User talk:Thesazh

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Asparagusus were:

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Muduganti Jithender Reddy and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Asparagusus (interaction) 13:30, 15 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Thesazh! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Asparagusus (interaction) 13:30, 15 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Asparagusus,

Thank you for reviewing my article draft for Muduganti Jithender Reddy. I appreciate your feedback and guidance.

I've carefully reviewed your comments and have made significant revisions to the article draft in line with Wikipedia's guidelines and standards. I've strived to maintain a neutral tone, avoid peacock terms, and provide relevant and reliable sources to establish the notability of the subject. The article now adheres to Wikipedia's encyclopedic format.

I kindly request you to review the revised draft once again and provide your guidance. I am committed to ensuring that the article meets all Wikipedia requirements. If there are any specific areas that still need improvement or if I've overlooked something, please let me know. Your guidance is invaluable as I work towards contributing to Wikipedia in a meaningful way.

Thank you for your time and consideration.

Best regards,

Thesazh Thesazh (talk) 11:46, 16 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Thesazh. I've removed the rest of the peacock terms, but you still need to provide reliable sources that establish notability for the subject. Thanks for the kind message! Asparagusus (interaction) 13:12, 16 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Asparagusus,

Thank you for your prompt response and continued guidance. I sincerely appreciate your help in refining the article about Muduganti Jithender Reddy.

I have diligently addressed the issues you raised by reworking the content, removing any peacock terms, and providing a more neutral tone throughout the article. Additionally, I've included relevant images to enhance the visual aspect of the article and have cited sources where possible. I am fully committed to ensuring that the article adheres to Wikipedia's standards.

I kindly request you to review the revised draft once again to assess if the changes made align with Wikipedia's guidelines. If you find that the article now meets the required criteria, I would be grateful if you could consider approving and publishing it.

Thank you once again for your time, feedback, and support. I look forward to your response.

Best regards,

Thesazh Thesazh (talk) 16:10, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello again Thesazh! The draft still doesn't have any sources. If you have trouble finding any, you can ask for help at the Teahouse. Asparagusus (interaction) 23:09, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Qcne were:

The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations. Please cite your sources using footnotes. For instructions on how to do this, please see Referencing for beginners. Thank you.

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Written in a completely inappropriate tone.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Siddam Manohar and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Qcne (talk) 13:25, 20 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Qcne was: This submission is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: Zero improvement to tone, this is just WP:SPAM

Qcne (talk) 16:30, 23 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Draft:Siddam Manohar, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Qcne (talk) 16:30, 23 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Thesazh. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

• avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
• propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{edit COI}} template);
• disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest § How to disclose a COI);
• avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam § External link spamming);
• do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. 331dot (talk) 17:00, 23 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You claim to have taken this image of Mr. Reddy but it appears that you copied it out of a book; this could be a copyright violation. Please clarify. 331dot (talk) 17:01, 23 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You also claim to have taken this image. 331dot (talk) 17:02, 23 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, @331dot Regarding the Image of Mr. Reddy, I'm the one who taken this image Thesazh (talk) 09:23, 24 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I believe that you used your camera to take the picture of the book his picture is in, but I don't believe that you took the image in the book. 331dot (talk) 12:31, 24 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

And what about the other image? 331dot (talk) 12:33, 24 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note that taking an image of a picture in a book would be no different than sitting in a movie theater recording a film being shown, and then selling copies claiming it is your film. If you took a picture of a picture, copyright still remains with the original photographer. 331dot (talk) 10:22, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@331dot, I appreciate your guidance. Regarding the image of Mr. Reddy, it was initially captured by an unknown person and was sourced from a photo album. I uploaded it to this biography. Thesazh (talk) 10:56, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, you shouldn't do that. The copyright belongs to the original photographer whether you can identify them or not, unless the photo is old enough to be in the public domain(doubtful as he does not seem old enough) 331dot (talk) 11:00, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@331dot thanks for your guidance on this, It seems I misunderstood the Wikipedia terms regarding photo uploads, particularly in cases where the original photographer is not identifiable. I regret any oversight on my part, and I'm fully committed to rectifying this mistake. I will promptly remove the photo in question to ensure compliance with Wikipedia's copyright policies, If I have an option to remove the pic I'll remove it right away or else, please kindly remove for your end. Thesazh (talk) 11:07, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Thesazh. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Thesazh. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Thesazh|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. 331dot (talk) 17:48, 23 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@331dot

Let me clarify this for you, I want to clarify that I am assisting Chidipothu Manohar in compiling factual and neutral information for a potential Wikipedia page about his professional achievements. However, I am not receiving any form of compensation, financial or otherwise, for these edits. My aim is to ensure accuracy and adherence to Wikipedia guidelines regarding notable subjects. Thesazh (talk) 09:26, 24 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

So you are doing this for free out of the goodness of your heart? You just approached him at random? How do you know him? 331dot (talk) 12:30, 24 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@331dot

I work in the Telugu film industry as an English subtitle provider for Telugu films. In the course of my work, I had the opportunity to meet Chidipothu Manohar, and we discussed the idea of creating a Wikipedia page for him to highlight his contributions to the industry.

