{{helpme}}
Well, then, maybe it will work. So you're from Argentina. So I think we can talk in spanish in any future messages, as it is my mother language too. Bye —Preceding unsigned comment added by Onikiri (talk • contribs) 02:03, 25 January 2008 (UTC)
Hi. Well, there are lots of toy sites with info about Myth Cloth. Yeah, what you say about Seiya its true, i was at the site a while ago...I don't remember exactly right now, but it is true. Ah, i remember, I think you can find it in cavzodiaco.com.br, in the news of january. It is really only gold plating, not really a Cloth made out of pure gold, but it is gold indeed, and it looked nice. It was the Cloth that Seiya had in the Poseidon arc.
Hi, sorry if i didnt reply but I didnt think you needed me to say something. I dont really know what you want me to say. It was not me who reverted the changes you said you made to the Athena or other pages. I wrote the Athena, Poseidon, Artemis, Zeus, Apollon, Hypnos and Thanatos articles entirely, also Lyumnades Kaza and Thetis, and have contributed actively for all Saint Seiya articles. Most of the pics in the articles were uploaded by me, specially the pics from the manga found in them, i think i added all of them. I have noticed my articles rarely get edited, so i dont know if someone reverted what you typed.
By the way, did u add the help thingy to the japanese names of the Saints techniques? Theyre spelled correctly, so I just wondered why the help thingy is there...but anyway, in any case, i think you know japanese, i do too, so in case u need help there it would be my pleasure. I have noticed you add good info to the articles so I think we can work well together in the future.
Regards. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Onikiri (talk • contribs) 19:55, 22 January 2008 (UTC) talk:Tintor2/Archive 1
If you mean List of Naruto characters, summons and beasts are already (temporarily) listed there. ~SnapperTo 20:18, 24 November 2007 (UTC)
I was going to rewrite all of the main character articles at some point or another, and probably redirect those that don't have any significant conception/reception information. You are welcome to continue adding references to those articles; might save me some time whenever I start working on it. But if you'd like to focus your attention on something I won't be redoing, you can find references for the various lists (characters, jutsu, etc.) ~SnapperTo 03:52, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
Why can't we add what has happened in the latest chapter/ —Preceding unsigned comment added by SuperSaiyaMan (talk • contribs) 22:46, 31 December 2007 (UTC)
He was using the assumption that the article was a list article. The old one was, but the current one is a regular article with a few lists embedded. Apparently I forgot the do an edit summary. :(--Marhawkman (talk) 13:47, 25 December 2007 (UTC)
Wow, that is a lot of cruft. I'm not familiar with the series, and as such, I cannot make a truly informed decision on the matter. However, most of these articles are utterly terrible: giant chunks of extended plot summary and trivial details and trivia sections. For instance, an article like Aries Sion is composed of nothing but the aforementioned cruft, and they could easily be merged. Be bold in your mergers at first. If you meet resistance, then discuss. Feel free to ask other editors for their opinion on the subject if you want. If that fails (and I mean you meet an utter dead end facing hopelessly stubborn editors), then bring it to AfD. Good luck. Cheers, Sephiroth BCR (Converse) 18:25, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
The word predictable means 'possible to guess', it does not mean 'randomly guessed'. Although the chapter guide is not a crystal ball, the chapters that will be put in Volume 7 can be nothing else but the next 6 upto 9 chapters ahead. The number of the chapters put in the next volume might be questionable, but it is very possible give the range of the possible number of chapter. A tankubon cannot be too thick nor too thin. So the appropriate number of chapter can't escape 6 or 9 chapters. And it can't skip any chapter either. So it certainly has to start from chapter 52. If you have a problem with the certainty, say so. Commenting 'This is not a crystal ball' is rather insulting. It quite implies that I randomly guess it. You can just tell what will be put in the next volume by simply thinking a little bit.
Also, you seem to be the person who edit Kreios' Soma from Sickle back to Scimitar. However, I've asked many people and they quite agree that Scimitar certainly not the one. I'd like you to participate the talk at the bottom of this page: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Saint_Seiya_Episode_G
I do appreciate politeness. Thank you in advance. Anthonydraco (talk) 22:43, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
OK, I apologise you in return for the reaction. I don't know if I've shown too much aggression on what I told you. If I have, sorry.
Well, I too think that understanding is always better.
As for Kreios' Soma, I've provided the possible weapon Kreios' Soma can be on the concerning talk page already. Please check. I'm willing to discuss.
By the way, I've replied you on my talk page, but I'm not sure if you'd get it. So I do it here again. If this is not necessary, feel free to correct me. I'm still learning. Anthonydraco (talk) 23:24, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
I've also checked the not a crystal ball page. It appears that I cannot put any analysis on it. So, you are correct. I apologise. I've changed it back to unknown.
And in the reply, you said you don't understand the weapon. Am I to understand that I can proceed with editting it to a weapon that looks more like Kreios' Soma?Anthonydraco (talk) 23:29, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
Just because he wrote the article does not mean he owns it or improvements cannot be made (Naruto Articles).Earthbendingmaster (talk) 00:42, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
Yes. We should be civil about this. Earthbendingmaster (talk) 03:43, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
I have carefully checked the manga I own again and found the quote that Shaka does know that the current Pope is Saga. I'll provide you the quote here to avoid dispute. It might not be worded exactly like the Knights of Zodiac (Eng version).
