User talk:Travisl/Archive 1

This is an archive of past discussions with User:Travisl. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Hello, Travisl/Archive 1, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

• The Five Pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Editing tutorial
• Picture tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Naming conventions
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and vote pages using three tildes, like this: ~~~. Four tildes (~~~~) produces your name and the current date. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Kukini 02:44, 16 April 2006 (UTC)

Thanks! :) Admrb♉ltz ( T | C | E ) 07:25, 18 April 2006 (UTC)

Just wanted to let you know that the article has been protected for now. Hopefully the naming dispute can be resolved. Thanks. .:.Jareth.:. ^babelfish 07:56, 21 April 2006 (UTC)

Travis, this is Professor Paul. Thank you for noticing my "Wiki-work."  :) To me, Wikipedia is "recreation." May as well enjoy what you do, I always say. What was it that you liked? And, I am not finished with those articles yet. Take care. 02:06, 1 June 2006 (UTC)

Np :-) Matthew Fenton (contribs) 16:06, 8 August 2006 (UTC)

I am currently anticipating the rest of the design in the state route log (current + decommissioned) pending a design review which is taking place at List of Routes in Vermont . Pending the outcome of that, to which a table variant is used, I proposed three designs. You can see them here. Please discuss the design at List of Routes in Vermont, since I am aiming for readability and navigatability to not only "roadgeeks", but to all users per WP:MS. Thanks! Seicer (talk) (contribs) 15:24, 11 August 2006 (UTC)

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.

P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot 14:07, 13 August 2006 (UTC)

I added a strike-through to an article on your list that I have already fixed.

Epolk 21:13, 22 August 2006 (UTC)

Yea, i had thought that there had already been a discussion but as i reverted your message on the talk appeard so i reverted my revert. I just listend to that video and it does to me strongly imply he is an agent.. i'm gona see if i can find a clear shot of his badge as well. Matthew Fenton (Talk | Contribs) 16:18, 14 August 2006 (UTC)

Hey could you give your opinion on colour at this page here ? Matthew Fenton (Talk | Contribs) 16:34, 14 August 2006 (UTC)

Hey could you have a look at the template above as i do not wish to violate 3RR and a guy keeps reverting. Also both parts of Gone where given different prod. #s which is what makes them seperate :P! Matthew Fenton (Talk | Contribs) 07:40, 15 August 2006 (UTC)

What do you think of my recent changes? MatthewFenton (talk • contribs) 22:23, 23 August 2006 (UTC)

Okay, i think ive sorted the caption: see -> The Home Front (The 4400 episode) (Would you say thats ok caption size?) and about the text.. i'll see if i can find a darker colour or maybe just use black text :P MatthewFenton (talk • contribs) 16:21, 24 August 2006 (UTC)

PS: About the episode numbering thing.. yea sounds like a better idea :-) MatthewFenton (talk • contribs) 16:23, 24 August 2006 (UTC)

PSS: Also see Template:The 4400 episode; I've darkend the text a bit more, do you think i should make it some more dark? MatthewFenton (talk • contribs) 16:24, 24 August 2006 (UTC)

Ok, The numbering is done :-) (So it says now: 3.01 etc ;)) -- If you like the darker text ill implement it on the other tpl as well ;-) (i might be able to get it slightly darker) MatthewFenton (talk • contribs) 16:32, 24 August 2006 (UTC)

Ok, Implemented captions properly and the darker text :-)! MatthewFenton (talk • contribs) 16:48, 24 August 2006 (UTC)

Just a note; Shouldnt promicin be spelt with a cap. P? as its a name? I'm not sure tho im crap to spelling etc :P MatthewFenton (talk • contribs) 18:44, 24 August 2006 (UTC)

When we know more about promicin do you think we should give it an article as well, what do you think? MatthewFenton (talk • contribs) 18:45, 24 August 2006 (UTC)

Ahh i see ;) MatthewFenton (talk • contribs) 19:04, 24 August 2006 (UTC)

Sure; I'll get around to taking some today and making it better ;-)

Also i've got a few ideas for promicin thanks/MatthewFenton (talk • contribs) 07:13, 26 August 2006 (UTC)

