User talk:Trade

Hello, Trade, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

• Introduction and Getting started
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• How to create your first article
• Simplified Manual of Style

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Moxy (talk) 16:40, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hey. I saw you edited some handball articles. Pleas visit the Wikipedia:WikiProject Handball and Portal:Handball. You can also add you to the handball members list. When you edit handball article pleas add an assessment to the talk like: {{WikiProject Handball|class=stub|importance=low}}. --Malo95 (talk) 07:57, 24 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited The Sims 4: Parenthood, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Mediator and Insensitive (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:40, 20 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Trade. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Bulgarian Handball Federation, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 03:41, 18 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:21, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Bulgarian Handball Federation, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:24, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Hewhoamareismyself was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Bulgarian Handball Federation and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Bulgarian Handball Federation, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

hewhoamareismyself 05:52, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Trade! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! hewhoamareismyself 05:52, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I appreciate your work in creating Internet Archive links, but I do question the word "rescuing", in this edit, since all the original links were in fact functional. Is that word yours, or is it something that is standard with IABot? I ask because I think that "protecting" is a much better word when it comes to currently functioning links. -- John Broughton (♫♫) 05:10, 23 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Bulgarian Handball Federation, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:38, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Trade. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Bulgarian Handball Federation".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 04:26, 24 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Trade,

Please check out Wikipedia:Graphics_Lab/Illustration_workshop#Game_Rating_and_Administration_Committee_contentent_descriptor_pictograms. I hope the results are satisfactory! If not, please let me know what needs to be fixed. --Slashme (talk) 22:28, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Excellent work!--Trade (talk) 08:53, 5 November 2020 (UTC)@Slashme:[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:53, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I see you're doing a lot of IABot-related edits, but in articles that don't seem to need it. My understanding is current consensus is not to "rescue" sources unnecessarily as it bloats the page. If we decide to include the archive links for every page, a bot should do it. Note that "rescuing" doesn't actually do any archiving -- that's already done by the bot behind the scenes. It just moves the archive link that already exists in the bot's database into the article. — Rhododendrites ^talk \\ 14:21, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I do not have any easy way to see which references are archived in the Wayback Machine and which are not. It's either archive them all or risk the reference becoming rotten sometime in the future. Which, considering the age on many of these references, are likely to happen soon. @Rhododendrites: --Trade (talk) 08:28, 18 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

It is my understanding that the main purpose of IABot is automatically archiving links that are added as references. It maintains a database off-wiki. The idea is that by the time someone notices a link is dead, if it hadn't yet been archived it's too late. So it does it automatically, but doesn't add them to the article unless prompted to do so. I think it also periodically crawls to look for deadlinks and adds archive links to those, but I don't know how frequently. — Rhododendrites ^talk \\ 15:13, 18 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A Peer review request has been made for article Islamic marriage contract to receive a broader perspective on how it may be improved.

Bookku, 'Encyclopedias = expanding information & knowledge' (talk) 10:10, 10 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:48, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I have nominated 4chan for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. (t · c) buidhe 22:33, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I know I have problems of uploading images from Wikimedia Commons to insert into the page, but the copyright is very difficult and I don't see "fair use" copyright anywhere. So, I use it CC0 instead. Later, it went bad minutes ago about copyright images because CC0 is not possibly acquired for the images or just a public domain. I'm no help for uploading for images anymore. In case, it is possible to redo the license from CC0 into "fair use" again? If not, I'd appreciated you at lot about that. Fortunewriter (talk) 16:45, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to upload a fair use image it has to be done on Wikipedia only. Fair use images should not be uploaded to Wikimedia Commons. Just do the same as you did with File:Epidemic FilmPoster.jpeg User:Trade--Trade (talk) 19:00, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The article about Artist and poet Ashraf Fayadh to which you seem to have contributed previously may be due for a positive news update of release. This just for info if you wish to cross check and update. Bookku (talk) 14:28, 12 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:30, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You cannot withdraw a legal threat made by another user, -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 23:14, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I wasn't trying to. I was trying to help him with setting up the unblock request since it's clear he wants to be unblocked Trade (talk) 23:16, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I understand, but they need to follow the instructions they've been given. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 23:17, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