Here is a link to my profile in the film industry for your reference [Imdb: Sashi Kotipalli - iMDb and one of my works with same tagline I mentioned in subtitle file as Sazh in Youtube trailer: Changure Bangaru Raja - Official Trailer - Saregama Telugu]. Additionally, I'll provide Mr. Manohar's relevant details to support the authenticity of our connection. Thesazh (talk) 12:42, 24 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You have a conflict of interest and you must formally disclose it, go to WP:COI for instructions. 331dot (talk) 12:45, 24 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@331dot Thank you for the guidance regarding the conflict of interest policies on Wikipedia. I understand the importance of transparency and adherence to these guidelines. To ensure compliance, I'll refrain from editing pages where I have a conflict of interest and strictly adhere to the guidelines moving forward.

Regarding the new page for Manohar, I'd like to confirm that I'll proceed with the creation in compliance with Wikipedia's policies. I will incorporate reliable, neutral sources and maintain a neutral point of view in line with the community standards. I aim to contribute valuable content while strictly adhering to the guidelines on conflict of interest. If there are specific formats or guidelines I should follow for the new page creation, I'm open to suggestions and guidance. These are the points I understood from WP:COI, kindly help me if I'm wrong

{{COI|employer=Sazh|client=Chidipothu Manohar|relationship=brother|talk=About Chidipothu Manohar's filmography and education}}

== Disclosure of Conflict of Interest ==

As a contributor on Wikipedia, I disclose that I have a potential conflict of interest when creating articles for individuals I am personally acquainted with or have a professional relationship with in the Telugu film industry. My intention is to contribute neutral, well-sourced content that adheres to Wikipedia's guidelines and policies on notability, reliability, and neutrality. I commit to maintaining transparency and welcome guidance from the Wikipedia community to ensure compliance with Wikipedia's standards. I aim to follow Wikipedia's guidelines for conflict of interest and will refrain from promotional content or biased editing. Please feel free to reach out on my talk page for any clarification or concerns regarding my contributions.

This user has publicly declared that they have a conflict of interest regarding the Wikipedia article Thesazh.

Thesazh (talk) 12:57, 24 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you put the small user box on your user page, that will satisfy the need to disclose, thanks. The larger notice is meant for others to use on articles, so I have suppressed it here. 331dot (talk) 14:58, 24 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@331dot Thank you for your understanding and your help in this process, I'll start writing the article, thank you! Thesazh (talk) 23:21, 24 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Maliner were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Siddam Manohar and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Maliner (talk) 12:56, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DreamRimmer was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Siddam Manohar and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

– DreamRimmer (talk) 01:45, 29 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@DreamRimmer

Thank you for the guidance provided. I've diligently searched for additional reliable sources and references regarding Chidipothu Manohar's career in the film industry. However, despite exhaustive efforts, I've encountered challenges in locating extensive, independent coverage that meets Wikipedia's standards.

I understand the importance of verifiable and substantial references. I'm committed to ensuring that any information shared regarding Manohar's career is supported by credible sources. I will continue my efforts to identify stronger references and will resubmit the draft as soon as I can gather sufficient and appropriate sourcing.

Thank you for your guidance and patience. Should you have any specific recommendations or further advice on finding suitable references, I'd greatly appreciate it. Thesazh (talk) 11:33, 3 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You can search for sources via the Editor resources located at the bottom of the AfC template in your draft. – DreamRimmer (talk) 12:22, 3 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Thesazh,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Duvvuru Varshitha for deletion, because it seems to be promotional, rather than an encyclopedia article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Maliner (talk) 16:35, 20 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This page is not unambiguously promotional, because... I understand your concern about the promotional tone, and I'm committed to ensuring that the article aligns with Wikipedia's guidelines. I will carefully review and revise the content to address any promotional elements. Please grant me the opportunity to make the necessary adjustments, and I assure you that I'll adhere strictly to Wikipedia's standards for neutrality and encyclopedic content. If there are specific areas you find promotional, I would greatly appreciate your guidance so that I can make the corrections accordingly. Thank you for your understanding, and I look forward to your feedback. Thesazh (talk) 16:56, 20 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Muduganti Jithender Reddy. Thanks! Deb (talk) 17:50, 20 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Grabup was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of films). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Not in-depth covarage from multiple independent reliable sources, also not yet released so no critical reviews. Wait for the release.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Nindha (Film) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

GrabUp - Talk 04:41, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Grabup was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of films). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Nindha (Film) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

GrabUp - Talk 05:23, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Updated the whole page, Kindly go through once and let me know if anything I missed out Thesazh (talk) 11:14, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Grabup. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Draft:Nindha (film) have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. You are not allowed to delete past declines and comments left by Afc reviewers, If you continue to delete, you can be blocked from editing. GrabUp - Talk 17:27, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Nearlyevil665 was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

