User talk:Tornado chaser/Archive January-July 2018

This is an archive of past discussions with User:Tornado chaser. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

do not simply delete the modified articles. please refer the facts and figures in the cited sources. wikipedia is to provide the readers true information rather than the filtered info. Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2405:204:3488:CDE9:5CD8:3AB7:8D80:21A1 (talk) 13:01, 1 January 2018 (UTC)

There are 2 problems with your edit, first you are not just stating facts, but directly saying this car should not be bought, which violates wikipedia's policy on neutral point of view, also I suspect that in may be WP:UNDUE to include a section about theft in this artical, feel free to ask me if you have any questions. Tornado chaser (talk) 13:07, 1 January 2018 (UTC)

i will make the changes and comments that will not say the car should not be broght. i will just highlight the facts — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2405:204:3488:CDE9:5CD8:3AB7:8D80:21A1 (talk) 13:13, 1 January 2018 (UTC)

refer the sources. this info is really required. Please read and then make the changes. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2405:204:3488:CDE9:5CD8:3AB7:8D80:21A1 (talk) 13:12, 1 January 2018 (UTC)

now i am putting the indian media news in the article. all the provided links are national dailies. please let me know the reason it should not be posted — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2405:204:3488:CDE9:5CD8:3AB7:8D80:21A1 (talk) 13:21, 1 January 2018 (UTC)

(edit conflict)Your sources don't say what you wrote, the first source (hindustan times) only talks about 1 theft case which happened to be a swift, it does not say that the swift is commonly stolen. Then you talk about the theft ring that was busted, citing 2 sources, but 1 (the hindu) doesn't say anything about the swift, and the other source (daily pioneer) says 1 of the stolen cars was a swift, not that most were. You cite no sources at all for the fact that "India is known for the whole gangs involved in the theft of Maruti Swift", and while you do cite the safety features, you have no sources for the fact that thefts of the swift are increasing. You cite a hindustan times article on the car theft ring, but it only mentions that 2 of 4 stolen cars were swifts. It was an improvement when you removed the non neutral language form your edit, but you still need to have properly referenced info, see WP:V. Tornado chaser (talk) 13:34, 1 January 2018 (UTC)

now read these sources -

Source 1 https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/delhi/car-snatchers-held-50-cases-solved/articleshow/62301214.cms

the comment in article is - The gang specialised in stealing Swift cars but stole other vehicles after receiving the demand from their counterparts in northeast India and Nepal. The cars were transported from Haryana to Nagaland in containers. According to joint commissioner (crime), Alok Kumar, the gang used to dispose of the stolen vehicles by implanting the documents of total loss accidental vehicles. They also supplied these cars to dealers in Haryana and Delhi as used cars. Cops have recovered 15 Swift and Swift Dzire cars, two i20s, two Scorpios, two Innovas, two Crets and two Ciaz apart from a Tata Safari,

Source 2 https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/gurgaon/6-burglars-arrested-scorpio-swift-and-gold-biscuit-seized/articleshow/59328459.cms search for Swift Stolen

http://www.tribuneindia.com/news/chandigarh/snatchers-gang-busted-3-held/518173.html

search for swift

Source 3 http://www.dailypioneer.com/city/inter-state-gang--of-vehicle-lifters-busted-six-held.html search for swift

videos you can see

now do not revert. discuss and then do — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2405:204:3488:CDE9:5CD8:3AB7:8D80:21A1 (talk) 13:46, 1 January 2018 (UTC)

The only source you cite that mentions a pattern of stealing swifts (not just 1 or 2 thefts) is a source that talks about a crime ring that stole 15 swifts, the edit you made to the swift article had the same problems I pointed out in my last comment, for example you still have not provided even 1 source that says india is known for swift thefts. Even a gang that specialized in stealing swifts and stole 15 is not significant enough to be in an encyclopedia article on swifts, see WP:UNDUE. I am fine with discussing this but your repeated reinstatement of disputed content while discussion is ongoing is verging on disruptive editing. Tornado chaser (talk) 14:58, 1 January 2018 (UTC)

I do not agree wiTh you. INDIA is not known for swift thefts. But the car is repeatedly stolen in India. Do you want if specifically the swift is the most stollen car then is it a valid information. I do not agree with you. I think swift stolen information is correct Lavikushi (talk) 17:15, 1 January 2018 (UTC)

@Lavikushi: Could you clarify what you mean? and who you are talking to (me or 2405:204:3488:cde9:5cd8:3ab7:8d80:21a1). Tornado chaser (talk) 17:17, 1 January 2018 (UTC)

Hello Tornado,Iam new to wiki ,now I have added a source kindly check — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jyothiz (talk • contribs) 10:51, 2 January 2018 (UTC)

@Jyothiz: You added a citation, but you put it under the content, rather than directly after the3 sentence/paragraph being sourced from it. You should move the reverence to be directly after the content you are sourcing to that reference, feel free to ask me if you have any questions. Tornado chaser (talk) 19:20, 2 January 2018 (UTC)

Good afternoon Tornado chaser!