As they don't seem capable of following instructions, I left a note on blocking admin's talk. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 23:25, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A more interesting question is whether or not a reasonable person would take the "legal" part seriously. Considering it was one remark out of a larger rant/shitpost(?) Trade (talk) 23:29, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

We block legal threats on sight, whether I personally agree or not -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 23:39, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I stumbled by this talk page by accident and saw the exchange above. A few hours ago, I left this message for a blocked user who was confused:

"FYI, Wikipedia has still another policy, WP:NLT - "No Legal Threats". I read at an off-Wikipedia site that you're thinking of involving a lawyer. If someone makes a legal threat, our policy is to block them. This policy's purpose is less about silencing critics and discouraging them from exercising their legal rights than simplifying the legal process. This policy protects the Wikimedia Foundation from having a bunch of amateur editors complicating a potential lawsuit by saying all sorts of unhelpful things. As you have seen by now, our community includes a wide range of personalities; some are problematic. If you're taking the legal route, Wikimedia wants their lawyers talking to you and your lawyers -- professionals talking to professionals."

In other words, this is less about punishment than legal process, although many editors and even many admin think of it as a punitive tool to be wielded. When in doubt, block. --A. B. ^{(talk • contribs • global count)} 23:35, 20 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:50, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Trade. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Schloss Pertenstein, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 02:05, 1 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Do not add references or citation needed tags. Per the consensus reached in a June 2018 request for comment (permanent link), there is no need to add references to this list solely to verify that the artist is indeed a notable YouTuber. Those references are in the articles or should be added to there. When you edit the list, there is an edit notice. Follow what it says. Thanks. Mr. C.C.^{Hey yo!}_{I didn't do it!} 05:27, 1 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, that was stupid of me Trade (talk) 09:12, 1 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Trade. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Rayman Redemption".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. ✗plicit 14:07, 9 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Violence against nonbinary people indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:21, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You have recently edited a page related to gender-related disputes or controversies or people associated with them, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

• adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
• comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
• follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
• comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
• refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

⇒SWATJester ^{Shoot Blues, Tell VileRat!} 00:30, 13 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You have recently edited a page related to articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

• adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
• comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
• follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
• comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
• refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

TarnishedPath^talk 04:14, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think it counts as an "introduction" when i already received the same template two weeks ago imho. My guess is that users are only supposed to receive this once to avoid spam Trade (talk) 04:18, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Once per topic -- it's an area where the policy isn't super well written (there are individual articles that are covered by 3+ contentious topics, for instance). But from a process standpoint, they're technically correct. ⇒SWATJester ^{Shoot Blues, Tell VileRat!} 04:40, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Given your WP:ASPERSION casting in article talk space you should pay attention to the contents of the notice. TarnishedPath^talk 09:20, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

Danish Free Press Society

added a link pointing to Young Conservatives

Katrine Winkel Holm

added a link pointing to Young Conservatives

Young Conservatives (Denmark)

added a link pointing to Young Conservatives

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 18:08, 4 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

	Caring
	Thanks for including an NSFW tag with the image you wanted to ask about on Talk:2024 shooting at a Donald Trump rally; helped me brace myself for the image. Staraction (talk | contribs) 03:27, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Trade. A reply to your request at the Illustration workshop has been made. You may view your reply here.
If you are satisfied, please copy/paste the following code and add it to your request: {{resolved|1=~~~~}}

You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{GL Illustration reply}} template.

TheWanderingTraders (talk) 22:13, 16 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

After uploading videos to Commons, you found a relevant Wikipedia article where they could go, and you messaged me as an editor of that article to consider using the videos. They are great. Thanks for doing the extra steps to share after uploading. Bluerasberry (talk) 11:16, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:36, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Trade. Thank you for your work on Anomalous Materials. Another editor, MPGuy2824, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

not mentioned in target page

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|MPGuy2824}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

-MPGuy2824 (talk) 15:21, 31 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Its one of the chapters of the game Trade (talk) 10:27, 1 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@MPGuy2824:--Trade (talk) 04:56, 3 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I've changed the target to Black Mesa Research Facility where it is mentioned. The problem was that with a mention it would be surprising to readers. Happy editing! -MPGuy2824 (talk) 07:31, 3 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You've been putting in some good work here! Great work!