• in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
• reliable
• secondary
• independent of the subject
  

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Nindha (film) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

nearlyevil665 17:59, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Thesazh. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Siddam Manohar".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. ✗plicit 14:04, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Thesazh. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Muduganti Jithender Reddy, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 11:06, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Thesazh. Thank you for your work on Currency Nagar. Another editor, North8000, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Good start

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 14:27, 18 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Pailam Pilaga, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 17:10, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to Pailam Pilaga. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability, it is promotional and reads like an advertisement, you may have a possible Conflict of Interest and Apart from the promotional wording, the sources do not seem to be reliable. Get better sources before moving it to the main space.. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 18:45, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Jeraxmoira

Thank you for your feedback on the Pailam Pilaga draft. I've rephrased the content to align with Wikipedia's guidelines and incorporated reliable sources to better establish the film's notability. I'm looking forward to seeing this draft move towards publication in the article space once reviewed. Thesazh (talk) 19:36, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to Pailam Pilaga. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability and please see Wikipedia:Notability (films). I would advise you to submit it for review instead of moving it back to the mainspace. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 08:06, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Jovanmilic97 was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

• in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
• reliable
• secondary
• independent of the subject
  

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

All references here are covering routine announcements and press release reiterations that every other movie out there gets - song release, first look, poster, casting. Are there any reviews of the movie in reliable sources? As it stands, it doesn't meet WP:GNG or WP:NFILM.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Pailam Pilaga and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Jovanmilic97 (talk) 14:33, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Jovanmilic97 Good day! I've added more notable and reliable sources for the article, kindly have a look on it, and do let me know, if I miss out anything or needed anything! Thesazh (talk) 15:06, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to Dhakshina (film). Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Ednabrenze (talk) 06:18, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Thesazh, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

While your contributions are appreciated, I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Laggam (film), should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Laggam (film).

Deletion discussions usually run for seven days and are not votes. Our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. The most common issue in these discussions is notability, but it's not the only aspect that may be discussed; read the nomination and any other comments carefully before you contribute to the discussion. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Bastun}}. And don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Bastun^{Ėġáḍβáś₮ŭŃ!} 15:15, 11 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Bastun

Thank you for bringing this to my attention. I appreciate the opportunity to address the concerns regarding the Laggam (film) article.

I believe Laggam is notable due to its upcoming theatrical release, significant regional media coverage, and interest from the Telugu film audience. It has been covered by news outlets and has generated discussions on social media platforms, contributing to its cultural relevance.

Infact, I have added references to articles and interviews from reputable media outlets that discuss the film's release, its cast, and production. These sources should help establish the film's notability as per Wikipedia's guidelines.

@Bastun I am open to any further suggestions for improving the article and ensuring that it meets Wikipedia's standards for notability and verifiability. Thesazh (talk) 15:23, 11 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Thesazh. WP:NFF states that unreleased films should not have articles. If you'd prefer, I can move the article to draft space until it's officially released, at which point it can be moved back to article space? You can continue to work on it while it's in draft space. Bastun^{Ėġáḍβáś₮ŭŃ!} 15:32, 11 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Bastun

Thank you for your suggestion and for clarifying the policy. I understand the WP:NFF guidelines regarding unreleased films. Moving the article to the draft space sounds like a reasonable solution. I would appreciate it if you could proceed with that.

This would give me the opportunity to continue improving the article with more details and sources as they become available, and then I can move it back to the article space once the film is officially released.

Thanks again, Cheers! Thesazh (talk) 15:47, 11 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

That's done now, and best of luck with the article. I hope you enjoy the film when it's released! Bastun^{Ėġáḍβáś₮ŭŃ!} 15:56, 11 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to Laggam (film). Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because Moving to draftspace in advance of film's release, per WP:NFF.. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Bastun^{Ėġáḍβáś₮ŭŃ!} 15:54, 11 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to Mahendra Nath Kondla. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit for review" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Mekomo (talk) 15:42, 26 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for reviewing the article on Mahendra Nath Kondla and for your guidance. I understand the importance of ensuring the subject meets the notability criteria and that the article requires additional reliable sources.

Could you please clarify if the notability needs to be established more for the person (Mahendra Nath Kondla) or for his work (such as the films Sabari and Viraaji)? I would be happy to add the required sources

@Mekomo Thesazh (talk) 15:47, 26 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Happy New Year!

Thesazh,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.
Abishe (talk) 16:08, 31 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

   Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.