Made some minor edits today, i think its slightly better and also added 2 pics. You know what i think? We should start a 4400 WikiProject hehe :-P! thanks/MatthewFenton (talk • contribs) 18:41, 26 August 2006 (UTC)

Noinclude makes it be present in the prototype (Template:) but not when it is in transcluded somewhere else. Includeonly makes it not present in the prototype, only when it is transcluded elsewhere. —Centrx→talk • 05:09, 27 August 2006 (UTC)

The 4400 pages are starting to look pretty good , what do you think :)? thanks/MatthewFenton (talk • contribs) 08:50, 27 August 2006 (UTC)

Yup :-), I'm going to start writing full episode synopsises i hope in time for s4 premiere. thanks/MatthewFenton (talk • contribs) 09:14, 27 August 2006 (UTC)

Hi great work in a short time ;-), i hope you dont mind but im going to replace your screencap as it doesnt have the dimensions of the other ones (It's WS and the others are SS) also you know when you upload caps for the episodes could you use my summary template that includes a FUR etc so we can keep consistency :P

{{subst:User:MatthewFenton/copyright|The 4400|List of The 4400 episodes|YOURUSERNAME|YOURREALNAME}}

PS: I'm sorry if it sounds like im nitpicking (i hope you dont think i am) but for episodes could you use a name like: The 4400 - XxYZ - <ep_name>.jpg please ?

I'm sorry, i probablly sound like a jerk telling you what to do, great work btw :) thanks/MatthewFenton (talk • contribs) 07:53, 28 August 2006 (UTC)

Hey there, i've created Wikipedia:WikiProject The 4400; I've listed your name in the members because i expect you'd be interested in the wikiproject and you know alot about The 4400 ;-)! thanks/MatthewFenton (talk • contribs) 16:16, 28 August 2006 (UTC)

If you have the DVDs a media player like VLC Media Player (the one i use) is fantastic at screen grabbing :-) thanks/MatthewFenton (talk • contribs) 17:03, 28 August 2006 (UTC)

I was wondering what do you think of including pictures of minor characters for use in List of The 4400 minor characters? (I was thinking they should only be used for characters who've had a 4400 centric episode (IE: Orson in the pilot)) thanks/MatthewFenton (talk • contribs) 17:09, 28 August 2006 (UTC)

I thought that guy was talking to me, hehe! :P thanks/MatthewFenton (talk • contribs) 17:23, 28 August 2006 (UTC)

I created a new page List of The 4400 recurring characters; I considered what would be classed as recuring and came up with:

• At least 3 episodes
• Been a crucial part in a story line (April had the Ben story line, Gary NTAC/Dennis stuff etc)

Got any ideas? thanks/MatthewFenton (talk • contribs) 17:46, 28 August 2006 (UTC)

Sounds good (PS: Sorry for late reply didnt notice your reply was in my archive -- oppsy :P!) thanks/MatthewFenton (talk • contribs) 20:52, 28 August 2006 (UTC)

Sure; I'll retake one tommorow :-) - What do you think of my extended reviews :-P? I took a break tonight as im shattered but back to writing tommorow :). thanks/Fenton, Matthew Lexic Dark 52278 Alpha 771 22:19, 5 September 2006 (UTC)

Updated the screencap ;-) - So what do you think of my reviews so far :-)? I was particularly proud of Wake Up Call (The 4400 episode) as its my longest review to date :P. thanks/Fenton, Matthew Lexic Dark 52278 Alpha 771 08:11, 6 September 2006 (UTC)

That new pic okay? I didnt bother witing tonight.. i'm just soo tired, and i dont know why :( thanks/Fenton, Matthew Lexic Dark 52278 Alpha 771 20:45, 6 September 2006 (UTC)

PS: I changed the highland beach photo to thsi free great one Buchanan took (check out his gallery; he's took some great pictures of vancouver ;-)!) thanks/Fenton, Matthew Lexic Dark 52278 Alpha 771 20:46, 6 September 2006 (UTC)

Yea, it's general to leave it how it is autored by a person not from the country of creation. I thought i'd got all the typos out of it as i wrote it in MSWord, i *should* of set the dictionary to American. i'll try and remember to use the American words in future episodes, but being from England the only American spellings i know i see on the web :P. (PS: Do you use MSN Messenger? Would be good if we could chat.) thanks/Fenton, Matthew Lexic Dark 52278 Alpha 771 21:01, 6 September 2006 (UTC)