I am a rookie here but I do see something worth noting:

Guts and Blackpowder is a game on Roblox, there are plenty of pages on games that are and likely will stay as drafts.

see Wikipedia:Notability

any objections please reply, happy to parley

~~~ BigBoiWikiWhale (talk) 20:14, 29 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! You do realize i am not the author of that draft, right? Trade (talk) 20:16, 29 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

apologies, I used the latest edit

sorry for inconvenience

I didn't even know that was a tag haha

gday BigBoiWikiWhale (talk) 20:18, 29 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Trade! The thread you created at the Teahouse, Is there anyone here who can write Traditional Chinese (Taiwan), has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please create a new thread. See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by KiranBOT, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=KiranBOT}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). —KiranBOT (talk) 03:25, 10 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A page you created has been nominated for deletion because it is a biography of a living person that is entirely negative in tone and contains unsourced content, according to section G10 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

Do not create articles about living people that are entirely negative in tone and unsourced. Wikipedia has a policy of verifiability and any negative information we use must be reliably sourced, and our articles must be balanced. Negative, unreferenced biographies of living people, along with other attack pages, are not tolerated by Wikipedia, and users who create or repost such pages and images in violation of our biographies of living persons policy may be blocked from editing. TheTechnician27 (Talk page) 14:41, 11 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

i have no clue what this is even about Trade (talk) 16:16, 11 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@TheTechnician27:--Trade (talk) 16:17, 11 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Sorryyyyyyyyy, Trade. I forgot to clean up the message Twinkle sends after realizing the original creator wasn't the one who targeted the redirect that way, and I especially didn't realize that the Twinkle message was this severe. I was out for a long time and didn't see all of this until just now. 😭 Here's an official 'IOU' if you ever need some random busywork done; I promise I'm actually competent enough for it. TheTechnician27 (Talk page) 00:16, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Trade,

This is to let you know that File:Escape from Camp Campbell - Camp Camp S1-E1.webm, a featured picture you uploaded, has been selected as the English Wikipedia's picture of the day (POTD) for June 10, 2026. A preview of the POTD is displayed below and can be edited at Template:POTD/2026-06-10. If you have any concerns, please place a message at Wikipedia talk:Picture of the day. Thank you! Jay8g [V•T•E] 23:01, 8 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Apologies if this is a stupid question but why do you have those links on your userpage? Polygnotus (talk) 19:31, 8 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Just thought it would be interesting to note whenever i saw someone outside Wikipedia talks about Wikipedia articles. Trade (talk) 19:53, 8 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I apologize if my wording was confusing in the RFPP. I was also going to request higher protection, but since there was already a request, I decided to just reply to it. ☩ (Babysharkboss2) 14:09, 10 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I acknowledge receipt of your email. I do not know why you have sent it to me specifically, or by email instead of the more normal talk page. I will not be acting on the email. The concern you raised should be addressed by editing the article, or discussion on its talk page. Stifle (talk) 08:39, 12 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You have recently edited a page related to post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia's norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have an expanded level of powers and discretion in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

• adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
• comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
• follow editorial and behavioural best practices;
• comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
• refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures, you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 16:13, 12 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You have recently edited a page related to articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia's norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have an expanded level of powers and discretion in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

• adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
• comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
• follow editorial and behavioural best practices;
• comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
• refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures, you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 16:17, 12 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

adjacent to what @Significa liberdade just provided notification for. You're absolutely editing in good faith but repeat posts to the article Talk page are not helpful at your current volume. Please think on whether you're adding to the discussion or just opining. We need to lower the volume of posts to keep our sanity. Star Mississippi 16:19, 12 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I don't see a need to revdel the article you emailed me about. There is rough consensus to include that person's name in other articles (see here), and the list in question includes other people who are listed as "(suspect)". Whether or not to include it in that list is a separate debate, but removing the name from the history is unnecessary when the name is available elsewhere on Wikipedia. --Ahecht (TALK
PAGE) 15:26, 14 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]