Abishe (talk) 16:08, 31 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Abishe Thank you and wishing you a bombastic New Year! Thesazh (talk) 15:32, 1 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Thesazh. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Siddam Manohar".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Vanderwaalforces (talk) 11:19, 1 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Shukra (film) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shukra (film) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

ARandomName123 (talk)^{Ping me!} 04:36, 14 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Maataraani Mounamidhi-Release Poster.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Johnj1995 (talk) 04:00, 16 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ramam Raghavam is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ramam Raghavam until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 06:00, 19 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Jeraxmoira I'm the internal team of the film, and the film is going to be released on February 14th, 2025, and in the recent interview, the film director and actor [Dhanraj (actor)] stated about the same plot line about the film! Thesazh (talk) 07:51, 19 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Thesazh. Thank you for your work on Mahendra Nath Kondla. Another editor, North8000, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

good start

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 22:10, 21 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Shukra Poster.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:40, 30 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to Ramam Raghavam. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ramam Raghavam. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit for review" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 17:49, 10 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Don't move it back until you have two full length reviews. Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 17:50, 10 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Jeraxmoira noted, thanks! the film is going to be released in theatres next week! will republish once the reviews are out! Thesazh (talk) 17:58, 10 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Ramam Raghavam release date poster.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Johnj1995 (talk) 02:38, 11 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Ramam Raghavam Release Date poster.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:34, 12 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page 14 Days Girlfriend Intlo, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A bare URL and missing title error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 14:39, 24 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on File:Mahendra Nath Kondla at Viraaji Interview.webp requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a copyright violation and has no credible claim of fair use or permission. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use it — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Whpq (talk) 00:34, 17 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on File:Jyothi Rai at Masterpiece Teaser Launch in Hyderabad.webp requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a copyright violation of https://www.instagram.com/jyotipoorvaj/p/C79EeHHvqBQ/?img_index=4 and has no credible claim of fair use or permission. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use it — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Whpq (talk) 00:50, 17 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on File:Jyothi Rai at A Masterpiece Teaser launch.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a copyright violation of https://mirchi9.news/happy-birthday-jyothi-poorvaj-masterpiece/ and has no credible claim of fair use or permission. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use it — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Whpq (talk) 00:51, 17 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Thesazh! While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, it's important to understand and adhere to guidelines about using information from sources to prevent copyright and plagiarism issues. Here are the key points:

• Limited quotation: You may only copy or translate a small portion of a source. Any direct quotations must be enclosed in double quotation marks (") and properly cited using an inline citation. More information is available on the non-free content page. To learn how to cite a source, see Help:Referencing for beginners.
• Paraphrasing: Beyond limited quotations, you are required to put all information in your own words. Following the source's wording too closely can lead to copyright issues and is not permitted; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when paraphrasing, you must still cite your sources as appropriate.
• Image use guidelines: In most scenarios, only freely licensed or public domain images may be used and these should be uploaded to our sister project, Wikimedia Commons. In some scenarios, non-freely copyrighted content can be used if they meet all ten of our non-free content criteria; Wikipedia:Plain and simple non-free content guide may help with determining a file's eligibility.
• Copyrighted material donation: If you hold the copyright to the content you want to copy, or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license the text for publication here. Please see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
• Copying and translation within Wikipedia: Wikipedia articles can be copied or translated, however they must have proper attribution in accordance with Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. For translation, see Help:Translation § Licensing.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices. Persistent failure to comply may result in being blocked from editing. If you have any questions or need further clarification, please ask them here on this page, or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 00:53, 17 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Siddharth G.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

• make a note permitting reuse under the CC BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
• Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to [email protected], stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{permission pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to [email protected].

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. Here is a list of your uploads. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

This is an automated notification. Please refer to the page's history for further information. DatBot (talk) 00:32, 7 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This photo indicates you have a potential conflict of interest with regards to your editing. Your editing patterns also shows you are possibly connected to other accounts that are part of a large WP:UPE sock farm. Please read WP:COI and WP:PAID and make the appropriate disclosure if applicable. Also, please list any accounts you use or have used in Wikipedia. CNMall41 (talk) 04:29, 10 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, @CNMall41 I have verified the COI status and updated on my user page, and I am not connected to any of other handles on Wikipedia, the only handle I use to edit or draft an article on Wikipedia [English and Telugu] is the same I'd of mine! Which is.. User:Thesazh, I have moved back the article to the publishing page, please kindly have a look and let me know, if anything best I can do! Thesazh (talk) 06:29, 10 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The issue is that you agreed not to edit directly and yet you are still creating pages in the mainspace, while at the same time NOT disclosing your affiliation. Unfortunately, this will need to go to WP:COIN. --CNMall41 (talk) 15:38, 10 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to Siddharth Gollapudi. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because Needs sources, likely COI. . I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. CNMall41 (talk) 04:30, 10 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to Akshara Nunna. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 09:37, 10 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Jeraxmoira was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Siddharth Gollapudi and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 09:39, 10 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Jeraxmoira

I can understand your concern, but, please kindly go through this link, which clearly mentioned on the poster of Siddharth Gollapudi

https://www.indiaglitz.com/thulasivanam--review-telugu-webseries-1711184466 Thesazh (talk) 10:20, 10 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

What does this have to do with the poster? Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 14:22, 10 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Jeraxmoira

