Hello, Vikiloger. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Ronkay, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.
If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.
If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by CoconutOctopus were:
Your draft shows signs of having been generated by a large language model, such as ChatGPT. Their outputs usually have multiple issues that prevent them from meeting our guidelines on writing articles. These include:
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ronkay Arslan and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
Hello, Vikiloger!
Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! CoconutOctopustalk22:28, 12 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Hi CoconutOctopus, Thank you for your kind message and for taking the time to review my draft. I understand the feedback, and I’ll do my best to review the guidelines and improve the article based on the points you mentioned. I really appreciate your help and support as I continue learning how to contribute properly to Wikipedia! Vikiloger (talk) 23:17, 12 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Hi CoconutOctopus! 😊 I did my best to follow your suggestions and keep everything as simple and clear as possible. If the draft still isn’t suitable, I’m more than happy to keep working on it. I really appreciate your kind guidance and feedback. Thank you again! — Vikiloger Vikiloger (talk) 23:44, 12 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
June 2025
Please do not introduce links to draft articles in actual articles. Since a draft is not yet ready for the main article space, it is not in shape for ordinary readers, and links from articles should not go to a draft. Such links are contrary to the Manual of Style. These links have been removed. Thank you. Taffer😊💬(she/they)22:58, 12 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks a lot for the kind and helpful note. I’m still learning and doing my best to understand and follow the wikipedia guidelines. I really appreciate your time and gentle reminder.. it helps a lot! Vikiloger (talk) 23:15, 12 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
All good! It's a very understandable thing to do. Best of luck with your work on the draft. I hope you enjoy your time here, and happy editing! Taffer😊💬(she/they)23:16, 12 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Hi again Taffer! 😊 I’ve made all the changes you suggested and tried to follow the guidelines as clearly as I could. If it’s not too much trouble, I’d be very grateful if you could take a quick look. Any feedback you have would really help me improve further. Thank you so much for your time! 🙏 — VikilogerVikiloger (talk) 23:40, 12 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not the one who declined your submission, that would be @CoconutOctopus. I'm not an AFC reviewer, so my eye for this is lacking, but I can tell you that a glaring problem is a lack of sources. Since you're writing a biography of a living person, every change that could possibly be challenged must be accompanied by a citation to a reliable source. From a skim of the sources you cited, only the boxofficemojo.com citation is marked as reliable, and citations to IMDB should generally be avoided per WP:IMDB.
Also, it was mentioned in an above template, but I can't recommend the teahouse enough. Lurking there and asking questions helped tremendously when I first got started editing, and I still poke my head in with questions to this day. The folks in there are friendly, helpful, and can point you in good directions for any general editing questions you have. Taffer😊💬(she/they)23:54, 12 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you so much for your kind message and detailed advice. I really appreciate your time and your suggestions. You’re right.. I will focus on adding more reliable sources and avoid IMDb. I’m also checking out WPRSP and will spend more time at the Teahouse.
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by GoldRomean were:
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ronkay Arslan and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
Thank you very much for your feedback. I’ve carefully reviewed your notes and made sure to address the concerns. I’ve removed or reworded all promotional or non neutral phrasing, and added additional reliable, third party sources to support the article.
I truly appreciate your guidance and will keep improving based on it. Please let me know if there is anything else I can fix.
Hi! Every statement in your article needs sources; please add sources to sections such as "Music and performance" and all sentences without sources (or remove the sentences). Cheers, GoldRomean (talk) 03:38, 13 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Hi GoldRomean,
Thank you again for your help and feedback. 🙏 I looked at your new comments and made more changes. I removed anything that didn’t have a source, and added better sources from news and media. I also tried to make the article more neutral and clear.
This is my first time editing like this, so I’m learning a lot. I’m trying to follow all the Wikipedia rules and I really appreciate your support. If you see anything else I should fix, please let me know.
As you kindly pointed out and as mentioned by other helpful reviewers, I’ve added reliable sources to the flagged sections such as “Early life and education”. I also removed the parts that lacked strong sourcing or could not be verified properly.
I’m happy to continue improving the article and appreciate your guidance throughout the process. Looking forward to your further feedback. Thank you again for your time and support! 🙏 Vikiloger (talk) 04:18, 13 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you so much again for your continued guidance and support! I’ve just added the COI disclosure at the bottom of the draft page, as requested. I truly appreciate all your help throughout this process. Please feel free to let me know if there’s anything else I should review or improve! Vikiloger (talk) 04:25, 13 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{edit COI}} template), including links or details of reliable sources that support your suggestions;
In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.
I confirm that I have a conflict of interest regarding this article, as I am the subject of it. I have followed Wikipedia’s content guidelines, used only reliable third-party sources, and removed any unsourced or promotional content. I welcome further feedback and will continue to make improvements based on reviewer guidance. — Vikiloger (talk) 13 June 2025 Vikiloger (talk) 04:22, 13 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Wow! GoldRomean likely has their own guidance to offer, but until then I'd like to offer my compliments: I'd noticed your earlier COI disclosures(thanks for doing that pre-emptively by the way), but hadn't realized that you were the subject of the article. That draft is one of the better autobiographies I've personally seen attempted. Props for the quality of your work despite your inherent bias. Taffer😊💬(she/they)04:38, 13 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Hi again, I wanted to quickly note that I’ve now removed the “Early life and education” section, as I understand your concerns regarding primary sources. At this time, I don’t have access to strong secondary sources to support that section.. so I believe it’s better to remove it entirely for now. If verifiable, independent sources become available in the future (e.g. interviews or profiles), I’ll consider re-adding it appropriately.Thank you again for your support and helpful guidance throughout this process! – Vikiloger 😊
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by SafariScribe were:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ronkay Arslan and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Kovcszaln6 was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ronkay Arslan and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by WikiMentor01 was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ronkay Arslan and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
