User talk:Trystan

Archives

1, 2

Welcome to my talk page. If you post here, I will reply here. If I posted on your talk page, I will watch it, so feel free to reply there.

• Aurora (disambiguation)*
• Belasco*
• Capital*
• Capitol*
• Center of the universe*
• Junk mail*
• Pope Peter II*
• Titania (disambiguation)*
• Twin Towers*

November songs

... for a constructive comment in the Laurence Olivier RfC, to which I referred in my arbcand questions. -- Gerda Arendt (talk) 13:45, 30 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You seem to be missing many LGBT peer reviews that did happen but are at old titles, or redirects, e.g. Wikipedia:WikiProject LGBT studies/Peer review/Cleveland Street scandal and Wikipedia:WikiProject LGBT studies/Peer review/James Dobson. DrKay (talk) 17:16, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@DrKay: Thanks for letting me know. I think every PR that had a redirect starting Wikipedia:WikiProject LGBT studies/Peer review/ now has a redirect starting Wikipedia:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studies/Peer review/, so they should work with the post-move project banner template. I've restored the old-peer-review parameter for everything I had removed it from. The only exception is for Talk:Cultural depictions of Matthew Shepard, which as far as I can tell did not ever have a peer review of any kind; the PR parameter was likely copied over inadvertently from the parent article when the talk page was created.--Trystan (talk) 18:52, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, Trystan. I'd like to wish you a wonderful First Edit Day on behalf of the Wikipedia Birthday Committee! Have a great day! DaniloDaysOfOurLives (talk) 02:46, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

hey trystan learn your latin "persecutione extrema" translates into "extreme persecution" not "final persecution" see it now? extrema = extreme I come from a latin country and i studied latin in school so please don't be so narrow minded. 172.218.110.125 (talk) 04:31, 19 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have replied at Talk:Prophecy of the Popes.--Trystan (talk) 15:44, 19 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not important enough to make a long argument, but a one-paragraph mention of the 20/20 doesn't need its own subsection.

Clearly the people writing the article originally considered the two the same material, because the paragraph discussing responses to the "Book of Matt" in fact covers responses to both. Many of the citations are explicitly to the 20/20 piece, and dated years before the book. If you really think the subsections shouldn't be merged, you might usefully go to the last paragraph and move the references to the proper subsections. That would make the article redundant and awkward, of course (since the criticisms of book and article are nearly identical), but since you insist they are different, responses to the 20/20 news show should not be cited as being responses to the Book of Matt.

If it bothers you that there's only one subheading under the subsequent reporting heading, that is trivially fixed. Michael-Zero (talk) 14:56, 26 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks.

Michael-Zero (talk) 13:51, 28 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, this notice is for everyone who took part in the 2023 RfC on lists of airline destinations. I have started a new RfC on the subject. If you would like to participate please follow this link: Wikipedia talk:What Wikipedia is not § RfC on WP:NOT and British Airways destinations. Sunnya343 (talk) 01:17, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Joan Armatrating, Crys Matthews, Cheryl Wheeler 2601:282:2382:2D0:8071:D411:DECD:840D (talk) 08:35, 10 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, thank you for thanking me here, I appreciate it. I was unsure how that edit would be received, but as someone who particularly respects that user, and seeing as how they weren't blocked for a grossly severe violation of policy (death/legal threats, sockpuppetry, et al), I figured I'd restore them to the inactive list as a means of compromise. Once again, thank you. JeffSpaceman (talk) 22:41, 16 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to include "Nellie", in breach of MOS:NICKNAME, then please seek consensus on the talk page. GiantSnowman 18:49, 4 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

We clearly have a difference of opinion as to how to apply MOS:NICKNAME to this article. I set out my view in my initial edit summary reverting you and restoring the longstanding version of the article. I think the change is contrary to the guideline and makes the article worse, but if you are going to edit war your preferred version into place rather than seek consensus for the change in good faith, it is frankly not worth my time to fight over.--Trystan (talk) 19:08, 4 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there! I hope this message finds you well. I'd like extend an invitation to you to join the upcoming Wikimedia LGBT+ online Community Meeting. We will be discussing, among other topics, the 2025 edition of the Wiki Loves Pride global campaign and how to collaborate better across languages on queer-related articles. You can register and find more information about it on: meta:WMLGBT Community Meeting April 2025.--Freddy eduardo (talk) 14:49, 17 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Trystan. I'm looking for experienced editors to interview here. Feel free to pass if you're not interested. Clovermoss🍀 (talk) 14:24, 24 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Trystan Reese. Why don't you want your picture on Wikipedia? Countryboy603 (talk) 19:17, 10 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I am not Trystan Reese. As for why I removed that picture from LGBTQ people, I stated my reasons in the edit summary.--Trystan (talk) 20:26, 10 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I was wondering too, so I googled "flight 93 lgbt", and you could make the argument it was in scope. SarekOfVulcan (talk) 04:30, 30 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]