User talk:UtcurschArchives: 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 | 32 | 33 | 34 | 35 | 36 | 37 | 38 | 39 | 40 | 41 | 42 | 43 | 44 | 45 | 46 | 47 Administrators' newsletter – July 2025News and updates for administrators from the past month (June 2025). 
The Signpost: 18 July 2025
Endowment tax form, Wikimania, elections, U4C, fundraising and a duck!
And how do we know?
Five-year journey comes to healthy fruition.
Wikimedians from around the world will gather in person and online at the twentieth annual meeting of Wikimania.
As well as "hermeneutic excursions" and other scientific research findings.
The report covers the Foundation's operations from July 2023 - June 2024
A step towards objective and comprehensive coverage of a project nearly too big to follow.
Drawn this century!
How data from the Wikipedia "necessary articles" lists can shed new light on the gender gap
Annual plans, external trends, infrastructure, equity, safety, and effectiveness. What does it all mean?
Rest in peace.
Wouldn't it be nice without billionaires, scandals, deaths, and wars?
If you are too blasé for Mr. Blasé and don't give a FAC. Need your attention!Hi Utcursch, Kindly check these two discussions - [1], [2], User:McKhan2 is particularly engaging these discussions as clear harassment and just accused of you being tagged there for Wikipedia:Canvassing. Meanwhile, that person tagged you first in the discussion along with Ekdalian to get support from previous editors who have edited my edits in edit summaries while not even checking discussion tagged as "Kalal POV pushing", where you advised to not push Kalal POV here but with context use where Ahluwalia caste is mentioned itself given two different identities. Now, they first accuse me of not letting Kalal mention there, meanwhile, that discussion suggests the opposite. Then they propose to edit the entire article but it has been well attributed and edited in the same way as they proposed. After I keep hinting at their true opinion of BIAS and Harassment involving my edits by using analysis to gaslight and divert conversations and keep tagging you and Ekdalian, another editor who removed well sourced edits by just mentioning their pov in edit summaries. It is a caste of varied origins, and "distinct social groups" as you said and should be kept like that but they think "only Kalal/Kalwar pov" is valid. I remember a few socpup-users who were banned for doing same tone edits like @Newworldruler [1] banned by admin @Discospinster. All the same, they engage in talk discussion doing similar stuff while acting as some core-policies fan. I am certainly not that much fan of such discussions Utcursch and would really love your attention and time on reading the discussions and please read my replies as well. Whatever I answer, the next reply carefully is cherrypicked with the words to again "gaslight." They are just so negatively directed with continuos misinterpretations starting from deviating my "note saying, I checked their edits again on the page after nearly a month" by saying that's a lie citing work prior to their such engagements and including your and others edit summaries and now accusing of CANVASS when I cited "KALAL POV PUSHING" to be read and not edit summaries to support their lame accusations. Repeated warnings and continuous non-good faith replies by first accusing of stuff and then acting like they care and want to move forward by suggesting another misleading edits. After your guidance and Abecdare's as well on previous edits, my work is based on Wikipedia policies with keeping relevance in mind. All the topics are mentioned with sources, and if you find even a single line or two without sources, just let me know, I have bookmarked enough to add but given AirshipJungle... editors note to not overcite as they removed many references, I have limited them. Those conversations are diverting from one topic to another and to next to keep engaging in such deliberate misinterpretation attacks that appear to be subtle and personal. I have nothing to add but just the discussion there and one-time checking the article which is well-quoted and sourced is enough as a reply. Thank you Utcursch, I am going offline and if they edit anything given their continuous harassment on contentious topics, I will check and respond to it later and do hope your attention there. HilssaMansen19Irien1291S • spreading wiki love ~ Message here; no calls 08:59, 23 July 2025 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – August 2025News and updates for administrators from the past month (July 2025).
The Signpost: 9 August 2025
Plus a mysterious CheckUser incident, and the news with Wikinews.
A review of June, July and August.
Who is this guy?
Threads since June.
And slop.
It's not a conlang, it's a crossword puzzle.
gang aft agley, an' lea'e us nought but grief an' pain, for promis'd joy!
Everybody's Somebody's Fool. Nomination of Operation Rajiv for deletion The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Operation Rajiv until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.𝗭𝗲𝗽𝗵𝘆𝗿 (ᴛᴀʟᴋ) 12:10, 30 August 2025 (UTC) Nomination of GSFC Complex INA for deletionA discussion is taking place as to whether the article GSFC Complex INA, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted. The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/GSFC Complex INA until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 3 September 2025 (UTC) Administrators' newsletter – September 2025News and updates for administrators from the past month (August 2025).
The Signpost: 9 September 2025
UK Online Safety Act remains undefeated.
Plus Wiki rules, Wiki Spin, and physicists get street cred!
The price of Liberty is eternal vigilance.
And other new research findings.
Tis true: there's magic in the web of it.
With the usual mix of war, death, super heroes, a belt, and Wednesday.
It's an easy one. The Signpost: 2 October 2025
This time "not merely negative".
Wickedpedia wrangles post-truth politics.
Unexpected news!
Fifty hot topics from fourteen noticeboards.
Policy, politics, icons, captchas, and LLMs.
And other recent publications.
When to walk away.
Rest in peace.
Celebrities, deaths and software.
All invited! |