IM address sent via e-mail. Travisl 22:50, 6 September 2006 (UTC)

Hi! Thanks for updating, take care! --Hedwig in Washington ^(TALK) 02:54, 24 September 2006 (UTC)

Yep! It's part of a plan to imrpoove the episode list and make it better, i'll tell you why and more on messenger :-) thanks/Fenton, Matthew Lexic Dark 52278 Alpha 771 15:41, 29 September 2006 (UTC)

I'm currently in the proccess of writing the synopsis for Carrier, would you like to review it before I submit it to the wiki for typos etc? thanks/Fenton, Matthew Lexic Dark 52278 Alpha 771 21:59, 29 September 2006 (UTC)

Ah. I'll let you look at it on the wiki then when you get sometime, hehe.. domains are cool ;-) (I own derwafflehuas.net and matthewfenton.net) thanks/Fenton, Matthew Lexic Dark 52278 Alpha 771 22:11, 29 September 2006 (UTC)

Based upon your comments at Talk:Alton Brown, I have opened a User conduct RFC dealing with User:Omallystwin. Please take a look at it and if you agree with the claims please add your name as second certifier. If a second certifier is not added to the RFC it will be deleted in 48 hours. --Allen3 ^talk 12:14, 28 October 2006 (UTC)

You're welcome, bo-ne-he-ad! Now go tag the others skulking on wikipedia! --Don Sowell 07:03, 12 December 2006 (UTC)

"Thanks also for fixing my Poker user tag. Didn't even know it was broken yet."

You're welcome!

"BTW, I was just looking at your list of contributions. You've pretty much stuck to sports and a couple of presidents. Compare that to my list -- I'm much more all over the place: a lot of local stuff, some TV shows, a few movies, etc."

Yep! You've done some great work! I loved the article on Wonderbug. That show was probably my favorite from the Kroft Supershow. Too bad the title song was removed. That should probably find it's way back into the article.

"The fun ones (and I'm using the term "fun" pretty loosely) are when I click Random article and look for spelling and grammar mistakes, or when I check out Recent changes looking for really badly done edits. Just an observation."

Ooh! Nice idea. I've been using the random button to read articles, but not really shooting for editing them. It takes me awhile to get rid of my tendancy to be gun shy about that.

"I've not gotten to the point where I'm running bots and placing articles up for deletion or the like."

Me neither, lthough someone seems to have a thorn in their side about breaking up NFL team articles. I really should follow up on that one after the holidays.

--Don Sowell 16:50, 28 December 2006 (UTC)

Hi there. If you have to leave a page only partially written, with the intention of returning later, if you add the template {{underconstruction}} at the top of the page it will stop all but the most over-zealous editors from flagging or deleting it. Useful tip.--Anthony.bradbury 23:28, 30 December 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading Image:Fakepromicinbomb.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 16:07, 29 January 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading Image:Highland beach.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 16:35, 29 January 2007 (UTC)

The best bet for a good zombie image is probably to take something from the many photos of zombie walks that are floating around online, perhaps from Flickr; it only needs one with some decent makeup, and usage permission from the photographer. The existing zombie-walk image is a bit dull, but it used to be at the top, so I've put it back up for now. --McGeddon 23:51, 3 March 2007 (UTC)

Helpme question: The Samuel Gamboa Potter article was written by User:AOTV, which is probably Action Outdoors TV, the network that airs Potter's show. User:Sampotter has just edited the page with some (malformed) links to additional information.

I don't have the experience to be bold and tell the user that it's a potential violation of a policy to create an autobiographical page (WP:AUTO is sufficiently wishy-washy in this context) and that it's questionable to edit one's own biography. I also don't know if this biography is of someone who is notable enough to have a biography on Wikipedia. Should I hand this off to someone with more experience? If I should handle it myself, what advice can you give me; what templates or examples should I follow? Travisl 03:22, 20 March 2007 (UTC)

Nominate for Articles for Deletion and follow the steps! Cheers! Real96 03:33, 20 March 2007 (UTC)

Hello; you misspelled the name of the article in your AfD procedure, having nominated Samuel Gamoba Potter for deletion (which doesn't exist). You can go ahead and fix it, or I am sure someone else will get to it in time. ◄Zahakiel► 05:07, 21 March 2007 (UTC)

forgot about the trans. in minn., i basically copied it from a metro transit(Minnesota) template i made. LOL —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Tcmetro (talk • contribs) 12:15, 5 April 2007 (UTC).