Thank you for your warm welcome to Wikipedia. Also, your username is a very cool one. I used to want to be a storm chaser when I was younger.

Now, in terms of Kegedonce Press. I'll admit that it was my first edit (I'm still really new to Wikimedia as a whole) but I am in no way affiliated or are employed by or for Kegedonce Press. I just really appreciate Indigenous literature. I noticed when I was doing Wikipedia searches on Indigenous content in North America that it was asking for further information (such as secondary sources), so I did some digging and inputted some new content.

The red (unlinked) names are ones that I will approach the authors to request permission to write a Wikipedia article on them (as some of them have written works that have greatly contributed to Indigenous literature in Canada, some have even won awards). I do not work for the authors that I wish to input into the article (and create content for), but recognize the increasing need for Indigenous content on Wikipedia.

If you have any pro-tips on how to do this without appearing to have a conflict of interest, I would sincerely appreciate your input.

Cheers,

Morinjam Morinjam (talk) 21:08, 11 January 2018 (UTC)

You seem to be ok, I Looked at some of your edits and there doesn't seem to be a COI problem (not that it hurts to know the rules), feel free to ask my if you have any questions. Tornado chaser (talk) 02:04, 12 January 2018 (UTC)

@Morinjam:. Tornado chaser (talk) 02:05, 12 January 2018 (UTC)

Please don't try to fix these issues of "desired title occupied by redirect" by cut-and-paste moves. That just detroys all article history. I'll put in a request for a technical page move, and an admin will sort it. --Elmidae (talk · contribs) 18:12, 14 January 2018 (UTC) Requested [1]. --Elmidae (talk · contribs) 18:17, 14 January 2018 (UTC)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Jesse Hamilton. Legobot (talk) 04:29, 16 January 2018 (UTC)

An article that you have been involved in editing—Fake News Awards—has been proposed for merging with another article. If you are interested, please participate in the merger discussion. Thank you. DARTHBOTTO _talk•cont 23:04, 18 January 2018 (UTC)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:David Wolfe (entrepreneur). Legobot (talk) 04:31, 19 January 2018 (UTC)

Hello, You kindly left me a message after I edited a page about myself. I looked on the guidelines and believe I was within right to edit the page due to the fact the article is continually being edited to include my own private information: I have a stage name and my private and legal name keeps being published. I am desperately checking the page frequently and remove it whenever I see it. But it’s upsetting me that the work I put into making the page more neutral, as stipulated by Wikipedia, by including information about my whole career and not just lengthy information about one credit, and removing private information and old photos with incorrect captions, keeps being undone. I try to rectify and it is a waste of time. What can I do? Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Amyjk (talk • contribs) 23:31, 20 January 2018 (UTC)

@Amyjk: I looked at the article more and removed the supposed real name (it was not in any of the sources cited, violating WP:V), I agree that newer photos are better, but why is an old photo worse than no photo?(and what is wrong with the caption?) I think the reason you are being reverted is because self-promotional editing is so common that any editing by the subject of an article is suspicious, when editing an article about yourself, make sure to add references to reliable sourcesand to always edit in a neutral manner Feel free to ask me if you have any questions. Tornado chaser (talk) 01:54, 21 January 2018 (UTC)

Where did the tornado chaser go? Oh wow. I'm blown away....Anyone that wants to challenge the "conspiracy theory" please do your own investigation like any logical person would before they open there mouths and start yapping about something they haven't a clue about. DBLUF (talk) 22:09, 21 January 2018 (UTC) I didn't think you'd have much to say to that. DBLUF (talk) 22:17, 21 January 2018 (UTC)

@DBLUF:I responded on your talk page. Tornado chaser (talk) 22:31, 21 January 2018 (UTC)

Hi there!

I just wanted to let you know I have published a new page on this - with much shorter new wording than the one you objected to and which hopefully now meets encylopedic criteria.

I hope I've learnt from your comments. I'm new to this. I started by editing a page but this is the first I have created to update Wikipedia.

I'm a motorcycle and rugby football enthusiast.

Jack — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jackfenwick (talk • contribs) 12:19, 22 January 2018 (UTC)

@Jackfenwick: I made a few changes to the draft page to make it sound less like an ad, feel free to ask if you have any questions. Tornado chaser (talk) 22:40, 22 January 2018 (UTC)

@Tornado chaser: Many thanks for the guidance. I thought a generic dry description would be helpful and OK. Jackfenwick (talk) 13:40, 23 January 2018 (UTC)

Why did you remove the word typically from the edit? Are females that do not produce eggs not females? Post menopausal, cancer survivors, etc. are All still female, no??

Feel free to message me: [email protected]

Looks like an accident/error on my part, thanks for fixing it. Tornado chaser (talk) 01:39, 25 January 2018 (UTC)

Hi TornadoChaser,

Thanks for your feedback on my talk page in regards to recent edits made to the Roxy Jacenko biographical wiki page.

If you had taken the time to properly examine the edit history of the page, you would see that at multiple instances, citations and references to her narcissm and her family history have been continually removed by single ip address non-registered users, believed to be owned by Roxy Jacenko or people within her business. You would know as a recent changes patroller that this actually represents wiki vandalism. These IP addresses have had messages added to their talk pages by multiple users asking them not to remove references on the page.