The poster defines that he played the character and here are some more articles shows about Siddharth Gollapudi and his roles

https://www.indiaglitz.com/nindha-review-telugu-movie-35014

https://www.thehansindia.com/movie-reviews/nindha-review-a-decent-comeback-from-varun-sandesh-80267

https://www.deccanchronicle.com/entertainment/arrow-cinemas-latest-film-vindu-bhojanam-makes-a-splash-on-aha-ott-platform-1809664 Thesazh (talk) 14:51, 10 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Can you mention the films in which the subject has played a lead role? Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 15:26, 10 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Jeraxmoira

Subject is an Actor who plays the key roles and prominent roles in the film like other Telugu actors Rahul Ramakrishna Vennela Kishore

likewise the subject also started his career playing small roles in Hindi Television and then switched into Telugu Films, his films Nindha Thulasivanam helped him to get good recognition! Thesazh (talk) 15:30, 10 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

None of them mention him playing a prominent role. Nindha lists him at the bottom of the cast. Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 15:38, 10 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Jeraxmoira

Please go through these links once;

Thulasivanam : https://www.indiaglitz.com/thulasivanam--review-telugu-webseries-1711184466

SWA: https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/entertainment/telugu/movies/news/swa-a-sound-of-soul-review-an-honest-attempt-by-a-bunch-of-debutants/articleshow/89349608.cms

Vindu Bhojanam:

https://www.ottplay.com/news/vindu-bhojanam-ott-release-date-when-and-where-to-watch-the-akhil-raj-drama/19431436c2408 Thesazh (talk) 16:35, 10 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Indiaglitz is unreliable, the Times of India article has no byline and the OTTPlay article mentions him only once. This does not indicate prominent roles. Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 18:00, 10 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard regarding a possible conflict of interest incident with which you may be involved. Thank you. Here is the thread.CNMall41 (talk) 15:48, 10 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Thesazh! The thread you created at the Teahouse, Notability Issues, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please create a new thread. See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by KiranBOT, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=KiranBOT}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). —KiranBOT (talk) 03:31, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to Shiva Shambho (2025 film). Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 05:15, 27 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The file File:Siddharth Gollapudi.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Uploaded for Draft:Siddharth Gollapudi. No other use.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Min☠︎rax^«¦talk¦» 03:39, 28 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Shiva Shambho - Release Poster.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:27, 29 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to Supreeth C Krishna. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability and Needs more citations in multiple reliable sources.. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Bakhtar40 (talk) 12:12, 3 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Fade258 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Fails to show WP:NDIRECTOR as I didn't found significant coverage in reliable and independent references to the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Supreeth C Krishna and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Fade258 (talk) 17:01, 22 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to Bakasura Restaurant. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 10:19, 1 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Bakasura Restaurant.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Johnj1995 (talk) 05:41, 3 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to ALCC (O Universal Bachelor). Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability and Reviews on Telugucinemas and Deccan Chronicle are not bylined. Please add reviews from reliable sources with attributed authors.. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 08:40, 14 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Shashtipoorthi-Release-Date-Poster.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:59, 15 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to Uppu Kappurambu. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 05:48, 20 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Uppu Kappurambu is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Uppu Kappurambu until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 11:25, 20 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Jeraxmoira Hi, I've added new reliable sources to support notability for Uppu Kappurambu, including Prime Video’s official announcement and media coverage from Times of India, Deccan Chronicle, New Indian Express, Filmfare. Kindly request a re-review. Thanks for your time. Thesazh (talk) 11:59, 20 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by WikiMentor01 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Supreeth C Krishna and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

WikiMentor01 (talk) 11:47, 23 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your account has been blocked indefinitely for advertising or promotion and violating the Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use. This is because you have been making promotional edits to topics in which you have a financial stake, yet you have failed to adhere to the mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a form of conflict of interest (COI) editing which involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is strictly prohibited. Using this site for advertising or promotion is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia.

If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, please read our guide to appealing blocks to understand more about unblock requests, and then add the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} at the end of your user talk page. For an unblock to be considered, you must:

• Confirm that you have read and understand the Terms of Use and paid editing disclosure requirements.
• State clearly how you are being compensated for your edits, and describe any affiliation or conflict of interest you might have with the subjects you have written about.
• Describe how you intend to edit such topics in the future.

Vanamonde93 (talk) 16:21, 23 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Vanamonde93 @Jeraxmoira

I understand that my editing activity raised concerns regarding promotional content and undisclosed paid advocacy. However, I want to clarify that I have not received any financial compensation or external incentives for any of the articles I worked on till date, including Guard (2025 film) or Vadlamani Srinivas. My edits stemmed purely from personal interest and support for regional cinema and emerging public figures. I acknowledge that even without payment, some of my edits may have appeared to cross promotional boundaries, and I deeply regret not being more cautious or transparent in those instances. I also recognize the importance of conflict of interest (COI) guidelines and paid editing disclosure, and I take full responsibility for any procedural lapses on my part. Please let me know if there's anything more I can do to assist in resolving this matter transparently. Thesazh (talk) 18:10, 23 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

---

Administrators: if this block includes a Volunteer Response Team ticket number, this block was placed as part of the conflict of interest VRT queue and the user must not be unblocked without the express consent of a user with access to the queue.

