User talk:UsedEdgesII

Although not required, I am disclosing that I am a previously banned editor who is disclosing this account as a Clean Start. I have previously edited for compensation which is not against Wikipedia guidelines; however, edits that I have made could have violated Wikipedia’s policy on conflict of interest. I was previously banned for using Sock accounts. All accounts have since been disclosed to the Wikipedia Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee.

I do not currently receive compensation for editing however I may choose to do so in the future. I will not disclose which articles I have received compensation for but invite those to check all my edits for NPOV. If you have an issue with an edit that you feel violates COI policy, please leave a message on my talk page or report it to the COI Notice Board.

Hi UsedEdgesII! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Please join other people who edit Wikipedia at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space on Wikipedia where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. We hope to see you there! Visit the Teahouse This message was delivered automatically by your friendly neighborhood HostBot (talk) 03:13, 19 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You could not move Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Maersk Line to Maersk Line. You ask what you should have done. You should have applied a {{db-move}} tag to Maersk Line and waited for the deletion to happen. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 20:29, 25 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for the trouble and thank you for the information. I placed the template in my toolbox for future reference. Still learning. --UsedEdgesII (talk) 20:56, 25 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

When you opened the above AfD, the article was relatively new and did not have much in the way of sourcing. It has now been substantially improved and sourced. K&H were an important New England architecture firm in the early 20th century and received extensive coverage for their works. Some of that coverage has now been added. You may want to take a fresh look. Cbl62 (talk) 20:40, 26 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the comment. I do see the additional sources that you have mentioned and also see that others have left some keep votes for the discussion. My only issue is that there is no "inherent" notability for the company. The buildings do have inherent notability which is why creating articles about the buildings would not be an issue. However, since me leaving additional comments on the deletion discussion would just lend to prejudice the argument, I will stay off and refrain from leaving any additional comments. It appears that you have persuaded at least one other person so I hope that things work out. --UsedEdgesII (talk) 17:14, 28 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Yannis Pappas, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page American (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:12, 29 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A misunderstood category at CSD. It's really only for things like 'uycuytyttuykewwewe gfrtrrt' (so long as you're sure they're not quite sensible remarks in something like Upper Slobodian). Also nonsense are things like 'farm wickedly the faculty lengthwise reported subtended samoyed'. Stuff that would get you thrown out of a surrealist poetry meeting, and which are totally incoherent in English. Once again, a caveat - beware of machine translations from Japanese and Chinese in particular. I deleted it as vandalism, anyway... Peridon (talk) 20:56, 5 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry. Late checking my messages. I am not sure what you mean by the above statements. Can you elaborate? --UsedEdgesII (talk) 20:01, 8 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for creating yet another sock account - you are already blocked and you cannot edit. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Elen of the Roads (talk) 23:42, 8 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The WikiProject Articles for creation newsletter

The WikiProject Articles for creation Newsletter Volume I, No. I – December 2012 Visit the Articles for creation homepage Project news Five changes have been proposed to the AfC policy. Join the discussion here. Another change has been proposed to the courtesy blanking policy. It involves CSDing distributive submissions. Discuss it here. The beta script still needs testing. Learn how you can help here. The backlog is at emergency status and another drive has been proposed here and suggestions on changes to the structure have been proposed here. Discussion on updating the backlog notification is underway here. A discussion on whether autoconfirmed users are allowed to skip the backlog is going on here. Discussion on users not adding categories and not checking copyvios is going on here. Backlog news[1] There are 2838 pending submissions in the backlog. You can help! Article rankings[1]  FA  GA B C Start Stub  FL List Category Disambig Draft File Project Redirect Template NA ??? Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 WikiProject Articles for creation articles by quality      Refresh From the Editors This is the very first newsletter for WikiProject Articles for creation! If you find any errors or have suggestions on what to improve/include in future newsletters, please leave a message here. Contributors to this Issue Dom497 (talk · contribs) Nathan2055 (talk · contribs) Notes ^ a b Information may not be current due to caching. Click here to purge this page's server cache. Script corner: Stable: v4.1.15 - Beta: v4.1.16b2 v4.1.16b2 is now available in the beta channel! Reviewers can use the beta version of the script by following the instructions here and should report bugs here! Release notes can be found here as well as in the source code. If you are JavaScript savvy, please contact Nathan2055 (talk · contribs) if you wish to help with development. Reviewing articles and more since 2005!

WikiProject Articles for creation Backlog Elimination Drive

WikiProject AFC is holding a one month long Backlog Elimination Drive!
The goal of this drive is to eliminate the backlog of unreviewed articles. The drive is running from March 1st, 2013 – March 31st, 2013.

Awards will be given out for all reviewers participating in the drive in the form of barnstars at the end of the drive.
There is a backlog of over 2000 articles, so start reviewing articles! Visit the drive's page and help out!

Delivered by User:EdwardsBot on behalf of Wikiproject Articles for Creation at 13:44, 27 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Articles for creation Backlog Elimination Drive

WikiProject AFC is holding a one month long Backlog Elimination Drive!
The goal of this drive is to eliminate the backlog of unreviewed articles. The drive is running from July 1st, 2013 – July 31st, 2013.

Awards will be given out for all reviewers participating in the drive in the form of barnstars at the end of the drive.
There is a backlog of over 1000 articles, so start reviewing articles! Visit the drive's page and help out!

A new version of our AfC helper script is released! It includes many bug fixes, new improvements and features, code cleanup, and more page cleanups. If you want to see a full list of changes, go to Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Helper script/Development page. Please report bugs and feature requests there, too! Thanks.

Delivered at 12:43, 19 June 2013 (UTC) by EdwardsBot (talk), on behalf of WikiProject AFC

WikiProject Articles for creation Backlog Elimination Drive

WikiProject AFC is holding a one month long Backlog Elimination Drive!
The goal of this drive is to eliminate the backlog of unreviewed articles. The drive is running from October 1st, 2013 – October 31st, 2013.

Awards will be given out for all reviewers participating in the drive in the form of barnstars at the end of the drive.
There is a backlog of over 2800 articles, so start reviewing articles! Visit the drive's page and help out!

A new version of our AfC helper script is released! It includes many bug fixes, new improvements and features, code enhancements, and more. If you want to see a full list of changes, visit the changelog. Please report bugs and feature requests there, too! Thanks. --Mdann52talk to me!

This newsletter was delivered on behalf of WPAFC by EdwardsBot (talk) 15:10, 30 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]