In future, I would ask you to refrain from reverting entire edits and marking as "vandalism" without doing proper research and to instead, if you believe an article lacks citation, mark it as such.

Thanks for your time - Tommosimmo

@Tommosimmo: Calling someone a narcissist or any other opinionated word in wikipedia's voice is a violation of WP:NPOV, fixing NPOV violations is not vandalism. Tornado chaser (talk) 19:39, 26 January 2018 (UTC)

There was a reference for it.

http://www.loscerritosnews.net/2018/01/26/pico-rivera-councilman-greg-salcido-says-all-us-military-personnel-are-dumbshits/

Please do not delete something with a credible source again.

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:ReleaseTheMemo. Legobot (talk) 04:27, 29 January 2018 (UTC)

You undid an edit of mine without bothering to give a reason.[2] Have you read the manual of style? Have you read WP:REVEXP? If not, why not? If so, then presumably you are behaving disruptively just for fun here. 2.25.45.223 (talk) 08:24, 30 January 2018 (UTC)

Hi,

I would like to update my page. How can I go about this please ? Mostly Olympic and World Cup related.

CAREER NOTES (INC. TOP RESULTS) IN 2011:

FINA World Aquatic Championships

Bronze: Combo

4: Free Team

4: Technical Team

Brazil Open

Gold: Technical Team

Gold: Free Team

German Open

Silver: Technical Team

Silver: Free Team

CAREER NOTES (INC. TOP RESULTS) IN 2010:

FINA World Cup

Bronze: Team

Bronze: Combo

Japan Open

Gold: Free Team

Gold: Technical Team

Gold: Combo

CAREER NOTES (INC. TOP RESULTS) IN 2009:

FINA World Aquatic Championships

4: Technical Team

Japan Open

Gold: Technical Duet

German Open

Bronze: Technical Duet

CAREER NOTES (INC. TOP RESULTS) IN 2008:

Olympic Games

4: Team

CAREER NOTES (INC. TOP RESULTS) IN 2007:

FINA World Aquatic Championships

6: Technical Team

6: Free Team

CAREER NOTES (INC. TOP RESULTS) IN 2006:

FINA World Cup

4: Combo

6: Team

PAN AM GAMES RESULTS — ALL EVENTS, ALL GAMES:

2007

Silver: team

WORLD CHAMPIONSHIP APPEARANCES – BEST RESULTS BY YEAR:

2011

Bronze: Combo

4: Free Team

4: Technical Team

2009

6: Technical Duet

2007

6: Free Team

6: Technical Team

2002

JUNIOR WORLD CHAMPIONSHIPS -

Silver: Combo

Bronze: Team — Preceding unsigned comment added by TraySync (talk • contribs) 21:44, 30 January 2018 (UTC)

@TraySync:You need to cite reliable sources for the things you add, you should also be familiar with wikipedia's conflict of interest policy, since you are writing about yourself. Feel free to ask any questions Tornado chaser (talk) 21:51, 30 January 2018 (UTC)

I notice that you've added some helpful information in the Rogers Drums article. I think that you'll be happy to know that Rogers is back in business. [3] Thanks. Garagepunk66 (talk) 05:14, 31 January 2018 (UTC)

Hi there, you’ve helped me before, and I need your help again with two pages of La Luna Sangre: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_La_Luna_Sangre_characters https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/La_Luna_Sangre Need page protection and/or request warning a few unknown IP users who are either practicing in this article or vandalizing because edits entered are gibberish. They delete huge chunks of text without stating why, no edit summary. ThanksPipamidalton(talk) 02:09, 1 February 2018 (UTC) Pipamidalton (talk) 02:09, 1 February 2018 (UTC)

http://www.notreble.com/buzz/2014/12/18/in-memoriam-larry-sims/ Roxifari (talk) 18:54, 23 April 2018 (UTC)

please help translate this message into your local language via meta

The 2017 Cure Award

In 2017 you were one of the top ~250 medical editors across any language of Wikipedia. Thank you from Wiki Project Med Foundation for helping bring free, complete, accurate, up-to-date health information to the public. We really appreciate you and the vital work you do! Wiki Project Med Foundation is a user group whose mission is to improve our health content. Consider joining here, there are no associated costs.

Thanks again :-) -- Doc James along with the rest of the team at Wiki Project Med Foundation 02:58, 26 April 2018 (UTC)

Tornado chaser, please read the preceding text before reverting. The identification of the specimen as Australovenator is supported by reliable sources shortly prior to the inserted text, and therefore there is no point in reiterating the identification of the specimen (by a non-academic source, note) after a discussion of its portrayals in media. 2001:569:782B:7A00:B4CC:D054:6B07:BF07 (talk) 03:18, 26 July 2018 (UTC)

The preceding text does not specify that the dwarf allosaur from the video was Australovenator, only that a certain fossil was. Tornado chaser (talk) 03:30, 26 July 2018 (UTC)

This is an archive of past discussions with User:Tornado chaser. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.