Thanks for uploading Image:FHALodging.gif. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 19:06, 6 April 2007 (UTC)

Do you like the 2002 revival of TZ? Matthew 20:10, 12 April 2007 (UTC)

I tried watching some of the 1985 series, "The Wall" was good.. then another was about them flying on a spaceship to some planet of God.. I found that one slightly silly. I've been watching the 2002 episodes lately, I've liked them. I remember watching "It's Still a Good Life" in 2003, hehe :-). Matthew 21:32, 12 April 2007 (UTC)

Hey. It's because FutonCritic uses official press releases for their information (so it's the word of the USA Network) where as the previous stemmed from a fan-blog (and they have dubious reliability). Matthew 15:57, 4 May 2007 (UTC)

To retain subject continuity, I left my reply to your communication on my talk page. Romanspinner (talk) 08:15, 18 May 2007 (UTC)

Ha, thanks for the good word, and for your own fine efforts on that article. The GA Tribunal isn't so impressed, but hell... it was too soon. And at least it put us on the right track. Someday ZIPC shall be the best damn article about nothing on this whole site! Subcreature 20:55, 3 June 2007 (UTC)

Y	Your request to be unblocked has been granted for the following reason(s): Autoblock of 216.9.250.6 lifted or expired. Request handled by:  Netsnipe  ►  07:57, 10 June 2007 (UTC)

Afternoon Travis, just a heads up that Brooke is actually main cast for season one (just double checked my DVD). Oh, did you enjoy "The Wrath of Graham"? Matthew 15:09, 20 June 2007 (UTC)

I was quite apprehensive at first, but I enjoyed the episode. From my perspective it is basically a 4400 of the week story that ties up loose ends, etc. I get the feeling we'll be hearing from the future soon. Matthew 20:32, 20 June 2007 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Kentucky Rye (The Twilight Zone), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, you can request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material. To do this, affix the template {{hangon}} to the page and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Best regards 195.137.96.79 05:08, 24 June 2007 (UTC)

Recreated, this time with crunchy nutritious content. Travisl 22:25, 24 June 2007 (UTC)

Nice one! 195.137.96.79 02:21, 26 June 2007 (UTC)

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on The Trunk (The Twilight Zone), by UnitedStatesian (talk · contribs), another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because The Trunk (The Twilight Zone) is very short providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting The Trunk (The Twilight Zone), please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Please note, this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion, it did not nominate The Trunk (The Twilight Zone) itself. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. --Android Mouse Bot 2 14:23, 25 June 2007 (UTC)

Note to self: Blank article appropriately deleted. Project tag in discussion still there. Yay! Travisl 17:05, 25 June 2007 (UTC)

Thanks! I can't believe I missed that! Murderbike 06:48, 28 June 2007 (UTC)

Sure thing. For the record: c+p = copy+paste (plagiarism), MoS = Manual of Style and req. could mean request or required. Matthew 18:56, 2 July 2007 (UTC)

Hi Travis, late message (sorry, had to pop out). A common misconception on Wikipedia is that a primary source: a) sources the air-date and b) sources the title (some shows (e.g. the Star Treks) have titles self-contained -- so the episode would be a valid source in those cases).

The episode itself is unverifiable for the air-date in the sense that one can't actually verify it (unless they actually watched the episode that night), thus a reliable secondary source should be stated. Secondary sources are also preferred over the primary source (the episode is the primary source). Indeed not all of the 4400 LOE is sourced (I actually already have sources lined up), and indeed not all of the episode pages are compliant with Wikipedia's sourcing policies/guidelines. Matthew 14:37, 3 July 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading Image:Tina.ogg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 02:34, 6 September 2007 (UTC)

After going through a detailed rationale and additing it to the .ogg, it turned out the bot was on the fritz. Go figure. Travisl 15:58, 18 September 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading Image:KRpostcardsmaller.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:43, 16 September 2007 (UTC)

