User talk:TheOneAndOnlyInkpen

I'm getting myself into too much trouble. I just want to edit again. --TheOneAndOnlyInkpen (talk) 01:22, 28 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, TheOneAndOnlyInkpen, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as User:TheOneAndOnlyInkpen, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

• Your first article
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• Biographies of living persons
• How to write a great article
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Help pages
• Tutorial

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Drmies (talk) 04:14, 27 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not introduce inappropriate pages, such as User:TheOneAndOnlyInkpen, to Wikipedia. Doing so is considered to be vandalism and is prohibited. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Drmies (talk) 04:14, 27 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This page should not be speedy deleted as pure vandalism or a blatant hoax, because this userpage is meant to be fictional (as I've mentioned in my user page) please do not ban me from Wikipedia. This is not meant to interfere with real life and actual occurances --TheOneAndOnlyInkpen (talk) 04:24, 27 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I will delete the section until further notice. --TheOneAndOnlyInkpen (talk) 04:30, 27 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The page was intended to mimic an actual Wikipedia article. This is not acceptable. The page will be properly deleted (as a new user, you are only able to revert it), and you're urged to contribute in a productive manner. If you want to create your own fictional articles, you can do that elsewhere. Risker (talk) 04:32, 27 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, TheOneAndOnlyInkpen, and Welcome to Wikipedia!   

I'm sorry for what I have done. I promise I will not do anything like this ever again. I will just stick to small edits. --TheOneAndOnlyInkpen talk) 04:36, 27 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Bbb23 (talk) 13:04, 27 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

TheOneAndOnlyInkpen (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I was unaware of the fact that writing unfactual information on my user page was considered vandalism. I won't do anything again. I have created this account so that I could edit and add more things encyclopedia and I have not created it for disrupting the site. TheOneAndOnlyInkpen (talk) 16:43, 27 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a free web host for stuff you made up. To be unblocked, please show us an example edit that you would like to make to Wikipedia. For example, see this edit where I added some info about a defunct newspaper that was briefly revived. If you can't think of anything, see this page or click on "random article" until you land on something interesting. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 19:22, 27 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

How am I supposed to do that? --TheOneAndOnlyInkpen (talk) 20:11, 27 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

By the way, I have archived an old edit from a few days ago: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:MobileDiff/928137612 I hope that is enough proof --TheOneAndOnlyInkpen (talk) 20:15, 27 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry for what I did on my user page but blocking me? I didn't want any trouble here and already one week into this account and I already got banned from editing. --TheOneAndOnlyInkpen (talk) 17:01, 27 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Thing is, if we leave you alone we can also not unblock you. I think you should consider what Wikipedia is and what you were doing here and what you think you could do here, and then ask to be unblocked. Arguing with administrators is not fruitful. Drmies (talk) 20:38, 27 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• I'm sorry if I sounded rude. I just want to unblocked and I didn't want to get into all this drama in the first place. But if I can't get unblocked, will my block expire and when?. --TheOneAndOnlyInkpen (talk) 01:21, 28 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Video: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=ojYKcTFsYqo I hope that this will provide an explanation and we can come to an compromise. --TheOneAndOnlyInkpen (talk) 02:08, 28 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I watched the first few minutes of the 8-minute video, but it was boring watching someone type with some voices in the background. I have revoked your access to this page.--Bbb23 (talk) 02:14, 28 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The camera is way too shaky. Can't even read half of the time. ~~ CAPTAIN MEDUSA^talk 15:09, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

TheOneAndOnlyInkpen (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Hello, almost 6 years ago, I was blocked indefinitely from editing. I have reflected on my block over the years and understood the admin's reasonings for it and how my edits were harmful. I realize how creating "fictional articles" on my user page was a violation of Wikipedia's policies and could have led to belief of misinformation. I also understand how my attempts to get unblocked only made things worse and my edits did not seem of good faith.

I am sorry for my actions in the past; I was young and immature and didn't fully understand the site's policies. I am also sorry that my tone sounded rude and snarky while I was trying to get unblocked.

It has been 6 years; I believe I have matured since then and have since felt compelled to try to receive a second chance. My interest in this website has been ever-growing since then. I would love to return to edit and contribute to Wikipedia. I hope you can take the time to review my request and that I didn't write too much.

Thank you, TheOneAndOnlyInkpen

Accept reason:

It's been a long time. I see no reason why not. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇} 22:57, 9 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Restoring talk page access. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 08:09, 9 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Bbb23: courtesy notification -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 11:39, 9 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Deepfriedokra: Thank you. Should I just copy my appeal into the template? --TheOneAndOnlyInkpen (talk) 21:23, 9 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please do. U R welcome. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 21:28, 9 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Deepfriedokra seems a pretty solid appeal to me - 6 years is a long time and I see no reason we shouldn't give this user a fresh start. CoconutOctopus talk 22:02, 9 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Amen. That's what I was thinking. Make it so, if you like . -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 22:56, 9 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you all so much for your consensus, and for allowing me to have a second chance. I will try to make amends by starting to contribute to this encyclopedia. --TheOneAndOnlyInkpen (talk) 01:54, 10 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hey there! I saw one of your edits at Hurricane Erin (2025) that removed redlinks. Please do not remove them without rationale as I may use them as jumping off points for new articles. Thanks, ✶Quxyz✶ (talk) 02:15, 17 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Apologies for removing the redlinks. I didn't look at the page history then so I didn't see your edit summary about them. Will you also create new articles about the Cape Verde gov't departments that were linked? Best, --TheOneAndOnlyInkpen (talk) 02:40, 17 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

After Erin pulls away, I'll start working on the Guadeloupe mountains and Antiguan NODS. I'll look into the three Cabo Verdean departments but it might be a while as I do not know Portuguese nor Spanish for the cognates. ✶Quxyz✶ (talk) 02:55, 17 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]