would expect that such a high performance hatchback should be included on the hot hatch list. Cheers. FlyingOtter (talk) 23:42, 20 April 2011 (UTC)
RoeweI've replied to your comment on the Talk:Rower page. Please let me know how you feel about my suggestion; your feedback is important! Fleetham (talk) 02:14, 22 April 2011 (UTC) Reliant ScimitarGreat split, I would have done it myself if I could. BTW, you've always been a level-headed person in my dealings with you; could you please visit Kei car amd its talkpage? I have an ongoing revert war with a single purpose account (FFGR79) whose single goal seems to be the inclusion of one picture in as many projects as possible: see their German contributions here. Thanks, ⊂| Mr.choppers |⊃ (talk) 13:30, 19 October 2011 (UTC) Your rollback requestHello Warren Whyte, I have granted rollback rights to your account in accordance with your request. Please be aware that rollback should be used to revert vandalism/spam/blatantly unconstructive edits, and that using it to revert anything else (such as by revert-warring or reverting edits you disagree with) can lead to it being removed from your account...sometimes without any warning, depending on the admin who becomes aware of any misuse. If you think an edit should require a reason for reverting, then don't use rollback and instead, use a manual edit summary. For practice, you may wish to see Wikipedia:New admin school/Rollback. Good luck. Acalamari 17:38, 18 December 2011 (UTC)
|