Thanks for your contributions to Vadlamani Srinivas. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because you may have a possible Conflict of Interest. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 18:00, 23 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Thesazh (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I respectfully request to be unblocked. I understand the concerns raised about promotional editing and the importance of transparency under Wikipedia’s Terms of Use. However, I would like to clarify that I have not received any payment or compensation for editing pages such as Guard (2025 film) or Vadlamani Srinivas. My interest in these articles was purely voluntary, based on my personal enthusiasm for regional cinema and notable public figures. While I understand my actions may have appeared promotional, I assure you they were not financially motivated. I now recognize that even the appearance of a conflict of interest, especially when editing articles related to topics I’m familiar with, requires disclosure and careful compliance with Wikipedia’s guidelines. Moving forward, I will: - Disclose any potential COI or affiliations in accordance with Wikipedia’s paid editing policies. - Avoid editing topics where impartiality could be questioned, and instead focus on general maintenance or verifiably neutral topics. - Engage with the community through talk pages when unsure, and not make major content decisions unilaterally.

I confirm that I have read and understand the [Terms of Use](https://foundation.wikimedia.org/wiki/Terms_of_Use/en) and Wikipedia's [Paid Contribution Disclosure](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Paid-contribution_disclosure) policy.

Thank you for your time and consideration.

Thesazh (talk) 18:12, 23 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

This unblock request appears to have been written by a chatbot using a large language model. The purpose of unblock requests is to determine whether you, the human operating this account, understand why you were blocked – not to test a chatbot's ability to tell us what we want to hear. A message written (or rewritten) by a chatbot can also cause you to sound like you're making empty promises. It is better to write the unblock request yourself. Please read through the guide to appealing blocks for more help.

Additionally, you have posted multiple comments on this page that are mostly or wholly LLM-generated, including Special:Diff/1297182258 and Special:Diff/1297164778. Please note that, per the WP:AITALK guideline, LLM-generated comments on Wikipedia can be collapsed and disregarded. If you want to be considered for an unblock, you will need to commit to refrain from using an LLM to edit Wikipedia. — Newslinger talk 14:00, 17 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Thesazh (talk) 18:12, 23 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Uninvolved editor, but i think they deserve a chance Tankishguy :)(: (talk) 06:02, 24 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Quoting your words from the SPI, I myself moved Guard (2025 film) into draft space as I have worked for that film as Digital PR, and as well, Subtitler. It's a joke if they didn't pay you when you worked as their Digital PR. Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 06:42, 24 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I’m writing to firmly clarify the confusion surrounding my involvement with Guard (2025 film) and other Wikipedia articles I’ve worked on.

I do know that we are not supposed to expose the identity, but I dont want to risk the handle I've been working, to become a good wikipedia contributor!

Yes, I am Sashi, a professional English Subtitle provider for Telugu feature films. My contributions on Wikipedia stem solely from a personal interest in improving my writing and contributing accurate, encyclopaedic content, especially for films I’ve worked on as a subtitler only.

Let me state unequivocally:

I have not been paid for any Wikipedia article creation or edits. My role as a Digital PR, in this context, was a self-initiated outreach where I informed a film team about the absence of a Wikipedia article. That does not imply any compensation or promotional intent. I only receive payment for subtitling work! Never for article writing or editing.

Regarding Guard (2025 film):

I recently interacted with a cast member regarding its OTT release. When I noticed the film lacked a Wikipedia article, I offered, on my own accord, to write one. The team politely declined, stating they had already hired someone. I left it there. Later, I saw an article for the film created by another user @CNMall41, and based on its sourcing, I moved it to mainspace in good faith, not out of COI or coordinated effort.

I also want to clarify that edits such as the one on music director Devi Sri Prasad's page were done purely as a fan and Wikipedia contributor. Again, there was no financial or promotional link.

I’ve now updated my user page with a clear COI disclosure (even if there’s no paid editing involved) to avoid future confusion.

Please understand, my intent has always been to contribute respectfully and responsibly. If any edits or articles require adjustments to meet Wikipedia standards, I’m open to feedback and correction. @Jeraxmoira Thesazh (talk) 09:12, 24 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, it's a good idea not to use your talkpage when blocked (except for unblock requests) Tankishguy :)(: (talk) Tankishguy :)(: (talk) 10:17, 24 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for letting me know! Thesazh (talk) 10:22, 24 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

No Problem, let Admins handle this. Tankishguy :)(: (talk) 10:25, 24 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

please take the other request down. Tankishguy :)(: (talk) 10:26, 24 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You are just blatantly lying at this point. I recently interacted with a cast member regarding its OTT release. When I noticed the film lacked a Wikipedia article, I offered, on my own accord, to write one. I'm not sure why you offered to write an article for them in the first place. Wikipedia articles shouldn't concern them and you don't need their permission to create one unless you're trying to build a relationship with them.

