User talk:Topcipher/Archives/2017/JulyThis week's article for improvement (week 27, 2017)
This week's article for improvement (week 28, 2017)
New Page Reviewer Newsletter
Hello Topcipher/Archives/2017, thank you for your efforts reviewing new pages!
![]() Backlog update:
Technology update:
General project update:
If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here. TonyBallioni (talk) 03:48, 14 July 2017 (UTC) This week's article for improvement (week 29, 2017)
This week's article for improvement (week 30, 2017)
Beauty.AIHello! I am contacting you with respect to your decision to reject the Beauty.AI draft. I believe that it does, as a concept, fulfill the notability requirements. Namely, this text: "Wikipedia requires significant coverage (not just mere mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject..." I feel this has been fulfilled. It has numerous articles discussing Beauty.AI, its methodology, its flaws, and its impact and contribution to a problem with how bias infects AI. As far as your unique text, my intention has always been to make it about the contest and not the company, as I do not feel that the company itself is as notable as it is for Beauty.AI. I also feel that independent sources have been acquired in great number. I acknowledge and understand your concerns, but I hope that you may reconsider for these reasons. Thank you for your time. -- Aiconomy (talk) 09:41, 24 July 2017 (UTC) This week's article for improvement (week 31, 2017)
|