Apparently, even though the image's page automatically shows where the image is being used, I've got to duplicate the information with the fair use claim, as per WP:NFCC#10c. Done, but it sure seems redundant. Travisl 15:59, 18 September 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading Image:Tacoma Seal.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 20:18, 26 November 2007 (UTC)

Added seal rationale. This bot is a little overzealous -- it was blatantly obvious that this was a seal which fell under fair use for the only article it was linked to. Makes me hesitate to add any more image improvements. Travisl (talk) 22:01, 26 November 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for the compliment, I was a little worried about going too far with changing the layout. Shinerunner (talk) 00:01, 15 January 2008 (UTC)

Hi, I just added a prototype userbox to the project talk page. Let me know what you thinkShinerunner (talk) 15:30, 27 January 2008 (UTC)

Thanks mucho, glad you enjoyed it, I've got more to come, including the Vashon - Burton rivalry on Colvos Passage and the boats' alleged tactic of "baby-snatching." I believe the Hoodsport boat Dode had a female skipper, that was not unknown in those days when boats were run by families as a business. Could write a whole article on that. On a related topic, you might like my Steamboats of the Columbia River also. BTW, Mosquito Fleet still lives, doncha know, down to just one boat however. See Virginia V. Here's an image from an old real estate brochure, somehow my family (who lived near Three Tree Point), ended up with the negatives. When my mother was a child in the 1940s, the remains of the dock were still there. Mtsmallwood (talk) 06:06, 7 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:KRpostcardsmaller.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Rettetast (talk) 21:17, 8 February 2008 (UTC)

Expanded even more. Travisl (talk) 23:01, 11 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for correcting the Mason County template. I work with a lot of these templates, and there's always so much to fill in, I sometimes forget to change everything — especially the county seat line, since unlike the stuff about the county itself, it won't mess up the template if I accidentally leave in the information from the templates from which I copied the new one. Nyttend (talk) 16:01, 26 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for thinking of me on this issue, I don't like to get involved too much in wiki guidelines issues (other than trying to follow them), I just like to write. A lot of people think there's too much external linking, I guess there's some issue with misuse to generate search engine hits or whatever. That's all beyond what I know. Just one external link in an article doesn't seem too bad as long as it's not to some objectionable site, maybe if there's an issue the article should have a discussion of why the link is important or significant. This link in question at Lakewood, Washington seems to be to the municipal government, no? I wouldn't think that would be objectionable. On the other hand, if the linked page is masquerading as a municipal government page, I would think that should be stricken. Has someone run WHOIS on the link? Hope that helps. BTW, I have a new article you might be interested in, Hassalo (sternwheeler 1880) Mtsmallwood (talk) 17:57, 5 March 2008 (UTC)

The EL website doesn't seem too bad. There is barely anything there. If the site becomes more obviously a blog or business related thing, then maybe take it up. As it is it doesn't seem to be doing any harm. I agree that people often add external links to their websites that don't add anything to wikipedia, but I avoid being a wiki-cop and usually don't remove things that aren't blatantly bad. A lot of the San Juan island pages get constantly peppered with commercial links, real estate, etc, which sometimes gets to me. If the person is hoping to generate search engine hits, as I understand it links on wikipedia are ignored by search engines so it doesn't help in that way. Sorry to not be more helpful. Pfly (talk) 21:07, 5 March 2008 (UTC)

Followup, I can't find a good page about it at the moment, but there's some info about wikipedia's "nofollow" thing here: Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/2007-01-22/Nofollow. May or may not be relevant.. Pfly (talk) 21:18, 5 March 2008 (UTC)

Hi Travisl. I'm running a small survey about wikipedian barnstars. If you have the time, I would really appreciate you taking a look and participating. The survey can be found here. Thank you! Bestchai (talk) 01:51, 12 March 2008 (UTC)

Can you restore this image so that I may add fair use rationale to it? Thanks. Travisl (talk) 14:48, 11 March 2008 (UTC)

I restored it, don't forget to remove the tag after you've added the rationale. Melesse (talk) 04:17, 12 March 2008 (UTC)

This is an archive of past discussions with User:Travisl. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.