Users who are compensated for any publicity efforts related to the subject of their Wikipedia contributions are deemed to be paid editors, regardless of whether they were compensated specifically to edit Wikipedia. Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 13:58, 24 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Jeraxmoira

At the time I had a conversation with the concerned film team, the topic of Wikipedia came up, and I intentionally asked them whether a page for their film existed or if they had hired anyone previously to create one. This was not for approval or to seek compensation, but because I’ve been actively working towards fulfilling the eligibility to request New Page Reviewer rights, which requires the creation of at least 25 valid articles. To avoid unintentionally duplicating someone else's efforts! Or stepping over any prior contributor’s work! I’ve been reaching out to film teams I’ve previously worked with only to ask whether anyone had already been engaged to create their Wikipedia article.

My sole purpose here is twofold: 1) to ensure I’m not duplicating content, and 2) to build writing discipline by engaging with topics I already have context on, through my previous subtitling work.

For example, in the case of the Telugu film Shashtipoorthi, I myself recently applied a speedy deletion tag after discovering that someone had created a redundant page even though one already existed in mainspace. I did this to prevent unnecessary duplication, not for self-promotion or paid editing.

To be clear: I do not accept or expect any payment for Wikipedia contributions, and I take care to ask only to ensure transparency and avoid overlap, not to build client relationships. All my actions have been done with the intent to follow community norms and improve my editorial experience on Wikipedia. Thesazh (talk) 14:15, 24 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thesazh, you have clearly not read the paid editing policy with sufficient care. It does not matter that you were not paid specifically to edit. If you are paid for PR of any sort, you are considered a paid editor. And it is not in the least credible that the considerable volume of promotional editing you have engaged in was entirely voluntary. You have a long history of writing about marginally notable subjects; uploading images that clearly were taken for promotional purposes, likely not by you but by the subject; writing in a highly promotional tone; repeatedly moving your creations to mainspace from draftspace without addressing the reasons for draftification; and ignoring or partially complying with warnings related to all of the above. If your livelihood is digital PR, you need to play by the rules on Wikipedia, and that means full and complete disclosure of payment on every page, not the excuses you are offering. If you want to contribute to Wikipedia from a personal interest you still need to comply with policies about neutrality and conflict of interest, and you need to take people seriously when they tell you how to do so. You have had ample warning about all of this, so at this point demonstrating that you are sincere will probably mean taking a break from Wikipedia for a little while. Vanamonde93 (talk) 16:15, 24 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Jeraxmoira @CNMall41

I want to sincerely clarify something that has really affected me: I have never been paid for any Wikipedia article I’ve created or edited. All contributions I made, whether film articles or biographies, were driven by genuine personal interest, especially in Telugu cinema and film subtitling, where I have professional experience. I understand now that even being involved with a film (like subtitling) can be seen as a potential conflict of interest, even without payment for editing, or writing any articles. This wasn’t fully clear to me before, and I regret not disclosing it properly. I never intended to misuse Wikipedia or violate any policy. If my edits seemed promotional or overly supportive of certain films, I’m open to correcting them and learning how to improve. I kindly request a fair chance to regain the community's trust, not as a paid editor, but as someone who loves films and wants to grow as a contributor. I’m willing to step back temporarily as mentioned by @Vanamonde93, I request a chance to demonstrate good faith.

As I don't have option to do any edits on Wikipedia, once I receive the editing chance again, I'll update the following on my User Page for avoid any future errors about COI again

"I’ve worked as a subtitler for some Telugu films. I am not paid for Wikipedia editing or article creation, and all my edits are made voluntarily based on public sources" Thesazh (talk) 16:27, 24 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

He doesn't work in PR for the articles. He works as an English subtitler For Telegu films. Tankishguy :)(: (talk) 19:51, 24 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Tankishguy This is what, I'm trying to convey! but, don't know where exactly i missed this particular point!

All articles I did because of my own interest, no pay, no attention, no credits, Nothing! just likewise a digital pr guy who does all these digital blogs and stuff! I wanted to achieve that new pages patrol thing, and that's what my aim is! Thesazh (talk) 20:24, 24 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

and ofcourse, to be a good wikipedia contributor! Thesazh (talk) 20:25, 24 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I know... Admins admittably are hard to win over, but that is good. Tankishguy :)(: (talk) 20:55, 24 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

(Non-administrator comment) You stated below that I’ve worked closely with the subject in a creative/content capacity. This contradicts your insistence that you have no COI. Could you please explain? GoldRomean (talk) 20:13, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@GoldRomean

I understand now that working on a film in any creative capacity, like subtitling/closed captions, can still count as a conflict of interest, even if I wasn’t paid or asked to write the article. I’ve never been paid to write any Wikipedia pages. I created some of these articles (like Guard (2025), Paderu 12th Mile, Vaibhavam) based on my familiarity with the films, as I worked on them as a subtitler. Since I had background knowledge of the projects and their teams, I thought I could contribute meaningfully and help improve Wikipedia’s regional cinema coverage, I was also working toward becoming a page reviewer and saw this as a way to gain experience and improve my writing. Thesazh (talk) 20:25, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