Aiolia: So when Aiolos was branded a traitor 13 years ago, he slanderedhim!? Mu: My and the Ancient Teacher's hunch was correct... Aldebaran: What!? We have been fooled all these 13 years!? Milo: So that means that woman is the real Athena. Shaka: I know that Shaka has been impersonating the Pope since 13 years ago, but why can't I sense his evil?
This is from Saint Seiya vol.13 p.56.
So those that did know but still serve him are Deathmask, Aphrodite, and Shura like you said, but from this, it means that even Shaka serve Saga, he didn't know about the evil side. Anthonydraco (talk) 21:37, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
'Minor specter' means a less important specter. Just 'minor' means an underage person. Edward is a kid. So if you want to say he is a kid by maintaining the word minor, pick the latter so that it doesn't give the wrong impression. Saying he's a minor character gives meaning that he's not very important. Anthonydraco (talk) 23:03, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
While I appreciate your efforts on those section added in the Sanctuary article, those parts are not neccessary.
The mission section has already been mentioned in the first section, as it is about the Sanctuary itself. There's no need to repeat the same information in the same page.
The weapon section is about 'Saint', not directly about 'Sanctuary'. While this is an article about 'Sanctuary', not everything about Saint Seiya is needed here, just about 'Sanctuary'. Also, the weapons and the reason why Saints fight without them are already mentioned in another seperate article. If you do want to add those data, I suggest you link them instead of copying the text there. Adding more text will add unneccessary data to the database and lengthen the article. Anthonydraco (talk) 21:45, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
You have recently deleted a large section of Cygnus Hyoga. While it looks as if you are going to replace the deleted content in a alternative form (swapping Notable people and events with Plot overview) It is advisable to keep the original text in place until your new section obsoletes the old section. Barry m (talk) 12:17, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
I'll be getting to Goku's page very soon. Otherwise, I'm not understanding your concern. Lord Sesshomaru (talk • edits) 22:19, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
Well, first off, a personal sandbox is just a subpage of your own user page. To create one is like creating a new article; just create "User:Tintor2/Sandbox" or "User talk:Tintor2/Sandbox" (you can either extend it from you user page or talk page)
You don't even have to name it Sandbox, e.g. "User:Tintor2/This is my writing section". Or if you just want it to be temporary for creating a single article, you can name it User talk:Tintor2/Sagara Sanosuke draft or User talk:Tintor2/Myojin Yahiko draft, since those are the articles you're planning to fix. Just as long the article starts with "User:Tintor2" or "User talk:Tintor2".
Afterwards, if you want to delete the subpage, just replace the info on the page with the template {{Db-userreq}} in order for someone to speedily delete the subpage. For more information on creating a subpage go here: Wikipedia:Subpages.
Second, what did you want me to check? DarkAngel █▀▀007▄▄█ 07:32, 22 January 2008 (UTC)
For some reason, I'm not really comfortable with this edit. The format before was in-line with the other character articles because not everyone is part of the family tree. May I change this? Please respond on your talk page, Lord Sesshomaru (talk • edits) 17:24, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
The article looks fine. It could use more reception information, but that's the only big thing. Maybe a picture of him mid-strike, slashing a couple of guys? I'd also suggest shortening the Background section, but other than that it should be an easy GA once you ref everything. ~SnapperTo 01:37, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
I just have to ask, how did this happen? Lord Sesshomaru (talk • edits) 23:50, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
P.S.: If you'd like, join the discussion over here. We need to get everything straight if we really want Naruto's article to pass WP:GA review. Lord Sesshomaru (talk • edits) 01:15, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
Himura Kenshin could actually be featured article material by the time it passes WP:GAN. About "hitokiri battōsai", do you think it should be capitalised since it is a title? Lord Sesshomaru (talk • edits) 22:45, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
Good, but your logic is flawed. By your logic, you are claiming that there is no time difference between part 1 and part 2, when in fact, it has been confirmed and verified that there is. Sasuke9031 (talk) 02:17, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
I'll do my best to help you. I took a quick glance at one of the scans, but they don't really give much info. Just, what I assume is basic stuff, like how he has two scars in a cross-shape (There's something about a Tomoe here. Is this a character from the show?) His hair is tied in two tails, which are flowing to make him look younger, but not too much as to make it more gender-neutral. His sword has a long Habaki to make it easier to draw it out of the scabbard. On the whole, the sword has a simply structure, with emphasis on strength. There's also something about his haori. Something with western suspenders, or something. I'll look at it in more detail later. I'm a bit busy right now. JadziaLover 19:35, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
I read somewhere in the image policies that the maximum would be two-three pics. The Ranma ½ articles overdid it drastically and they risk losing all of them. Kenshin is perfect, no need to add more. That line, "When creating Kenshin, Watsuki made him inspired by the history of a real ..." I thought it was a bit better before. Think you can give it another wording? Lord Sesshomaru (talk • edits) 16:57, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
I just finished looking at Rurouni Kenshin and here's what I noted is missing:
You voted twice. You should correct this to avoid confusion. Lord Sesshomaru (talk • edits) 02:09, 19 February 2008 (UTC)
If it was just a link, I would have removed it outright, but since it was used to source a claim, I merely removed the link, following discussion at WT:ANIME#Appropriate sources for reception. Honestly, I'm not too sure on whether to keep it or not, but I think it can stay as long as it isn't re-linked. —TangentCube, Dialogues 11:27, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