As a follow-up, you state in your request that you will “Avoid editing topics where impartiality could be questioned, and instead focus on general maintenance or verifiably neutral topics.”, so what kind of articles do you intend to work on instead? GoldRomean (talk) 00:01, 30 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the follow-up. Going forward, I intend to focus on general maintenance tasks like fixing typos, improving formatting, updating citations, and working on clearly notable topics that have wide secondary coverage, especially in areas like Indian history, public domain literature, and verified filmographies of already established actors or projects, I genuinely want to contribute positively within the policies of Wikipedia and grow as a responsible editor. @GoldRomean Thesazh (talk) 10:07, 30 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

(Non-administrator comment) Would you agree to not edit at all about films on which you worked (whether for "digital PR", subtitling or anything else), or actors/filmmakers with which you worked, to avoid any potential COI issue? Also, starting with edit requests could be a good way to have reviewers give you feedback on your edits.

You mention that you had been reaching out to film teams I’ve previously worked with only to ask whether anyone had already been engaged to create their Wikipedia article. Just to clarify, Wikipedia articles are, in the overwhelming majority of cases, written by volunteers, and film teams will usually not engage anyone to create one.

You also don't need 25 articles for the new page reviewer right. That is only needed for another permission, autopatrolled, which doesn't affect its holder at all and is only there to make the life of new page reviewers easier by not having them review tons of articles from very experienced editors. Chaotic Enby (talk · contribs) 05:14, 6 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Chaotic Enby Thank you for the clarification and your time. Yes, I completely understand the concern, and I agree not to edit or create articles related to any films I’ve worked on in any capacity, whether as a subtitler, in digital PR, or any other involvement. I’ll also refrain from editing about individuals I’ve worked with, to avoid any conflict of interest issues moving forward.

I also appreciate the note about edit requests, and I’ll begin contributing that way to get feedback and improve my understanding of editorial standards.

And thank you for clearing up the confusion between autopatrolled and new page reviewer rights. I misunderstood the requirement and appreciate the guidance.

Going forward, I’m committed to editing only neutral and verifiable content, and to contributing responsibly within Wikipedia’s policies. Thesazh (talk) 05:52, 6 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I will concur. With the "blatantly lying" part. They already hired someone to create a page that you have a COI with?

• @Vanamonde93: - how do you feel about a possible unblock? PhilKnight (talk) 03:30, 3 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  (Non-administrator comment) Even the slightest consideration for an unblock should come with a pblock on all India-related articles. Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 05:14, 3 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  @PhilKnight: To be honest, I do not find Thesazh's explanations above credible. The totality of their contributions makes it very clear they have a deep vested interest in promoting the subjects they write about. Their attempt above to claim that the PR work they admitted to doing was uncompensated is also not credible in my view. Even the most generous interpretation of their behavior has them violating WP:COI and ignoring numerous warnings. I do not believe they should be unblocked at all, and if they are, it should only be with a TBAN from Indian film and biography. Vanamonde93 (talk) 18:00, 8 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to Vaibhavam. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because you may have a possible Conflict of Interest. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. CNMall41 (talk) 21:41, 23 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I understand your concern regarding possible COI on the Vaibhavam article. I want to clarify that while I’ve worked closely with the subject in a creative/content capacity, I have not received financial compensation. Thesazh (talk) 21:56, 23 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

For all the Wikipedians out there, I meant the term COI on my user page in the following Acknowledgement,

I have contributed to articles related to Telugu films and public figures, I have NEVER collaborated with creatively or professionally. I am NOT paid for these edits but am disclosing any possible conflict of interest in line with Wikipedia's guidelines, every article and edit which were done by @Thesazh is totally solely by me Thesazh (talk) 21:56, 23 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Guard Release Date poster.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:15, 26 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Paderu 12 Mile - Release Poster.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:23, 26 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Shashtipoorthi-Release-Date-Poster.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:28, 26 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Vaibhavam.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:34, 26 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Uppu Kappurambu - Release Date Poster.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:33, 3 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on ALCC (O Universal Bachelor) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://icmb.in/movie/alcc/. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 16:17, 29 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:ALCC Release Poster.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:02, 1 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. A page you created or have recently made significant changes to, Jyothi Poorvaj, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for pages, so it has been blanked and redirected. Three typical reasons for this are that: (1) the article's subject appears to fail our notability guidelines; (2) the article is unsourced; or (3) the sources used in the article are unreliable. The page's history is preserved and it is possible to restore the article: If you believe that this page should remain included on Wikipedia or that this action was taken in error, then you may revert the edit that blanked and redirected the page.

Wikipedia:Your first article has more information about creating articles, and you may also want to read our introduction page to learn more about contributing. Thank you. Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 05:51, 6 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]